Effects of High-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Different Frequencies on Upper Limb Function after Ischemic Stroke

  • XIAO Chang-lin ,
  • PAN Cui-huan ,
  • CHEN Yan ,
  • HU Nan ,
  • HUANG Shao-kuan ,
  • LI Qian ,
  • FU Zhen ,
  • OU Xiu-jun ,
  • LUO Li-juan
Expand
  • 1.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou Dongsheng Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
    2.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
    3.The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China

Received date: 2019-01-21

  Revised date: 2019-02-19

  Online published: 2019-05-29

Supported by

Guangzhou Bureau of Education Guangzhou Medical University Innovation Quality Project (No. B16021008)

Abstract

Objective To observe the effect of 3 Hz and 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with ischemic stroke.Methods From June, 2016 to September, 2017, 60 inpatients with ischemic stroke were randomly divided into sham rTMS group (n = 19), 3 Hz-rTMS group (n = 21) and 10 Hz-rTMS group (n = 20). All the patients received routine training and their own rTMS for two weeks. Their rest motor threshold (RMT) was measured, and they were assessed with modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremities (FMA-UE) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) before and after treatment, and at six weeks follow-up. Results There were 48 patients completing the trial, while five in 3 Hz-rTMS group, five in 10 Hz-rTMS group and two in the sham rTMS group dropped. The RMT increased in 3 Hz and 10 Hz rTMS groups (t > 2.390, P < 0.05) after treatment, but there was no significantly difference among the three groups (F = 0.164, P > 0.05). The MAS scores of elbow and wrist decreased gradually over time in 3 Hz and 10 Hz rTMS groups (P < 0.05), and the MAS scores of elbow was less in 3 Hz and 10 Hz rTMS groups than in the sham rTMS group at follow-up (P < 0.05). The interaction of time and group was significant on the FMA-UE scores (F = 14.243, P < 0.001), and the FMA-UE scores improved more in 3 Hz and 10 Hz rTMS groups than in the sham rTMS group at different stages (P < 0.01). The interaction of time and group was not significant in MBI score (F = 1.481, P > 0.05), and there was no significant difference among the three groups at any time (F < 2.925, P > 0.05). Conclusion Both 3 Hz and 10 Hz rTMS can promote the recovery of upper limb motor function in ischemic stroke patients safely and effectively, and 10 Hz rTMS is recommended as less time is needed.

Cite this article

XIAO Chang-lin , PAN Cui-huan , CHEN Yan , HU Nan , HUANG Shao-kuan , LI Qian , FU Zhen , OU Xiu-jun , LUO Li-juan . Effects of High-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Different Frequencies on Upper Limb Function after Ischemic Stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2019 , 25(5) : 557 -563 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.05.011

References

1 KlomjaiW, KatzR, Lackmy-ValléeA. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS) [J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2015, 58(4): 208-213.
2 McIntyreA, MirkowskiM, ThompsonS, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for spasticity post stroke [J]. PM R, 2018, 10(3): 293-302.
3 KimS Y, ShinS B, LeeS J, et al. Factors associated with upper extremity functional recovery following low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients [J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2016, 40(3): 373-382.
4 AuriatA M, NevaJ L, PetersS, et al. A review of transcranial magnetic stimulation and multimodal neuroimaging to characterize post-stroke neuroplasticity [J]. Front Neurol, 2015, 6(29): 226.
5 沈滢,单春雷,殷稚飞,等. 不同频率重复经颅磁刺激对脑梗死患者上肢功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2012, 27(11): 997-1001.
6 LeeJ H, KimS B, LeeK W, et al. Factors associated with upper extremity motor recovery after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients [J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2015, 39(2): 268.
7 ThomsonR H, RogaschN C, MallerJ J, et al. Intensity dependent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulation of blood oxygenation [J]. J Affect Disord, 2012, 136(3): 1243-1246.
8 TougeT, GerschlagerW, BrownP, et al. Are the after-effects of low-frequency rTMS on motor cortex excitability due to changes in the efficacy of cortical synapses? [J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2001, 112(11): 2138-2145.
9 JungS H, ShinJ E, JeongY, et al. Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of different stimulation durations [J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2008, 119(1): 71-79.
10 KhedrE M, EtrabyA E, HemedaM, et al. Long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke [J]. Acta Neurol Scand, 2010, 121(1): 30-37.
11 LeQ, QuY, TaoY, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on hand function recovery and excitability of the motor cortex after stroke: a meta-analysis [J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 93(5): 422-430.
12 SankarasubramanianV, MachadoA G, ConfortoA B, et al. Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation [J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2017, 128(6): 892-902.
13 ZhangL, XingG, ShuaiS, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke-induced upper limb motor deficit: a meta-analysis [J]. Neural Plast, 2017, 2017: 1-12.
14 GersnerR, DhamneS C, ZangenA, et al. Bursts of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), together with lorazepam, suppress seizures in a rat kainate status epilepticus model [J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2016, 62: 136-139.
15 孙玮,赵晨光,牟翔,等. 低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中患者上肢痉挛的临床研究[J]. 中国康复, 2017, 32(2): 102-105.
16 GaoW, YuL, LiuY, et al. Effects of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on KCC2 expression in rats with spasticity following spinal cord injury [J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 2017, 37(5): 777-781.
17 ChangW H, KimY H, BangO Y, et al. Long-term effects of rTMS on motor recovery in patients after subacute stroke [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2010, 42(8): 758-764.
18 HatemS M, SaussezG, Della FailleM, et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery [J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016, 13(10): 442.
19 KimC, ChoiH E, JungH, et al. Comparison of the effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients [J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2014, 38(5): 585-591.
20 HsuW, ChengC, LiaoK, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor functions in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis [J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(7): 1849-1857.
21 SasakiN, MizutaniS, KakudaW, et al. Comparison of the effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013, 22(4): 413-418.
22 ZhangT, LiuL, XieR, et al. Value of using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for stroke rehabilitation assessment [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(42): e12802.
23 MahdiS, AlbertowskiK, AlmodayferO, et al. An international clinical study of ability and disability in autism spectrum disorder using the WHO-ICF framework [J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2018, 48(6): 2148-2163.
24 BarrosG S, BorbaC D S R, BorbaD S P, et al. Efficacy of coupling repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper-limb spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(2): 222-229.
Outlines

/