美国高校物理治疗教育项目分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.04.017

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2022, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 484-489.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.04.017

美国高校物理治疗教育项目分析

高惠刚,张潇雅,黄丽,刘远文,胡昔权()

中山大学附属第三医院康复医学科,广东广州市 510630

收稿日期:2021-06-01 修回日期:2022-03-29 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-05-05
通讯作者: 胡昔权 E-mail:xiquhu@hotmail.com
作者简介:高惠刚(1989-),男,汉族,广东佛山市人,治疗师,主要研究方向：脑损伤后运动评估与康复。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC2001603);中山大学附属第三医院国家自然科学基金培育专项基金项目(2021GZRPYQN10)

Analysis of physical therapy education programs in universities of United States

GAO Huigang,ZHANG Xiaoya,HUANG Li,LIU Yuanwen,HU Xiquan()

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China

Received:2021-06-01 Revised:2022-03-29 Published:2022-04-25 Online:2022-05-05
Contact: HU Xiquan E-mail:xiquhu@hotmail.com
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program(2018YFC2001603);Special Incubation Project of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University for National Natural Science Foundation(2021GZRPYQN10)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的分析美国高校物理治疗专业的教育特点,为我国康复治疗教育的国际化发展提供借鉴。方法从美国三所具一定代表性的高校的官方网站、知网、万方、PubMed数据库收集相关文献及资料,结合作者自身的学习经历,对美国高校物理治疗教育的若干特点进行详细分析总结。结果美国物理治疗教育具有严格的认证体系、以执业胜任力为导向的课程目标、全面的课程计划、以学生为中心的教育理念、较高的信息化程度、多元化的教学评价等特点,符合世界卫生组织对康复胜任力的目标。结论美国物理治疗教育特色显著,教育体系较为完善,对我国具一定参考价值。

关键词: 物理治疗, 美国, 教育

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the educational characteristics of physical therapy in universities of United States, and provide reference for the international development of rehabilitation therapy education in China.Methods Based on the data collected from the official websites of three universities in the United States and the databases at home and abroad, combined with the author's learning experience, the characteristics of physical therapy education in universities of United States in detail was analyzed.Results Characteristics of physical therapy education in universities of United States had strict accreditation system, course objectives oriented by practicing competence, comprehensive curriculum plan, educational concept of student-centered, high level of teaching informatization, diversified teaching and learning evaluation system, which conformed to the goal of rehabilitation competency of World Health Organization.Conclusion Physical therapy education in United States has remarkable characteristics and a well-developed system, which has certain reference value for China.

Key words: physical therapy, United States, education

高惠刚,张潇雅,黄丽,刘远文,胡昔权. 美国高校物理治疗教育项目分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(4): 484-489.

GAO Huigang,ZHANG Xiaoya,HUANG Li,LIU Yuanwen,HU Xiquan. Analysis of physical therapy education programs in universities of United States[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2022, 28(4): 484-489.

图/表 2

表1

表2

WCPT与三所高校的课程对比"

比较对象	生物与物理科学	临床科学	社会、行为和技术科学	临床实践教育
WCPT建议课程	解剖学、组织学、生理学、运动生理学、运动科学、生物力学、人体运动学、神经学、病理学、影像学、药理学	肌肉骨骼系统、神经肌肉系统、心血管系统、呼吸系统、其他内外科疾患	应用心理学、应用社会学、交流、管理、伦理及价值观、财政、教学、信息交流技术、临床推理、循证实践、应用统计学	早期临床经验分阶段实习
匹兹堡大学	人体解剖、运动生理、神经科学、药理学、运动机能学	心肺物理治疗、肌骨物理治疗、神经物理治疗、老年物理治疗、患者管理、成长与发育、临床复杂案例	领导力与专业发展、循证实践、卫生与健康、人类疾病调查	早期见习分阶段实习
圣路易斯华盛顿大学	神经科学、运动机能学、细胞、系统与疾病、人体解剖、诊断与证据分析、运动生理	物理治疗临床技能、肌骨疾病诊断与管理、神经疾病诊断与管理、心肺疾病诊断与管理、常见临床疾病诊断与管理、神经病学、骨科学、案例组合分析	专业与技能发展、组织与管理、卫生、健康与康复、健康、体适能与疾病预防	早期见习分阶段实习
南卡罗来纳州医科大学	神经科学、运动科学、应用生理与营养、药理学、人体解剖学、表面解剖学、运动发育学、临床病理生理、影像学与电诊断	物理治疗基础、治疗性运动与按摩、心肺物理治疗、肌骨物理治疗、神经物理治疗、皮肤物理治疗、儿童物理治疗、假肢与支具、成人发育与衰老、鉴别诊断、功能性转移	实践管理、循证实践、临床推理与实践、跨专业教育与实践、健康促进学	早期见习分阶段实习

表2

参考文献 34

[1]	吴世彩. 发展康复高等教育实现现代康复价值[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(9):993-1000.
	WU S C. Development of higher education of rehabilitation: realizing the values of modern rehabilitation[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2018, 24(9):993-1000.
[2]	韩云峰, 王永顺. 美国物理治疗行业的发展及其启示[J]. 体育学刊, 2016, 23(1):87-91.
	HAN Y F, WANG Y S. The development of physiotherapy industry in United States and its enlightenment[J]. Phys Educ, 2016, 23(1):87-91.
[3]	缪萍, 刘浩, 潘翠环. 美国物理治疗教育的发展及其对国内的启示[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(3):343-345.
	MIAO P, LIU H, PAN C H. The development of physical therapy education in the United States and its enlightenment to China[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2016, 31(3):343-345.
[4]	缪萍, 刘浩, 潘翠环. 美国物理治疗专业教育的评估与认证体系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(2):245-248.
	MIAO P, LIU H, PAN C H. Evaluation and accreditation of physical therapy education in United States[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2015, 21(2):245-248.
[5]	Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education. Standards and required elements for accreditation of physical therapist education programs[A/OL].(2020-11-03)[2022-03-10]. https://www.capteonline.org/globalassets/capte-docs/capte-pt-standards-required-elements.pdf.
[6]	University of Pittsburgh. Program outcomes of doctor of physical therapy[EB/OL]. [2022-03-10]. https://www.shrs.pitt.edu/dpt/program-outcomes.
[7]	European Commission. The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF)[EB/OL]. [2021-10-12]. http://www.ecompetences.eu/site/objects/download/4550_EQFbroch2008en.pdf.
[8]	World Confederation for Physical Therapy. Physiotherapist education framework[EB/OL]. [2021-10-12]. https://www.fisioterapia-colombia.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Physiotherapist-education-framework-FINAL_compressed.pdf.
[9]	American Physical Therapy Association. Becoming a PT[EB/OL]. [2021-10-12]. https://www.apta.org/your-career/careers-in-physical-therapy/becoming-a-pt.
[10]	American Physical Therapy Association. Professional development, lifelong learning, and continuing competence in physical therapy[EB/OL]. [2021-10-12]. https://www.apta.org/apta-and-you/leadership-and-governance/policies/professional-development-lifelong-learning.
[11]	University of Pittsburgh. Admissions of DPT program in University of Pittsburgh[EB/OL]. [2021-09-12]. https://www.shrs.pitt.edu/dpt/admission.
[12]	World Confederation for Physical Therapy. WCPT guideline for physical therapist professional entry level education[EB/OL]. [2021-09-12]. http://www.wcpt.org/guidelines/entry-level-education.
[13]	Medical University of South Carolina. Courses & curriculum of DPT program in Medical University of South Carolina[EB/OL]. [2021-09-12]. https://chp.musc.edu/academics/physical-therapy/courses-curriculum.
[14]	University of Pittsburgh. DPT curriculum for residential and hybrid formats in University of Pittsburgh[EB/OL]. [2021-10-13]. https://www.shrs.pitt.edu/dpt/curriculum.
[15]	Washington University School of Medicine in St.Louis. DPT Curriculum in Washington University School of Medicine in St.Louis[EB/OL]. [2021-10-12]. https://pt.wustl.edu/education/doctor-of-physical-therapy/degree-requirements-curriculum/curriculum-prior-to-2021/.
[16]	BERGER-ESTILITA J, FUCHS A, HAHN M, et al. Attitudes towards Interprofessional education in the medical curriculum: a systematic review of the literature[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020, 20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02176-4
[17]	赵炬明. 论新三中心:概念与历史——美国SC本科教学改革研究之一[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2016(3):35-56.
	ZHAO J M. On the new three centers: concept and history: research on the undergraduate teaching reform of SC in the United States[J]. Res HED Eng, 2016(3):35-56.
[18]	赵炬明, 高筱卉. 关于实施"以学生为中心"的本科教学改革的思考[J]. 中国高教研究, 2017(8):36-40.
	ZHAO J M, GAO X H. A Study on the implementation of "student-centered" undergraduate teaching reform[J]. Chin Higher Educ Res, 2017(8):36-40.
[19]	赵炬明. 聚焦设计:实践与方法(上)——美国"以学生为中心"的本科教学改革研究之三[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018(2):30-44.
	ZHAO J M. Focus on design: practice and methods——"student-centered" undergraduate teaching reform in the United States No.3[J]. Res HED Eng, 2018(2):30-44.
[20]	陈威. 建构主义学习理论综述[J]. 学术交流, 2007(3):175-177.
	CHEN W. A review of constructivist learning theory[J]. Academic Exchange, 2007(3):175-177.
[21]	王飞, 王安庆. 以问题为基础的学习法结合案例学习法在康复治疗学骨科见习教学中的应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(10):1237-1240.
	WANG F, WANG A Q. Application of case-based learning combined with problem-based learning in teaching of orthopedic practice for rehabilitation therapy[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2018, 24(10):1237-1240.
[22]	赵炬明. 助力学习:学习环境与教育技术——美国"以学生为中心"的本科教学改革研究之四[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2019(2):7-25.
	ZHAO J M. Assisted learning: learning environment and educational technology: student-centered undergraduate teaching reform in the United States No.4[J]. Res HED Eng, 2019(2):7-25.
[23]	University of Pittsburgh. Doctor of Physical Therapy Residential and Hybrid Program in University of Pittsburgh[EB/OL]. [2021-10-12]. https://www.shrs.pitt.edu/dpt/about.
[24]	BAYLISS A J, WARDEN S J. A hybrid model of student-centered instruction improves physical therapist student performance in cardiopulmonary practice patterns by enhancing performance in higher cognitive domains[J]. Phys Ther, 2011, 25(3):14-20.
[25]	BOUCHER B, ROBERTSON E, WAINNER R, et al. "Flipping" Texas State University's physical therapist musculoskeletal curriculum: implementation of a hybrid learning model[J]. Phys Ther Educ, 2013, 27(3):72-77.
[26]	VENERI D A, GANNOTTI M. A comparison of student outcomes in a physical therapy neurologic rehabilitation course based on delivery mode: hybrid vs traditional[J]. Allied Health, 2014, 43(4):e75-e81.
[27]	LI S, LIAO X, BURDICK W, et al. The effectiveness of flipped classroom in health professions education in China: a systematic review[J]. Med Educ Curric Dev, 2020, 12(7):1-17
[28]	NG L, SEOW K C, MACDONALD L, et al. eLearning in physical therapy: lessons learned from transitioning a professional education program to full elearning during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Phys Ther, 2021, 101(4):1-9.
[29]	GARNON K, YOUNG B, BACHMAN T, et al. Doctor of physical therapy education in a hybrid learning environment: reimagining the possibilities and navigating a "New Normal"[J]. Phys Ther, 2020, 100(8):1268-1277. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa096
[30]	梁宇, 孟晶莹, 乔建梁. 形成性评价在临床技能模拟训练课程中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2020(2):141-142.
	LIANG Y, MENG J Y, QIAO J L. Application of formative assessment in clinical skill simulation training course[J]. Chin J Med Educ Explor, 2020(2):141-142.
[31]	赵炬明. 关注学习效果:美国大学课程教学评价方法述评——美国"以学生为中心"的本科教学改革研究之六[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2019(6):9-23.
	ZHAO J M. Focus on learning effect: a review of teaching evaluation methods in american universities:a study on student-centered undergraduate teaching reform in the United States: No.6[J]. Res HED Eng, 2019(6):9-23.
[32]	World Health Orgnization. Rehabilitation Competency Framework.[A/OL](2021-01-22)[2022-03-10]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240008281.
[33]	World Health Orgnization. Adapting the WHO Rehabilitation Competency Framework to a specific Context[A/OL].(2021-02-03)[2022-03-10]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015333.
[34]	World Health Orgnization. Using a contextualized competency framework to develop rehabilitation programmes and their curricula[A/OL]. (2021-02-03)[2022-03-10]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240016576.

标准	要求
标准1	该项目达到与其使命和目标相关的毕业生成就指标和项目成果。
标准2	该项目参与了有效的、持续的、正式的、全面的自我评估和规划过程,以改进项目。
标准3	机构和项目的运作符合相关制度及法律法规。
标准4	项目教师有资格胜任他们的角色,并有效地履行他们的职责。
标准5	该项目招募、录取和招收毕业生,符合机构和项目的使命和目标,并符合社会对不同人口的物理治疗服务的需求。
标准6	该项目有一个全面的课程计划。
标准7	课程设置包括内容、学习经验、学生测试和评估过程,旨在帮助学生实现物理治疗初始实践所需的教育成果,以及在不断变化的卫生保健环境中发挥作用所需的终身学习。
标准8	项目资源足以满足项目当前和预计的需求。

美国高校物理治疗教育项目分析

Analysis of physical therapy education programs in universities of United States

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	钱李果, 吴同绚, 张巧云, 邢剑, 杨延砚. 康复治疗师继续教育病例库联合案例学习法的设计与运用效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(3): 249-257.
[2]	刘华, 王丽媛, 马欣, 李静, 王丽. 基于OBE-CDIO模式运动康复训练教程课程改革的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(3): 270-275.
[3]	韩雪娇, 史冀鹏, 卫金鹏, 朱天瑞, 徐红旗, 何慕寒. 体力活动和平衡能力与残疾的关联性研究——基于NHANES的横断面研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 1-12.
[4]	胡龙, 余航. 暑期小学期临床实践教学对康复治疗学专业学生共情能力培养的实践研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(1): 117-124.
[5]	张浩楠, 杨剑. 大学生身体活动与健康：健康和教育政策的跨领域融合发展研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(8): 869-875.
[6]	陆丹丹, 姚敬智, 李姿, 王柯文, 孙鑫廖, 陈建敏, 许建文. 2014年至2023年帕金森病物理治疗的文献计量学分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(8): 906-913.
[7]	曹静, 刘晶, 张晓燕, 高少宇. 基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构构建中小学特殊教育教师胜任力评价指标体系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(6): 621-627.
[8]	朱晨晨, 廖思斯, 潘建明, 夏币华, 洪宁杰. 0~3岁发育障碍婴幼儿早期家庭教育与康复：基于ICF的目标设置与服务体系研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(6): 635-641.
[9]	武砀, 张青, 吴佳洺, 贾文蓉, 武爱红, 武剑. 融合教育背景下特殊需要儿童参与身体活动的支持保障系统研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(6): 650-657.
[10]	武爱红, 张青, 吴佳洺, 谢俊霞, 武砀. 胜任力导向和功能定向的中小学融合教育教师培训课程体系构建研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(5): 539-547.
[11]	张青, 吴佳洺, 贾文蓉, 于发友. 融合教育情境下中小学教师胜任力架构与内容：基于RCF和ICF的研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(4): 406-414.
[12]	朱晨晨, 廖思斯, 刘悦, 潘建明, 朱竹林, 夏币华, 谢莹. 0~3岁发育障碍婴幼儿家庭早期教育和康复的政策架构与支持系统研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(3): 324-330.
[13]	屠金康, 李占和, 闫彦宁, 刘雪枫, 李方方, 何龙文. 美国作业治疗协会实践指南的内容研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(12): 1472-1477.
[14]	孙文, 梁永胜, 张瑜, 周静, 高薇薇, 王勇丽, 陈雪芬. 构建基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构的言语听觉康复高等职业教育课程体系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(9): 1003-1010.
[15]	周静, 丁忠冰, 钟凯颖, 王丹, 李群群, 曹艳静, 陈雪芬. 发展基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构的言语听觉康复技术专业高等职业教育体系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(9): 993-1002.