临床研究

血栓弹力图在脑梗死预后中的价值

  • 张玉峰 ,
  • 陈兵 ,
  • 井峰
展开
  • 1.河北北方学院研究生学院,河北张家口市 075000
    2.解放军总医院第八医学中心神经内科,北京市 100091
张玉峰(1985-),男,汉族,河北无极县人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:血栓弹力图与缺血性脑血管病。

收稿日期: 2019-01-16

  修回日期: 2019-03-01

  网络出版日期: 2019-04-24

Application of Thrombelastography in Prognosis of Cerebral Infarction

  • ZHANG Yu-feng ,
  • CHEN Bing ,
  • JING Feng
Expand
  • 1.Graduate School of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei 075000, China
    2.Department of Neurology, the 8th Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China

Received date: 2019-01-16

  Revised date: 2019-03-01

  Online published: 2019-04-24

摘要

目的 探讨血栓弹力图(TEG)在评估脑梗死患者长期预后中的价值。 方法 2015年1月至2016年7月,选取神经内科住院首次发病的脑梗死患者255例,入院进行TEG和常规凝血试验(凝血四项和血小板)检测,出院3个月后进行TEG检测,采用门诊就诊或电话联系方式对患者跟踪随访1年。根据脑梗死是否复发,分为预后不良组(n = 51)与预后良好组(n = 204),比较两组TEG参数和常规凝血检测指标的差异。 结果 两组总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、糖尿病、高血压病、吸烟、入院美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分和服用抗血小板药物等方面比较无显著性差异(P > 0.05);两组的凝血酶时间(TT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)和血小板(PLT)比较无显著性差异(P > 0.05)。与预后良好组相比,预后不良组入院时凝血反应时间和凝血形成时间缩短,凝块形成速率和最大振幅增加(P < 0.05);出院3个月后,预后不良组仅最大振幅水平增高(P < 0.05),而凝血反应时间、凝血形成时间和凝块形成速率无显著性差异(P > 0.05)。 结论 在脑梗死预后不良患者中,TEG参数异常可提示血液存在高凝状态,对判断脑梗死的长期预后有一定临床意义。

本文引用格式

张玉峰 , 陈兵 , 井峰 . 血栓弹力图在脑梗死预后中的价值[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019 , 25(4) : 460 -464 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.04.017

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of thrombelastography in long-term prognosis for patients with cerebral infarction. Methods From January, 2015 to July, 2017, 255 patients with cerebral infarction hospitalized were selected. Thrombelastography and routine coagulation test (four coagulation and platelets) were tested after patients' admission. And thrombelastographic test was performed again 3 months after discharge. The patients were followed up for a year by outpatient visits or telephone contact. According to whether cerebral infarction recurred, they were divided into unfavorable prognosis group (n = 51) and favorable prognosis group (n = 204), and the difference of thrombelastography and routine coagulation test were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference in total cholesterol, triglyceride, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, scores of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and administration of antiplatelet drugs between the two groups (P > 0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in thrombin time, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, and platelet in routine coagulation test between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared to the favorable prognosis group at admission, reaction time and kinetics time of thrombelastographic test shortened significantly, while rate of clot strengthening and maximum amplitude increased significantly in the unfavorable prognosis group (P < 0.05); three months after discharge, only maximum amplitude increased significantly (P < 0.05) while there was no significant difference in reaction time, kinetics time and rate of clot strengthening in the unfavorable prognosis group (P > 0.05). Conclusion Abnormal parameters of thrombelastographic test may indicate hypercoagulability in blood in the patients with cerebral infarction which predicts unfavorablein long-term outcome.

参考文献

[1] HartertH. Blutgerinnungsstudien mit der Thrombelastographie; einem neuen Untersuchungs verfahren [J]. [in Undetermined Language]. Klin Wochenschr, 1948, 26(37-38): 577-583.
[2] KangY G, MartinD J, MarquezJ, et al. Intraoperative changes in blood coagulation and thrombelastographic monitoring in liver transplantation [J]. Anesth Analg, 1985, 64(9): 888-896.
[3] TumanK J, SpiessB D, McCarthyR J, et al. Comparison of viscoelastic measures of coagulation after cardiopulmonary bypass [J]. Anesth Analg, 1989, 69(1): 69-75.
[4] GibbsN M, CrawfordG P, MichalopoulosN. Thrombelastographic patterns following abdominal aortic surgery [J]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 1994, 22(5): 534-538.
[5] GurbelP A, BlidenK P, KreutzR P, et al. The link between heightened thrombogenicity and inflammation: pre-procedure characterization of the patient at high risk for recurrent events after stenting [J]. Platelets, 2009, 20(2): 97-104.
[6] RafiqS, JohanssonP I, OstrowskiS R, et al. Hypercoagulability in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: prevalence, patient characteristics and postoperative outcome [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 41(3): 550-555.
[7] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2014[J].中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(4): 246-257.
[8] TsivgoulisG, BogiatziC, HeliopoulosI, et al. Low ankle-brachial index predicts early risk of recurrent stroke in patients with acute cerebral ischemia [J]. Atherosclerosis, 2012, 220(2): 407-412.
[9] CrawfordK M, Gallego-FabregaC, KourkoulisC, et al. Cerebrovascular disease knowledge portal: an open-access data resource to accelerate genomic discoveries in stroke [J]. Stroke, 2018, 49(2): 470-475.
[10] OnoH, NishijimaY, OhtaS, et al. Hydrogen gas inhalation treatment in acute cerebral infarction: a randomized controlled clinical study on safety and neuroprotection [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2017, 26(11): 2587-2594.
[11] MosimannP J, KaesmacherJ, GautschiD, et al. Predictors of unexpected early reocclusion after successful mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients [J]. Stroke, 2018, 49(11): 2643-2651.
[12] 宫鑫,苗青,李春芳. D-二聚体、纤维蛋白原和高敏C反应蛋白水平与急性脑梗死严重程度的相关性[J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(18): 3740-3744.
[13] DebP, SharmaS, HassanK M. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute ischemic stroke: An overview with emphasis on therapeutic significance beyond thrombolysis [J]. Pathophysiology, 2010, 17(3): 197-218.
[14] Del ZoppoG J, MabuchiT. Cerebral microvessel responses to focal ischemia [J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2003, 23(8): 879-894.
[15] YilmazG, GrangerD N. Cell adhesion molecules and ischemic stroke [J]. Neurol Res, 2008, 30(8): 783-793.
[16] DuJ, WangQ, HeB, et al. Association of mean platelet volume and platelet count with the development and prognosis of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke [J]. Int J Lab Hematol, 2016, 38(3): 233-239.
[17] GreiseneggerS, EndlerG, HsiehK, et al. Is elevated mean platelet volume associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute ischemic cerebrovascular events? [J]. Stroke, 2004, 35(7): 1688-1691.
[18] AkayO M. The double hazard of bleeding and thrombosis in hemostasis from a clinical point of view: a global assessment by Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) [J]. Clin Appl ThrombHemost, 2018, 24(6): 850-858.
[19] 布伦,唐发宽,齐帜,等. 经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者血小板抑制率的血栓弹力图测定[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(5): 417-418.
[20] InabaK, RizoliS, VeigasP V, et al. 2014 Consensus Conference on Viscoelastic Test-Based Transfusion Guidelines for Early Trauma Resuscitation: Report of the panel [J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2015, 78(6): 1220-1229.
[21] ShiZ, ZhengW C, FuX L, et al. Hypercoagulation on thromboelastography predicts early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2018, 46(3-4): 125-131.
[22] ElliottA, WetzelJ, RoperT, et al. Thromboelastography in patients with acute ischemic stroke [J]. Int J Stroke, 2015, 10(2): 194-201.
[23] YaoX, DongQ, SongY, et al. Thrombelastography maximal clot strength could predict one-year functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2014, 38(3): 182-190.
[24] LiuZ, ChaiE, ChenH, et al. Comparison of thrombelastography (TEG) in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 6466-6471.
[25] ChenG, BlidenK P, ChaudharyR, et al. Central aortic pulse pressure, thrombogenicity and cardiovascular risk [J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2017, 44(2): 223-233.
[26] 杨昊翔,尹立勇,于丹军,等. 阿司匹林抵抗与缺血性脑卒中复发相关性研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2017, 45(9): 957-959.
文章导航

/