Functioning and Disability for Patients with Spinal Cord Injury or Traumatic Brain Injury: Accessed with WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 Chinese Version

  • SHI Hong-mei ,
  • WU Ming ,
  • LI An-qiao
Expand
  • 1. Psychological Department, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Centre, Beijing 100068, China;
    2. China Key Laboratory of Classification, Evaluation and Rehabilitation (Sport) of Intellectual and Development Disability, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China

Received date: 2017-06-15

  Online published: 2017-06-27

Abstract

Objective To study the activity and participation status of patients with spinal cord injury or traumatic brain injury. Methods From 2013 to 2016, 60 patients with spinal cord injury and 38 patients with traumatic brain injury were assessed with WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS 2.0) (International Chinese Version of fully structured interviewer administered 36 questions). Results The patients with traumatic brain injury had moderate dysfunction in domains of cognition and getting along with people, and severe dysfunction in other domains. The patients with spinal cord injury had mild dysfunction in domain of cognition, moderate dysfunction in domains of self-care and getting along with people, and severe dysfunction in other domains. The dysfunction was severer in domains of cognition and self-care in the patients with traumatic brain injury than in the patients with spinal cord injury (t>2.140, P<0.05). Conclusion The inpatients with spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury are difficult in mobility, self-care, getting along with people, life activities and participation.

Cite this article

SHI Hong-mei , WU Ming , LI An-qiao . Functioning and Disability for Patients with Spinal Cord Injury or Traumatic Brain Injury: Accessed with WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 Chinese Version[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017 , 23(6) : 741 -744 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.06.026

References

[1] 邱卓英,陈迪. 基于ICF的残疾和康复信息标准体系及其应用研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 501-507.
[2] 熊德凤,张冠庭,潘经光,等. 运用世界卫生组织《残疾评定量表》(WHODAS 2.0)评定香港残疾人士和慢性病患者的活动和参与障碍[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 508-512.
[3] 世界卫生组织, 世界银行. 《世界残疾报告》国际中文版[M]. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2011: 1-325.
[4] 邱卓英. 《世界残疾报告》的架构、方法与应用意义[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(10): 901-904.
[5] 邱卓英. 世界卫生组织国际分类家族的发展与应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(1): 1-3.
[6] 邱卓英,李沁燚. 《世界残疾报告》及其对残疾和康复的重要意义[J]. 残疾人研究, 2012(3): 9-14.
[7] 邱卓英. 国际社会有关残疾发展的重要文件——世界卫生组织、世界银行共同发布首份《世界残疾报告》[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2011, 17(6): 508-511.
[8] 邱卓英,陈迪,祝捷. 构建基于ICF的功能和残疾评定的理论和方法[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(7): 675-677.
[9] 邱卓英. 国际残疾调查与统计的主要方法研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2004, 10(6): 321-325.
[10] 陈银海,刘敏,何井华. 脊髓损伤患者流行病学调查[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2011, 27(6): 1032-1033.
[11] 张旭,闫金玉,李剑锋,等. 脊髓损伤患者康复评定的研究进展[C]. 第三届全国脊髓损伤治疗与康复研讨会论文集, 2012.
[12] 蔡飞鸣,邱卓英.《国际功能、残疾与健康分类》对全科医学的启示[J]. 中国全科医学, 2004, 7(2): 130-131.
[13] 王莲娥,周洁,金欢. 世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第2版中文版在精神残疾评定中的信效度检验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2013, 27(2): 121-125.
[14] 世界卫生组织分类、评定、调查与术语项目小组. 世界卫生组织残疾评定量表及其与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的关系[J]. 张爱民,蔡飞鸣,鲁玉红,等,译. 中国康复理论与实践, 2003, 9(1): 15-17.
[15] 何燕燕,邱卓英. 世界卫生组织《残疾评定量表》在残疾运动员功能评定中的应用[J].中国康复理论与实践, 2006, 12(3): 268-269.
Outlines

/