目的 考察残疾认同量表在中文语境中的适用性。 方法 2018年5月，多阶段抽样获得291份残疾认同量表问卷结果，利用探索性因子分析研究残疾认同量表的结构，采用验证性因子分析讨论量表的结构效度。 结果 量表总Cronbach α系数为0.865，量表各维度内部一致性为0.742~0.838，重测信度总量表为0.776，各维度内部一致性为0.640~0.893。提取到5个因子，分别命名为个人认同维度的肯定残疾、污名/羞耻，以及社会认同维度的社会接纳、社会排斥-个人归因、社会排斥-社会归因。 结论 该量表有较高的信度和效度，经过进一步修订可用于中国残疾认同研究。
Objective To investigate the applicability of Disability Identity Scale in Chinese context. Methods A total of 291 questionnaires about Disability Identity Scale were collected with multi-stage sampling in May, 2018. The preliminary structure of the Disability Identity Scale was analyzed with exploratory factor analysis, and the structural validity of the scale was discussed with confirmatory factor analysis. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.865, and the internal consistency of each dimension of the scale was 0.742 to 0.838. The total test-retest reliability was 0.776, and the internal consistency of each dimension was 0.640 to 0.893. Five factors were extracted, named Positive Disability and Stigma/Shame in the dimension of personal identity, Social Acceptance, Social Exclusion-Personal Attribution, Social Exclusion-Social Attribution in the dimension of social identity. Conclusions Disability Identity Scale is reliable and stable that can be used in the study of disability identity in China after modification.
[1] DarlingR B. Disability and Identity: Negotiating Self in a Changing Society [M]. Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2013.
[2] DunnD S, BurcawS. Disability identity: exploring narrative accounts of disability [J]. Rehabil Psychol, 2013, 58(2): 148-157.
[3] PutnamM. Conceptualizing disability: developing a framework for political disability identity [J]. J Disabil Policy Studies, 2005, 16(3): 188-198.
[4] HahnH, BeltT L. Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of disabled activists [J]. J Health Soc Behav, 2004, 45(4): 453-464.
[5] HahnH, BeaulaurierR. Attitudes toward disabilities: a research note on activists with disabilities [J]. J Disabil Policy Studies, 2001, 12(1): 40-46.
[6] AntonakmR F, LivnehH. Measurement of attitudes toward persons with disabilities [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2000, 22(5): 211-224.
[7] 郑曦. 大学生残疾人态度量表测评[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2005, 11(9): 772-773.
[8] 田琪,郝元涛,陶健婷,等. 世界卫生组织残疾态度量表中文版的信度、效度分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(46): 8681-8685.
[9] DarlingR B, HeckertD A. Activism, models, identities, and opportunities: a preliminary test of a typology of disability orientations [M]// Barnartt S N. Disability as a Fluid State. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010: 203-229.
[10] DarlingR B, HeckertD A. Orientations toward disability: differences over the lifecourse [J]. Int J Disabil Dev Educ, 2010, 57(2): 131-143.
[11] GillC J. Four types of integration in disability identity development [J]. J Vocational Rehabil, 1997, 9(1): 39-46.
[12] RhodesP, NoconA, SmallN, et al. Disability and identity: the challenge of epilepsy [J]. Disabil Soc, 2008, 23(4): 385-395.
[13] OliverM. The social model of disability: thirty years on [J]. Disabil Soc, 2013, 28 (7): 1024-1026.
[14] 李学会,傅志军. 从隔离走向融合?——我国视力障碍者高等教育的历史、特点及政策变迁[J]. 社会工作, 2015(6): 35-46, 126.
[15] 李学会,张凤琼. 心智障碍者的权益保障:家庭视角的审视[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2018, 20(5): 58-65.
[16] 赵必华,顾海根. 心理量表编制中的若干问题及题解[J]. 心理科学, 2010, 33(6): 1467-1469.
[17] ChaskesJ. Out of a coma and into a wheelchair: social and physical accessibility and the construction of disabled identity [M]// Barnartt SN. Disability as a Fluid State. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010: 49-66.
[18] ShakespeareT. Disability, identity and difference [M]// Barnes C C, Merce G. Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability. Leeds: The Disability Press, 1996: 94-113.
[19] MalhotraR, RoweM. Exploring Disability Identity and Disability Rights through Narratives: Finding a Voice of Their Own [M]. London: Routledge, 2014.
[20] 邱卓英,李安巧,黄珂,等. 基于ICF和联合国《残疾人权利公约》对国际组织有关残疾定义及其测量的内容研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(10): 1117-1121.
