CJRTP

Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice >

2017 , Vol. 23 >Issue 12: 1481 - 1485

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.12.021

Orginal Article

Comparative Analysis on Personnel Allocation of Assistive Device Institutions between 2010 and 2014 in Shanghai, China

Expand
  • 1.China Research Center on Disability Issues at Fudan University, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Shanghai 200032, China;
    2.Resource Center of Assistive Technology in Shanghai, Shanghai 200120, China

Received date: 2017-05-23

  Revised date: 2017-06-07

  Online published: 2017-12-28

Fold

Abstract

Objective To understand the development situation and existing problems of personnel allocation of assistive device institutions during the "Twelfth Five-Year" period in Shanghai, China. Methods A questionnaire was designed and a census was conducted to obtain the personnel allocation data from district and street level assistive institutions in 2010 and 2014 about age, education background, major and years of working, etc. Results During the comparison between 2010 and 2014, there was significant difference only on years of working from district level (P<0.01), and there were significant differences on age, education background, major and years of working from street level (χ2≥43.603, P<0.001). The personnel structures in urban districts and suburban districts were significantly different between 2010 and 2014 (χ2≥16.166, P<0.001). Conclusion During the "Twelfth Five-Year" period, the construction of talents for assistive device institutions got remarkable achievement in Shanghai, but it is still necessary to strengthen professional training and reduce the difference of structure.

Key words： assistive device institution; personnel allocation; comparative analysis

Cite this article

LIU Xiao-lan, SONG Yu, PEI Zhao, JIN Rong, GAI Tong, YANG Zhe, WEI Zhi-hua, LÜ Jun, CHEN Gang . Comparative Analysis on Personnel Allocation of Assistive Device Institutions between 2010 and 2014 in Shanghai, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2017 , 23(12) : 1481 -1485 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.12.021

References

[1] 朱图陵,金德闻. 辅助器具与辅助技术[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2006, 21(3): 252-254.
[2] 舒彬,杨志金,李香平,等. 重庆市残疾人辅助器具需求分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2010, 25(8): 768-771.
[3] 毕琪,宋毓,季敏,等. 上海市辅助器具适配对残疾人室内外活动能力影响的调查[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(7): 766-769.
[4] 刘璐璐,范佳进,陈晓帆. 辅助器具在残疾人康复中的作用[J]. 科技经济导刊, 2016(5): 99, 108.
[5] 张晓玉. 个人移动辅助器具的分类、现状和未来目标[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2010, 25(9): 885-888.
[6] 阮剑华,郭瑾,陶健婷. 国内外残疾人辅助器具服务模式的对比与启示[C].北京:第七届北京国际康复论坛论文集下册, 2012: 938-943.
[7] 闫媚. 残疾人辅助器具服务现状与政策建设思考[J]. 残疾人研究, 2012, 8(4): 67-70.
[8] 吕军,陈刚,虞慧炯,等. 上海市残疾人康复服务评价指标体系研究概述[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(6): 589-591.
[9] 田壮,宋毓,金荣,等. 上海市残疾人辅助器具组合适配评估结果分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(2): 221-226.
[10] 阮剑华,陶健婷,陈伟宏. 残疾人辅助器具综合服务刍议[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(3): 204-207.
[11] 肖源. 南京市残疾人辅助器具辅助技术专业服务人才现状的调查研究[J]. 科教文汇(上旬刊), 2012(6): 83,91.
[12] 范佳进. 辅助器具与辅助技术服务[C].北京:第六届北京国际康复论坛论文集, 2011: 6.
[13] 董理权,吴小高. 构建辅助器具适配体系探讨[J]. 残疾人研究, 2014, 14(2): 16-19.
[14] 王姣艳,何侃. 国内外残疾人康复人才培养模式比较研究[J]. 残疾人研究, 2012, 5(1): 39-43.
[15] 李建军,程军,高峰,等. 我国康复人才战略研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22 (5): 605-607.
[16] 夏欧东,赖露颖,陈爱华,等. 康复人才培养中的协同创新机制研究与应用[J]. 中国高等医学教育, 2016(9): 19-20.
[17] 陈振声. 中国残疾人辅助器具服务体系的构建[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2011, 17(6): 583-585.
[18] 孙先德. 构建辅助器具适配服务体系推动残疾人事业全面发展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(11): 1001-1003.
[19] 李晞,吴小高. 我国残疾人辅助器具服务工作的现状及展望[J]. 残疾人研究, 2016, 23(3): 43-47.
[20] 王保华. 瑞典冰岛残疾人辅助器具服务考察[J]. 残疾人研究, 2011, 3(3): 73.
[21] 何川. 详解北美辅具服务专业人员认证体系[J]. 中国残疾人, 2014(7): 66-68.
[22] 章小霞,郑俭. 美国残疾人辅助技术服务专业人员的资格考核对我国的启示[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(11): 1094-1095.
[23] 李衡,季敏,陈万春,等. 上海市残疾人辅助器具服务机构人力配置现状分析[J]. 医学与社会, 2012, 25(12): 40-42.
[24] 杨建萍,虞慧炯,李衡,等. 上海市残疾人联合会康复人才培训现状及需求分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(1): 94-97.
[25] 陈刚,吕军,虞慧炯,等. 上海城区残疾人康复需求与服务现状分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(6): 592-594.
[26] 虞慧炯,吕军,陈刚,等. 上海郊县残疾人康复需求与服务现状分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(6): 595-597.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉