经颅直流电刺激对卒中后失语患者视听觉通道命名的效果

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.05.002

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 506-512.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.05.002

• 专题脑卒中并发症康复 • 上一篇下一篇

经颅直流电刺激对卒中后失语患者视听觉通道命名的效果

陶媛媛¹, 孙蓉², 乐捷², 米海霞², 杜晓霞^1,2,3, 宋鲁平^1,2,3

1.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市 100068
2.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院神经康复科，北京市 100068
3.神经损伤与康复北京市重点实验室，北京市 100068

收稿日期:2019-03-05 修回日期:2019-04-17 出版日期:2019-05-25 发布日期:2019-05-29
通讯作者: 宋鲁平(1964-)，女，汉族，山东人，主任医师、教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向：神经康复、认知神经科学。E-mail: songluping882002@aliyun.com
作者简介:陶媛媛(1994-)，女，汉族，安徽芜湖市人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：神经康复。
基金资助:
1.中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No. 2016CZ-6)；2.国家重点研发计划重点专项(No. 2016YFF0201002)；3.中国康复研究中心项目(No. 2017ZX-12)

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Naming of Visual and Auditory Modality in Post-stroke Aphasia

TAO Yuan-yuan¹, SUN Rong², LE Jie², MI Hai-xia², DU Xiao-xia^1,2,3, SONG Lu-ping^1,2,3

1.Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China
2.Neurological Rehabilitation Department, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
3.Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurological Injury and Rehabilitation, Beijing 100068, China

Received:2019-03-05 Revised:2019-04-17 Published:2019-05-25 Online:2019-05-29
Contact: SONG Lu-ping, E-mail: songluping882002@aliyun.com
Supported by:
Special Fund Project for Basic Scientific Research Business of Central Public Scientific Research Institute (No. 2016CZ-6), National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFF0201002) and China Rehabilitation Research Center Project (No. 2017ZX-12)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对恢复期卒中后失语患者视听觉通道命名能力的影响。方法 2018年3月至11月，32例恢复期卒中后失语患者随机分为对照组和实验组，各16例。实验组在左侧额下回(L-IFG)实施阳极tDCS，对照组实施假tDCS，刺激的同时行语言训练。治疗前和治疗2周后，采用西方失语症成套测试(WAB)、图片命名测试和环境声音命名测试进行评定。结果对照组15例、实验组16例完成实验。治疗后，两组WAB失语商均显著提高(t > 5.081, P < 0.001)，治疗前后差值两组间无显著性差异(t = 1.550, P > 0.05)；两组图片命名评分均明显提高(Z > 2.650, P < 0.01)，治疗前后差值实验组高于对照组(Z = -2.258, P < 0.05)；实验组WAB实物命名评分明显提高(Z = -3.239, P < 0.01)，治疗前后差值实验组明显高于对照组(Z = -3.008, P < 0.01)；实验组环境声音命名评分显著提高(t = -4.745, P < 0.001)，治疗前后差值实验组高于对照组(t = 2.224, P < 0.05)；实验组WAB自发命名、WAB完成句子、WAB反应命名评分均提高(Z > 2.191, P < 0.05)，对照组WAB自发命名评分提高(Z = -2.376, P < 0.05)，治疗前后差值两组间均无显著性差异(Z < 1.568, P > 0.05)。结论 tDCS阳极刺激L-IFG对视觉和听觉通道的命名能力均有改善作用，可能通过影响语义或语音加工提高命名能力。

关键词: 脑卒中, 失语, 经颅直流电刺激, 命名, 视觉通道, 听觉通道

Abstract: Objective To observe the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the naming of visual and auditory modality in patients with post-stroke aphasia.Methods From March to November, 2018, 32 patients with post-stroke aphasia were randomly divided into control group (n = 16) and treatment group (n = 16). The treatment group accepted anodal-tDCS (A-tDCS) over left-inferior frontal gyrus (L-IFG) concurrent with speech training, while the control group accepted sham-tDCS. Before and two weeks after treatment, they were assessed with Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), Picture Naming Test and Environmental Sound Naming Test. Results One patient was lost in the control group. After treatment, Aphasia Quotient of WAB improved in both groups (t > 5.081, P < 0.001), but the difference before and after treatment was not significantly different between two groups (t = 1.550, P > 0.05); the Picture Naming Test score improved in both groups (Z > 2.650, P < 0.01), and the difference before and after treatment was more in the treatment group than in the control group (Z = -2.258, P < 0.05); the object naming score of WAB improved in the treatment group (Z = -3.239, P < 0.01), and the difference before and after treatment was more in the treatment group than in the control group (Z = -3.008, P < 0.01); the score of Environment Sound Naming Test improved in the treatment group (t = -4.745, P < 0.001), and the difference before and after treatment was more in the treatment group than in the control group (t = 2.224, P < 0.05). The scores of spontaneous naming, sentences complement and reaction naming of WAB improved in the treatment group (Z > 2.191, P < 0.05), while the score of spontaneous naming of WAB improved in the control group (Z = -2.376, P < 0.05), but the differences before and after treatment were not significantly different between two groups (Z < 1.568, P > 0.05). Conclusion A-tDCS over L-IFG may improve the naming ability of visual and auditory modality, which may associate with semantic or phonetic processing.

Key words: stroke, aphasia, transcranial direct current stimulation, naming, visual modality, auditory modality

中图分类号:

R743.3

陶媛媛, 孙蓉, 乐捷, 米海霞, 杜晓霞, 宋鲁平. 经颅直流电刺激对卒中后失语患者视听觉通道命名的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(5): 506-512.

TAO Yuan-yuan, SUN Rong, LE Jie, MI Hai-xia, DU Xiao-xia, SONG Lu-ping. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Naming of Visual and Auditory Modality in Post-stroke Aphasia[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(5): 506-512.

参考文献

1 BerthierM L. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment [J]. Drugs Aging, 2005, 22(2): 163-182.
2 徐舒,李泓钰,杜晓霞,等. 经颅直流电刺激治疗脑卒中后失语研究进展[J]. 中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2018, 18(6): 461-466.
3 陈文莉,单春雷. 非侵入性脑刺激在失语症治疗中的应用[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2014, 36(1): 67-71.
4 de AguiarV, PaolazziC L, MiceliG. tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: the role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment andpatient characteristics [J]. Cortex, 2015, 63: 296-316.
5 MontenegroI R, Alvarez-MontesinosJ A, EstudilloA J, et al. Direct current electrical stimulation in the treatment of aphasia [J]. Rev Neurol, 2017, 65(12): 553-562.
6 Gomez Palacio SchjetnanA, FarajiJ, MetzG A, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a review of recent advancements [J]. Stroke Res Treat, 2013, 2013: 170256.
7 MarangoloP, FioriV, Di PaolaM, et al. Differential involvement of the left frontal and temporal regions in verb naming: a tDCS treatment study [J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2013, 31(1): 63-72.
8 CaramazzaA . How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? [J]. Cogn Neuropsychol, 1997, 14(1): 177-208.
9 HambergerM J, GoodmanR R, PerrineK, et al. Anatomic dissociation of auditory and visual naming in the lateral temporal cortex [J]. Neurology, 2001, 56(1): 56-61.
10 中华神经科学会,中华神经外科学会. 各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 1996, 29(6): 379-380.
11 NitscheM A, BiksonM. Extending the parameter range for tDCS: safety and tolerability of 4 mA stimulation [J]. Brain Stimul, 2017, 10(3): 541-542.
12 ChhatbarP Y, ChenR, DeardorffR, et al. Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients – a phase I current escalation study [J]. Brain Stimul, 2017, 10(3): 553-559.
13 李泓钰,王强,王静,等. 经颅直流电刺激对卒中后抑郁的疗效[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(5): 565-570.
14 A L JrRhoton. The cerebrum [J]. Neurosurgery, 2002, 51(Suppl 4): 1-51.
15 张清芳,杨玉芳. 影响图画命名时间的因素[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(4): 447-454.
16 FangY, HanZ, ZhongS, et al. The semantic anatomical network: evidence from healthy and brain-damaged patient populations [J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2015, 36(9): 3499-3515.
17 FangY, WangX, ZhongS, et al. Semantic representation in the white matter pathway [J]. PLoS Biol, 2018, 16(4): e2003993.
18 HanZ, MaY, GongG, et al. White matter structural connectivity underlying semantic processing: evidence from brain damaged patients [J]. Brain, 2013, 136(10): 2952-2965.
19 VestitoL, RoselliniS, ManteroM, et al. Long-term effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in chronic post-stroke aphasia: a pilot study [J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2014, 8: 785.
20 汪洁,吴东宇,宋为群,等. 双额叶在线经颅直流电刺激对失语症图命名的作用[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(1): 31-35.
21 肖露,魏凤芹,牟谷萼,等. 经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中恢复期Broca失语患者图命名能力的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2015, 37(11): 810-813.
22 槐雅萍,左秀芹,尹昱,等. 经颅直流电刺激对脑卒中患者失语症恢复的影响[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016, 22(10): 1137-1140.
23 MarcellM M, BorellaD, GreeneM, et al. Confrontation naming of environmental sounds [J]. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 2000, 22(6): 830-864.
24 BallasJ A, HowardJ H. Interpreting the language of environmental sounds [J]. Environ Behav, 1987, 19(1): 91-114.
25 SayginA P, DickF, BatesE. An online task for contrasting auditory processing in the verbal and nonverbal domains and norms for younger and older adults [J]. Behav Res Methods, 2005, 37(1): 99-110.
26 BrandtJ, BakkerA, MaroofD A. Auditory confrontation naming in Alzheimer's disease [J]. Clin Neuropsychol, 2010, 24(8): 1326-1338.
27 舒华,柏晓利,韩在柱,等. 词汇表征和加工理论及其认知神经心理学证据[J]. 应用心理学, 2003, 9(2): 41-45.
28 IndefreyP, LeveltW J. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components [J]. Cognition, 2004, 92(1-2): 101-144.
29 PriceC J, FristonK J. Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments [J]. Neuroimage, 1997, 5(4 Pt1): 261-270.
30 PriceC J. The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging [J]. J Anat, 2000, 197(Pt 3): 335-359.
31 LewisJ W, WightmanF L, BrefczynskiJ A, et al. Human brain regions involved in recognizing environmental sounds [J]. Cereb Cortex, 2004, 14(9): 1008-1021.
32 王穗苹,黄健. 语言理解中的语义加工:不同模态神经影像的研究[J]. 生理学报, 2019, 71(1): 127-139.
33 LauE F, PhillipsC, PoeppelD. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2008, 9(12): 920-933.
34 MarangoloP, FioriV, CalpagnanoM A, et al. tDCS over the left inferior frontal cortex improves speech production in aphasia [J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2013, 7(2): 539-549.
35 MarangoloP, FioriV, CampanaS, et al. Something to talk about: enhancement of linguistic cohesion through tDCS in chronic non fluent aphasia [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2014, 53(1): 246-256.
36 RussoC, Souza CarneiroM I, BologniniN, et al. Safety review of transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke [J]. Neuromodulation, 2017, 20(3): 215-222.
37 关龙舟,魏云,李小俚. 经颅电刺激——一项具有发展前景的脑刺激技术[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2015, 30(11): 1-5.
38 ChhatbarP Y, GeorgeM S, KautzS A, et al. Quantitative reassessment of safety limits of tDCS for two animal studies [J]. Brain Stimul, 2017, 10(5): 1011-1012.

[1]	周治宁, 周容, 肖燕文, 王博文, 吕娇娇, 刘宇. 多靶区经颅直流电刺激对健康成年人工作记忆-姿势控制双任务表现的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 21-28.
[2]	林娜, 高菡璐, 卢惠苹, 陈燕清, 郑军凡, 陈述荣. 虚拟现实技术对脑卒中上肢功能影响的弥散张量成像研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 61-67.
[3]	王昊懿, 史亚伟, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 主观垂直感知障碍对脑卒中患者功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 68-73.
[4]	陈珺雯, 陈谦, 陈程, 李淑月, 刘玲玲, 吴存书, 龚翔, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 改良八段锦身体活动对脑卒中患者心肺功能、运动功能和日常生活活动能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 74-80.
[5]	胡永林, 马颖, 窦超, 陆安民, 江小鸽, 宋新建, 肖玉华. 肩部控制训练联合神经松动术对脑卒中偏瘫患者肩痛及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 81-86.
[6]	王贺, 韩靓, 阚梦凡, 于少泓. 电刺激治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征有效性的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1048-1056.
[7]	孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 王耀霆, 王红雨, 闫兴洲. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 875-881.
[8]	王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895.
[9]	王海云, 王寅, 周信杰, 何爱群. 基于“中枢-外周-中枢”理论的经颅直流电刺激结合针刺干预脑卒中患者中枢及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 919-925.
[10]	陈怡婷, 王倩, 崔慎红, 李映彩, 张思鈺, 魏衍旭, 任慧, 冷军, 陈斌. 双侧序贯重复经颅磁刺激干预脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 926-932.
[11]	李振亚, 孙洁, 郭鹏飞, 王光明. 脑卒中患者口期和咽期吞咽功能改变与误吸的相关性：基于电视透视吞咽检查[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 933-939.
[12]	李芳, 霍速, 杜巨豹, 刘秀贞, 李小爽, 宋为群. 经颅直流电刺激联合任务导向性康复训练对脊髓损伤大鼠前肢运动障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 777-781.
[13]	华玲, 张一楠, 郑玉, 孙俏仪, 房辉, 宋达. 手控节律音乐治疗对脑卒中后单侧空间忽略的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 833-838.
[14]	蒋孝翠, 刘臻, 苏清伦, 赵秦, 夏晓昧, 陆飞. 间歇性Theta节律经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后非流利性失语的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 839-843.
[15]	许苗苗, 李楠, 应颖, 杨凯翔, 杨婧瑞, 李杰, 邱彦群. 重复外周磁刺激对左右颈7神经交叉移位术后脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 686-690.

经颅直流电刺激对卒中后失语患者视听觉通道命名的效果

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Naming of Visual and Auditory Modality in Post-stroke Aphasia

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0