发声复述及延迟时间对特定型语言障碍儿童新词命名学习的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.04.015

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 448-454.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.04.015

发声复述及延迟时间对特定型语言障碍儿童新词命名学习的影响

KIM Ha-kyung¹，王艳霞²,沈双²

1.华东师范大学教育学部教育康复学系，上海市 200062
2.滨州医学院特殊教育学院，山东烟台市 264003

出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-04-24
通讯作者: 王艳霞，E-mail： 2574042824@qq.com
作者简介:KIM Ha-kyung (1965-)，女，韩国釜山市人，博士，主要研究方向：言语语言病理学。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No. 31500765)

Impacts of Vocal Rehearsal and Retention Duration on Novel Word Naming in Children with Specific Language Impairment

Ha-kyung KIM¹,WANG Yan-xia², SHEN Shuang²

1.Department of Education and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
2.Department of Special Education College, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong 264003, China

Published:2019-04-20 Online:2019-04-24
Contact: WANG Yan-xia, E-mail： 2574042824@qq.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31500765)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨发声复述及延迟时间对特定型语言障碍(SLI)儿童新词命名学习的影响。方法 2017年11月至12月，来自普通幼儿园的儿童45例分为SLI组、生理年龄匹配组和语言能力匹配组，每组15例。采用3(组别)×2(发声复述：有/无)×2(延迟时间：10 s/5 min)三因素混合实验设计，考察发声复述和延迟时间对SLI儿童新词命名学习的影响。结果组别主效应显著(F = 3.706, P < 0.05)，发声复述主效应非常显著(F = 25.570, P < 0.001)，延迟时间主效应非常显著(F = 226.746, P < 0.001)；发声复述和延迟时间交互效应非常显著(F = 22.808, P < 0.001)，延迟时间和组别交互效应显著(F = 3.739, P < 0.05)。其他因素交互效应均不显著。结论 SLI儿童存在新词命名学习缺陷，发声复述策略能减少新词语音信息在短时记忆中的衰退，改善新词命名。

关键词: 特定型语言障碍, 新词命名, 发声复述, 延迟时间

Abstract: Objective To explore impacts of vocal rehearsal and retention duration on novel word naming in children with specific language impairment (SLI). Methods November to December, 2017, 45 children from kindergartens were selected in SLI group (n = 15), physiological age matching group (n = 15) and language ability matching group (n = 15). A three-factor mixed experimental design was used to investigate the effects of three factors: groups, vocal rehearsal (with/without) and retention duration (ten seconds/five minutes). Results The main effects of groups (F = 3.706, P < 0.05), vocal rehearsal (F = 25.570, P < 0.001) and retention duration (F = 226.746, P < 0.001) were significant. The interaction effects of vocal rehearsal×retention duration (F = 22.808, P < 0.001) and retention duration×groups (F = 3.739, P < 0.05) were significant. The interaction effects between other factors were not significant. Conclusion There are novel word naming learning defects in SLI children. However, the vocal rehearsal strategy may promote novel word naming learning and reduce the decline of novel word phonological information in short-term memory, to improve the phenomenon of novel word naming defects.

Key words: specific language impairment, novel word naming learning, vocal rehearsal, retention duration

中图分类号:

R493

KIM Ha-kyung,王艳霞,沈双. 发声复述及延迟时间对特定型语言障碍儿童新词命名学习的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(4): 448-454.

Ha-kyung KIM,WANG Yan-xia,SHEN Shuang. Impacts of Vocal Rehearsal and Retention Duration on Novel Word Naming in Children with Specific Language Impairment[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(4): 448-454.

参考文献

[1] 锜宝香,张旭志,洪书婷. 学前特定型语言障碍儿童进入小学的追踪研究：语言、识字表现之探讨[J]. 特殊教育学报, 2012(36): 61-92.
[2] LeonardL B. Children with Specific Language Impairment [M]. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2000: 3-337.
[3] 许月琴. 台北市五岁儿童特定型语言障碍之调查研究[D]. 台北:台湾师范大学, 1999.
[4] 姚晓菊. 普通幼儿园低龄儿童特定型语言障碍的调查报告[J]. 考试周刊, 2013(53): 194-195.
[5] 许瑾,刘小燕,吴德,等. 4~5岁普通话特定型语言障碍儿童的筛检与诊断[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2012(6): 430-434.
[6] 张放放. 4-6岁汉语特定型语言障碍儿童叙述语言发展研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2010.
[7] Befi-LopesD M, SilvaC P F D, BentoA C P, et al. Semantic representation and naming in children with specific language impairment [J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2002, 45(5): 998-1014.
[8] RiceM L, OettingJ B, MarquisJ, et al. Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment [J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1994, 37(1): 106-122.
[9] 程晓荣,范炤,周宗奎. 英语新词学习认知机制的研究进展：语音工作记忆还是语音敏感性？[J]. 心理学进展, 2014(4): 64-69.
[10] GuptaP, TisdaleJ. Word learning, phonological short-term memory, phonotactic probability and long-term memory: towards an integrated framework [J]. Phil Trans R Soc Lond, 2009, 364(1536): 3755-3771.
[11] GathercoleS E. Nonword repetition and word learning: the nature of the relationship [J]. Appl Psycholinguist, 2006, 27(4): 513-544.
[12] StanovichK E, SiegelL S. Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: a regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model [J]. Brit J Educ Psychol, 1994, 86(1): 24-53.
[13] ContiramsdenG, BottingN, FaragherB. Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI) [J]. J Child Psychol Psychiat, 2001, 42(6): 741-748.
[14] ThornA S C, GathercoleS E. Language differences in verbal short-term memory do not exclusively originate in the process of subvocal rehearsal [J]. Psychon B Rev, 2001, 8(2): 357-364.
[15] BaddeleyA. Working memory [J]. Science, 1992, 255(5044): 556-559.
[16] HenryL A, TurnerJ E, SmithP T, et al. Modality effects and the development of the word length effect in children [J]. Memory, 2000, 8(1): 1-17.
[17] GranottN, ParzialeJ. Microdevelopment-Transition Processes in Development and Learning [M]. Cambridge: CUP Press, 2002.
[18] BjorklundD F, MillerP H, CoyleT R, et al. Instructing children to use memory strategies: evidence of utilization deficiencies in memory training studies [J]. Dev Rev, 1997, 17(4): 411-441.
[19] BaddeleyA D. Working Memory [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, 1986.
[20] GillC B, Klecan-AkerJ, RobertsT, et al. Following directions: rehearsal and visualization strategies for children with specific language impairment [J]. Child Lang Teach Ther, 2003, 19(1): 85-103.
[21] AltM. Phonological working memory impairments in children with specific language impairment: Where does the problem lie? [J]. J Commun Disord, 2011, 44(2): 173-185.
[22] AltM, SpauldingT. The effect of time on word learning: an examination of decay of the memory trace and vocal rehearsal in children with and without specific language impairment [J]. J Commun Disord, 2011, 44(6): 640-654.
[23] LeeS J, HaJ W, KooM M, et al. Delayed non-word repetition according to rehearsal conditions in 6- to 7-year-old children [J]. Commun Sci Disord, 2016, 21(1): 69-83.
[24] 张静云. 汉语学龄儿童快速映射非词记忆能力研究[D]. 天津:天津师范大学, 2014.
[25] 马笑. 语素义对汉语特异性语言损伤儿童词语学习的影响[D]. 南京:南京师范大学, 2016.
[26] LeonardL B, WeismerS E, MillerC A, et al. Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children [J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2007, 50(2): 408-428.
[27] EllisW S, EvansJ, HeskethL J. An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment [J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 1999, 42(5): 1249-1260.
[28] PageM P A, NorrisD. The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall [J]. Psychol Rev, 1998, 105(4): 761-781.
[29] 骞心曼. 3-6岁台湾特定型语言障碍儿童的辞汇习得——以图片命名作业为例[D]. 桃园:中原大学, 2006.
[30] 郑振宇. 2267名2-6岁儿童汉语单音节词语音发展状况调查[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2007.
[31] RyuE J, HaJ W. The effect of vocal rehearsal on retrieval of new phonological representations in children with and without specific language impairment [J]. Commun Sci Disord, 2016, 21(4): 605-616.
[32] 陈昱君. 学前特定型语言障碍儿童新词学习与音韵处理能力之探究[D]. 台北:台湾师范大学, 2012.
[33] 桑标,缪小春. 皮博迪图片词汇测验修订版(PPVT-R)——上海市区试用常模的修订[J]. 心理科学通讯, 1990(5): 22-27.
[34] LeeS, YimD. Nonword production performance according to vocal rehearsal condition in children with language delay [J]. Commun Sci Disord, 2017, 22(3): 471-484.

发声复述及延迟时间对特定型语言障碍儿童新词命名学习的影响

Impacts of Vocal Rehearsal and Retention Duration on Novel Word Naming in Children with Specific Language Impairment

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘小燮, 褚红玲, 刘美, 郭艾鑫, 王思远, 曾凡硕, 江山, 谢欲晓, 周谋望. 2022年医学期刊发表中国康复医学指南和共识的科学性、透明性和适用性评级[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1365-1376.
[2]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于ICD-11和ICF的活动和参与与生活质量测量工具的内容比较[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1454-1464.
[3]	李经宇, 吕云, 辛雨, 李硕, 彭思静, 密忠祥. 城市医疗集团康复患者向下转诊意愿及影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1481-1488.
[4]	廖婷, 丛芳, 黄昆仑. 残疾儿童水中运动康复的健康与功能效益：基于ICD-11和ICF的系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(11): 1286-1295.
[5]	刘梦雅, 张利, 张梦, 宋楠楠, 周静蕾. 中国老年人内在能力与日常生活活动的相关性：基于CHARLS数据[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(10): 1140-1146.
[6]	唐家玉, 邱服冰. 老年人心理社会干预与心理健康的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(10): 1164-1170.
[7]	张宁, 杨远滨, 田浩林, 万梦莹. 功能性近红外光谱应用于康复领域的可视化分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(10): 1171-1178.
[8]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[9]	陈渔, 郭峰, 郭建瑞, 董彤彤, 夏雪莲. 镜像视觉反馈训练中大脑运动皮质激活的脑电特征研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 967-976.
[10]	马甜甜, 于子夫, 秦芳, 冷晓轩, 刘西花. 强制性运动疗法在康复领域应用的可视化分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 822-832.
[11]	王雨生, 贾子善, 张攻孜, 左秀芹, 孙彤, 赵艺扬. 人体自主平衡恢复过程中姿势调控的个体影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 590-594.
[12]	邱晓, 凌骏麒, 从洋洋, 白玉龙. 3D扫描容积法评定上肢远端体积的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 364-367.
[13]	张雪茹, 陈思齐, 胡伟斌, 刘巧云. 基于ICF-CY的残疾儿童综合性口语沟通功能调查[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 320-325.
[14]	张叶凡, 张晗, 张艳秋, 石志学, 邢洋, 嵇丽红, 蔡伟芹, 高倩倩, 高润国, 陈晓云, 井淇. 基于地理重心模型2011年至2021年残联系统康复人员分布研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(1): 64-70.
[15]	张元鸣飞,杨延砚,张娜,刘京宇,刘小燮,张之良,周谋望. 2021年度国家康复医学专业医疗服务与质量安全报告[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(12): 1365-1379.