F波最小潜伏期对糖尿病周围神经病的早期诊断价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.08.013

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 962-965.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.08.013

F波最小潜伏期对糖尿病周围神经病的早期诊断价值

戴月, 杨林丽, 蒋瑞, 孙成梅

南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院神经电生理室，江苏淮安市 223001

收稿日期:2019-03-26 修回日期:2019-05-08 出版日期:2019-08-25 发布日期:2019-08-16
通讯作者: 孙成梅，E-mail: scmstss@126.com
作者简介:戴月(1990-)，女，汉族，江苏宿迁市人，硕士，医师，主要研究方向：神经电生理、肌病及周围神经病。

Early Diagnosis Value of F-wave Minimum Latency for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

DAI Yue, YANG Lin-li, JIANG Rui, SUN Cheng-mei

Neuroelectrophysiological Room, Huai’an First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Huai’an, Jiangsu 223001, China

Received:2019-03-26 Revised:2019-05-08 Published:2019-08-25 Online:2019-08-16
Contact: SUN Cheng-mei, E-mail: scmstss@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的利用身高矫正的F波最小潜伏期探讨F波对于糖尿病周围神经病(DPN)的早期诊断价值。方法选取2018年1月至10月入院的2型糖尿病患者211例，进行下肢神经传导检查(NCS)和胫神经F波最小潜伏期测定。利用国人身高矫正后的F波参考值判定F波的异常。根据有无DPN临床症状和体征分为有症状组(n = 126)和无症状组(n = 85)；根据糖尿病病程长短分为病程≤ 1年组(n = 45)、病程> 1~10年组(n = 85)和病程> 10年组(n = 81)。比较各组下肢运动神经传导检查(MNCS)异常率、感觉神经传导检查(SNCS)异常率、总NCS异常率及F波最小潜伏期异常率。结果有症状组F波最小潜伏期异常率高于MNCS、SNCS和NCS异常率(χ²> 7.088, P < 0.01)。无症状组F波最小潜伏期异常率明显高于MNCS、SNCS和NCS异常率(χ²> 7.545, P < 0.01)。不同病程组的F波异常率大多数均大于MNCS、SNCS和NCS异常率(P < 0.05)。结论糖尿病患者F波最小潜伏期的敏感性高于MNCS、SNCS和NCS，能够提示亚临床病变，对DPN的早期诊断具有重要意义。

关键词: F波, 糖尿病周围神经病, 糖尿病

Abstract: Objective To study the early diagnostic value of F-wave for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods A total of 211 patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted to hospital from January to October, 2018 were selected. The nerve conduction studies (NCS) of lower limbs and the minimum latency of F-wave in tibial nerve were measured. The height corrected reference of F-wave was used to judge the abnormality of F-wave. According to the clinical symptoms and signs, they were divided into symptomatic group (n = 126) and asymptomatic group (n = 85). According to the duration of diabetes, they were divided into three groups: less than one year group (n = 45), one to ten years group (n = 85) and more than ten years group (n = 81). The abnormal rates of motor nerve conduction studies (MNCS), sensory nerve conduction studies (SNCS), NCS and F-wave minimum latency in different groups were compared. Results The abnormal rate of F-wave was higher than that of MNCS, SNCS and NCS in lower limbs in the symptomatic group (χ² > 7.088, P < 0.01). The abnormal rate of F-wave in the asymptomatic group was prominently higher than that of MNCS, SNCS and NCS (χ² > 7.545, P < 0.01). The abnormal rate of F-wave in each course was higher than that of MNCS, SNCS and NCS (P < 0.05). Conclusion The abnormal of F-wave minimum latency is more senstive than that of MNCS, SNCS and NCS, which suggested subclinical lesions, and is valuable for the early diagnosis of DPN.

Key words: F-wave, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, diabetes mellitus

中图分类号:

R587.1

戴月, 杨林丽, 蒋瑞, 孙成梅. F波最小潜伏期对糖尿病周围神经病的早期诊断价值[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(8): 962-965.

DAI Yue, YANG Lin-li, JIANG Rui, SUN Cheng-mei. Early Diagnosis Value of F-wave Minimum Latency for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(8): 962-965.

参考文献

1 IqbalZ, AzmiS, YadavR, et al. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: epidemiology, diagnosis, and pharmacotherapy [J]. Clin Ther, 2018, 40(6): 828-849.
2 SloanG, ShilloP, SelvarajahD, et al. A new look at painful diabetic neuropathy [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2018, 144: 177-191.
3 LimJ Z, NgN S, ThomasC. Prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers [J]. J R Soc Med, 2017, 110(3): 104-109.
4 FisherM A. F-waves－physiology and clinical uses [J]. Scientific World Journal, 2007, 7(2): 144-160.
5 KoharaN, KimuraJ, KajlR, et al. F-wave latency serves as the most reproducible measure in nerve conduction studies of diabetic polyneuropathy: multicentre analysis in healthy subjects and patients with diabetic polyneuropathy [J]. Diabetologia, 2000, 43(7): 915-921
6 NobregaJ A, PiheiroD S, ManzanoG M, et al. Various aspects of F-wave values in a healthy popultion [J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2004, 115(10): 2336-2342.
7 潘华,林金嬉,陈娜,等. 国人F波正常参考值范围的建立[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(2): 93-93.
8 中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2017年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(1): 4-67.
9 崔丽英. 简明肌电图学手册[M]. 北京:北京科学出版社, 2006: 183-198.
10 KazamelM, DyckP J. Sensory manifestations of diabetic neuropathies: anatomical and clinical correlations [J]. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2015, 39(1): 7-16.
11 JerathN U, AulE, ReddyC G, et al. Prolongation of F-wave minimal latency: a sensitive predictor of polyneuropathy [J]. Int J Neurosci, 2016, 126(6): 520-525.
12 中华医学会神经病学分会肌电图与临床神经电生理学组. 糖尿病周围神经病诊断和治疗共识[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2013, 11(46): 787-789.
13 PinheiroD S, ManzanoG M, NobregaJ A. Reproducibility in nerve conduction studies and F-wave analysis [J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2008, 119(9): 2070-2073.
14 PanH, JianF, LinJ, et al. F-wave latencies in patients with diabetes mellitus [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2014, 49(6): 804-808.
15 KimuraJ. Current understanding of F-wave physiology in the clinical domain [J]. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol, 2006, 59: 299-303.
16 YgihashiS, YamagishiS, WadaR. Pathology and pathogenetic mechanisms of diabetic neuropathy: correlation with clinical signs and symptoms [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2007, 77(3) : S184-S189.
17 IzenbergA, PerkinsB A, BrilV. Diabetic neuropathies [J]. Semin Neurol, 2015, 35(4): 424-430.
18 RussellJ W, ZillioxL A. Diabetic neuropathies [J]. Continuum (Minneap Minn), 2014, 20(5): 1226-1240.
19 AndersenH, StalbergE, FalckB. F-wave latency, the most sensitive nerve conduction parameter in patients with diabetes mellitus [J]. Muscle Nerve, 1997, 20(10): 1296-1302.
20 FishierM A. F-waves in diabetes mellitus: answers and questions [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2014, 49(6): 783-785.
21 PuksaL, StalbergE, FalckB. Occurrence of A-waves in F-wave studies of healthy nerves [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2003, 28(5): 626-629.
22 山磊,ErnestoG, GranieriE, 等. 吉兰-巴雷综合征早期的电生理发现[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(2): 172-173.
23 AygulR, KotanD, UlviH, et al. The relationship of median nerve F-wave parameters with severity and subtypes of carpal tunnel syndrome [J]. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2014, 27(1): 1-6.
24 RajaballyY A, VaranasiS. Practical electrodiagnostic value of F-wave studies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy [J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2013, 124(1): 171-175.
25 SathyaG R, KrishnamurthyN, VeliathS, et al. F wave index: a diagnostic tool for peripheral neuropathy [J]. Indian J Med Res, 2017, 145(3): 353-357.

[1]	王芳, 杨涛, 何耀广, 曹子君, 刘国庆, 胡军, 张建国, 樊瑜波. 基于糖尿病患者步态周期足底压力的变刚度鞋垫设计[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 408-415.
[2]	冯臣,药家明,周国瑾,李慕瑶,王黎,王梅. 高强度间歇训练对2型糖尿病患者运动干预的效果：基于《WHO关于身体活动和久坐行为的指南》和WHO-FICs[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(6): 646-652.
[3]	王梅,廖婷,陈建. 社区环境下2型糖尿病三种运动相关干预模式健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(11): 1288-1298.
[4]	曹子君,王芳,何耀广,张宇,王萌秀,张建国. 糖尿病患者足底压力和鞋垫减压结构的有限元分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(7): 852-858.
[5]	王小泉,刘超然,王宁华. 糖尿病患者正中神经的超声评估[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(3): 329-333.
[6]	陈影, 张爽, 余珍, 潘利妞, 张伟宏. 运动对2型糖尿病患者血脂影响的网状Meta分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(7): 849-858.
[7]	穆晶晶, 陈斌娟, 逯雪峰, 张曈, 王媛, 王引弟, 童明辉. 剪切波弹性成像在2型糖尿病腓肠神经病变中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(2): 213-216.
[8]	王梅, 李玉霞, 张田丽, 曾斯琴, 杜亮, 柴丽, 董燕飞, 邱卓英, 李安巧. 运动干预糖尿病前期和糖尿病的研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(11): 1272-1278.
[9]	夏小慧, 王卉, 张社平, 夏惠芸. KCNQ1基因7个位点单核苷酸多态性与糖尿病前期人群运动干预敏感性的关联[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(5): 575-580.
[10]	陈炳霖, 郭佳宝. 高强度间歇运动对2型糖尿病干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(3): 353-362.
[11]	孟晴, 陈伟, 张明, 高民. 有氧联合抗阻运动对2型糖尿病患者的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(12): 1465-1470.
[12]	刘淑芬, 全建东, 张路, 赵肖奕, 陈丽霞, 李文慧. 体力活动相对活跃2型糖尿病患者心肺耐力与不同类型体力活动的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(12): 1471-1474.
[13]	刘江山, 张庆文. Irisin与糖尿病[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(7): 796-798.
[14]	闫斌, 田国庆. 肾素-血管紧张素系统与糖尿病认知障碍的关系及中药的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(3): 270-273.
[15]	张冰，李维辛. 老年人糖尿病相关性肌少症的研究进展①[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2016, 22(11): 1294-1297.

F波最小潜伏期对糖尿病周围神经病的早期诊断价值

Early Diagnosis Value of F-wave Minimum Latency for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0