《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (7): 834-839.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2021.07.016

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

悬吊推拿运动治疗颈型颈椎病的持续疗效

李建飞1,李倩2,李佳潞1,王健1,刘丽1,李丽3()   

  1. 1.山东中医药大学,山东济南市 250013
    2.济南护理职业学院,山东济南市 250100
    3.山东中医药大学第二附属医院康复医学科,山东济南市 250001
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-30 修回日期:2021-05-06 出版日期:2021-07-25 发布日期:2021-07-28
  • 通讯作者: 李丽 E-mail:lily.jinan@163.com
  • 作者简介:李建飞(1996-),女,汉族,山东烟台市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:颈肩腰腿痛的防治、脑卒中患者的中西医结合康复。|李丽(1962-),女,汉族,山东济南市人,硕士,教授、主任医师,主要研究方向:颈肩腰腿痛的防治、中西医结合康复、脑卒中后运动障碍。
  • 基金资助:
    1.山东省重点研发计划项目(2017GSF19114);2.山东省中医药科技发展计划项目(2019-0249)

Long-term Effect of Sling-massage Exercise on Cervical Spondylopathy

LI Jian-fei1,LI Qian2,LI Jia-lu1,WANG Jian1,LIU Li1,LI Li3()   

  1. 1. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ji'nan, Shandong 250013, China
    2. Ji'nan Vocational College of Nursing, Ji'nan, Shandong 250100, China
    3. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Chinese Medicine, Ji'nan, Shandong 250001, China
  • Received:2021-03-30 Revised:2021-05-06 Published:2021-07-25 Online:2021-07-28
  • Contact: LI Li E-mail:lily.jinan@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Shandong Key R & D Program(2017GSF19114);Shandong Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Development Program(2019-0249)

摘要:

目的 观察悬吊推拿运动技术治疗颈型颈椎病的疗效。

方法 2020年6月至2021年2月,山东中医药大学第二附属医院颈型颈椎病患者68例随机分为对照组(n= 34)和观察组(n= 34),对照组接受常规推拿治疗,观察组经弱链测试寻找弱链接肌群,采用针对性推拿手法和悬吊运动。共治疗4周。治疗前后,采用McGill疼痛量表(MPQ)、颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)进行评定;治疗前、治疗后、治疗后2周、治疗后4周,采用肌电生物反馈仪检测患侧斜方肌上束中值频率(MF)。

结果 对照组脱落4例,观察组脱落3例。治疗后,两组MPQ和NDI评分均显著下降(|Z| > 4.879, P < 0.001),MF上升;两组间MPQ和NDI评分均无显著性差异(|Z| < 1.100, P >0.05),对照组MF低于观察组(t = 2.184, P <0.05)。治疗结束后,对照组MF迅速下降,观察组有所下降,对照组MF持续显著低于观察组(t > 3.770, P <0.001)。

结论 悬吊推拿运动技术对颈型颈椎病的即刻疗效与常规推拿相似,但疗效持续时间较长。

关键词: 颈型颈椎病, 悬吊运动, 推拿, 长期疗效

Abstract:

Objective To explore the effect of sling-massage exercise on neck type cervical spondylopathy (NTCS).

Methods From June, 2020 to February, 2021, 68 patients with NTCS from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly divided into control group (n= 34) and observation group (n= 34). The control group accepted routine massage, while the observation group accepted sling exercise and massage based on weak link test, for four weeks. They were assessed with McGill Pain Qusetionnaire (MPQ) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) before and after treatment, and measured median frequency (MF) of the upper trapezius muscle on the affected side with electromyography biofeedback before treatment, after treatment, two weeks after treatment and 4 weeks after treatment.

Results Four cases in the control group and three cases in the observation group dropped down. The scores of MPQ and NDI decreased in both groups after treatment (|Z| > 4.879, P < 0.001), while MF increased (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in scores of MPQ and NDI between the two groups after treatment (|Z| < 1.100, P >0.05), while MF was less in the control group than in the observation group (t = 2.184, P <0.05). MF decreased more in the control group than in the observation group, and was continually less in the control group than in the observation group after treatment (t > 3.770, P <0.001).

Conclusion Sling-massage exercise is as effective as massage on NTCS immediately, and for more time.

Key words: neck type cervical spondylopathy, sling exercise, massage, long-term effect

中图分类号: