专题

矫形器和运动训练对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的效果比较

  • 刘巍 ,
  • 吴会东 ,
  • 刘垚 ,
  • 石田真 ,
  • 敖丽娟 ,
  • 陈茉弦 ,
  • 王聪 ,
  • 蒋飞云
展开
  • 1.昆明医科大学,云南昆明市 650500
    2.香港理工大学生物医学工程系,香港 999077
刘巍(1988-),男,白族,云南大理市人,硕士,助教,主要研究方向:康复工程学。

收稿日期: 2018-08-28

  修回日期: 2018-11-22

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-16

基金资助

云南省教育厅科学研究基金教师类项目(No. 2018JS175)

Comparison of Orthosis and Exercise Training for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

  • LIU Wei ,
  • WU Hui-dong ,
  • LIU Yao ,
  • SHI Tian-zhen ,
  • AO Li-juan ,
  • CHEN Mo-xian ,
  • WANG Cong ,
  • JIANG Fei-yun
Expand
  • 1.Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China
    2.Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received date: 2018-08-28

  Revised date: 2018-11-22

  Online published: 2019-08-16

Supported by

Supported by Foundation:Yunnan Education Department Scientific Research Fund for Teachers (No. 2018JS175)

摘要

目的 探讨矫形器和运动训练治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)的疗效以及两种治疗方法对患者心理状况和生活质量的影响。 方法 2017年7月至2018年2月,选取10~16岁、Cobb角25°~40°的特发性脊柱侧凸患者55例,分为运动训练组(n = 25)和矫形器组(n = 30),并进行对应治疗。分别记录患者治疗前、治疗3个月、治疗6个月后的Cobb角、躯干位移(TS)、顶椎旋转度(AVR)和顶椎偏离中线距离(AVT),并于治疗前和治疗6个月后采用国际脊柱侧凸研究学会22项问卷(SRS-22)对生活质量和心理状态进行评定。 结果 治疗后,运动训练组SRS-22中功能/活动度、疼痛、自我形象/外观和治疗满意度评分均优于矫形器组(t > 2.137, P < 0.05)。治疗3个月及治疗6个月后,两组Cobb角均显著小于治疗前(t > 4.461, P < 0.001);治疗6个月后,矫形器组Cobb角小于运动训练组(t = 2.548, P < 0.05)。治疗3个月后及治疗6个月后,两组TS、AVR和AVT均优于治疗前(t > 2.338, P < 0.05);治疗6个月后,矫形器组TS、AVR、AVT均优于运动训练组(t > 2.259, P < 0.05)。 结论 单独的运动训练对Cobb角为25°~40°的AIS患者有较好的疗效,且在心理状况和生活质量方面的改善优于矫形器治疗,但是在脊柱侧凸畸形的改善方面不如矫形器治疗。

本文引用格式

刘巍 , 吴会东 , 刘垚 , 石田真 , 敖丽娟 , 陈茉弦 , 王聪 , 蒋飞云 . 矫形器和运动训练对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的效果比较[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019 , 25(8) : 869 -874 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.08.001

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of spinal orthosis and exercise training on psychological status and quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods From July, 2017 to Febrary, 2018, 55 AIS patients aged ten to 16 years were enrolled. According to the individual's choice, they were divided into exercise group (n = 25) and orthosis group (n = 30). The Cobb's angle, apex vertebral rotation (AVR), trunk shift (TS) and apex vertebral translocation (AVT) were measured before, three months and six months after intervention. They were also evaluated with Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire-22 (SRS-22) before and six months after intervention. Results Six months after intervention, the scores of function/activity level, pain, self-image/appearance and treatment satisfaction were better in the exercise group than in the orthosis group (t > 2.137, P < 0.05). Three months and six months after intervention, the Cobb's angles reduced significantly in both groups (t > 4.461, P < 0.001); six months after intervention, the Cobb's angle was smaller in the orthosis group than in the exercise group (t = 2.548, P < 0.05). Three months and six months after intervention, TS, AVR and AVT improved in both groups (t > 2.338, P < 0.05); six months after intervention, they were better in the orthosis group than in the exercise group (t > 2.259, P < 0.05). Conclusion Single exercise training is effective on AIS patients with Cobb's angle between 25° to 40°, especially for psychological status and the quality of life, however, it isn't as better as orthotics treatment for deformity correction.

参考文献

1 程永红. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸治疗研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2012, 20(9): 819-822.
2 AulisaA G, GuzzantiV, FalcigliaF, et al. Lyon bracing in adolescent females with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study based on SRS and SOSORT criteria [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16: 316.
3 BusscherI, WapstraF H, VeldhuizenA G. Predicting growth and curve progression in the individual patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: design of a prospective longitudinal cohort study [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2010, 11: 93.
4 SimonyA, HansenE J, CarreonL Y, et al. Health-related quality-of-life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients 25 years after treatment [J]. Scoliosis, 2015, 10: 22.
5 梁菊萍,周璇,陈梅佳,等. 特发性脊柱侧凸支具治疗研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2018, 33(5): 604-610.
6 郭立民,舒钧,劳汉昌,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸支具治疗研究分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2015, 23(11): 967-971.
7 杜青,周璇,励建安,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸改良色努支具应用研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2014, 22(9): 779-782.
8 许阳阳,苏宝科,冯会梅,等. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的支具治疗相关研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(4): 470-473.
9 周璇,杜青. 脊柱侧凸特定运动疗法研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(4): 478-481.
10 WeissH R. Physical therapy intervention studies on idiopathic scoliosis-review with the focus on inclusion criteria1 [J]. Scoliosis, 2012, 7(1): 4.
11 张亚明. 青少年轻度特发性脊柱侧弯的矫正动作研究[D]. 石家庄:河北师范大学, 2015.
12 张宏超. 手法治疗配合夜间侧凸矫形器治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的临床观察[D]. 哈尔滨:黑龙江中医药大学, 2011.
13 黄英,刘敏,吴强. 改良型色努矫形器配合运动疗法治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疗效分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(1): 81-83.
14 王哲. 青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的生物力学研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2007.
15 邱贵兴,郭盛杰,刘勇,等. 脊柱侧凸关节突中Ⅰ、Ⅱ型胶原和转化生长因子β_1表达的研究[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2005, 85(34): 2391-2394.
16 GrivasT B, BountisA, VrasamiI, et al. Brace technology thematic series: the dynamic derotation brace [J]. Scoliosis, 2010, 5: 20.
17 袁望舒,陈丽霞. 特发性脊柱侧凸的保守治疗研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(3): 287-289.
18 贺星,蔡艺芳,谭恒,等. 运动疗法治疗Ⅰ°青少年型特发性脊柱侧凸的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(3): 266-268.
19 LiX F, LiH, LiuZ D, et al. Low bone mineral status in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17(11): 1431-1440.
20 McKayH A, PetitM A, SchutzR W, et al. Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density after modified physical education classes: a randomized school-based exercise intervention study in prepubescent and early pubescent children [J]. J Pediatr, 2000, 136(2): 156-162.
21 张秀英,王克来,张连海,等. 矫形支具在先天性脊柱侧凸治疗中的应用[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2012, 20(8): 711-713, 768.
22 CanaveseF, KaelinA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Indications and efficacy of nonoperative treatment [J]. Indian J Orthop, 2011, 45(1): 7-14.
23 周万勇,于峰,王世芳. 矫形器配合矫形操治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧弯效果观察[J]. 山东医药, 2011, 51(47): 78-79.
24 傅涛,厉彦虎. 功能性康复训练改善青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的研究[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2017, 21(28): 4462-4468.
25 XuG J, FuX, TianP, et al. Comparison of single and dual growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a meta-analysis [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11(1): 80.
文章导航

/