《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2024, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 972-978.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.08.013
梁天佳, 龙耀斌(), 陆丽燕, 周金英, 黄福才, 黄林鹏, 邬映超, 龙耀翔, 韦小翠, 柳忠
收稿日期:
2024-04-17
出版日期:
2024-08-25
发布日期:
2024-09-11
通讯作者:
龙耀斌(1974-),男,壮族,广西南宁市人,博士,主任医师,主要研究方向:神经康复、肌骨康复、儿童康复。E-mail: long232316@163.com
作者简介:
梁天佳(1975-),男,壮族,广西南宁市人,硕士,主任医师,主要研究方向:神经康复、肌骨康复、老年康复。
基金资助:
LIANG Tianjia, LONG Yaobin(), LU Liyan, ZHOU Jinying, HUANG Fucai, HUANG Linpeng, WU Yingchao, LONG Yaoxiang, WEI Xiaocui, LIU Zhong
Received:
2024-04-17
Published:
2024-08-25
Online:
2024-09-11
Supported by:
摘要:
目的 探讨绳带辅助本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术(PNF)训练联合绳带辅助脑机接口(BCI)训练在脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢康复中的应用效果。
方法 2022年3月至2023年2月,选取广西医科大学第二附属医院脑卒中偏瘫住院患者96例,随机分为常规组(n = 32)、PNF组(n = 32)和联合组(n = 32)。各组均给予常规康复治疗,常规组给予上肢PNF训练,PNF组给予上肢绳带辅助PNF训练,联合组给予上肢绳带辅助PNF训练和上肢绳带辅助BCI训练,共4周。治疗前后,分别采用偏瘫上肢功能测试-香港版(FTHUE-HK)、Fugl-Meyer上肢功能评定(FMA-UE)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)进行评估。
结果 各组FTHUE-HK评分、MBI评分的组内效应(F > 341.219, P < 0.001)、组间效应(F > 21.705, P < 0.001)和交互效应(F > 3.171, P < 0.05)均显著;FMA-UE评分的组内效应(F = 520.472, P < 0.001)和组间效应(F = 41.939, P < 0.001)显著,交互效应不显著(P > 0.05)。治疗后,各项指标均为联合组最优(P < 0.05)。
结论 绳带辅助PNF训练联合绳带辅助脑机BCI训练能进一步促进脑卒中偏瘫上肢运动功能障碍患者的恢复,提高其日常生活能力。
中图分类号:
梁天佳, 龙耀斌, 陆丽燕, 周金英, 黄福才, 黄林鹏, 邬映超, 龙耀翔, 韦小翠, 柳忠. 绳带辅助本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术训练联合绳带辅助脑机接口训练对脑卒中偏瘫上肢康复效果的随机对照试验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 972-978.
LIANG Tianjia, LONG Yaobin, LU Liyan, ZHOU Jinying, HUANG Fucai, HUANG Linpeng, WU Yingchao, LONG Yaoxiang, WEI Xiaocui, LIU Zhong. Effect of rope-assisted proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combined with rope-assisted brain-computer interface training on upper limb function in stroke patients with hemiplegia: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2024, 30(8): 972-978.
表2
各组治疗前后各指标的描述统计结果"
变量 | 组别 | n | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 | 标准差 | 均值 | 标准差 | |||
FTHUE-HK | 常规组 | 32 | 2.01 | 0.65 | 2.48 | 0.76 |
PNF组 | 32 | 2.12 | 0.81 | 2.95 | 0.75 | |
联合组 | 32 | 2.16 | 0.69 | 3.35 | 0.78 | |
FMA-UE | 常规组 | 32 | 19.32 | 4.52 | 22.51 | 5.33 |
PNF组 | 32 | 18.95 | 4.91 | 25.86 | 5.64 | |
联合组 | 32 | 19.10 | 5.02 | 28.74 | 5.85 | |
MBI | 常规组 | 32 | 33.87 | 6.92 | 38.25 | 8.36 |
PNF组 | 32 | 32.69 | 7.48 | 42.67 | 8.12 | |
联合组 | 32 | 34.05 | 7.35 | 47.52 | 8.95 |
表3
各指标的重复测量方差分析结果"
变量 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHUE-HK | 组内 | 32.505 | 1 | 32.505 | 341.219 | < 0.001 |
组间 | 4.135 | 2 | 2.068 | 21.705 | < 0.001 | |
组内×组间 | 8.573 | 2 | 4.286 | 4.750 | 0.011 | |
FMA-UE | 组内 | 2073.755 | 1 | 2073.755 | 520.472 | < 0.001 |
组间 | 334.198 | 2 | 167.099 | 41.939 | < 0.001 | |
组内×组间 | 288.010 | 2 | 144.005 | 2.851 | 0.063 | |
MBI | 组内 | 4134.797 | 1 | 4134.797 | 510.450 | < 0.001 |
组间 | 668.375 | 2 | 334.187 | 41.256 | < 0.001 | |
组内×组间 | 735.542 | 2 | 367.771 | 3.171 | 0.047 |
表4
各指标的事前LSD差异检验结果"
变量 | 组别 | 组别 | 平均 值差 | P值 | 95%CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上限 | 下限 | |||||
FTHUE-HK | 常规组 | PNF组 | -0.110 | 0.551 | -0.477 | 0.257 |
常规组 | 联合组 | -0.150 | 0.374 | -0.485 | 0.185 | |
PNF组 | 联合组 | -0.040 | 0.832 | -0.416 | 0.336 | |
FMA-UE | 常规组 | PNF组 | 0.370 | 0.755 | -1.988 | 2.728 |
常规组 | 联合组 | 0.220 | 0.854 | -2.167 | 2.607 | |
PNF组 | 联合组 | -0.150 | 0.904 | -2.631 | 2.331 | |
MBI | 常规组 | PNF组 | 1.180 | 0.515 | -2.421 | 4.781 |
常规组 | 联合组 | -0.180 | 0.920 | -3.747 | 3.387 | |
PNF组 | 联合组 | -1.360 | 0.466 | -5.066 | 2.346 |
表5
各指标的事后LSD差异检验结果"
变量 | 组别 | 组别 | 平均 值差 | P值 | 95%CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上限 | 下限 | |||||
FTHUE- HK | 常规组 | PNF组 | -0.470 | 0.015 | -0.847 | -0.093 |
常规组 | 联合组 | -0.870 | < 0.001 | -1.255 | -0.485 | |
PNF组 | 联合组 | -0.400 | 0.041 | -0.782 | -0.018 | |
FMA-UE | 常规组 | PNF组 | -3.350 | 0.017 | -6.092 | -0.608 |
常规组 | 联合组 | -6.230 | < 0.001 | -9.027 | -3.433 | |
PNF组 | 联合组 | -2.880 | 0.049 | -5.752 | -0.008 | |
MBI | 常规组 | PNF组 | -4.420 | 0.036 | -8.538 | -0.302 |
常规组 | 联合组 | -9.270 | < 0.001 | -13.598 | -4.942 | |
PNF组 | 联合组 | -4.850 | 0.027 | -9.120 | -0.580 |
[1] | 王陇德, 彭斌, 张鸿祺, 等. «中国脑卒中防治报告2020»概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2022, 19(2): 136-144. |
WANG L D, PENG B, ZHANG H Q, et al. Brief report on stroke prevention and treatment in China (2020)[J]. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 19(2): 136-144. | |
[2] | ZHAO Y, HUA X, REN X, et al. Increasing burden of stroke in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, incidence, mortality, and case fatality[J]. Int J Stroke, 2023, 18(3): 259-267. |
[3] | GREFKES C, FINK G R. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives[J]. Neurol Res Pract, 2020, 2: 17. |
[4] | WANG H, ARCEO R, CHEN S, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve hand motor function in individuals with moderate to severe stroke: a systematic review protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(9): e32413. |
[5] | COSCIA M, WESSEL M J, CHAUDARY U, et al. Neurotechnologyaided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke[J]. Brain, 2019, 142(8): 2182-2197. |
[6] |
HUANG J, JI J R, LIANG C, et al. Effects of physical therapy-based rehabilitation on recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2022, 11(2): 521-531.
doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3710 pmid: 35249330 |
[7] | AREEUDOMWONG P, BUTTAGAT V. Comparison of core stabilisation exercise and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training on pain-related and neuromuscular response outcomes for chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Malays J Med Sci, 2019, 26(6): 77-89. |
[8] | 单桂琴, 刘皓华. 对脑梗死偏瘫患者采取绳带捆绑技术的临床意义研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2021, 15(1): 245-247. |
SHAN G Q, LIU H H. A study on the clinical significance of using rope tying technique in cerebral infarction patients with hemiplegia[J]. Chin J Mod Drug Appl, 2021, 15(1): 245-247. | |
[9] | 柳忠, 龙耀斌, 梁天佳. 绳带疗法对不完全性胸腰段脊髓损伤患者步行功能的影响[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2021, 38(7): 1427-1431. |
LIU Z, LONG Y B, LIANG T J. Effect of rope therapy on walking function in patients with incomplete thoracolumbar spinal cord injury[J]. J Guangxi Med Univ, 2021, 38(7): 1427-1431. | |
[10] | 张俊华, 邱桂才, 于明, 等. 绳带捆绑技术在脑梗死偏瘫患者康复治疗中的运用[J]. 中国全科医学, 2016, 19(26): 3227-3230. |
ZHANG J H, QIU G C, YU M, et al. Application of the rope bundled technology in the rehabilitation of cerebral infarction patients with hemiplegia[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2016, 19(26): 3227-3230. | |
[11] | 燕桢, 张立新. 脑机接口在康复治疗中的应用[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(2): 228-232. |
YAN Z, ZHANG L X. The application of brain computer interface in rehabilitation therapy[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2020, 35(2): 228-232. | |
[12] | 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(9): 710-715. |
The Neurology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, Chinese Stroke Society. Diagnostic criteria of cerebrovascular diseases in China (version 2019)[J]. Chin J Neurol, 2019, 52(9): 710-715. | |
[13] | 张妍昭, 黄琴, 王刚, 等. 香港版偏瘫上肢功能测试评定脑卒中患者上肢功能的效度和信度研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2016, 38(11): 826-829. |
ZHANG Y Z, HUANG Q, WANG G, et al. A study on the validity and reliability of the Hong Kong version of the hemiplegic upper limb function test for evaluating upper limb function in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2016, 38(11): 826-829. | |
[14] | BIAN L, ZHANG L, HUANG G, et al. Effects of priming intermittent theta burst stimulation with high-definition tDCS on upper limb function in hemiparetic patients with stroke: a randomized controlled study[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2024, 38(4): 268-278. |
[15] | HEMANDEZ E D, GALEANO C P, BARBOSA N E, et al. Intra-and inter-rater reliability of Fugl-Meyer Assessment of upper extremity in stroke[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2019, 51(9): 652-659. |
[16] |
OHURA T, HASE K, NAKAJIMA Y, et al. Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2017, 25, 17(1): 131.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2 pmid: 28841846 |
[17] | 刘桂杉, 勾丽洁, 马明, 等. 双侧训练联合运动想象疗法对老年脑卒中患者上肢功能恢复的效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(13): 3179-3182. |
LIU G S, GOU L J, MA M, et al. Effect of bilateral training combined with motor imagery therapy on the recovery of upper limb function in elderly stroke patients[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2019, 39(13): 3179-3182. | |
[18] |
MICERA S, CALEO M, CHISARI C, et al. Advanced neurotechnologies for the restoration of motor function[J]. Neuron, 2020, 105(4): 604-620.
doi: S0896-6273(20)30066-0 pmid: 32078796 |
[19] | KIM H W, PARK Y H. Effects of incorporating non-elastic taping into PNF techniques on muscle activities, balance, and gait in patients with chronic stroke[J]. J Korean Phys Soc, 2020, 15(1): 113-121. |
[20] |
SCRIVENER K, DORSCH S, MCCLUSKEY A, et al. Bobath therapy is inferior to task-specific training and not superior to other interventions in improving lower limb activities after stroke: a systematic review[J]. J Physiother, 2020, 66(4): 225-235.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.008 pmid: 33069609 |
[21] | CHEN R, ZHANG Y, WANG X, et al. Treatment effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with motor relearning procedure on spasticity and limb motor function in stroke patients[J]. Front Neurol, 2023, 14: 1213624. |
[22] |
马甜甜, 于子夫, 秦芳, 等. 强制性运动疗法在康复领域应用的可视化分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(7): 822-832.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.07.012 |
MA T T, YU Z F, QIN F, et al. Application of constraint-induced movement therapy in the field of rehabilitation: a visualized analysis[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2023, 29(7): 822-832. | |
[23] | MADHOUN H Y, TAN B, FENG Y, et al. Task-based mirror therapy enhances the upper limb motor function in subacute stroke patients: a randomized control trial[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2020, 56(3): 265-271. |
[24] |
刘明月, 李哲, 曹永生, 等. 基于运动表象的脑机接口训练对亚急性期脑卒中患者手功能康复的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(1): 71-76.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.01.010 |
LIU M Y, LI Z, CAO Y S, et al. The effect of brain computer interface training based on motor imagery on hand function rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2023, 29(1): 71-76. | |
[25] | 辛玉甫, 张晓鸽, 赵智伟, 等. 本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法对脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力、平衡功能和步行能力的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2020, 42(12): 1071-1074. |
XIN Y F, ZHANG X G, ZHAO Z W, et al. The effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular promotion therapy on daily life activity, balance function, and walking ability in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2020, 42 (12): 1071-1074. | |
[26] | 王万宏, 徐朦婷, 李琳琳, 等. 绳带疗法对偏瘫患者步态和生活质量的疗效观察[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报, 2019, 43(2): 195-198. |
WANG W H, XU M T, LI L L, et al. The effect of rope therapy on gait and quality of life of patients with hemiplegia[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Chin Med, 2019, 43(2): 195-198. | |
[27] | 柳忠, 龙耀斌, 梁天佳, 等. 绳带疗法联合PNF技术对脑卒中患者步行功能的效果分析[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2023, 40(12): 2078-2083. |
LIU Z, LONG Y B, LIANG T J, et al. Effectiveness of rope therapy combined with PNF technique on walking ability of stroke patients[J]. J Guangxi Med Univ, 2023, 40(12): 2078-2083. | |
[28] | GUIU-TULA F X, CABANAS-VALDES R, SITJA-RABERT M, et al. The Efficacy of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) approach in stroke rehabilitation to improve basic activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(12): e016739. |
[29] | NGUYEN P T, CHOU L W, HSIEH Y L. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation-based physical therapy on the improvement of balance and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Life (Basel), 2022, 12(6): 882. |
[30] | 柳忠, 龙耀斌, 梁天佳, 等. 绳带疗法联合重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后偏瘫患者步行功能和下肢运动功能的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2022, 44(3): 218-220. |
LIU Z, LONG Y B, LIANG T J, et al. Effects of rope therapy associated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on walking function and lower extremity motor function in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2022, 44(3): 218-220. | |
[31] |
梁天佳, 龙耀斌, 陆丽燕, 等. 本体感觉神经肌肉促进绳带训练联合重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(3): 262-268.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.03.003 |
LIANG T J, LONG Y B, LU L Y, et al. Effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation rope training and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function of stroke patients with hemiplegia[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2023, 29(3): 262-268. | |
[32] | 张明, 王斌, 贾凡, 等. 基于脑电图的脑机接口技术在脑卒中患者上肢运动功能康复中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2024, 28(4): 581-586. |
ZHANG M, WANG B, JIA F, et al. Application of brain-computer interface technology based on electroencephalogram in upper limb motor function rehabilitation of stroke patients[J]. Chin J Tissue Eng Res, 2024, 28(4): 581-586. | |
[33] | HU Y Q, GAO T H, LI J, et al. Motor imagery-based brain-computer interface combined with multimodal feedback to promote upper limb motor function after stroke: a preliminary study[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2021, 2021: 1116126. |
[34] |
杨延辉, 王浩冲, 董媛媛, 等. 视觉运动诱导的脑机接口技术应用于脑卒中患者上肢运动功能和认知功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(4): 472-478.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2023.04.013 |
YANG Y H, WANG H C, DONG Y Y, et al. Effect of visual motion-induced brain computer interface technology on upper limb motor and cognitive function of patients with stroke[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2023, 29(4): 472-478. | |
[35] | 薛夏利, 邓钟义, 李宁. 脑机接口辅助训练对脑卒中患者上肢功能恢复效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2023, 43(1): 8-14. |
XUE X L, DENG Z Y, LI N. Meta analysis of the effect of brain computer interface assisted training on upper limb function recovery in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2023, 43(1): 8-14. | |
[36] | SEBASTIAN-ROMAGOSA M, CHO W, ORTNER R, et al. Brain computer interface treatment for motor rehabilitation of upper extremity of stroke patients: a feasibility study[J]. Front Neurosci, 2020, 14: 591435. |
[37] | BAI Z, FONG K N K, ZHANG J J, et al. Immediate and long-term effects of BCI-based rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stoke: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2020, 17(1): 57. |
[38] | 贾杰. 脑卒中上肢康复:手脑感知与手脑运动[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2020, 35(4): 385-389. |
JIA J. Rehabilitation of upper limbs after stroke: hand brain perception and hand brain movement[J]. Chin J Rhabil Med, 2020, 35(4): 385-389. | |
[39] | 贾杰. "中枢-外周-中枢"闭环康复—脑卒中后手功能康复新理念[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(11): 1180-1182. |
JIA J. "Central-peripheral-central " closed-loop rehabilitation-a new concept of hand function rehabilitation after stroke[J]. Chin J Rhabil Med, 2016, 31(11): 1180-1182. | |
[40] | 贾杰. "手脑感知-手脑运动"理论在脑卒中后上肢康复的应用[J]. 康复学报, 2024, 34(4): 311-315, 322. |
[1] | 中国残疾人康复协会神经康复专业委员会, 中国康复研究中心. 神经重症气管切开患者气道功能康复与管理专家共识(2024)[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 869-881. |
[2] | 周静, 张晓晓, 丁忠冰, 陈建超, 魏星星, 林姝琦. 智力与发展性残疾儿童言语与语言障碍康复的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 894-902. |
[3] | 戴栖, 武庆昌, 管彦舒, 沈海勤, 鲍捷. 基于ICF构建注意缺陷多动障碍儿童运动康复方案[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 903-913. |
[4] | 吕倩倩, 王萌萌, 吴易凌, 杨晓真, 马玲玲, 赵亚萍, 肖瑶, 桑杲. 早期介入丹佛模式基础上联合神经反馈训练对孤独症谱系障碍儿童效果的随机对照试验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 914-921. |
[5] | 牛茂林, 赵潭, 刘晓丽, 郭峰. 在线和离线高精度经颅直流电刺激对健康成年人手指运动技能学习效果的随机对照试验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 957-964. |
[6] | 于婷婷, 蔡福良, 缪桂华, 顾晨, 彭媛. 基于个性优势的结构化治疗与教育对缺血性脑卒中康复效果的随机对照试验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 965-971. |
[7] | 王哲, 万勤, 黄昭鸣, 王勇丽, 钱红. 成年卒中后非流畅性失语症患者言语韵律功能特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(8): 979-992. |
[8] | 周静, 易玲, 陈建超, 陈雪芬, 魏星星, 陈晶晶. 基于ICF的听力障碍儿童言语与语言康复服务:理论架构与服务体系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 745-751. |
[9] | 冯蕾, 吕军, 王晓茜, 郑红颖, 邵萍, 王安妮, 孙梅, 陈刚. 基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构探讨我国儿童康复治疗师胜任力和专业活动[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 752-759. |
[10] | 陈岚卿, 吕军, 王晓茜, 郑红颖, 邵萍, 王安妮, 孙梅, 陈刚. 华东三省市儿童康复治疗师胜任力及专业活动研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 760-767. |
[11] | 井淇, 蔡伟芹, 高倩倩, 嵇丽红, 董志伟, 邢洋, 李伟, 张建华. 基于ICF的社区老年人健康相关康复服务架构与策略探析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 804-810. |
[12] | 段林茹, 郑洁皎, 陈茜, 李燕. 脑卒中患者跌倒风险的相关因素研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 811-817. |
[13] | 罗薇, 何怡, 张庆苏. 脑卒中后构音障碍患者构音器官运动功能与言语清晰度的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 818-822. |
[14] | 何爱群, 黎景波, 何茂莉, 叶思媚, 宋秋爽, 刘海鸥, 谢有书. 作业技能再学习策略对脑卒中偏瘫上肢功能效果的随机对照试验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 823-830. |
[15] | 陈晨, 孟兆祥, 杨康, 张敏杰, 左亚南, 王奎, 张熙斌, 全逸峰, 金星. 智能镜像手套任务导向性训练联合低频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者手功能效果的随机对照试验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(7): 831-838. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
|