临床研究

冠心病康复有氧运动不同强度设定方法的一致性研究

  • 刘功亮 ,
  • 杨坚 ,
  • 王人卫 ,
  • 李擎 ,
  • 范利
展开
  • 1.上海市徐汇区中心医院康复医学科,上海市 200031;
    2. 上海体育学院,上海市 200438
刘功亮(1991-),男,汉族,上海市人,硕士研究生,治疗师,主要研究方向:神经康复和心肺康复。通讯作者:李擎(1973-),女,博士,副主任医师,主要研究方向:心肺康复。

收稿日期: 2018-04-23

  修回日期: 2018-07-12

  网络出版日期: 2018-08-20

基金资助

上海市徐汇区卫计委重大项目课题(No. SHXH201443)

Consistency of Different Intensity Setting Methods of Aerobic Exercise for Coronary Heart Disease

  • LIU Gong-liang ,
  • YANG Jian ,
  • WANG Ren-wei ,
  • LI Qing ,
  • FAN Li
Expand
  • 1. Rehabilitation Department, Xuhui Central Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai 200031, China;
    2. Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China

Received date: 2018-04-23

  Revised date: 2018-07-12

  Online published: 2018-08-20

摘要

目的 探讨冠心病康复不同有氧运动强度设定方法的一致性,为基层康复机构的冠心病患者进行有氧运动提供安全有效的强度设定方法。方法 2016年7月至2017年7月选取本院低、中危冠心病患者25例,采集安静心率和年龄等基本信息,进行心肺运动试验获取无氧阈和峰值摄氧量。休息1 d后,进行6分钟步行试验。分别使用无氧阈法、峰值摄氧量法、心率储备法、年龄预计法和安静心率+20法计算靶心率,比较不同方法确定靶心率的相关性与一致性。结果 年龄预计法确定的靶心率与无氧阈法无显著性相关(r=-0.131, P>0.05),两者存在非常高度显著性差异(P<0.001);安静心率+20法所推算的靶心率与无氧阈法无显著性相关(r=0.372, P>0.05);峰值摄氧量法确定的靶心率与无氧阈法之间存在非常显著性相关(r=0.872, P<0.01),两者无显著性差异(P>0.05),Bland-Altman检验显示两种方法具有一致性;心率储备法确定的靶心率与无氧阈法之间存在非常高度显著性相关(r=0.836, P<0.001),两者无显著性差异(P>0.05),Bland-Altman检验显示两种方法具有一致性。结论 年龄预计法、安静心率+20法确定的有氧运动靶强度与无氧阈法不具有相关性和一致性;心率储备法、峰值摄氧量法确定的有氧运动靶强度与无氧阈法相关,具有一致性。

本文引用格式

刘功亮 , 杨坚 , 王人卫 , 李擎 , 范利 . 冠心病康复有氧运动不同强度设定方法的一致性研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018 , 24(8) : 950 -955 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.08.015

Abstract

Objective To explore the consistency of different intensity setting methods of aerobic exercise in order to provide the safe and effective strength setting method for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).Methods From July, 2016 to July, 2017, CHD patients in our hospital were recruited. The basic data were collected. The patients received cardiopulmonary exercise test firstly to obtain anaerobic threshold, peak oxygen intake and other indicators. They underwent Six-minute Walk Test after a day off. The target heart rate was calculated using anaerobic threshold method (AT), peak oxygen uptake index method (PI), heart rate reserve method (HRR), age estimates method (AE) and quiet heart rate plus 20 method (HR20), respectively. The correlation and consistency of different methods were analyzed.Results There was no correlation (r=-0.131, P>0.05) and there was a very significant difference (P<0.001) between AE and AT on determining target heart rate. There was no correlation (r=0.372, P>0.05) between HR20 and AT. There was correlation (r=0.872, P<0.01) and there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between PI and AT on determining the target heart rate, and the Bland-Altman test showed a consistency between them. There was correlation (r=0.836, P<0.001) and there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between HRR and AT on determining the target heart rate, and Bland-Altman test demonstrated a consistency between them.Conclusion There was no correlation and consistency of AE and HR20 to AT on the target intensity of aerobic exercise. There was significant correlation and consistency between AT and HRR/PI.

参考文献

[1] Lopez A, Mathers C, Ezzati M, et al.Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors[M]. Washington D.C., USA: World Health Organization, 2006: 10.
[2] Anderson L, Taylor RS.Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014(12): D11273.
[3] Grace S L, Bennett S, Ardern CI, et al.Cardiac rehabilitation series: Canada[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2014, 56(5): 530-535.
[4] Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, et al.Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35: 2929-2933.
[5] Humphrey R, Guazzi M, Niebauer J.Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe[J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2014, 56(5): 551-556.
[6] 李政颖. 运动疗法在冠心病康复中的作用观察[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2010, 19(10): 884-885.
[7] Hamm LF, Wenger NK, Arena R, et al.Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Disability: role in assessment and improving functional capacity, a position statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation[J]. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev, 2013, 33(1): 1-11.
[8] Franklin BA.Preventing exercise-related cardiovascular events: is a medical examination more urgent for physical activity or inactivity?[J]. Circulation, 2014, 129(10): 1081-1084.
[9] 刘江生. 冠心病患者的康复(2006年版)[J]. 心血管康复医学杂志, 2006, 15(b12): 22-55.
[10] 严文文,车琳,宋浩明, 等. 肺栓塞患者运动耐力的评估[J]. 国际心血管病杂志, 2010, 37(5): 301-303.
[11] 车琳,王乐民. 心肺运动试验的临床应用[C]. 哈尔滨:中国康复医学会第七次全国老年医学与康复学术大会, 2012.
[12] ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-minute Walk Test[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002, 166(1): 111-117.
[13] 王集红,季玉珍,刘宇,等.运动负荷气体交换法在老年人心肺功能状况评价中的应用[J].中国康复医学杂志, 2003, 18(3): 161-163.
[14] 陈学伟, 张娜, 徐传香,等.最大摄氧量间接测量法——踏阶运动心率的变化特征[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2015, 33(1): 43-44.
[15] Agostoni P, Corrà U, Cattadori G, et al.Prognostic value of indeterminable anaerobic threshold in heart failure[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2013, 6(5): 977-987.
[16] 车琳,王乐民. 冠心病二级预防综合管理[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2014, 2(4): 4-7.
[17] 刘学华. 监控下有氧运动对冠心病患者心肺功能的影响[D]. 上海:上海体育学院, 2015.
[18] Conraads VM, Beckers PJ.Exercise training in heart failure: practical guidance[J]. Heart, 2010, 96(24): 2025-2031.
[19] Crescimanno G, Modica R, Lo Mauro R, et al.Role of the cardio-pulmonary exercise test and six-minute walking test in the evaluation of exercise performance in patients with late-onset Pompe disease[J]. Neuromuscul Disord, 2015, 25(7): 542-547.
[20] Datta D, Normandin E, ZuWallack R. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the assessment of exertional dyspnea[J]. Ann Thorac Med, 2015, 10(2): 77-86.
[21] Fox SR, Naughton JP, Haskell WL.Physical activity and the prevention of coronary heart disease[J]. Ann Clin Res, 1971, 3(6): 404-432.
[22] Robert AR, Roberto L.The surprising history of the "HRmax=220-age" equation[J]. J Exerc Physiol, 2002, 5(2): 1-10.
[23] 赵理强,朱荣. 运动中最大心率推算公式的探讨[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2007, 10(2): 213-214.
[24] Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR.Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited[J]. Am Coll Cardiol, 2001, 37(1): 153-156.
[25] Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Schulman KA, et al.Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long-term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly medicare beneficiaries[J]. Circulation, 2010, 121(1): 63-70.
[26] Zavorsky GS.Evidence and possible mechanisms of altered maximum heart rate with endurance training and tapering[J]. Sports Med, 2000, 29(1): 13-26.
[27] 秦永生,张敏,郝占国,等. 运动训练与心率变化[J]. 中国临床康复, 2003, 7(6): 952-953.
[28] 王正珍. ACSM运动测试与运动处方指南[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社.2013: 191-192.
[29] 吴卫,彭莉,尹松. 最大摄氧量、无氧阈在评价有氧能力方面的差异分析[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 34(5): 215-218.
[30] 王俊义,张鹏,刘毅梅, 等. 6分钟步行试验与运动心肺功能测定预测肺癌患者术后并发症的价值[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2013, 19(2): 137-139.
[31] 高真真,季鹏,夏月清, 等. 不同强度有氧运动对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后患者心功能及运动耐力的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(4): 344-348.
[32] Burnley M, Jones AM.Oxygen uptake kinetics as a determinant of sport performance[J]. Eur J Sport Sci, 2007, 7(2): 63-79.
[33] Tueller C, Kern L, Azzola A, et al.Six-minute walk test enhanced by mobile telemetric cardiopulmonary monitoring[J]. Respiration 2010, 80(5): 410-418.
[34] 马明,林强,秦洪云. 六分钟步行试验与摄氧量的相关性研究[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2009, 13(50): 9909-9912.
[35] 钱兴皋,林强,李雪萍,等. 6分钟步行试验的运动强度和临床应用价值研究[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2014, 22(4): 37-40.
[36] 陈卉. Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2007, 24(3): 308-309, 315.
[37] Myles PS, Cui J.Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2007, 99(3): 309-311.
[38] Bland JM, Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement[J]. Lancet, 1986, 1(8476): 307-310.
[39] 周宇豪, 许金芳, 贺佳. 诊断试验一致性评价中几种方法的比较及应用[J].中国卫生统计, 2011, 28(1): 40-42.
文章导航

/

〈 〉