神经束路示踪技术在脊髓损伤与再生研究中的应用进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.06.008

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 657-661.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.06.008

神经束路示踪技术在脊髓损伤与再生研究中的应用进展

李琬悦¹, 丁煜萌¹, 王曦²

1.第四军医大学学员一旅,陕西西安市 710032;
2.第四军医大学基础部神经生物学教研室暨脑科学协同创新中心,陕西西安市 710032。

收稿日期:2016-10-18 修回日期:2016-11-08 出版日期:2017-06-25 发布日期:2017-06-27
通讯作者: 王曦,女,博士,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向：中枢神经系统损伤及修复。E-mail: wangzh@fmmu.edu.cn。
作者简介:李琬悦(1994-),女,汉族,四川沐川县人,本科生。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.81171156)

Application of Neural Tract Tracing Techniques in Study of Spinal Cord Injury and Regeneration (review)

LI Wan-yue¹, DING Yu-meng¹, WANG Xi²

1. First Pragade of Undergraduates, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China;
2. Department of Neurobiology and Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, School of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China

Received:2016-10-18 Revised:2016-11-08 Published:2017-06-25 Online:2017-06-27
Contact: Correspondence to WANG Xi. E-mail: wangzh@fmmu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 脊髓损伤是神经科学领域重要的研究方向之一,而神经束路示踪技术是其重要的研究手段。脊髓中神经纤维性质复杂,在人类和动物间存在很多分布差异。本文对神经束路示踪技术、脊髓损伤易累及的主要神经纤维的分布特点和在种属间的差异及神经束路示踪技术在脊髓损伤与再生研究中的应用进行综述。

关键词: 脊髓损伤, 神经束路示踪技术, 逆行示踪, 顺行示踪, 跨节示踪, 综述

Abstract: Spinal cord injury is one of the important field of neuroscience, and neural tract tracing techniques are important research tools. The neural fiber types in the spinal cord are complex, and there are some difference in structures between human beings and animals. This article reviewed different types of neural fibers closely related with spinal cord injury and regeneration, the difference between human beings and animals, and the application of neural tract tracing techniques in the study of spinal cord injury and regeneration.

Key words: spinal cord injury, neural tract tracing technique, retrograde tracing, anterograde tracing, transganglionic tracing, review

中图分类号:

R651.2

李琬悦, 丁煜萌, 王曦. 神经束路示踪技术在脊髓损伤与再生研究中的应用进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(6): 657-661.

LI Wan-yue, DING Yu-meng, WANG Xi. Application of Neural Tract Tracing Techniques in Study of Spinal Cord Injury and Regeneration (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2017, 23(6): 657-661.

参考文献

[1] Schwab JM, Brechtel K, Mueller CA, et al. Experimental strategies to promote spinal cord regeneration–an integrative perspective [J]. Prog Neurobiol, 2006, 78(2): 91-116.
[2] Fakhoury M. Spinal cord injury: overview of experimental approaches used to restore locomotor activity [J]. Rev Neurosci, 2015, 26(4): 397-405.
[3] 李建军,周红俊,洪毅,等. 2002年北京市脊髓损伤发病率调查[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2004, 10(7): 412-413.
[4] Tuszynski MH, Steward O. Concepts and methods for the study of axonal regeneration in the CNS [J]. Neuron, 2012, 74(5): 777-791.
[5] Okano H. Strategic approaches to regeneration of a damaged central nervous system [J]. Cornea, 2011, 30(Suppl 1): S15-S18.
[6] Lanciego JL, Wouterlood FG. A half century of experimental neuroanatomical tracing [J]. J Chem Neuroanat, 2011, 42(3): 157-183.
[7] Wouterlood FG. Laser Scanning Microscopy and Quantitative Image Analysis of Neuronal Tissue [M]. New York: Humanna Press, 2014: 51-86.
[8] Wouterlood FG, Bloem B, Mansvelder HD, et al. A fourth generation of neuroanatomical tracing techniques: exploiting the offspring of genetic engineering [J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2014, 235: 331-348.
[9] Nauta WJ. Selective silver impregnation of degenerating axons in the central nervous system [J]. Stain Technol, 1952, 27(3): 175-179.
[10] Fink RP, Heimer L. Two methods for selective silver impregnation of degenerating axons and their synaptic endings in the central nervous system [J]. Brain Res, 1967, 4(4): 369-374.
[11] 朱贺,徐丽丽,李丽,等. 常用神经示踪剂及其示踪特点研究进展[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2009, 4(4): 288-290
[12] Roozbehi A, Joghataei MT, Bakhtiyari M, et al. Age-associated changes on axonal regeneration and functional outcome after spinal cord injury in rats [J]. Acta Med Iran, 2015, 53(5): 281-286.
[13] Hanna A, Thompson DL, Hellenbrand DJ, et al. Sustained release of neurotrophin-3 via calcium phosphate-coated sutures promotes axonal regeneration after spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurosci Res, 2016, 94(7): 645-652.
[14] Dengler-Crish CM, Smith MA, Inman DM, et al. Anterograde transport blockade precedes deficits in retrograde transport in the visual projection of the DBA/2J mouse model of glaucoma [J]. Front Neurosci, 2014, 8: 290
[15] Kikukawa S, Kawaguchi S, Mizoguchi A, et al. Regeneration of dorsal column axons after spinal cord injury in young rats [J]. Neurosci Lett, 1998, 249(2-3): 135-138.
[16] Bayless DW, Daniel JM. Sex differences in myelin-associated protein levels within and density of projections between the orbital frontal cortex and dorsal striatum of adult rats: implications for inhibitory control [J]. Neuroscience, 2015, 300: 286-296
[17] Reiner A, Veenman CL, Medina L, et al. Pathway tracing using biotinylated dextran amines [J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2000, 103(1): 23-37.
[18] Lai BQ, Qiu XC, Zhang K, et al. Cholera toxin B subunit shows transneuronal tracing after injection in an injured sciatic nerve [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(12): e0144030
[19] Buffelli M, Burgess RW, Feng G, et al. Genetic evidence that relative synaptic efficacy biases the outcome of synaptic competition [J]. Nature, 2003, 424(6947): 430-434.
[20] Bareyre FM, Kerschensteiner M, Misgeld T, et al. Transgenic labeling of the corticospinal tract for monitoring axonal responses to spinal cord injury [J]. Nat Med, 2005, 11(12):1355-1360.
[21] Willenberg R, Steward O. Non-specific labeling limits the utility of Cre-Lox bred CST-YFP mice for studies of corticospinal tract regeneration [J]. J Comp Neurol, 2015, 523(18): 2665-2682.
[22] Rosenzweig ES, Brock JH, Culbertson MD, et al. Extensive spinal decussation and bilateral termination of cervical corticospinal projections in Rhesus monkeys [J]. J Comp Neurol, 2009, 513(2): 151-163.
[23] Weidner N, Ner A, Salimi N, et al. Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001, 98(6): 3513-3518.
[24] Danilov CA, Steward O. Conditional genetic deletion of PTEN after a spinal cord injury enhances regenerative growth of CST axons and motor function recovery in mice [J]. Exp Neurol, 2015, 266: 147-160.
[25] Freund P, Schmidlin E, Wannier T, et al. Anti-Nogo-A antibody treatment promotes recovery of manual dexterity after unilateral cervical lesion in adult primates-re-examination and extension of behavioral data [J]. Eur J Neurosci, 2009, 29(5): 983-996.
[26] Hoogewoud F, Hamadjida A, Wyss AF, et al. Comparison of functional recovery of manual dexterity after unilateral spinal cord lesion or motor cortex lesion in adult macaque monkeys [J]. Front Neurol, 2013, 4: 101.
[27] Nakagawa H, Ninomiya1 T, Yamashita T, et al. Reorganization of corticospinal tract fibers after spinal cord injury in adult macaques [J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 11986.
[28] Wannier-Morino P, Schmidlin E, Freund P, et al. Fate of rubrospinal neurons after unilateral section of the cervical spinal cord in adult macaque monkeys: effects of an antibody treatment neutralizing Nogo-A [J]. Brain Res, 2008, 1217: 96-109.
[29] Morris R, Tosolini AP, Goldstein JD, et al. Impaired arpeggio movement in skilled reaching by rubrospinal tract lesions in the rat: a behavioral/anatomical fractionation [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2011, 28(12): 2439-2451.
[30] Yang HS, Kwon HG, Hong JH, et al. The rubrospinal tract in the human brain: diffusion tensor imaging study [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2011, 504(1):45-48.
[31] Mestre H, Ramirez M, Garcia E, et al. Lewis, Fischer 344, and Sprague-Dawley rats display differences in lipid peroxidation, motor recovery, and rubrospinal tract preservation after spinal cord injury [J]. Front Neurol, 2015, 6: 108.
[32] Weishaupt N, Hurd C, Wei DZ, et al. Reticulospinal plasticity after cervical spinal cord injury in the rat involves withdrawal of projections below the injury [J]. Exp Neurol, 2013, 247: 241-249.
[33] Filli L, Engmann AK, Weinmann O, et al. Bridging the gap: a reticulo-propriospinal detour bypassing an incomplete spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurosci, 2014, 34(40): 13399-13410.
[34] Bonner JF, Connors TM, Silverman WF, et al. Grafted neural progenitors integrate and restore synaptic connectivity across the injured spinal cord [J]. J Neurosci, 2011, 31(12): 4675-4686.
[35] Hoeber L, Trolle C, Konig N, et al. Human embryonic stem cell derived progenitors assist functional sensory axon regeneration after dorsal root avulsion injury [J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 10666.

神经束路示踪技术在脊髓损伤与再生研究中的应用进展

Application of Neural Tract Tracing Techniques in Study of Spinal Cord Injury and Regeneration (review)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[3]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[4]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[5]	刘冬, 徐子涵, 李江, 鞠萍. M1区联合背外侧前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛患者脑电图θ振幅的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 87-94.
[6]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[7]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[8]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[9]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[10]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[11]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[12]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[13]	李芳, 霍速, 杜巨豹, 刘秀贞, 李小爽, 宋为群. 经颅直流电刺激联合任务导向性康复训练对脊髓损伤大鼠前肢运动障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 777-781.
[14]	张园, 杨剑. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的学校健康服务及效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 791-799.
[15]	王少璞, 陈钢. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的心理行为健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 800-807.