足底振动刺激诱发人体特定方向姿势调整的测试系统研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.09.018

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9): 1110-1116.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.09.018

• 辅助技术 • 上一篇

足底振动刺激诱发人体特定方向姿势调整的测试系统研究

李高峰^1,²(),梅剑峰^2,³,张蒙^2,³,蔡红波^1,²,曹萍^1,²,李陈娜^1,²,张小军³

1.北京社会管理职业学院（民政部培训中心）康复工程学院,北京市 101601
2.民政部肌骨生物力学重点实验室,北京市 101601
3.北京工业大学机械工程与应用电子技术学院,北京市 100124

收稿日期:2020-09-09 修回日期:2020-12-04 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-09
通讯作者: 李高峰 E-mail:chicotli@126.com
作者简介:李高峰(1979-),男,汉族,河南平舆县人,硕士,副教授,主要研究方向：康复辅助技术,人体姿势控制。
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目-民政部肌骨生物力学重点实验室课题(ZDSYS2019-1)

Testing System for Analyzing Directionally-specific Postural Adjustments Indued by Plantar Vibratory Stimulation

LI Gao-feng^1,²(),MEI Jian-feng^2,³,ZHANG Meng^2,³,CAI Hong-bo^1,²,CAO Ping^1,²,LI Chen-na^1,²,ZHANG Xiao-jun³

1. Department of Rehabilitation Engineering, Beijing College of Social Administration (Training Center of Ministry of Civil Affairs), Beijing 101601, China
2. Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal System Biomechanics and Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, Beijing 101601, China
3. College of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Electronics Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2020-09-09 Revised:2020-12-04 Published:2021-09-25 Online:2021-10-09
Contact: LI Gao-feng E-mail:chicotli@126.com
Supported by:
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities-A Project from Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal System Biomechanics and Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Civil Affairs(ZDSYS2019-1)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的构建一种能够开展足底皮肤振动刺激对人体姿势控制影响研究的实验测试系统,并验证其有效性。方法设计制作能够实现振动刺激的机械装置和控制系统,应用生物力学测试方法,于2019年10月2日至6日,对25例健康大学师生开展足底振动刺激实验。选取每位受试者的左足前部、左足后部、右足前部、右足后部、左足、右足、双足前部、双足后部8个振动位置,分别在20 Hz、40 Hz、60 Hz和80 Hz频率下,施加振幅1 mm的振动刺激,对比不同振动条件下的姿势响应情况。结果足底振动刺激下压力中心响应幅值比与非振动条件下响应幅值有显著性差异(P < 0.05)。结论测试系统能够对足底不同位置施加不同频率、不同幅值的振动刺激,并且能够采集、分析不同振动条件下受试者压力中心的变化趋势。该系统可以用于足底无毛皮肤振动刺激对于人体姿势控制测试的临床实验研究。

关键词: 足底振动, 压力中心, 姿势响应, 测试系统

Abstract:

Objective To construct a testing system for the effects of plantar surface vibration stimulation on the human postural adjustments, and to explore its practicability.Methods The mechanical device and control system providing vibration stimulation were designed and built. Twenty-five healthy teachers and students (aged 19~29 years) were recruited from our college to participate in the experimental study from 2nd to 6th, October, 2019. The amplitudes of postural response were compared following non-stimulation and stimulation at left forefoot, left heel, right forefoot, right heel, left foot, right foot, double forefoot, double heels of each subject at the 20 Hz, 40 Hz, 60 Hz and 80 Hz vibrations, respectively.Results The amplitude of the center of pressure response under foot cutaneous stimulation increased compared with the response amplitude under non-vibration conditions (P < 0.05).Conclusion The locations of vibration as well as different vibration parameters (such as frequency, amplitude) could be adjusted, and the information of postural response to vibratory stimulation of the plantar surface, especially the excursion of center of pressure could be collected in the system which can be applied in the experimental study on the human posture control.

Key words: plantar vibration, center of pressure, postural response, testing system

李高峰,梅剑峰,张蒙,蔡红波,曹萍,李陈娜,张小军. 足底振动刺激诱发人体特定方向姿势调整的测试系统研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(9): 1110-1116.

LI Gao-feng,MEI Jian-feng,ZHANG Meng,CAI Hong-bo,CAO Ping,LI Chen-na,ZHANG Xiao-jun. Testing System for Analyzing Directionally-specific Postural Adjustments Indued by Plantar Vibratory Stimulation[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2021, 27(9): 1110-1116.

图/表 5

图1

图2

图3

表1

表2

参考文献 29

[1]	SÍLVIA L P, ADRIANA N S, MARJORIE H W, et al. Assessment of postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a review[J]. Res Dev Disabil, 2013, 34(5):1367-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.034
[2]	MARJORIE H W, ANNE S C. Postural dysfunction during standing and walking in children with cerebral palsy: what are the underlying problems and what new therapies might improve balance?[J]. Neural Plast, 2005, 12:211-219. doi: 10.1155/NP.2005.211
[3]	李高峰, 丛燕, 周大伟, 等. 全身振动刺激在脑性瘫痪患者临床康复中的应用[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2016, 38(5):397-400.
	LI G F, CONG Y, ZHOU D W, et al. The progress of the application on whole body vibration in clinical rehabilitation for people with cerebral palsy[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2016, 38(5):397-400.
[4]	MAGNUSSON M, ENBOM H, JOHANSSON R, et al. Significance of pressor input from the human feet in anterior-posteriro postural control: the effect of hypothermia on vibration-induced body sway[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 1990, 110(3):182-188. doi: 10.3109/00016489009122535
[5]	MAURER C, MERGNER T, BOLHA B, et al. Human balance control during cutaneous stimulation of the plantar soles[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2001, 302(1):45-48. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01655-X
[6]	KENNEDY P M, INGLIS J T. Distribution and behaviour of glabrous cutaneous receptors in the human foot sole[J]. J Physiol, 2002, 538(3):995-1002. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013087
[7]	KAVOUNOUDIAS A, ROLL R, ROLL J P. The plantar sole is a 'dynamometric map' for human balance control[J]. Neuroreport, 1998, 9(14):3247-3252. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199810050-00021
[8]	KAVOUNOUDIAS A, ROLL R, ROLL J R. Specific whole-body shifts induced by frequency-modulated vibrations of human plantar soles[J]. Neurosci Lett, 1999, 266(3):181-184. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00302-X
[9]	吴方芳, 王人成, 金德闻, 等. 足底振动刺激对人体平衡能力影响的实验测试系统的研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2007, 22(12):1090-1092.
	WU F F, WANG R C, JIN D W, et al. Research on detecting and analyzing system for study the effect of foot bottom vibration excitement with the balance control ability of human[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2007, 22(12):1090-1092.
[10]	CHRISTOPHER H. Broad spectrum (3-250 Hz) vibratory stimulation of the plantar surface targeted to activate different subpopulations of cutaneous mechanoreceptors induces directionally-specific whole body postural adjustments [D]. Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, 2014.
[11]	ROBYN L M, NICHOLAS D J S, LEAH R B. Foot sole skin vibration perceptual thresholds are elevated in a standing posture compared to sitting[J]. Gait Posture, 2016, 43:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.027
[12]	MICHEL G, BRIAN L D. Expectation and the vestibular control of balance[J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2005, 17(3):463-469. doi: 10.1162/0898929053279540
[13]	DAY B L, CAUQUIL A S, BARTOLOMEI L. Human body-segment tilts induced by galvanic stimulation: a vestibularly driven balance protection mechanism[J]. J Physiol, 1997, 500(3):661-672. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp022051
[14]	CYNTHIA T, MARC B, JOYCE F. Effects of plantar cutaneo-muscular and tendon vibration on posture and balance during quiet and perturbed stance[J]. Hum Mov Sci, 2011, 30(2):153-171. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.04.002
[15]	BUSA M A, VAN EMMERIK R E A. Multiscale entropy: a tool for understanding the complexity of postural control[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2016, 5(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.01.018
[16]	LI G, DUAN J, CONG Y, et al. Effects of plantar vibratory stimulation on posture control in children with cerebral palsy[J]. J Health Med Informat, 2016, 7(3):1-5.
[17]	WANG Y, WATANABE K, CHEN L. Effect of plantar cutaneous inputs on center of pressure during quiet stance in older adults[J]. J Exerc Sci Fit, 2016, 14(1):24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2016.02.001
[18]	GREGOR B K, OLENA P, ANNIKA P, et al. Hypometric anticipatory postural adjustments in dystonia are not affected by deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2017, 636:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.015
[19]	ATEFEH A, MOKHTAR A, MAHMOOD B, et al. Effect of vibration on postural control and gait of elderly subjects: a systematic review[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2018, 30(7):713-726. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0831-7
[20]	ROBYN L M, CATHERINE M H, LEAH R B. Cutaneous afferent feedback from the posterior ankle contributes to proprioception[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2017, 636:145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.058
[21]	RAKSHATHA K, BEOM-CHAN L, CHARLES S L. Balancing sensory inputs: Sensory reweighting of ankle proprioception and vision during a bipedal posture task[J]. Gait Posture, 2017, 52:244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.009
[22]	TAKAKUSAKI K. Functional neuroanatomy for posture and gait control[J]. J Mov Disord, 2017, 10(1):1-17.
[23]	STRZALKOWSKI N D J, ALI R A, BENT L R. The firing characteristics of foot sole cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferents in response to vibration stimuli[J]. J Neurophysiol, 2017, 118(4):1931-1942. doi: 10.1152/jn.00647.2016
[24]	SIMONE G V S S, MAIYA K Y, SHAWN M B, et al. Effects of foot position on skin structural deformation[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019, 95:240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.012
[25]	FREDERIC V, ANTOINE L, FRANCK B, et al. How can the stimulation of plantar cutaneous receptors improve postural control? review and clinical commentary[J]. Neurophysiol Clin, 2019, 49(3):263-268. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2018.12.006
[26]	FREDERIC J F V. The sensory role of the sole of the foot: review and update on clinical perspectives[J]. Neurophysiol Clin, 2020, 50(1):55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2019.12.003
[27]	KATIE A G, MARCO T, W BRENT L, et al. Standing centre of pressure alters the vibration transmissibility response of the foot[J]. Ergonomics, 2019, 62(9):1202-1213. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1626490
[28]	GOGGINS K A, TARABINI M, LIEVERS W B, et al. Biomechanical response of the human foot when standing in a natural position while exposed to vertical vibration from 10-200 Hz[J]. Ergonomics, 2019, 62(5):644-656. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1559362
[29]	CHADEFAUX D, GOGGINS K, CAZZANIGA C, et al. Development of a two-dimensional dynamic model of the foot-ankle system exposed to vibration[J]. J Biomech, 2020, 99:109547 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109547

状态	左足前部	左足后部	右足前部	右足后部	双足前部	双足后部	左全足	右全足
不振	31.634±10.447	33.754±12.777	-31.351±8.804	-34.744±10.091	1.111±5.841	1.216±6.358	35.306±11.468	-34.625±8.865
20 Hz振动	41.938±10.19	38.979±6.974	-43.102±12.099	-36.473±12.197	-0.580±8.269	0.328±7.161	44.934±13.311	-44.838±10.463
40 Hz振动	41.471±9.97	34.776±7.016	-44.038±12.556	-36.995±13.182	0.243±9.578	0.015±7.92	52.982±14.209	-47.688±10.574
60 Hz振动	45.987±13.89	34.093±8.816	-47.480±15.79	-40.106±14.534	0.549±10.222	0.808±9.125	55.893±12.338	-47.510±11.027
80 Hz振动	43.793±12.07	36.348±7.979	-45.388±13.415	-37.260±13.523	-0.215±9.109	-0.130±8.078	46.964±13.381	-44.852±10.843
F值	64.609	63.246	56.804	53.138	0.136	0.124	60.233	77.463
P值	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.969	0.973	< 0.001	< 0.001

状态	左足前部	左足后部	右足前部	右足后部	双足前部	双足后部	左全足	右全足
不振	-26.522±10.016	38.059±6.965	-27.082±8.958	39.502±7.378	-27.258±8.473	35.075±3.988	6.758±17.687	8.418±13.664
20 Hz振动	-58.006±6.797	81.182±6.704	-57.184±3.625	79.569±7.989	-59.380±6.384	81.569±9.685	-2.212±16.993	3.485±13.023
40 Hz振动	-59.510±5.199	83.831±12.370	-61.648±6.124	82.655±2.726	-60.673±6.227	82.989±16.050	-6.305±15.499	-0.309±14.055
60 Hz振动	-63.789±6.194	86.750±7.519	-57.944±8.167	91.797±9.116	-62.872±6.605	94.026±13.738	-6.738±17.989	-10.622±9.917
80 Hz振动	-63.130±5.678	83.932±7.648	-64.351±7.608	83.425±9.431	-63.663±8.627	89.476±14.317	-2.062±15.149	-2.408±11.591
F值	5.415	5.96	2.989	11.689	5.403	3.802	0.738	2.239
P值	0.020	0.010	0.034	< 0.001	0.020	0.013	0.573	0.088

足底振动刺激诱发人体特定方向姿势调整的测试系统研究

Testing System for Analyzing Directionally-specific Postural Adjustments Indued by Plantar Vibratory Stimulation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 29

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	马圣楠, 柯竟悦, 董洪铭, 李建萍, 张洪浩, 刘超, 沈双, 李古强. 核心稳定性训练干预前交叉韧带重建术后动态平衡及表面肌电的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 882-889.
[2]	王尹芝;顾冬云;戴尅戎. 最大重心-压力中心倾角法评估不同年龄人群静态平衡的研究①[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2015, 21(08): 967-973.
[3]	王娜;瓮长水;朱才兴;刘立明;焦伟国;成忠实. 功能性蹲屈测试系统在老年人下肢等长肌力测量中的重测信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2010, 16(1): 19-20.
[4]	尹志勇;赵辉;王正国;李晓炎;刘大维;宁心 . 便携式站姿、坐姿人体平衡测试系统的研制 [J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2005, 11(03): 178-179.