单侧小腿截肢者穿戴假肢后行走功能的评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.03.024

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 358-362.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.03.024

单侧小腿截肢者穿戴假肢后行走功能的评价

魏艳琴¹, 曹学军^{1, 2}, 杨平^{1, 2}, 蔡丽飞^{1, 2}

1.首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市 100068;
2.中国康复研究中心康复工程研究所,北京市 100068。

收稿日期:2016-12-28 出版日期:2017-03-05 发布日期:2017-03-31
作者简介:魏艳琴(1980-),女,汉族,河北张家口市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：康复工程。通讯作者：曹学军(1961-),男,汉族,上海市人,硕士,研究员,副教授,主要研究方向：康复工程。E-mail: zkba@sina.com。
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No.2015CZ-19)

Walking Ability of Unilateral Transtibial Amputees with Prostheses

WEI Yan-qin¹, CAO Xue-jun^{1, 2}, YANG Ping^{1, 2}, CAI Li-fei^{1, 2}

1. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China;
2. Institute of Rehabilitation Engineering, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China

Received:2016-12-28 Published:2017-03-05 Online:2017-03-31
Contact: Correspondence to CAO Xue-jun. E-mail: zkba@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨单侧小腿截肢者穿戴假肢后的步行特点。方法2016年4至12月,20例单侧小腿截肢穿戴假肢者为实验组,20名健康成年人为对照组,分别进行L测试、静态站立平衡测试、室内6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和室外1000 m复杂路面步行测试。结果L测试中,穿戴定踝软跟脚和储能脚患者的完成时间无显著性差异(t=0.675, P>0.05)。平衡测试中,实验组和对照组重心轨迹面积、重心轨迹长度、X最大偏移量和Y最大偏移量无显著性差异(t<0.803, P>0.05)。6MWT中,实验组和对照组各项参数均存在非常显著性差异(t>2.774, P<0.01)。室外1000 m步行测试完成时间和能量消耗实验组和对照组间存在非常高度显著性差异(t>4.130, P<0.001)。结论单侧小腿截肢穿戴假肢者与正常人的行走功能存在差异;不同类型假脚可能对患者步行能力产生影响。

关键词: 单侧小腿截肢, 步行, 假肢, 评定

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate walking ability of amputees with unilateral transtibial prosthesis. MethodsFrom April to December, 2016, 20 unilateral transtibial amputees (patients) and 20 healthy adults (controls) were tested with L test, balance test, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and 1000 m walking outdoor on various terrain. ResultsThere was no significant difference in time of L test between the amputees wearing Solid Ankle Cushion Heel (SACH) and Storage Foot (t=0.675, P>0.05). In balance tests, there was no significant difference in the total track length, confidence ellipse area, maximum horizontal deviation and maximum vertical deviation between the patients and the controls (t<0.803, P>0.05). Each parameter was significantly different in 6MWT between them (t>2.774, P<0.01), as well as the time and energy expenditure of outdoor 1000 m walk test (t>4.130, P<0.001). ConclusionThe walking ability of the unilateral transtibial amputees wearing prostheses is different from normal people. The transtibial prosthetic feet that the amputees wear may impact their walking ability.

Key words: unilateral transtibial amputation, walking, prostheses, evaluation

中图分类号:

R687.5

魏艳琴, 曹学军, 杨平, 蔡丽飞. 单侧小腿截肢者穿戴假肢后行走功能的评价[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(3): 358-362.

WEI Yan-qin, CAO Xue-jun, YANG Ping, CAI Li-fei. Walking Ability of Unilateral Transtibial Amputees with Prostheses[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2017, 23(3): 358-362.

参考文献

[1] 崔寿昌. 现代截肢应注意的问题[J]. 中国骨肿瘤骨病, 2002, 1(2): 78-82.
[2] 魏艳琴,曹学军,杨平,等. 下肢截肢者穿戴假肢行走能力的评价[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(7): 855-859.
[3] Reid L, Thomson P, Besemann M, et al. Going places: dose the two-minute walk test predict the six-minute walk test in lower extremity amputees [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2015, 47(3): 256-261.
[4] 刁子龙,曹学军,杨平,等. 单侧大腿截肢者步行能力研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(4): 470-474.
[5] Lamoth CJ, Ainsworth E, Polomski W, et al. Variability and stability analysis of walking of transfemoral amputees [J]. Med Eng Phys, 2010, 32(9): 1009-1014.
[6] 马鑫鑫,曹学军,杨平,等. 双小腿截肢者假肢辅助下行走能力的评价[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 588-591.
[7] Miller WC, Deathe AB. A prospective study examining balance confidence among individuals with lower limb amputation [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2004, 26(14-15): 875-881.
[8] Deathe AB, Miller WC. The L test of functional mobility: measurement properties of a modified version of the timed "up & go" test designed for people with lower-limb amputations [J]. Phys Ther, 2005, 85(7): 626-635.
[9] Sheehan RC, Beltran EJ, Dingwell JB, et al. Mediolateral angular momentum changes in persons with amputation during perturbed walking [J]. Gait Posture, 2015, 41(3): 795-800.
[10] Kaufman KR, Wyatt MP, Sessoms PH, et al. Task-specific fall prevention training is effective for warfighters with transtibial amputations [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(10): 3076-3084.
[11] Wong DW, Lam WK, Yeung LF, et al. Does long-distance walking improve or deteriorate walking stability of transtibial amputees [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2015, 30(8): 867-873.
[12] 恽晓平. 康复评定学[M]. 北京:华夏出版社, 2004: 128.
[13] Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, et al. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84(6): 803-811.
[14] 杨明,恽晓平,李炜垣,等. 穿戴下肢假肢者站立平衡功能的定量评定[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2003, 25(5): 44-46.
[15] Kark L, McIntosh AS, Simmons A. The use of the 6-min walk test as a proxy for the assessment of energy expenditure during gait inindividuals with lower-limb amputation [J]. Int J Rehabil Res, 2011, 34(3): 227-234.
[16] Gailey R. Predictive outcome measures versus functional outcome measures in the lower limb amputee [J]. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2005, 18(6): 51-60.
[17] Richardson JK, Thies SB, Demott TK, et al. A comparison of gait characteristics between older women with and without peripheral neuropathy in standard and challenging environments [J]. Am Geriatr Soc, 2004, 52(9): 1532-1537.
[18] 赵辉三. 假肢与矫形器学[M]. 2版. 北京:华夏出版社, 2013: 64.
[19] Yeung LF, Leung AK, Zhang M, et al. Long-distance walking effects on trans-tibial amputees compensatory gait patterns and implications on prosthetic designs and training [J]. Gait Posture, 2012, 35(2): 328-333.
[20] Wurdeman SR, Myers SA, Stergiou N. Transtibial amputee joint motion has increased attractor divergence during walking compared to non-amputee gait [J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2013, 41(4): 806-813.
[21] Legro MW, Reiber GE, Czerniecki JM, et al. Recreational activities of lower-limb amputees with prostheses [J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2001, 38(3): 319-325.
[22] Robinett CS, Vondran MA. Functional ambulation velocity and distance requirements in rural and urban communities: a clinical report [J]. Phys Ther, 1988, 68(9): 1371-1373.
[23] Narang IC, Mathur BP, Singh P, et al. Functional capabilities of lower limbamputees [J]. Prosthet Orthot Int, 1984, 8(1): 43-51.
[24] Sanderson DJ, Martin PE. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic adaptations in unilateral below-knee amputees during walking [J]. Gait Posture, 1997, 6(2): 126-136.
[25] Su PF, Gard SA, Lipschutz RD, et al. Gait characteristics of persons with bilateral transtibial amputations [J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2007, 44(4): 491-502.
[26] Perry J, Burnfield JM. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function [M]. 2nd ed. Thorofare, New Jersey: Slack, 2010.
[27] Doyle SS, Lemaire ED, Besemann M, et al. Changes to level ground transtibial amputee gait with a weighted backpack [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2014, 29(2): 149-154.
[28] Doyle SS, Lemaire ED, Besemann M, et al. Changes to transtibial amputee gait with aweighted backpack on multiple surfaces [J]. Clin Biomec (Bristol, Avon), 2015, 30(10): 1119-1124.
[29] Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, et al. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1976, 58(1): 42-46.
[30] Waters RL, Mulroy S. The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait [J]. Gait Posture, 1999, 9(3): 207-231.
[31] Fisher SV, Gullickson Jr G. Energy cost of ambulation in health and disability: a literature review [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1978, 59(3): 124-133.
[32] DuBow LL, Witt PL, Kadaba MP, et al. Oxygen consumption of elderly persons with bilateral below knee amputations: ambulation vs wheelchair propulsion [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1983, 64(6): 255-259.

单侧小腿截肢者穿戴假肢后行走功能的评价

Walking Ability of Unilateral Transtibial Amputees with Prostheses

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	魏梦力, 钟亚平, 周易文, 桂辉贤, 关烨明, 于婷婷. 单侧前交叉韧带重建患者步行双侧下肢肌肉协同模式差异[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 95-104.
[2]	胡晓诗, 张琦, 岳青, 梁艳华, 李晓松, 冯啊美, 张燕庆. 矫形弹力绷带对痉挛性偏瘫脑性瘫痪患儿步态对称性和步行能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1083-1089.
[3]	张意彬, 吕杰, 喻洪流. 基于模糊逻辑算法的智能膝关节假肢步态相位识别[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 896-902.
[4]	张倩, 孙新亭. 视频镜像训练对脑卒中恢复期患者下肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 703-707.
[5]	赵雅娴, 唐芷晴, 孙新亭, 王荣荣, 刘天昊, 张皓. 不同强度穿戴式下肢康复机器人训练对脑卒中后下肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 497-503.
[6]	金振华, 陈玲, 刘勇. 基于自我效能理论的数字化步行功能训练对脑卒中患者下肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 504-509.
[7]	张意彬, 李剑峰, 喻洪流. 一种智能膝关节假肢及其步态对称性评价[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 402-407.
[8]	王路, 陈艳, 苏久龙, 杜志伟, 于瑞, 胡楠, 曾一鸣, 余绵绚, 洪靖. 三维运动平台训练对脑卒中患者平衡与步行功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 485-490.
[9]	马启寿, 李中元, 符卫卫, 林茜. 重复经颅磁刺激对恢复期脑卒中患者步行的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(2): 167-173.
[10]	魏天祺, 罗家麒, 李紫娟, 吴雪良, 许攀攀, 张艳美, 赵晓萌, 吴勤峰. 基于丰富环境的增强现实训练对脑卒中步行功能的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1439-1445.
[11]	祝莉洁,贠国俊,张伟云,刘青,曹建国. 超声成像技术在痉挛型脑性瘫痪患儿腓肠肌定量评定中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(9): 1079-1083.
[12]	马玉宝,王晨曦,高维广,樊志娇,马全胜,孙凤龙. 体表感觉训练对前交叉韧带重建术后患者足偏角和足底冲量的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(9): 1096-1103.
[13]	柴丽,王梅. 基于ICF脑卒中核心分类组合评价轨道减重步行训练对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能康复的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(6): 653-658.
[14]	王亚囡,刘惠林,朱琳,杜雪晶,朱晓敏,刘元旻. 水中平板步行训练对脑卒中偏瘫患者双侧腹肌厚度及平衡功能的疗效[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(5): 524-529.
[15]	栾会芹,毕经芳,吴赛男,任韦燕,刘红梅,张莹莹,李增勇. 假肢接受腔内衬套的细胞毒性及力学性能检测[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(4): 479-483.