基于ICF比较我国智力障碍的鉴定标准

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.09.004

《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 1011-1015.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.09.004

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of Standards of Intellectual Impairment in China Using ICF

ZOU Min^1,2,3,4, QIU Zhuo-ying^2,3,4,5,6, SUN Hong-wei^1,2,3,4, JIA Li-ru^1,3, MA Hong-zhuo^3,4, LI An-qiao^3,4,7

1.Psychology Department of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
2.Key Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law, Ministry of Education), Beijing 100088, China
3.China Academy of ICF, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
4.WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China
5.Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing 100068, China
6.Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
7.China Key Laboratory of Classification, Evaluation and Rehabilitation Sport of Intellectual and Development Disability, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China

Received:2019-08-07 Revised:2019-08-26 Published:2019-09-25 Online:2019-09-25
Contact: QIU Zhuo-ying, E-mail: qiutiger@hotmail.com E-mail:qiutiger@hotmail.com
Supported by:
Supported by Key Laboratory of Evidence Science (China University of Political Science and Law, Ministry of Education) Opening Project (No. 2018KFKT07), Shandong Social Science Planning in 2018 (No. 18CJYJ11) and National Special Fund Projects of Based Research of Public Benefits for Institutes at Central Governmental Level Leading Project of Major Scientific Research (No. 2017CZ-7; No. 2018CZ-4)

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To compare the standards of intellectual impairment in China based on ICF to provide evidences for standardization of identification and services of intellectual impairment. Methods The national standards of intellectual impairment or injury from Standard of Identification of Work Capacity: Identification Classification of DisabilityCaused by Work-related Injuries, Occupational Diseases and Classification of Impairment Related to Injury and China Insurance Disability Standard and Code were compared under the framework, terminology, coding and evaluation of ICF. Results These three standards covered ICF three components, including body structure, body function, activity and participation, but not contextual factors. The terminology and coding system of China Insurance Disability Standard and Code came from ICF. However, there was no standardized terminology and coding system among sectors. The classification and evaluation for intellectual impairment were different among these three standards, that made it difficult to compare the outcome directly. Conclusion It is proposed to adopt the ICF framework and approach to standardize the definition, terms, coding, and evaluation of intellectual impairment in disability standards in China to promote data exchange of evaluation and service among sectors.

Key words: intellectual impairment, disability standard, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

CLC Number:

R493

ZOU Min, QIU Zhuo-ying, SUN Hong-wei, JIA Li-ru, MA Hong-zhuo, LI An-qiao. Comparison of Standards of Intellectual Impairment in China Using ICF[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(9): 1011-1015.

References

1 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(国际中文增补版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2015.
2 RauchA, StuckiG. ICF核心分类组合临床实践手册[M]. 邱卓英,励建安,吴弦光,译. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2013.
3 StuckiG, KostanjsekN, CiezaA. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A Tool to Classify and Measure Functioning [M]// PreedyV R, WatsonR R. Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. New York: Springer, 2010: 1-34.
4 KostanjsekN. Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems [J]. BMC Public Health, 2011, 11(4): 1-6.
5 PetersonD B, PaulH. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to conceptualize disability and functioning in psychological injury and law [J]. Psychol Injury Law, 2009, 2(3-4): 205-214.
6 杨天潼,王旭. 《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》评述及其法医临床学的应用价值[J]. 证据科学, 2012, 20(5): 565-577.
7 季阳,吕元一,于晓军. 统一伤残等级鉴定标准的原则与建议[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2015(4): 98-101.
8 高秋野,励建安,张霞,等. ICF通用组合在临床应用中的评估者间和评估者内信度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(12): 1339-1343.
9 邱卓英,李安巧,黄珂,等. 基于ICF和联合国《残疾人权利公约》对国际组织有关残疾定义及其测量的内容研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(10): 1117-1121.
10 邱卓英,李欣,刘冯铂,等. 基于ICF的智力残疾模式、测量方法及社会支持系统研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(4): 373-377.
11 李沁燚,邱卓英,董向兵. 基于ICF的残疾标准内容分析与比较研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(1): 22-25.
12 李沁燚. 基于ICF的相关行业残疾标准比较分析[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2017, 38(4): 71-76.
13 邹敏,孙宏伟,邱卓英,等. 基于ICD-11和ICF的智力残疾术语、诊断和分类研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(1): 1-5.
14 李毓秋,邱卓英,邹敏. 6~18岁重度智力残疾儿童的智力与适应性行为评定和分级方法研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(1): 6-9.
15 孙宏伟,邹敏,邱卓英,等. 基于ICF的智力残疾个别化服务与支持方案设计研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(1): 10-14.
16 王胜男,邱卓英,孙宏伟,等. 智力残疾人的职业康复：理论架构、方法与服务[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(1): 22-28.
17 王旭. 《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》解读与评析[J]. 证据科学, 2013, 21(6): 724-730.
18 王旭. 《人体损伤致残程度分级》的理解[J]. 法医学杂志, 2016, 32(5): 380-384.
19 王旭. 《劳动能力鉴定职工工伤与职业病致残等级》(2014)相关问题研究[J]. 证据科学, 2015, 23(6): 759-767.
20 夏文涛. 损伤与疾病共存时的职工工伤伤残评定[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2015(3): 20-23.
21 刘鑫,赵彩飞. 残疾标准制定与实施中的基本问题研究——以《人体损伤致残程度分级》为例[J]. 证据科学, 2017, 25(3): 268-280.
22 刘磊峰,刘波,邓小鹏,等. 道路交通事故伤残鉴定中影响智残程度的相关因素分析研究[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2015(4): 46-49.
23 丁昊,房慧. 探讨司法精神医学鉴定中应用心理测验的效果[J]. 系统医学, 2017, 2(23): 10-11.
24 王磊,王永华. 保险人看鉴定——道交人损之周围神经损伤篇[J]. 中国保险, 2017(3): 37-38.
25 中国保险监督委员会. 人身保险伤残评定标准及代码[S]. JR/T0083-2013.
26 StuckiG,邱卓英,励建安. 为在中国康复工作中全面应用ICF而努力[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2011, 17(1): 5-10.
27 RauchA, CiezaA, StuckiG, et al. 如何将国际功能、残疾和健康分类应用于临床康复管理[J]. 张霞,张静,邱卓英,等,译. 中国康复理论与实践, 2011, 17(1): 32-38.

[1]	LI Qin-yi;QIU Zhuo-ying;DONG Xiang-bing.. Comparison of Disability Standards Based on ICF [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2013, 19(1): 22-25.
[2]	SUN Gang;SHAN Peng.. Comparison of Disability Standard for Insurance and Strategy for Development [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2013, 19(05): 478-481.
[3]	LI Sheng-li;SUN Xi-bin;WANG Yin-hua;et al. The Second China National Sample Survey on Disability:Standard of Speech Disability [J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2007, 13(09): 801-803.

Comparison of Standards of Intellectual Impairment in China Using ICF

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0