Objective To investigate the characteristics of cognitive impairment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to analyze the related factors.Method From September, 2015 to September, 2017, 94 patients surviving from severe TBI were assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and their baseline data were recorded in detail. Results The scores were lower in the recall, abstraction, verbal fluency, visual executive and attention of MoCA, and higher in naming, digit span, orientation and calculation. The scores in total, attention, abstraction and recall were lower in patients with frontal lobe injury than those with basal ganglion injury. The scores in total, naming, abstraction and recall were lower in patients with frontal-temporal-parietal lobes injury than those with basal ganglion injury. Multivariate regression showed that the time of coma and the location of injury were the related factors to the total score of MoCA (P < 0.05). Conclusion Cognitive impairment after TBI demostrates commonly in many aspects, which are related with the time of coma and the area of injury.
1 温洪波,张振馨,牛富生,等. 北京地区蒙特利尔认知量表的应用研究[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2008, 47(1): 36-39.
2 ChengP X, YinP, NingP, et al. Trends in traumatic brain injury mortality in China, 2006–2013: a population-based longitudinal study [J]. PLoS Med, 2017, 14(7): e1002332.
3 PeetersW, van den BrandeR, PolinderS, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe [J]. Acta Neurochir, 2015, 157: 1683-1696.
4 TaylorC A, BellJ M, BreidingM J, et al. Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths－United States, 2007 and 2013 [J]. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2017, 66(9): 1-16.
5 MajdanM, PlancikovaD, BrazinovaA, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis [J]. Lancet Public Health, 2016, 1(2): e76-e83.
6 张立秀,刘雪琴. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表中文版广州市老人院人群划界分探讨[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2008, 22(2): 123-125.
7 孙宇任,安畅,何伟,等. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表北京版在沈阳市社区老年人群中的初步应用[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2012, 21(10): 948-950.
8 贾功伟,宋琦,殷樱,等. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表在重庆地区应用的初步研究[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2008, 3(1): 41-42.
9 易刚,肖军,唐娟娟. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表在成都市社区老年人轻度认知功能障碍筛查中的应用分析[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(2): 203-204.
10 董艳娟,蔡晓平,李国英,等. 中文版蒙特利尔认知评估量表和简易精神状态量表对老年帕金森病患者认知功能的评估[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2016, 19(2): 144-146.
11 黄菲芸,王艳红,李娟娟,等. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表在中国中老年人群筛查轻度认知功能障碍中的截断值的系统评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017, 17(4): 450-457.
12 丁雯雯,陈斌华,罗烈岚,等. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表在阿尔茨海默病早期诊断中的意义[J]. 北京医学, 2017, 39(11): 1184-1185.
13 王泽宇,朱晓峰,黄昕艳,等. 蒙特利尔认知量表和MMSE量表在阿尔茨海默病筛查中的比较与应用[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2011, 34(4): 40-42.
14 陈卫. 蒙特利尔认知量表在脑小血管病患者认知功能障碍筛查中的作用[D]. 青岛:青岛大学, 2011.
15 张彦红,梁伟雄,朱磊,等. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表与简易精神状态量表用于筛查血管性认知障碍的比较[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2012, 27(5): 431-436.
16 张一,姚秋近,陈超,等. 蒙特利尔认知评估量表在筛查老年颅脑创伤患者认知障碍中的应用研究[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2014, 33(7): 729-732.
17 张瑜,张一,姚秋近,等. 洛文斯顿作业治疗用认知评定量表在脑外伤早期患者认知功能评定中的效能[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(1): 84-87.
18 詹燕,王珊珊,荀雅晶,等. 脑外伤患者认知障碍的特点及康复疗效分析[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2016, 19(18): 77-79.
19 原劲松. 脑外伤患者认知障碍与损伤部位的关系分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2016, 14(2): 155.
20 戴备强,郑波,王小正,等. 不同部位脑外伤对认知功能的影响[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2016, 14(2): 144-147.
21 郭华珍,恽晓平,陈巍. 不同脑半球损伤患者认知功能障碍的比较[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2002, 8(9): 539-541.
22 邬树凯,陈峻严,高宏志,等. 重型创伤性颅脑损伤后认知功能障碍特征及其影响因素的初步研究[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2011, 34(29): 26-29.
23 ZhangH, ZhangX N, ZhangH L, et al. Differences in cognitive profiles between traumatic brain injury and stroke: a comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination [J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2016, 19(5): 271-274.
24 HukkelhovenC W, SteyerbergE W, RampenA J, et al. Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients [J]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 99(4): 666-673.
25 刘剑. 重度脑外伤患者的近期康复效果及长期预后研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(8): 756-759.
26 陈卉. 影响颅脑外伤预后的相关因素分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2012, 10(9): 347-348.
