综述

液体和气体尿动力学测压导管的比较

  • 赵海涛 ,
  • 廖利民
展开
  • 1. 首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市 100068;
    2. 中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院,北京市 100068
赵海涛(1996-),女,汉族,山西吕梁市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:神经泌尿学和尿动力学。

收稿日期: 2018-08-08

  修回日期: 2018-09-03

  网络出版日期: 2019-02-18

Comparison of Water Filled and Air Charged Urodynamic Pressure Measuring Catheters (review)

  • ZHAO Hai-tao ,
  • LIAO Li-min
Expand
  • 1. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China;
    2. Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China

Received date: 2018-08-08

  Revised date: 2018-09-03

  Online published: 2019-02-18

摘要

尿动力学检查可以再现患者的下尿路症状并且能客观解释患者的膀胱问题。目前,临床最常用的尿动力学测压导管是液体传导导管,由于经济、卫生等优点,受到广泛认可。然而,液体传导导管中气泡及患者活动会影响信号传导质量。气体传导导管操作简便易行,测量值不受气泡和患者活动的影响,已逐渐在某些地区开始用于尿动力学测压。气体传导系统与液体传导系统在很多方面存在差别,在流体力学原理、调零方法和操作细节等方面的差异直接或间接影响测压结果。国内外对气体传导系统的研究还不完善。本文综述国内外研究现状,从基本构造、发展沿革、零压力点设置、频率响应、膀胱测压、尿道压力描记、压力值转换算法和检查后的感染发生率等方面进行分析。

本文引用格式

赵海涛 , 廖利民 . 液体和气体尿动力学测压导管的比较[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019 , 25(1) : 55 -59 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.00.012

Abstract

Urodynamics is able to reproduce the patient's lower urinary tract symptoms and to explain patient's bladder problems objectively. Currently, the most commonly used urodynamic manometry catheter is water filled catherters, which is widely recognized due to its economic and healthy advantages. However, air bubbles and patient's activities can affect the quality and speed of signal transduction, interfering the explanation of the pressure results. The air-filled catheters are easy to operate, and the measures are unaffected by air bubbles and patient's activities, which have gradually begun to be used in urodynamic study in some areas. However, there are several differences between them in terms of fluid mechanics principle, zero set and detailed operations which directly and indirectly lead to the different pressure results. The researches on air-filled catheters at home and abroad are still not perfect. This article gave a detailed comparison between them based on the present studies from the following aspects: the essential structure, the developing history, the fluid mechanics principle, the zero pressure point setting, the frequency response, the cystometrogram, the urethral pressure profile, the conversion algorithm, and the urinary tract infection after the investigation, etc.

参考文献

[1] 廖利民. 尿动力学[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2012: 104-237.
[2] Kuhn A, Nager C, Hawkins E, et al.A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2007, 18(8): 931-935.
[3] 金锡御,宋波. 临床尿动力学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 52-111.
[4] Culligan P J, Goldberg R P, Blackhurst D W, et al.Comparison of microtransducer and fiberoptic catheters for urodynamic studies[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 98(2): 253-257.
[5] Pollak J T, Neimark M, Connor J T, et al.Air-charged and microtransducer urodynamic catheters in the evaluation of urethral function[J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2004, 15(2): 124-128.
[6] Brown M, Wickham J E A . The urethal pressure profile[J]. Br J Urol, 1969, 41(2): 211-217.
[7] 陈忠,刘正清,蔡丹,等. T-Doc 气体传导系统在尿动力学检查中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2007, 22(12): 885-887.
[8] 郭应禄, 杨勇. 尿失禁[M]. 济南: 山东科学技术出版社, 2003: 117-169.
[9] James E D.The behaviour of the bladder during physical activity[J]. Br J Urol, 1978, 50(6): 387-394.
[10] Liao L, Schaefer W.Quantitative quality control during urodynamic studies with TVRs for cystometry in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014, 46(7): 1301-1308.
[11] Liao L, Schaefer W.Qualitative quality control during urodynamic studies with TSPs for cystometry in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2014, 46(7): 1073-1079.
[12] Lu T J, Liao L M.Typical value ranges and typical signal patterns in the initial cough in patients with neurogenic bladder: quality control in urodynamic studies[J]. Int Neurourol J, 2016, 20(3): 214-223.
[13] Duckett J, Cheema K, Patil A, et al.What is the relationship between free flow and pressure flow studies in women?[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24(3): 447-452.
[14] Couri B M, Bitzos S, Bhardwaj D, et al.Performance analysis of the T-DOC® air-charged catheters: An alternate technology for urodynamics[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2017, 37(2), 619-625.
[15] Rowan D, James E D, Kramer A E, et al.Urodynamic equipment: technical aspects. produced by the International Continence Society working party on urodynamic equipment[J]. J Med Eng Technol, 1987, 11(2): 57-64.
[16] Zehnder P, Roth B, Burkhard F, et al.Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial[J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(3): 1013-1017.
[17] 朱克勤, 许春晓. 粘性流体力学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009: 4-7.
[18] 吴子牛. 空气动力学(上册)[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2007: 1-53.
[19] Ask P, Hok B.Pressure measurement techniques in urodynamic investigations[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 1990, 9(1):1-15.
[20] Schaefer W, Liao L M, Kirschner-Hermanna R, et al.Urodynamics quality control: qualitative plausibility control with typical signal patterns[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 1999, 18(A): 366-367.
[21] 凌永发,王杰. 压力传感器的选择与应用[J]. 云南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 12(3): 192-193.
[22] Abrams P, Damaser M S, Niblett P, et al.Air filled, including "air-charged," catheters in urodynamic studies: does the evidence justify their use?[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2017, 36(5):1234-1242.
[23] Gammie A, Drake M, Swithinbank L, et al.Absolute versus relative pressure[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2009, 28:468.
[24] Cooper M A, Fletter P C, Zaszczurynski P J, et al.Comparison of air-charged and water-filled urodynamic pressure measurement catheters[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2011, 30(3): 329-334.
[25] Shapiro G G, Krovetz L J.Damped and undamped frequency responses of under damped catheter manometer systems[J]. Am Heart J, 1970, 80(2):226-236.
[26] Hartford C G, Turner M J, van Schalkwyk J M, et al. Frequency responses of infant air-balloon versus liquid-filled catheters for intra-esophageal pressure measurement[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 1997, 24(5): 353-363.
[27] Thind P, Bagi P, Lose G, et al.Characterization of pressure changes in the lower urinary tract during coughing with special reference to the demands on the pressure recording equipment[J]. Neuroural Urodyn, 1994, 13(3):219-225.
[28] Gammie A, Clarkson B, Constantinou C, et al.International Continence Society guidelines on urodynamic equipment performance[J]. Neuroural Urodyn, 2014, 33(4): 370-379.
[29] Schaefer W, Abrams P, Liao L M, et al.Good urodynamic practice: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure flow studies[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2002, 21(3):261-274.
[30] Digesu G A, Derpapas A, Robshaw P, et al.Are the measurements of water-filled and air-charged catheters the same in urodynamics?[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(1): 123-130.
[31] Sheng W, Bruna M C, Ruth K.Comparison of air-charged and water-perfused catheters for use in cystometric assessment [Z].
[32] Gammie A, Abrams P, Bevan W, et al.Simultaneous in vivo comparison of water-filled and air-filled pressure measurement catheters: implications for good urodynamic practice[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2016, 35(8): 926-933.
[33] Holt D P E, Gibbs C, Wathes C M. Simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry using a microtip transducer catheter in the bitch: Effects of bitch position and transducer orientation[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2010, 9(3): 281-296.
[34] Hassan K A, Paul C F, Paul J Z, et al.Conversion of urodynamic pressures measured simultaneously by air-charged and water-filled catheter systems[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2015, 34(6): 507-512.
[35] 刘正清,郭立丽,姚启盛,等. 2种尿动力学测压导管的比较[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2010, 16(4): 474-476.
[36] Abrams P, Blaivas J G, Stanton S L, et al.ICS standardization report on “ The Standardisation of terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function”[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1988, 114(1): 106.
文章导航

/

〈 〉