《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2003, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (11): 687-688.

• 临床康复 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同康复方法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效评价

周光辉   

  1. 东莞市石龙人民医院 广东东莞市 523321
  • 收稿日期:2003-05-30 出版日期:2003-11-25 发布日期:2003-11-25

Clinical evaluation of three different recovery treatments on herniation of lumbar intervertebral disc

ZHOU Guang-hui   

  1. Shilong Peo-ple’s Hospital, Dongguan 523321, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2003-05-30 Published:2003-11-25 Online:2003-11-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的探讨不同康复方法对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法将156例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为腰椎牵引组(A组)、腰椎牵引加理疗组(B组)、腰椎牵引加针灸推拿组(C组),每组各 52例。治疗前及治疗2周后,采用目测类比评分法(VAS)、腰椎疾患治疗成绩评分表分别对患者疼痛和腰椎功能状态进行评定,并进行组间比较。结果止痛效果和腰椎功能状态改善指数B、C组高于A组(P<0.05),C组高于B组(P<0.05)。结论腰椎牵引加针灸推拿有较好的临床疗效,手法推拿复位有重要作用。

关键词: 腰椎间盘突出症, 牵引, 物理治疗, 推拿, 电针

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic effect of three different recovery treatments on herniation of lumbar intervertebral disc.Methods156 cases were divided into three groups, traction of lumbar (Group A, n=52), traction compared with physical therapy(Group B, n=52), traction with massage and electroacupuncture therapy(Group C,n=52). Before and after treatment, the clinical symptoms and signs were assessed and compared. ResultsThe efficiency of alleviative pain and the index of function improvement of lumbar vetebra were higher in Group B, C than that in Group A (P<0.05), higher in Group C than that in Group B (P<0.05).ConclusionThe traction of lumbar with massage and electroacupuncture is preferably effective, and the manual reduction plays an important role.

Key words: herniation of lumbar intervertebral disc, traction, physical therapy, massage, electroacupuncture