《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2015, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (07): 849-853.

• 特稿 • 上一篇    下一篇

肌内效贴对女性大学生膝关节肌力的影响

祁奇 1，陈文华 1，余波 1，王惠芳 2a，宣青青 3，王予彬 2b   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-07-25

Effects of Kinesio Taping on Muscle Strength of Knees in Female Students

QI Qi1, CHEN Wen-hua1, YU Bo1, WANG Hui-fang2a, XUAN Qing-qing3, WANG Yu-bin2b   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China; 2. a. Department of Rehabilitation, b. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Dongfang Hospital, Shanghai 200120, China; 3. Department of Rehabilitation, Ningbo No. 9 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315020, China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2015-07-25 Online:2015-07-25

PDF (PC)

被引次数

26

摘要： 目的 探讨肌内效贴扎对青年女性膝关节肌力的影响。方法 20名健康女大学生，用等速测试仪，以 60°/s角速度，测量无贴扎、肌内效贴扎、安慰贴扎 3种状态下的膝关节屈伸向心性收缩及离心性收缩相对峰力矩；用表面肌电图测试股内侧肌、股直肌、股外侧肌的肌电振幅均方根值(RMS)。结果 向心性收缩时，肌内效贴扎时伸肌相对峰力矩明显高于无贴扎、安慰贴扎时(P<0.01)，屈肌相对峰力矩 3种状态下无显著性差异(P>0.05)；股内侧肌在肌内效贴扎时 RMS标化值明显低于未贴扎时(P<0.01)；股外侧肌肌内效贴扎时RMS标化值明显低于未贴扎时、安慰贴扎时(P<0.01)；股直肌RMS标化值3种状态下无显著性差异(P>0.05)。离心性收缩时，肌内效贴扎时伸肌、屈肌相对峰力矩均明显高于无贴扎、安慰贴扎时(P<0.01)；股内侧肌、股外侧肌在肌内效贴扎时RMS标化值低于未贴扎时(P<0.01)；股直肌RMS标化值3种状态下无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 肌内效贴扎可以提高股四头肌向心性、离心性收缩肌力，增加腘绳肌离心性收缩肌力，提高股内侧肌及股外侧肌的肌纤维募集能力。

关键词: 肌内效贴, 膝, 表面肌电, 等速运动, 女性

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of Kinesio taping on function of knees in girls. Methods 20 female students were tested the peak torque of centripedal and eccentric contraction of knee flexion and extension with Biodex isokinetic testing at 60°/s angular velocity, with Kinesio taping, placebo taping and without taping. Their amplitude root of mean square (RMS) of surface electromyography of vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RM) and vastus lateralis (VL) were also recorded. Results For centripedal isokinetic contraction, the relative extensors peak torque was the most as Kinesio taping (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in relative flexor peak torque (P> 0.05). Standardized RMS of VM and VL were the least as Kinesio taping (P<0.01), but not significantly different of RF among all the conditions (P>0.05). For eccentric isokinetic contraction, the relative extensor peak torque of both extensors and flexors were the most as Kinesio taping (P<0.01), while the Standardized RMS of VM and VL were the least (P<0.01), but no significant difference was observed in RF (P> 0.05). Conclusion Kinesio taping may enhance the strength of centripedal, eccentric contractions of quadriceps and eccentric contractions of hamstring, and increase the muscle fibers recruitment of VM and VL.

Key words: Kinesio taping, knee, surface electromyography, isokinetic exercise, female