《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 730-736.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.06.016

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国人简易上肢功能检查测试结果分析

曹丽辉1,2,黄富表1,2(),徐筱婧媛3   

  1. 1.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院作业疗法科,北京市 100068
    2.首都医科大学康复医学院作业治疗教研室,北京市 100068
    3.北京师范大学社会发展与公共政策学院,北京市 100875
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-25 修回日期:2021-05-11 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-06-21
  • 通讯作者: 黄富表 E-mail:huangfubiao123@126.com
  • 作者简介:曹丽辉(1967-),女,汉族,上海市人,主管治疗师,主要研究方向:发育障碍的作业疗法|黄富表,男,博士,副主任治疗师。

Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function for Chinese

Li-hui CAO1,2,Fu-biao HUANG1,2(),Xiao-jing-yuan XU3   

  1. 1.Department of Occupational Therapy, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
    2.Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing, 100068, China
    3.School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2020-12-25 Revised:2021-05-11 Published:2021-06-25 Online:2021-06-21
  • Contact: Fu-biao HUANG E-mail:huangfubiao123@126.com

摘要: 目的

观察简易上肢功能检查(STEF)在中国成人中的测量结果,并与原数据进行比较。

方法

2020年5月至6月,根据STEF操作指南,使用其专用工具对130例中国健康成年人进行测试,使用单样本t检验将测得数据与日本人群原数据进行比较,根据差异对中国人的STEF进行调试。

结果

右侧10个操作项目中,大球、中球、大立方、大圆片、小立方、布、金属圆片、金属小球、铁钉共9个项目与日本人群数据比较有显著性差异(|t| > 1.760, P < 0.05);左侧10个操作项目中,大球、中球、大立方、大圆片、小立方、金属小球、铁钉共7个项目与日本人群数据比较有显著性差异(|t| > 2.257, P < 0.001)。

结论

中日样本STEF测试结果比较存在差异,应用时应进行适当调试。

关键词: 上肢功能, 简易上肢功能检查, 精细动作

Abstract: Objective

To observe the measurement of Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF) in Chinese, and compared to that of Japanese.

Methods

From May to June, 2020, 130 healthy individuals were tested with the toolkit and instructions of STEF, and the result was compared with Japanese data with one-sample t-test, and adjusted.

Results

Among the ten items performed on the right side of the STEF, nine items, except item four (middle-sized cubes), were significantly different from those of Japanese (|t| > 1.760, P < 0.05). Among the ten items performed on the left side of STEF, seven items, except item four (middle-sized cubes), item seven (vinyl sheets) and item eight (iron circular plates), were significantly different from those of the Japanese (|t| > 2.257, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

There is significant difference in the test results of STEF between Chinese and Japanese samples, and need to be adjusted.

Key words: upper extremity function, Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function, fine motor

中图分类号: