《中国康复理论与实践》

中国康复理论与实践 >

2016 , Vol. 22 >Issue 12: 1384 - 1383

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2016.12.005

专题 脑卒中患者上肢运动功能与活动的康复

镜像疗法改善脑卒中后上肢运动功能和日常生活活动的Meta分析

  • 白钟飞 ,
  • 张子未 ,
  • 王惠芳 ,
  • 陆佳妮
展开
  • 上海市养志康复医院(上海市阳光康复中心)作业治疗科，上海市 201619。
白钟飞(1989-)，男，四川青川县人，硕士，康复治疗师，主要研究方向：脑卒中后上肢功能障碍的康复和工伤职业康复。

收稿日期: 2016-06-20

  网络出版日期: 2017-01-15

收起

Effect of Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Motor Function and Activities of Daily Living after Stroke: A Meta-analysis　

  • BAI Zhong-fei ,
  • ZHANG Zi-wei ,
  • WANG Hui-fang ,
  • LU Jia-ni
Expand
  • Occupational Therapy Department, Shanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), Shanghai 201619, China

Received date: 2016-06-20

  Online published: 2017-01-15

Fold

摘要

目的　系统回顾镜像疗法对脑卒中患者患侧上肢运动功能和日常生活能力的疗效。方法　在Medline、PubMed、CINAHL、OT seeker、PEDro、万方数据库和中国知网数据库中系统检索2006年1月~2016年5月研究镜像疗法对脑卒中患者上肢功能疗效的研究，纳入随机对照研究，排除不以患侧上肢运动功能和日常生活活动能力为主要结局指标的研究。进行数据提取，采用RevMan 5.3进行分析。结果　共纳入14篇随机对照研究。相比对照治疗，镜像疗法可提高患侧上肢Fugl-Meyer评分(SMD=0.81, 95%CI=0.43~1.20, P<0.001, I2=64%)，在剔除仅纳入严重偏瘫的2篇文献后，效应提高(SMD=0.96, 95%CI=0.59~1.34, P<0.001, I2=51%)，且不同镜像疗法亚组间有非常显著性差异(P=0.004)。镜像疗法也可提高脑卒中患者患侧上肢动作研究量表评分(SMD=0.33, 95%CI=0.01~0.64, P=0.040, I2=0)、组块测试评分(SMD=0.70, 95%CI=0.03~1.37, P=0.040, I2=62%)，还可提高患侧上肢Brunstrom分级(SMD=1.56, 95%CI=1.07~2.06, P<0.001, I2=41%)；可提高脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力(SMD=0.93, 95%CI=0.62~1.24, P<0.001, I2=0)。尚无证据表明镜像疗法可改善患侧上肢肌张力(SMD=-0.22, 95%CI=-0.73~0.28, P=0.890, I2=0)。结论　镜像疗法可在一定程度上改善脑卒中患者患侧上肢运动功能，提高日常生活能力。

关键词： 脑卒中; 镜像疗法; 上肢; 运动功能; 日常生活活动; Meta分析

本文引用格式

白钟飞 , 张子未 , 王惠芳 , 陆佳妮 . 镜像疗法改善脑卒中后上肢运动功能和日常生活活动的Meta分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2016 , 22(12) : 1384 -1383 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2016.12.005

Abstract

Objective To systematically summarize the effects of mirror therapy on upper extremity motor function and activities of daily living after stroke.Methods The literatures about mirror therapy published between January, 2006 and May, 2016 were recalled from Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, OT seeker, PEDro, Wanfang and CNKI databases. The randomized control trials were included, and those didn't concern upper extremity motor function and activities of daily living were excluded. The data were extracted and analysed with RevMan 5.3.Results Fourteen trials were included. Mirror therapy could significantly improve Fugl-Meyer Assessment score (SMD=0.81, 95%CI=0.43-1.20, P<0.001, I2=64%). Subgroups analysis indicated movement based mirror therapy was more effective on mild to moderate hemiplegia (SMD=0.96, 95%CI=0.59~1.34, P<0.001, I2=51%) and the subgroup differences were also significant (P=0.004). Mirror therapy could improve score of Action Research Arm Test (SMD=0.33, 95%CI=0.01-0.64, P=0.040, I2=0), Box and Block Test (SMD=0.70, 95%CI=0.03-1.37, P=0.040, I2=62%) and Brunstrom stages (SMD=1.56, 95%CI=1.07-2.06, P<0.001, I2=41%) of affected upper extremities. It could also improve activities of daily living (SMD=0.93, 95%CI=0.62-1.24, P<0.001, I2=0). No evidence revealed mirror therapy could change muscle tone of flexors of affected upper limbs (SMD=-0.22, 95%CI=-0.73-0.28, P=0.890, I2=0).Conclusion Mirror therapy can significantly improve upper extremity motor function and activity of daily living.

Key words： stroke; mirror therapy; upper extremity; motor function; activity of daily living; Meta-analysis

参考文献

[1] J?rgense, H, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Functional and neurological outcome of stroke and the relation to stroke severity and type, stroke unit treatment, body temperature, age, and other risk factors: the Copenhagen stroke study [J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2000, 6(4): 1-19.
[2] Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, et al. A self-administered graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial [J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(6): 2123-2128.
[3] Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2009(4): CD004433.
[4] Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke [J]. Stroke, 2006, 37(4): 1045-1049.
[5] Saposnik G, Levin M. Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians [J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(5): 1380-1386.
[6] Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2008, 22(2): 111-121.
[7] Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke [J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(19): 1772-1783.
[8] Harvey RL. Improving poststroke recovery: neuroplasticity and task-oriented training [J]. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med, 2009, 11(3): 251-259.
[9] Rensink M, Schuurmans M, Lindeman E, et al. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review [J]. J Adv Nurs, 2009, 65(4): 737-754.
[10] Jeon BJ, Kim WH, Park EY. Effect of task-oriented training for people with stroke: a meta-analysis focused on repetitive or circuit training [J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2015, 22(1): 34-43.
[11] Viana R, Teasell R. Barriers to the implementation of constraint-induced movement therapy into practice [J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2012, 19(2): 104-114.
[12] Aguinis H, Henle CA, Beaty JC. Virtual reality technology: a new tool for personnel selection [J]. Int J Selec Asses, 2001, 9(1-2): 70-83.
[13] Grotta JC, Noser EA, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy [J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(11 suppl 1): 2699-2701.
[14] Jang SH, Kim YH, Cho SH, et al. Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients [J]. Neuroreport, 2003, 14(1): 137-141.
[15] Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors [J]. Proc Biol Sci, 1996, 263(1369): 377-386.
[16] Timms J, Carus C. Mirror therapy for the alleviation of phantom limb pain following amputation: a literature review [J]. Int J Ther Rehabil, 2015, 22(3): 135-145.
[17] Chan BL, Witt R, Charrow AP, et al. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain [J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(21): 2206-2207.
[18] Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror [J]. Lancet, 1999, 353(9169): 2035-2036.
[19] Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van Der Geest JN, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients a phase II randomized controlled trial [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2011, 25(3): 223-233.
[20] Deconinck FJ, Smorenburg AR, Benham A, et al. Reflections on mirror therapy a systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2015, 29(4): 349-361.
[21] Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke [J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(1): e1-e2.
[22] Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, et al. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(8): 920-925.
[23] Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials [J]. Phys Ther, 2003, 83(8): 713-721.
[24] Lannin N, Herbert R. Is hand splinting effective for adults following stroke? a systematic review and methodological critique of published research [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2003, 17(8): 807-816.
[25] Harvey L, Herbert R, Crosbie J. Does stretching induce lasting increases in joint ROM? a systematic review [J]. Physiother Res Int, 2002, 7(1): 1-13.
[26] Collaboration C. Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.3 [CP]. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2014.
[27] Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, 等. GRADE指南: Ⅳ. 证据质量分级[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(4): 456-463.
[28] Balshem H, Helfanda M, Schunemann HJ, 等. GRADE 指南: Ⅲ. 证据质量分级[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(4): 451-455.
[29] Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. rating the quality of evidence [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(4): 401-406.
[30] Arya KN, Pandian S, Kumar D, et al. Task-based mirror therapy augmenting motor recovery in poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2015, 24(8): 1738-1748.
[31] Dohle C, Pullen J, Nakaten A, et al. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009, 23(3): 209-217.
[32] Invernizzi M, Negrini S, Carda S, et al. The value of adding mirror therapy for upper limb motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2013, 49(3): 311-317.
[33] Kim K, Lee S, Kim D, et al. Effects of mirror therapy combined with motor tasks on upper extremity function and activities daily living of stroke patients [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(2): 483-487.
[34] Lee MM, Cho HY, Song CH. The mirror therapy program enhances upper-limb motor recovery and motor function in acute stroke patients [J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 91(8): 689-696, quiz 697-700.
[35] Lin KC, Huang PC, Chen YT, et al. Combining afferent stimulation and mirror therapy for rehabilitating motor function, motor control, ambulation, and daily functions after stroke [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2014, 28(2): 153-162.
[36] Park JY, Chang M, Kim KM, et al. The effect of mirror therapy on upper-extremity function and activities of daily living in stroke patients [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27(6): 1681-1683.
[37] Park Y, Chang M, Kim KM, et al. The effects of mirror therapy with tasks on upper extremity function and self-care in stroke patients [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2015, 27(5): 1499-1501.
[38] Samuelkamaleshkumar S, Reethajanetsureka S, Pauljebaraj P, et al. Mirror therapy enhances motor performance in the paretic upper limb after Stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(11): 2000-2005.
[39] Thieme H, Bayn M, Wurg M, et al. Mirror therapy for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2013, 27(4): 314-324.
[40] Wu CY, Huang PC, Chen YT, et al. Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013, 94(6): 1023-1030.
[41] Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2008, 89(3): 393-398.
[42] 张洪翠,于大君,刘志华,等. 镜像疗法对偏瘫患者上肢功能康复疗效的观察[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2011, 6(5): 381-387.
[43] Platz T, Pinkowski C, Van Wijck F, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2005, 19(4): 404-411.
[44] 岳雨珊,黄杰,谢斌,等. 镜像疗法改善脑卒中患者上肢功能障碍的系统评价[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2013, 35(2): 97-101.
[45] Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation [J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 1986, 1(3): 59-74.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉