《中国康复理论与实践》

中国康复理论与实践 >

2019 , Vol. 25 >Issue 9: 1000 - 1003

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.09.002

专题

运用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0评估老年脑卒中患者整体功能状态

  • 白利明 ,
  • 李新平 ,
  • 邱卓英 ,
  • 张鸣生 ,
  • 马洪卓 ,
  • 李安巧
展开
  • 1.广东人民医院，广东省医学科学院，广东省老年医学研究所康复医学科，广东广州市 510080
    2.中国ICF研究院，山东潍坊市 261053
    3.世界卫生组织国际分类家族中国合作中心，北京市 100068
    4.中国康复科学所康复信息研究所，北京市 100068
    5.中国康复研究中心康复信息研究所，北京市 100068
    6.中国智力和发展性残疾分级、评估与康复（运动）重点实验室，郑州大学，河南郑州市450001
白利明(1972-)，男，汉族，山西兴县人，硕士研究生，主治医师，主要研究方向：骨科康复、神经康复。

收稿日期: 2019-08-06

  修回日期: 2019-09-02

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-25

基金资助

广东省科技计划项目(No. 2013B060500060)

收起

Evaluation of Functioning for Aging Patients with Stroke Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0

  • BAI Li-ming ,
  • LI Xin-ping ,
  • QIU Zhuo-ying ,
  • ZHANG Ming-sheng ,
  • MA Hong-zhuo ,
  • LI An-qiao
Expand
  • 1.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Institute of Geriatrics, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
    2.China Academy of ICF, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
    3.WHO-FIC Collaborating Center in China, Beijing 100068, China
    4.Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing 100068, China
    5.Research Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
    6.China Key Laboratory of Classification, Evaluation and Rehabilitation Sport of Intellectual and Development Disability, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China

Received date: 2019-08-06

  Revised date: 2019-09-02

  Online published: 2019-09-25

Supported by

Supported by Guangdong Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2013B060500060)

Fold

摘要

目的 运用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)评估与分析老年脑卒中患者的整体功能状态。 方法 2018年8月至2019年2月，老年脑卒中住院患者107例根据病程分为≤ 6个月、7~12个月、13~18个月和19~24个月4个组。入院和出院时，采用WHODAS 2.0和改良Barthel指数(MBI)进行评定。 结果 出院时，患者WHODAS 2.0总分和MBI评分均显著改善(t > 2.481, P < 0.001)。患者WHODAS 2.0总分随病程呈下降趋势(F = 3.444, P < 0.05)，但与他人相处、生活活动和社会参与领域下降不明显(F < 2.410, P > 0.05)；WHODAS 2.0总分与MBI评分呈显著负相关(r = -0.540, P < 0.001)，但生活活动和社会参与两个领域的总分与MBI评分无显著性相关(r = 0.184, P > 0.05)。 结论 WHODAS 2.0可用于评估和分析老年脑卒中患者的整体功能状态。

关键词： 脑卒中; 世界卫生组织残疾评定量表; 康复; 评定

本文引用格式

白利明 , 李新平 , 邱卓英 , 张鸣生 , 马洪卓 , 李安巧 . 运用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0评估老年脑卒中患者整体功能状态[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019 , 25(9) : 1000 -1003 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.09.002

Abstract

Objective To apply World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a tool to assess the functioning of the old patients after stroke. Methods From August, 2018 to February, 2019, 107 old inpatients with stroke were divided into four groups according to the course of disease: ≤ 6 months, 7-12 months, 13-18 months and 19-24 months. They were assessed with WHODAS 2.0 and modified Barthel Index (MBI) at admission and discharge. Results The scores of both MBI and total WHODAS 2.0 improved at discharge (t > 2.481, P < 0.001). WHODAS 2.0 total scores decreased with the course of disease (F = 3.444, P < 0.05), but no significant decrease was found in the domains of Getting Along, Life Activities and Participation (F < 2.410, P > 0.05). WHODAS 2.0 total scores negatively correlated with MBI score (r = -0.540, P < 0.001), except the scores of domains of Life Activities and Participation (r = 0.184, P > 0.05). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 can be used as a tool to assess and follow up the function and disability of old stroke patients.

Key words： stroke; World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule; rehabilitation; assessment

参考文献

1 LevasseurM, RichardL, GauvinL, et al. Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities [J]. Soc Sci Med, 2010, 71: 2141-2149.
2 Ćwirlej-SozańskaA, Wilmowska-PietruszyńskaA, Wiśniowska-SzurlejA, et al. Analysis of health, functioning and disability of rural inhabitants aged 60-80 living in south-eastern Poland － a cross sectional study [J]. Ann Agric Environ Med, 2017, 25(3): 388-394.
3 NichollsE, LehanT, PlazaS L, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of disability in individuals with spinal cord injury in Neiva, Colombia, South America [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2012, 34(13): 1082-1088.
4 邱卓英,陈迪,祝捷. 构建基于ICF的功能和残疾评定的理论和方法[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(7): 675-677.
5 FedericiS, BracalentiM, MeloniF, et al. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2017, 39(23): 2347-2380.
6 KwonS Y, HongS E, KimE J, et al. Monitoring of functioning status in subjects with chronic stroke in South Korea using WHODAS II [J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2016, 40(1): 111-119.
7 DhamoonM S, MoonY P, PaikM C, et al. Trajectory of functional decline before and after ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study [J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(8): 2180-2184.
8 DonkelS J, BenaddiB, DippelD W J, et al. Prognostic hemostasis biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review [J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2019, 39(3): 360-372.
9 PettersenR, DahlT, WyllerT B. Prediction of long-term functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2002, 16(2): 149-159.
10 GalliT, MirataP, FogliaE, et al. A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation? [J]. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, 2018, 10: 301-307.
11 熊德凤,张冠庭,潘经光,等. 运用世界卫生组织《残疾评定量表》(WHODAS 2.0)评定香港残疾人士和慢性病患者的活动和参与障碍[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 508-512.
12 LeeD, HeffronJ L, MirzaM. Content and effectiveness of interventions focusing on community participation after stroke: a systematic review [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.008. [Epub ahead of print].
13 邱卓英,郭键勋,杨剑,等. 康复2030:促进实现《联合国2030年可持续发展议程》相关目标[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 373-378.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉