《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 356-363.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2026.03.012
收稿日期:2025-08-11
修回日期:2026-01-26
出版日期:2026-03-25
发布日期:2026-04-01
通讯作者:
张春芹,E-mail:13956661195@163.com
作者简介:张春芹(1988-),女,汉族,安徽合肥市人,主管护师,主要研究方向:颅内动脉瘤
基金资助:
ZHANG Chunqin(
), XIE Chengcheng, WANG Tingting
Received:2025-08-11
Revised:2026-01-26
Published:2026-03-25
Online:2026-04-01
Contact:
ZHANG Chunqin, E-mail: Supported by:摘要:
目的 调查颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者延续性护理需求状况,并分析其影响因素。
方法 2022年1月至2025年4月,选取安徽医科大学第四附属医院收治的121例颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者,采用一般资料调查表和延续性护理需求调查表进行问卷调查。采用多元线性回归分析延续性护理需求的影响因素。
结果 发出121份问卷,回收115份,有效回收率95.04%。延续性护理需求得分(100.54±6.97)分。不同年龄、受教育程度、家庭主要照顾者、术前Hunt-Hess分级、并发其他疾病数量、术后接受过康复训练、家附近有医疗卫生服务机构情况患者延续性护理需求评分比较有显著性差异(|F| > 8.104, |t| > 2.651, P < 0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,受教育程度、家庭主要照顾者、术前Hunt-Hess分级、并发其他疾病数量、家附近有医疗卫生服务机构情况均为颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者延续性护理需求的影响因素(|t| > 1.703, P < 0.05)。
结论 颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者延续性护理需求受教育程度、家庭主要照顾者、术前Hunt-Hess分级、并发其他疾病数量、家附近有医疗卫生服务机构情况等因素影响,医护人员应综合考虑患者具体情况与实际需求,为其提供针对性的延续性护理服务。
中图分类号:
张春芹, 谢程程, 王婷婷. 颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者延续性护理需求现状及影响因素分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2026, 32(3): 356-363.
ZHANG Chunqin, XIE Chengcheng, WANG Tingting. Status and influencing factors of the continuity of care needs in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2026, 32(3): 356-363.
表2
不同特征颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者延续性护理需求评分比较"
| 项目 | n | 延续性护理需求评分 | F/t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | ≤ 40岁 | 24 | 96.83±6.57 | 8.183 | < 0.001 |
| 41~65岁 | 45 | 99.71±5.90 | |||
| > 65岁 | 46 | 103.28±7.17 | |||
| 性别 | 男 | 67 | 100.63±7.46 | 0.159 | 0.874 |
| 女 | 48 | 100.42±6.30 | |||
| 受教育程度 | 初中及以下 | 34 | 104.00±6.86 | 9.559 | < 0.001 |
| 高中或中专 | 60 | 100.08±6.30 | |||
| 大专及以上 | 21 | 96.24±6.49 | |||
| 居住地 | 农村 | 49 | 101.51±7.66 | 1.291 | 0.199 |
| 城镇 | 66 | 99.82±6.38 | |||
| 医疗付费方式 | 医保 | 97 | 100.62±7.02 | 0.282 | 0.778 |
| 自费 | 18 | 100.11±6.87 | |||
| 家庭主要照顾者 | 家属 | 85 | 99.34±6.61 | 3.227 | 0.002 |
| 自己 | 30 | 103.93±6.96 | |||
| 动脉瘤发生部位 | 前交通动脉 | 32 | 99.09±5.86 | 1.087 | 0.358 |
| 后交通动脉 | 36 | 100.08±7.76 | |||
| 大脑中动脉 | 23 | 101.96±7.95 | |||
| 颈内动脉 | 24 | 101.79±5.97 | |||
| 动脉瘤数目 | 单发 | 74 | 100.35±7.62 | 0.387 | 0.700 |
| 多发 | 41 | 100.88±5.68 | |||
| 术前Hunt-Hess分级 | Ⅰ级 | 53 | 98.13±6.39 | 8.104 | < 0.001 |
| Ⅱ级 | 46 | 101.74±6.29 | |||
| Ⅲ级 | 16 | 105.06±7.92 | |||
| 并发其他疾病数量 | 无 | 18 | 96.11±6.41 | 8.702 | < 0.001 |
| 1种 | 68 | 100.16±6.08 | |||
| ≥ 2种 | 29 | 104.17±7.62 | |||
| 术后接受过康复训练 | 是 | 73 | 99.21±6.17 | 2.783 | 0.006 |
| 否 | 42 | 102.86±7.72 | |||
| 家附近有医疗卫生服务机构 | 是 | 85 | 99.54±6.56 | 2.651 | 0.009 |
| 否 | 30 | 103.37±7.43 | |||
表3
自变量赋值情况"
| 自变量 | 赋值 |
|---|---|
| 年龄 | ≤ 40岁 = 1,41~65岁 = 2,> 65岁 = 3 |
| 性别 | 男 = 1,女 = 2 |
| 受教育程度 | 初中及以下 = 1,高中或中专 = 2,大专及以上 = 3 |
| 居住地 | 农村 = 1,城镇 = 0 |
| 医疗付费方式 | 自费 = 1,医保 = 0 |
| 家庭主要照顾者 | 自己 = 1,家属 = 0 |
| 动脉瘤发生部位 | 前交通动脉 = 1,后交通动脉 = 2,大脑中动脉 = 3,颈内动脉 = 4 |
| 动脉瘤数目 | 多发 = 1,单发 = 0 |
| 术前Hunt-Hess分级 | Ⅰ级 = 1,Ⅱ级 = 2,Ⅲ级 = 3 |
| 并发其他疾病 | 无 = 1,1种 = 2,≥ 2种 = 3 |
| 术后接受过康复训练 | 否 = 1,是 = 0 |
| 家附近有医疗卫生服务机构 | 否 = 1,是 = 0 |
表4
颅内动脉瘤破裂出血患者延续性护理需求影响因素的多元线性回归分析结果"
| 自变量 | 回归系数 | β | t值 | P值 | 95%置信区间 | 共线性检验 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | 下限 | 上限 | 容差 | VIF | |||||
| 年龄 | ≤ 40岁 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 41~65岁 | 1.724 | 1.464 | 0.121 | 1.178 | 0.242 | -1.181 | 4.630 | 0.519 | 1.927 | |
| > 65岁 | 2.909 | 1.531 | 0.205 | 1.900 | 0.060 | -0.130 | 5.948 | 0.471 | 2.125 | |
| 性别 | 男 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 女 | 0.773 | 1.131 | 0.055 | 0.683 | 0.496 | -1.472 | 3.017 | 0.852 | 1.174 | |
| 受教育程度 | 初中及以下 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 高中或中专 | -2.206 | 1.295 | -0.159 | -1.703 | 0.092 | -4.777 | 0.365 | 0.632 | 1.581 | |
| 大专及以上 | -4.120 | 1.751 | -0.229 | -2.353 | 0.021 | -7.596 | -0.645 | 0.579 | 1.728 | |
| 居住地 | 农村 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 城镇 | 0.102 | 1.120 | 0.007 | 0.091 | 0.927 | -2.120 | 2.324 | 0.864 | 1.158 | |
| 医疗付费方式 | 医保 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 自费 | -0.211 | 1.583 | -0.011 | -0.133 | 0.894 | -3.353 | 2.932 | 0.800 | 1.250 | |
| 家庭主要照顾者 | 家属 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 自己 | 2.945 | 1.321 | 0.186 | 2.230 | 0.028 | 0.324 | 5.567 | 0.787 | 1.271 | |
| 动脉瘤发生部位 | 前交通动脉 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 后交通动脉 | 0.396 | 1.441 | 0.026 | 0.275 | 0.784 | -2.464 | 3.255 | 0.593 | 1.686 | |
| 大脑中动脉 | -0.316 | 1.642 | -0.018 | -0.192 | 0.848 | -3.575 | 2.943 | 0.614 | 1.629 | |
| 颈内动脉 | 1.991 | 1.575 | 0.117 | 1.264 | 0.209 | -1.136 | 5.118 | 0.646 | 1.548 | |
| 动脉瘤数目 | 单发 | 0.000 | 0.833 | 1.200 | ||||||
| 多发 | -0.223 | 1.177 | -0.015 | -0.189 | 0.850 | -2.558 | 2.113 | |||
| 术前Hunt-Hess分级 | Ⅰ级 | 0.000 | 0.748 | 1.336 | ||||||
| Ⅱ级 | 2.478 | 1.214 | 0.175 | 2.041 | 0.044 | 0.068 | 4.887 | 0.735 | 1.361 | |
| Ⅲ级 | 5.209 | 1.735 | 0.260 | 3.003 | 0.003 | 1.765 | 8.652 | |||
| 并发其他疾病 | 无 | 0.000 | 0.808 | 1.238 | ||||||
| 1种 | 1.632 | 1.575 | 0.116 | 1.036 | 0.303 | -1.495 | 4.759 | |||
| ≥ 2种 | 6.328 | 1.775 | 0.396 | 3.565 | 0.001 | 2.804 | 9.851 | 0.852 | 1.173 | |
| 术后接受过康复训练 | 是 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 否 | 1.827 | 1.186 | 0.127 | 1.541 | 0.127 | -0.527 | 4.181 | 0.812 | 1.232 | |
| 家附近有医疗卫生服务机构 | 是 | 0.000 | ||||||||
| 否 | 2.783 | 1.294 | 0.176 | 2.150 | 0.034 | 0.214 | 5.353 | 0.819 | 1.220 | |
| [1] |
ZHANG X H, ZHAO X Y, LIU L L, et al. Identification of ruptured intracranial aneurysms using the aneurysm-specific prediction score in patients with multiple aneurysms with subarachnoid hemorrhages: a Chinese population based external validation study[J]. BMC Neurol, 2022, 22(1): 201.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02727-w |
| [2] | 程晶晶, 刘红娟. 全面早期康复护理在颅内动脉瘤夹闭术患者中的效果观察[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2022, 29(3): 376-380. |
| CHENG J J, LIU H J. Observation of the effect of comprehensive early rehabilitation nursing in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm clipping surgery[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil, 2022, 29(3): 376-380. | |
| [3] | 叶慧, 边雪梅. 基于IPA分析法的延续护理干预在颅内动脉瘤患者居家康复中的应用效果[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2021, 18(6): 830-833. |
| YE H, BIAN X M. The application effect of continuous nursing intervention based on IPA analysis method in home rehabilitation of patients with intracranial aneurysms[J]. Med Lab Sci Clin, 2021, 18(6): 830-833. | |
| [4] | 周惠玲, 苏铭叶, 杨志玉, 等. 肝移植受者延续性护理服务需求现状和属性分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2024, 24(11): 1738-1742. |
| ZHOU H L, SU M Y, YANG Z Y, et al. Analysis of the current status and attributes of the demand for continuity of care services in liver transplant recipients[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2024, 24(11): 1738-1742. | |
| [5] | 张炜, 赵乐妍, 孙颖. 延续性护理在老年衰弱患者中的应用与效果评价[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2021, 37(26): 2016-2021. |
| ZHANG W, ZHAO L Y, SUN Y. Application and effectiveness evaluation of continuity nursing in elderly patients with frailty[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2021, 37(26): 2016-2021. | |
| [6] | PIROLI A, LEUTER C, FUSCO L, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for pain in a continuing care setting: a survey at an Italian Continuing Care Service[J]. Ann Ig, 2022, 34(1): 84-96. |
| [7] | 武美茹, 陈义彤, 刘星池, 等. 基于掌上天坛APP卒中患者延续性护理需求的质性研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(5): 586-591. |
| WU M R, CHEN Y T, LIU X C, et al. Qualitative study on the continuity of care needs of stroke patients based on the Palm Temple of Heaven APP[J]. Chin J Stroke, 2024, 19(5): 586-591. | |
| [8] | 卜文夺, 马红梅, 程惠玲, 等. 维持性血液透析患者对延续性护理需求状况及相关因素的调查分析[J]. 河北医药, 2020, 42(18): 2842-2847. |
| BU W D, MA H M, CHENG H L, et al. Investigation and analysis of the demand for continuity of care and related factors in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Hebei Med J, 2020, 42(18): 2842-2847. | |
| [9] |
徐婷, 董恩宏, 郭丽君, 等. 老年慢性病患者延续性健康管理需求及影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(13): 1665-1670.
doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.014 |
| XU T, DONG E H, GUO L J, et al. Research on the needs and influencing factors of continuity of health management in elderly chronic disease patients[J]. Chin Gener Pract, 2021, 24(13): 1665-1670. | |
| [10] | 中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会, 中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组. 中国颅内破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(8): 546-574. |
| Chinese Medical Association Neurointerventional Professional Committee, Chinese Intracranial Aneurysm Program Research Group. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of intracranial burst aneurysms 2021[J]. Chin J Cerebrovas Dis, 2021, 18(8): 546-574. | |
| [11] | 张海洪, 丛亚丽. 世界医学会«赫尔辛基宣言»2024版修订述评[J]. 医学与哲学, 2024, 45(21): 18-23. |
| ZHANG H H, CONG Y L. A review of the 2024 revision of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki[J]. Med Philos, 2024, 45(21): 18-23. | |
| [12] |
NINA P, SCHISANO G, CHIAPPETTA F, et al. A study of blood coagulation and fibrinolytic system in spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Correlation with Hunt-Hess grade and outcome[J]. Surg Neurol, 2001, 55(4): 197-203.
pmid: 11358585 |
| [13] | 马波. 脑卒中患者延续性护理服务需求现状及效果评价[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015. |
| MA B. Current situation and effectiveness evaluation of continuity of care services for stroke patients[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2015. | |
| [14] |
MCKAY J R. Digital approaches to continuing care[J]. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 2022, 35(4): 259-264.
doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000801 |
| [15] |
SU X, ZHONG M H, YE X M, et al. Effects of evidence-based continuing care bundle on health outcomes in rectal cancer patients with temporary stomas: a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. Cancer Nurs, 2021, 44(3): 223-234.
doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000762 |
| [16] |
FAKHA A, GROENVYNCK L, DE BOER B, et al. A myriad of factors influencing the implementation of transitional care innovations:a scoping review[J]. Implement Sci, 2021, 16(1): 21.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01087-2 |
| [17] |
LIU H, WANG Z, HU J, et al. Measuring the continuing care needs of inpatients in rural China[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2024, 24(1): 308.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10729-2 pmid: 38454448 |
| [18] |
ORTEGA MORENO D A, ALMULHIM I, KU J C, et al. Effect of non-neurological complications on the functional outcome of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. Neurochirurgie, 2025, 71(3): 101663.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101663 |
| [19] | 韩琳. 中青年脑卒中患者延续性护理需求的现状及影响因素分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017. |
| HAN L. Analysis of the current situation and influencing factors of continuity of care needs in middle-aged and young stroke patients[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2017. | |
| [20] | LARSON S, JOHN S, GOWRISANKAR S, et al. Social determinants of health framework identifies patients at risk for loss to follow-up after stroke[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2025, 14(9): 40986. |
| [21] |
KWAME A, PETRUCKA P M. Understanding patients' decision to leave hospital care in Ghana: clinical cases and underlying determinants[J]. BMC Nurs, 2024, 23(1): 867.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02469-9 pmid: 39614221 |
| [22] | 陈丽珊. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折手术患者延续性护理需求状况及其影响因素分析[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2021, 18(13): 1912-1915. |
| CHEN L S. Analysis of the continuous nursing needs and influencing factors of elderly patients undergoing femoral intertrochanteric fracture surgery[J]. Nurs Pract Res, 2021, 18(13): 1912-1915. | |
| [23] | TYLER N, HODKINSON A, PLANNER C, et al. Transitional care interventions from hospital to community to reduce health care use and improve patient outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2023, 6(11): 2344825. |
| [24] |
YOKOBATAKE K, OHTA T, KITAOKA H, et al. Safety of early rehabilitation in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 31(11): 106751.
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106751 |
| [25] |
LIU P, LI R, ZHANG T, et al. Multimodal assessment predicts cognitive impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2025, 111(2): 1977-1987.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002239 |
| [26] |
WESSELS L, WOLF S, ADAGE T, et al. Localized nicardipine release implants for prevention of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Neurol, 2024, 81(10): 1060-1065.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2564 pmid: 39158893 |
| [27] | 石砚, 曹娟. 白内障患者日间手术后延续性护理需求的相关因素[J]. 中国医药导报, 2022, 19(10): 190-193. |
| SHI Y, CAO J. Related factors of continuity of care needs for cataract patients after day surgery[J]. Chin Med J, 2022, 19(10): 190-193. | |
| [28] | 赵伟霞, 高洁, 刘璋. 老年骨质疏松性骨折患者出院后对疾病和康复锻炼认知、自我护理能力以及延续护理的需求[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2023, 32(6): 848-851. |
| ZHAO W X, GAO J, LIU Z. Elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures have a need for disease and rehabilitation exercise awareness, self-care ability, and continuity of care after discharge[J]. Mod J Integr Tradit Chin West Med, 2023, 32(6): 848-851. | |
| [29] |
WU L T, GLASS G F J R, CHEW E Y H, et al. Developing a theory of change to guide the design and implementation of a caregiver-centric support service[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2024, 24(1): 1620.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11931-y pmid: 39695613 |
| [30] | 郭鸣, 李冰洁, 梅利平, 等. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者Hunt-Hess分级与并发症及功能障碍相关性分析[J]. 神经损伤与功能重建, 2024, 19(4): 217-221. |
| GUO M, LI B J, MEI L P, et al. Correlation analysis between Hunt-Hess grading, complications, and functional impairment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Neur Injury Function Reconstruct, 2024, 19(4): 217-221. | |
| [31] |
YANG Y, WANG B, GE X, et al. Natural course of ruptured but untreated intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter 2-year follow-up study[J]. Stroke, 2023, 54(8): 2087-2095.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042530 pmid: 37306018 |
| [32] |
FAN M, JING L, WANG B, et al. Analysis of postoperative quality of life and prognosis of patients with intracranial aneurysm after nursing based on concept of time[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2023, 15(4): 2861-2869.
pmid: 37193153 |
| [33] | RASS V, IANOSI B A, LINDLBAUER M, et al. Factors associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: the RAISE score[J]. Crit Care Med, 2022, 50(1): 103-113. |
| [34] | ZHOU H, LIU H J, WANG C, et al. Prognostic factors for anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: a single-center series[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2024, 35(2): 167-169. |
| [35] |
LIM Y C, LEE E, SONG J. Depression or anxiety according to management modalities in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. Stroke, 2022, 53(12): 3662-3670.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040330 pmid: 36128901 |
| [36] |
HAMMING A L, VAN DIJCK J T J M, VISSER T, et al. Study on prognosis of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms (SPARTA): a protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Neurol, 2024, 24(1): 68.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03567-6 pmid: 38368355 |
| [37] |
CALERO-MARTINEZ S A, ABOUD N, SIMION G, et al. Self-assessment of quality of life in patients after suffering from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, principal component analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 25674.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11523-8 |
| [38] | 王琦, 张红梅, 张逍显, 等. 老年慢性病患者社区护理需求现状及影响因素[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(9): 1617-1620. |
| WANG Q, ZHANG H M, ZHANG X X, et al. The current situation and influencing factors of community nursing needs for elderly patients with chronic diseases[J]. Mod Prevent Med, 2020, 47(9): 1617-1620. | |
| [39] | 郭蕾, 方琴. 慢性病患者延续性护理需求的研究进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2024, 30(13): 1809-1815. |
| GUO L, FANG Q. Research progress on continuity of care needs of chronic disease patients[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2024, 30(13): 1809-1815. | |
| [40] | 沈蓝君, 夏露, 程云. 老年日间手术患者延续护理需求现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(21): 2622-2628. |
| SHEN L J, XIA L, CHENG Y. Research on the current situation and influencing factors of continued nursing needs in elderly day surgery patients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(21): 2622-2628. | |
| [41] |
WOO H N, LIM Y C, LEE J H, et al. Predictors of self-care performance in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 30304.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82090-7 |
| [42] | JONES BERKELEY S B, JOHNSON A M, MORMER E R, et al. Referral to community-based rehabilitation following acute stroke:findings from the COMPASS pragmatic trial[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcome, 2024, 17(1): 10026. |
| [1] | 薛蕾. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者Ⅰ期心脏康复运动时长的影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(12): 1414-1420. |
| [2] | 解海霞, 胡心星, 翟华, 林佩佩, 何建辉, 张佳, 董晓婉, 苌凤水. 生活重建训练对慢性期脊髓损伤患者及其照顾者焦虑和抑郁的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(11): 1333-1341. |
| [3] | 刘晨, 董理权, 闫媚, 江华. 功能障碍人群辅助器具适配度评价及影响因素分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2025, 31(11): 1354-1364. |
| [4] | 陈盼盼, 王炳龙, 董理权, 刘夕东, 杨幼平, 李佳玥. 成都肢体残疾人未满足辅助技术需求及其相关因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(5): 598-605. |
| [5] | 蒋娜, 卫宁, 曾艳玲, 张倩, 益筱哲, 陈万强, 景玉珍, 寄婧, 郭旭升, 裴泓波, 王建云. 康复患者次均住院费用影响因素的分析:基于分位数回归模型[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(4): 397-403. |
| [6] | 王子豪, 李昕华, 蒋慧萍, 郭赛男, 梁秋曼, 史婷奇. 全膝关节置换术后短期膝关节功能及其影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 111-118. |
| [7] | 王光程, 段明雪, 郭桐桐, 邢洋, 董志伟, 张琳琳, 郭培武, 井淇, 郑文贵. 康复治疗师职业发展及其转型影响因素分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 565-569. |
| [8] | 郭霜, 谢咏祺, 张良, 张春佳, 彭润, 杨德刚, 杨明亮. 舞蹈致儿童无骨折脱位型脊髓损伤神经学预后的影响因素及预测模型[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 582-589. |
| [9] | 高飞, 刘丽旭, 袁永学. 脑干卒中导致吞咽障碍的临床特征及康复[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 465-471. |
| [10] | 李经宇, 吕云, 辛雨, 李硕, 彭思静, 密忠祥. 城市医疗集团康复患者向下转诊意愿及影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1481-1488. |
| [11] | 刘晓燕,丁霞,董晨,李荣,孙驰. 社区与住院老年人跌倒的现状及影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(4): 389-398. |
| [12] | 葛章伟,黄馨,刘正东,张敏,张家奎. 重症监护室中老年患者术后谵妄影响因素分析及风险预测模型建立与评价[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(3): 340-345. |
| [13] | 龚翔,潘颖颖,曾玲丽,杨清艳,周蕴弢,沈莹莹,范亚蓓,肖剑秋. 儿童康复治疗师的人格特质与职业满意度影响因素调查[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(10): 1224-1230. |
| [14] | 袁永学,张庆苏. 环咽肌功能障碍患者康复结局的影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(8): 973-977. |
| [15] | 史珈铭,刘晓婷. 老年人社区康复服务需求及其影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(3): 334-340. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||