《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2006, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06): 519-520.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

低频调制中频电水浴疗法与电磁疗法治疗足跟痛疗效比较

李继华   

  1. 解放军总医院理疗科 北京市 100853
  • 收稿日期:2006-04-21 出版日期:2006-06-25 发布日期:2006-06-25

Comparison of Effect of Modulated Medium Frequency Low Frequency Current Hydroelectric Bath Therapy and Electromagnetic Therapy on Heel Pain

LI Ji-hua   

  1. The Department of Physiotherapy, the General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2006-04-21 Published:2006-06-25 Online:2006-06-25

PDF (PC)

摘要： 目的比较低频调制的中频电水浴疗法与电磁疗法治疗足跟痛的疗效。方法168例足跟痛患者随机分为低频调制的中频电水浴疗法组和电磁疗法组各84例,比较两组的治疗效果。结果低频调制的中频电水浴疗法组痊愈率71.43%,有效率97.62%;电磁疗法组痊愈率54.76%,有效率84.52%,低频调制的中频电水浴疗法组患者的痊愈平均治疗次数明显少于电磁疗法组(P<0.01)。结论低频调制的中频电水浴疗法在应用上有创新性,是治疗足跟痛的好方法。

关键词: 低频调制的中频电水浴疗法, 电磁疗法, 足跟痛

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the effects of modulated medium frequency low frequency current hydroelectric bath therapy and electromagnetic therapy on heel pain.Methods168 heel pain patients were randomly divided into group A (treated with modulated medium frequency low frequency current hydroelectric bath therapy) and group B (treated with electromagnetic therapy) with 84 cases in each group. The effect of two groups were observed and compared.ResultsThe cure rate and effective rate of the group A were 71.43% and 97.62% respectively, those of the group B were 54.76% and 84.52% respectively, and the number of average cure times of the group A was significantly less than that of the group B (P<0.01).ConclusionThe modulated medium frequency low frequency current hydroelectric bath therapy brings new ideas on clinical application and is a good method for treatment of heel pain.

Key words: modulated medium frequency low frequency current hydroelectric bath therapy, electromagnetic therapy, heel pain