《中国康复理论与实践》

中国康复理论与实践 >

2019 , Vol. 25 >Issue 8: 875 - 881

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.08.002

专题

脊髓型颈椎病的研究进展

  • 陈亮 ,
  • 王冲 ,
  • 高峰 ,
  • 王玉明 ,
  • 李建军
展开
  • 1.首都医科大学康复医学院，北京市 100068
    2a.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院脊柱脊髓神经功能重建科；100068；b.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院理疗科，北京市 100068
陈亮(1979-)，男，汉族，江苏泰兴市人，博士，主治医师，主要研究方向：脊柱、脊髓损伤的临床治疗与康复功能重建。

收稿日期: 2018-11-18

  修回日期: 2019-03-04

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-16

收起

Advance in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (review)

  • CHEN Liang ,
  • WANG Chong ,
  • GAO Feng ,
  • WANG Yu-ming ,
  • LI Jian-jun
Expand
  • 1.Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China
    2a.Department of Spinal and Neural Function Reconstruction; b. Department of Physiotherapy, Beijing Bo’ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China；b.Department of Spinal and Neural Function Reconstruction; b. Department of Physiotherapy, Beijing Bo’ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China

Received date: 2018-11-18

  Revised date: 2019-03-04

  Online published: 2019-08-16

Fold

摘要

脊髓型颈椎病是颈椎病最为严重的亚型，也是脊髓损伤最常见的原因。目前认为除了椎管狭窄造成的机械压迫和缺血性改变构成其病理生理基础外，颈椎的动态不稳也是造成脊髓损伤的重要因素。其临床表现及查体复杂多样，常常需要与一些老年病相鉴别，除表现为上运动神经元损伤所致的异常长束征，约51.9%的脊髓型颈椎病患者同时伴有根性病变。可疑脊髓型颈椎病者，磁共振成像为首选检查方法，弥散张量成像检测早期患者的敏感性更高。建议中、重度脊髓型颈椎病患者进行手术治疗，轻度患者自诊断开始3年之内可考虑保守治疗。

关键词： 脊髓型颈椎病; 治疗; 综述

本文引用格式

陈亮 , 王冲 , 高峰 , 王玉明 , 李建军 . 脊髓型颈椎病的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019 , 25(8) : 875 -881 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.08.002

Abstract

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most serious subtype of cervical spondylosis and the most common cause of spinal cord injury. At present, it is considered that mechanical compression and ischemic changes caused by spinal stenosis constitute the pathophysiological basis of spinal stenosis, and the dynamic instability of cervical spine is also an important factor causing spinal cord injury. Its clinical manifestations and physical examinations are complex and varied, and often need to be differentiated from some geriatric diseases. In addition to the abnormal long bundle sign caused by upper motor neuron injury, about 51.9% of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients also have root lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred method of examination in patients with suspected cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Compared with magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging is much more sensitive in detecting early patients. It is suggested that, patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy should receive surgery, and patients with mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy should consider conservative treatment within three years from the beginning of diagnosis.

Key words： cervical spondylotic myelopathy; treatment; review

参考文献

1 SinghA, TetreaultL, CaseyA, et al. A summary of assessment tools for patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review on validity, reliability and responsiveness [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(Suppl 2): 209-228.
2 WuJ C, KoC C, YenY S, et al. Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2013, 35(1): E10.
3 NouriA, TetreaultL, SinghA, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2015, 40(12): E675-E693.
4 NouriA, MartinA R, MikulisD, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of structural changes and measurement techniques [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2016, 40(6): E5.
5 BaptisteD C, FehlingsM G. Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy [J]. Spine J, 2006, 6(6 Suppl): 190S-197S.
6 EllingsonB M, SalamonN, HollyL T. Advances in MR imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(Suppl 2): 197-208.
7 ToledanoM, BartlesonJ D. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Neurol Clin, 2013, 31(1): 287-305.
8 FengbinY, DeyuC, XinweiW, et al. Trauma-induced spinal cord injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with or without lower cervical instability [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2013, 20(3): 419-422.
9 WinklerE A, SengilloJ D, SagareA P, et al. Blood-spinal cord barrier disruption contributes to early motor-neuron degeneration in ALS-model mice [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111(11): E1035-E1042.
10 FigleyS A, KhosraviR, LegastoJ M, et al. Characterization of vascular disruption and blood-spinal cord barrier permeability following traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2014, 31(6): 541-552.
11 KaradimasS K, ErwinW M, ElyC G, et al. Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2013, 38(22 Suppl1): S21-S36.
12 KaradimasS K, ErwinW M, ElyC G, et al. Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2013, 38(22 Suppl1): S21-S36.
13 KaradimasS K, GatzounisG, FehlingsM G. Pathobiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(Suppl 2): S132-S138.
14 AmentaP S, GhobrialG M, KrespanK, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy in the young adult: a review of the literature and clinical diagnostic criteria in an uncommon demographic [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2014, 120: 68-72.
15 LeblD R, BonoC M. Update on the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2015, 23(11): 648-660.
16 MatzP G, AndersonP A, HollyL T, et al. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2009, 11(2): 104-111.
17 TetreaultL A, KaradimasS, WilsonJ R, et al. The natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the rate of hospitalization following spinal cord injury: an updated systematic review [J]. Global Spine J, 2017, 7(3 Suppl): 28S-34S.
18 GibsonJ, NouriA, KruegerB, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a clinical review [J]. Yale J Biol Med, 2018, 91: 43-48.
19 ChoiB W, KimS S, LeeD H, et al. Cervical radiculopathy combined with cervical myelopathy: prevalence and characteristics [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2017, 27(7): 889-893.
20 WangL, HeeH T, WongH K. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology, presentation, assessment, natural history and management [J]. Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(3): 181-189.
21 KopjarB, TetreaultL, Kalsi-RyanS, et al. Psychometric properties of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2015, 40(1): E23-E28.
22 KatoS, OshimaY, OkaH, et al. Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0123022.
23 Sheikh TahaA M, ShueJ, LeblD, et al. Considerations for prophylactic surgery in asymptomatic severe cervical stenosis [J]. HSS J, 2015, 11(1): 31-35.
24 de Oliveira Vila?aC, OrsiniM, LeiteM A, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: what the neurologist should know [J]. Neurol Int, 2016, 8(4): 6330.
25 ZhangC, DasS K, YangD J, et al. Application of magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. World J Radiol, 2014, 6(10): 826-832.
26 MummaneniP V, KaiserM G, MatzP G, et al. Preoperative patient selection with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and electroencephalography: does the test predict outcome after cervical surgery? [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2009, 11(2): 119-129.
27 MastronardiL, ElsawafA, RopertoR, et al. Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7(6): 615-622.
28 HoriM, FukunagaI, MasutaniY, et al. New diffusion metrics for spondylotic myelopathy at an early clinical stage [J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(8): 1797-1802.
29 UrakawaT, MatsuzawaH, SuzukiY, et al. Analysis of ascending spinal tract degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy using 3D anisotropy contrast single-shot echo planar imaging on a 3.0-T system [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 15(6): 648-653.
30 VedantamA, JirjisM B, SchmitB D, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord: insights from animal and human studies [J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 74(1): 1-8, discussion 8.
31 GuanX, FanG, WuX, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging studies of cervical spondylotci myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(2): e01117707.
32 DalbayrakS, YamanO, FiridinM N, et al. The contribution of cervical dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2015, 25(1): 36-42.
33 KolcunJ P, ChiengL O, MadhavanK, et al. The role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Asian Spine J, 2017, 11(6): 1008-1015.
34 MatsumotoM, IshidaK. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord [J]. Masui, 2012, 61(1): 16-24.
35 FehlingsM G, WilsonJ R, YoonS T, et al. Symptomatic progression of cervical myelopathy and the role of nonsurgical management: a consensus statement [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2013, 38(22 Suppl): S19-S20.
36 RheeJ M, ShamjiM F, ErwinW M, et al. Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: a systematic review [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2013, 38(22 Suppl1): S55-S67.
37 BakhsheshianJ, MehtaV A, LiuJ C. Current diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Global Spine J, 2017, 7(6): 572-586.
38 TetreaultL A, RheeJ, PratherH, et al. Change in function, pain, and quality of life following structured nonoperative treatment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review [J]. Global Spine J, 2017, 7(3 Suppl): 42S-52S.
39 OshimaY, SeichiA, TakeshitaK, et al. Natural course and prognostic factors in patients with mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy with increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2012, 37(22): 1909-1913.
40 KongL D, MengL C, WangL F, et al. Evaluation of conservative treatment and timing of surgical intervention for mild forms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2013, 6(3): 852-856.
41 RheeJ, TetreaultL A, ChapmanJ R, et al. Nonoperative versus operative management for the treatment degenerative cervical myelopathy: an updated systematic review [J]. Global Spine J, 2017, 7(3 Suppl): 35S-41S.
42 LiuX, MinS, ZhangH, et al. Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(2): 362-372.
43 ZhuB, XuY, LiuX, et al. Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systemic review and meta-analysis [J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(7): 1583-1593.
44 MasakiY, YamazakiM, OkawaA, et al. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007, 20(1): 7-13.
45 SakaiK, OkawaA, TakahashiM, et al. Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty [J]. Spine (Phila Pa1976), 2012, 37(5): 367-376.
46 MacagnoA, LiuS, MarascalchiB J, et al. Perioperative risks associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on surgical treatment strategies [J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2015, 9: 24.
47 HanY C, LiuZ Q, WangS J, et al. Is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion superior to corpectomy and fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A systemic review and meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e87191.
48 GuanL, HaiY, YangJ C, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion may be more effective than cervical corpectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16: 29.
49 HuY, LvG, RenS, et al. Mid- to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective randomized controlled trials [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(2): e0149312.
50 van GeestS, de VormerA M, ArtsM P, et al. Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(Suppl 2): 229-235.
51 DuetzmannS, ColeT, RatliffJ K. Cervical laminoplasty developments and trends, 2003-2013: a systematic review [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 23(1): 24-34.
52 DahdalehN S, WongA P, SmithZ A, et al. Microendoscopic decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2013, 35(1): E8.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉