临床研究

手持型肌力测定仪测量下肢肌力的信度与效度

  • 贾延兵 ,
  • 刘浩 ,
  • 熊愿 ,
  • 王楚珊 ,
  • 洪文侠 ,
  • 钟林森 ,
  • 黄战武 ,
  • 张世杰
展开
  • 1.广东省工伤康复医院,a.物理治疗科;b.粤港运动损伤康复与研究中心,广东广州市 510440;
    2.宜兴九如城康复医院康复治疗部,江苏宜兴市 214200;
    3.东莞市康复医院物理治疗科,广东东莞市 523119。
贾延兵(1982-),女,汉族,河南禹州市人,主管治疗师,主要研究方向:烧伤及骨关节损伤的物理治疗。

收稿日期: 2016-09-25

  修回日期: 2017-01-13

  网络出版日期: 2017-05-24

Reliability and Validity of A Novel Hand-held Dynamometer for Muscles Strength of Lower Extremities

  • JIA Yan-bing ,
  • LIU Hao ,
  • XIONG Yuan ,
  • WANG Chu-shan ,
  • HONG Wen-xia ,
  • ZHONG Lin-sen ,
  • HUANG Zhan-wu ,
  • ZHANG Shi-jie
Expand
  • 1. a. Department of Physical Therapy; b. Guangdong-Hongkong Joint Sports Injury Rehabilitation and Research Center, Guangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510440, China;
    2. Rehabilitation Department, JORU Rehabilitation Hospital, Yixing, Jiangsu 214200, China;
    3. Department of Physical Therapy, Dongguan Rehabilitation Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong 523119, China

Received date: 2016-09-25

  Revised date: 2017-01-13

  Online published: 2017-05-24

摘要

目的 测试手持型肌力测定仪OE-210测定下肢肌力的信度与效度。方法 2016年3月1日至4月30日,正常青年人38名,由2位治疗师分别使用OE-210进行股四头肌和腘绳肌肌力测定,其中一位治疗师在3 d后重复测试1次。受试者1 d后接受下肢等速肌力测试。计算组内相关系数(ICC),OE-210测试结果与等速测试结果进行Pearson相关分析。结果 同一测试者重复测量ICC=0.718~0.924;不同测试者间ICC=0.784~0.870。OE-210测试结果与等速测试峰力矩正显著相关性(P<0.001),其中股四头肌轻中度相关(r=0.270~0.413),腘绳肌高度相关(r=0.582~0.668)。结论 OE-210肌力测定仪测试下肢股四头肌、腘绳肌的信度良好,而确保其使用效度的条件尚需进一步研究。

本文引用格式

贾延兵 , 刘浩 , 熊愿 , 王楚珊 , 洪文侠 , 钟林森 , 黄战武 , 张世杰 . 手持型肌力测定仪测量下肢肌力的信度与效度[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017 , 23(5) : 572 -574 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.05.017

Abstract

Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of a novel hand-held dynamometer, OE-210, for muscles strength of lower extremities. Methods From March 1st to August 30th, 2016, 38 young adults were tested the muscle strength of quadriceps and hamstrings with OE-210 dynamometer by 2 rators, and were retested by one of the raters three days later. The isokinetic test was also conducted on all the subjects one day afterwards. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of OE-210 test Results and the Pearson's correlation coefficient between Results of OE-210 and isokinetic test were calculated. Results The ICC of test-retest were 0.718 to 0.924, and the ICC of inter-rater were 0.784 to 0.870. The correlation between muscle performance measured with 2 tools were significant (P<0.001), that was light to medium on quadriceps (r=0.270-0.413), and strong on hamstrings (r=0.582-0.668). Conclusion OE-210 dynamometer was reliable for muscle strength measurement on quadriceps and hamstrings, and the conditions for valid application need further research.

参考文献

[1] Sapega AA. Muscle performance evaluation in orthopaedic practice [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990, 72(10): 1562-1574.
[2] Maffiuletti NA. Assessment of hip and knee muscle function in orthopaedic practice and research [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(1): 220-229.
[3] Awatani T, Mori S, Shinohara J, et al. Same-session and between-day intra-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements of isometric shoulder extensor strength [J]. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2016, 28(3): 936-939.
[4] Awatani T, Morikita I, Shinohara J, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of isometric shoulder extensor and internal rotator strength measurements performed using a hand-held dynamometer [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(11): 3054-3059.
[5] Kim SG, Lim DH, Cho YH. Analysis of the reliability of the make test in young adults by using a hand-held dynamometer [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(8): 2238-2240.
[6] Alfuth M, Hahm MM. Reliability, comparability, and validity of foot inversion and eversion strength measurements using a hand-held dynamometer [J]. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2016, 11(1): 72-84.
[7] 黄志平,尹彦,刘敏,等. 等速肌力测试与训练技术的研究进展[J]. 体育科技, 2011, 32(4): 52-58.
[8] Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice [M]. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health, 2009: 585-618.
[9] Muff G, Dufour S, Meyer A, et al. Comparative assessment of knee extensor and flexor muscle strength measured using a hand-held vs. isokinetic dynamometer [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016, 28(9): 2445-2451.
[10] Whiteley R, Jacobsen P, Prior S, et al. Correlation of isokinetic and novel hand-held dynamometry measures of knee flexion and extension strength testing [J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2012, 15(5): 444-450.
[11] Katoh M, Isozaki K. Reliability of isometric knee extension muscle strength measurements of healthy elderly subjects made with a hand-held dynamometer and a belt [J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(12): 1855-1859.
[12] Leiri A, Tushima E, Ishida K, et al. Reliability of measurements of hip abduction strength obtained with a hand-held dynamometer [J]. Physiother Theory Pract, 2015, 31(2): 146-152.
[13] Stark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, et al. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review [J]. PM R, 2011, 3(5): 472-479.
[14] 朴春花,桑德春,牧野健一郎,等. 脑卒中患者偏瘫侧肌力测定的信度和效度——手持式测力仪测定规则[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2008, 30(7): 456-459.
[15] Nollet F, Beelen A. Strength assessment in postpolio syndrome: validity of a hand-held dynamometer in detecting change [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 80(10): 1316-1323.
文章导航

/

〈 〉