目的 认识残疾人康复需求及其影响因素,为残疾人康复政策的制定提供科学依据。方法 2014年6月至2015年7月,基于江苏省残疾人基本服务与需求专项调查数据,从个体特征、经济特征、环境特征等方面,利用描述统计方法,理清影响残疾人康复需求的因素;建立Logit模型,对康复需求的影响因素进行多元回归分析。结果 江苏省16岁及以上残疾人中有康复需求的占43%。列联表分析和χ2检验表明,不同个体特征、经济特征和环境特征的残疾人,康复需求具有显著性差异。多元回归分析表明,个体特征、经济特征和环境特征等18个变量对残疾人康复需求有显著影响,但影响程度各有不同。结论 为满足残疾人的康复需求,应针对残疾人的不同特征,制定精细化康复实施方案。通过供需有效对接,为残疾人提供精准化的康复服务。
Objective To explore the rehabilitation needs of people with disabilities and the related factors, so as to provide a scientific basis for the rehabilitation policy-making for people with disabilities.Methods From June, 2014 to July, 2015, based on the national special survey of basic services and needs of people with disabilities in Jiangsu, China, this paper clarified the factors related with the rehabilitation needs of the disabled into the individual characteristics, economic characteristics, environmental characteristics and so on by the descriptive statistics method. The Logit model was established to explore the factors related with rehabilitation needs.Results In Jiangsu, 43% people with disabilities aged 16 and above had rehabilitation needs. Contingency table analysis and Chi square test showed that individual characteristics, economic characteristics and environmental characteristics had significant impact on the rehabilitation needs of the disabled. Multiple regression analysis showed that all the 18 variables were the significant related factors.Conclusion In order to meet the rehabilitation needs of the disabled, the refined and precise rehabilitation program should be designed in line with the different characteristics of the disabled. Through the effective docking of supplies and needs, we can provide accurate rehabilitation services for the disabled.
[1] 世界卫生组织. 世卫组织2014-2021年全球残疾问题行动计划:增进所有残疾人的健康[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(7): 601-610.
[2] 凌亢,白先春,许巧仙,等. 中国残疾人事业发展报告[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社, 2017.
[3] 周洪双,袁佳方. 预防残疾,我们该做点啥[N]. 光明日报, 2015-08-26(5).
[4] 崔斌,陈功,郑晓瑛. 中国残疾预防的转折机会和预期分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2012(1): 74-82.
[5] 李欣,邱卓英,杨剑,等. 康复2030:扩大康复规模以满足日益增长的康复需求[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 380-384.
[6] 邱卓英,李沁燚. 《世界残疾报告》及其对残疾和康复的重要意义[J]. 残疾人研究, 2012(3): 9-14.
[7] 邱卓英,陈迪. 发展卫生保健和康复服务,增进残疾人健康——学习《世卫组织2014-2021年全球残疾问题行动计划:增进所有残疾人的健康》[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(7): 611-615.
[8] 新华网. 残疾人康复何时不再难[EB/OL]. (2016-03-25)[2017-01-10]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/gongyi/2016-03/25/c_128819539.htm
[9] 中国残疾人联合会,国家卫生计生委,国务院扶贫办. 残疾人精准康复服务行动实施方案[EB/OL]. (2016-06-08)[2017-02-05]. http://www.cdpf.org.cn/zcwj/zxwj/201606/t20160608_556591.shtml
[10] Smith JN.Community responsibility for the disabled[J]. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1945, 239(1): 87-92.
[11] Rubin SE, Chan F, Thomas DL.Assessing changes in life skills and quality of life resulting from rehabilitation services[J]. Evid Based Nurs, 2003, 69(3): 4-9.
[12] Griffiths TL, Phillips CJ, Davies S, et al.Cost effectiveness of an outpatient multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation programme[J]. Thorax, 2001, 56(10): 779-784.
[13] Yang Y, George LK.Functional disability, disability transitions, and depressive symptoms in late life[J]. J Aging Health, 2005, 17(3): 263-292.
[14] 曹学军,汪家琮,杨平,等. 矫形器及辅助用具在脊髓损伤康复中的应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2008, 14(7): 628-629.
[15] 王辉. 脑瘫学生教育康复支持系统实践研究的现状、问题与发展趋势[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2010(10): 12-15.
[16] 郑飞雪. 社区康复项目实施对推进残疾人小康进程的借鉴和思考[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(8): 984-988.
[17] Yu F, Richmond T.Factors affecting outpatient rehabilitation outcomes in elders[J]. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2005, 37(3): 229-236.
[18] Enderby P, Wade DT.Community rehabilitation in the United Kingdom[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2001, 15(6): 577-581.
[19] 罗遐,卜普. 农村残疾人接受康复治疗行为的影响因素研究[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013(4): 128-134.
[20] 刘宝松,裴曌,郭咏军,等. 上海市成年肢体残疾人整体康复需求实现程度及相关因素分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(8): 883-886.
[21] 许利娟. 苏州市残疾人康复保障影响因素分析[D]. 苏州:苏州大学, 2010.
[22] 安峰. 日照市经济技术开发区持证残疾人康复需求调查[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2016.
[23] 中国残疾人联合会. 《2015年江苏省残疾人事业发展统计公报》[EB/OL]. (2016-10-27)[2017-02-06]. http://www.cdpf.org.cn/sjzx/dfsj/201610/t20161027_571468.shtml.
[24] 邱卓英,郭键勋,杨剑,等. 康复2030:促进实现《联合国2030年可持续发展议程》相关目标[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 373-378.
[25] 李沁燚,邱卓英,陈迪,等. 基于ICF构建国家功能、残疾和健康的信息架构和数据体系[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 385-389.