专题 现代康复高等教育研究

国际康复人力资源构成和配置及其对发展现代康复高等教育的启示

  • 井淇 ,
  • 孙宏伟 ,
  • 邱卓英
展开
  • 1.潍坊医学院,山东潍坊市 261053;
    2.中国ICF研究院,山东潍坊市 261053;
    3.中国康复健康研究院,山东潍坊市 261053;
    4.世界卫生组织国际分类家族中国合作中心,北京市 100068;
    5.“健康山东”重大社会风险预测与治理协同创新中心,山东潍坊市 261053;
    6.中国康复研究中心康复信息研究所,北京市 100068
井淇(1988-),男,汉族,山东临朐县人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向:卫生政策与管理评价、康复政策与管理。

收稿日期: 2018-09-04

  网络出版日期: 2018-09-27

基金资助

1.国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 71673202); 2.中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目重大科学研究引导基金项目(No. 2017CZ-7; No. 2018CZ-4); 3.山东省自然科学基金项目(No. ZR2017BG022); 4.山东省教育厅高等学校科研发展人文社科计划一般项目(No. J17RA231)

Composition and Allocation of Rehabilitation Workforces: Implications to Development of Higher Education of Modern Rehabilitation

  • JING Qi ,
  • SUN Hong-wei ,
  • QIU Zhuo-ying
Expand
  • 1. Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    2. China Academy of ICF, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    3. China Academy of Rehabilitation and Health, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    4. WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China;
    5. The Innovation Center for Socail Risk Prediction and Goverment in Health Sector of Shandong, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
    6. Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China

Received date: 2018-09-04

  Online published: 2018-09-27

Supported by

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (General) (No. 71673202), National Special Fund Projects of Basic Research of Public Benefits for Institutes at Central Governmental Level (Leading Project of Major Scientic Research) (No. 2017CZ-7No. 2018CZ-4), Shandong Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2017BG022) and Shandong Provincial Education Department's Higher Education Program (No. J17RA231)

摘要

本研究运用国际劳工组织《国际标准职业分类》、联合国教科文组织《国际标准教育分类》对国际康复人力资源的内涵、构成和配置现况进行系统分析,并提出对发展现代康复高等教育三个方面启示:康复高等教育的规模要适应国家对康复人力资源配置的需求;发展完善现代康复高等教育体系;根据国际化康复科学理论方法发展和完善现代康复高等教育的层次和学科专业体系。

本文引用格式

井淇 , 孙宏伟 , 邱卓英 . 国际康复人力资源构成和配置及其对发展现代康复高等教育的启示[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018 , 24(9) : 1011 -1017 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.09.004

Abstract

This paper analyzed the definition, composition and allocation of rehabilitation workforces at globe level using International Standard Classification of Occupations (International Labour Organization) and International Standard Classification of Education (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). Three implications had been drawn: To scale up higher education of rehabilitation to meet the needs and allocation of rehabilitation workforce at country level; To develop higher education system of rehabilitation; To develop disciplines and rehabilitation courses to meet international standards using international theories and approaches of modern rehabilitation sciences and technology.

参考文献

[1] World Health Organization, World Bank.World report on disability 2011 [R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
[2] Kostanjsek N, Good A, Madden RH, et al.Counting disability: global and national estimation[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2013, 35: 1065-1069.
[3] Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al.Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010[J]. Lancet, 2012, 380: 2197-2223.
[4] Mathers CD, Loncar D.Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030[J]. PLoS Med, 2006, 3: e442.
[5] World Health Organization.Resolution adopted by the 66th World Health Assembly on Disability (A66/12) [A]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.
[6] Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J.Health related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states' obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(1): 163-173.
[7] Landry MD, Hamdan E, Al Mazeedi S, et al.The precarious balance between 'supply' and 'demand' for health care: the increasing global demand for rehabilitation service for individuals living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 2008, 3: 393.
[8] Landry MD, Jaglal S, Wodchis WP, et al.Analysis of factors affecting demand for rehabilitation services in Ontario: a health-policy perspective[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2008, 30: 1837-1847.
[9] Stucki G, Cieza A, Melvin J.The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): a unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2007, 39: 279-285.
[10] Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, et al.Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2011, 43: 765-769.
[11] International Labour Orgnization.International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08)[S]. Geneva: International Labour Orgnization, 2012.
[12] World Health Organization.Japan Health System Review [R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.
[13] Gupta N, Castillolaborde C, Landry MD.Health-related rehabilitation services: assessing the global supply of and need for human resources[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2011, 11: 276.
[14] Emerson E, Madden R, Graham H, et al.The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health[J]. Public Health, 2011, 125: 145-147.
[15] Lang R.Community-based rehabilitation and health professional practice: developmental opportunities and challenges in the global North and South[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2011, 33: 165-173.
[16] Eide AH, Oderud T.Assistive technology in low-income countries[M]// MacLachlan M, Swartz L. Disability and International Development: Towards Inclusive Global Health. New York: Springer, 2009: 144-160.
[17] World Health Organization. Global Atlas of the Health Workforce [EB/OL]. [2018-05-17]. http://www.who.int/globalatlas/autologin/hrh_login.asp.
[18] World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease (GBD): Disease and injury country estimates for 2004 by cause for WHO Member States [EB/OL]. [2018-05-17]. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_country.
[19] The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATION Fields of education and training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013)–Detailed field descriptions;2015 [EB/OL]. [2018-05-17]. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-fields-of-education-and-training-2013-detailed-field-descriptions-2015-en.pdf.
[20] Jesus TS, Landry MD, Dussault G, et al.Human resources for health (and rehabilitation): Six Rehab-Workforce Challenges for the century[J]. Hum Res Health, 2017, 15(1): 8.
[21] 井淇,邱卓英,嵇丽红,等. 残联系统康复机构专业人员配置总量与结构分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(8): 975-979.
[22] McClanahan M, Sligar S. Adapting to WIOA 2014 minimum education requirements for vocational rehabilitation counselors[J]. J Rehabil, 2015, 81(3): 3-8.
[23] Sax CL.Assistive technology education: an online model for rehabilitation professionals[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2002, 24(1-3): 144-151.
[24] 世界卫生组织. 邱卓英. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类[M]. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2001.
[25] 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(儿童青少年版本)(国际中文版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2014.
[26] 世界卫生组织. 国际功能、残疾和健康分类(国际中文增补版)[M]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2015.
[27] World Health Organization.The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health[M]. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2001.
文章导航

/