《中国康复理论与实践》

中国康复理论与实践 >

2020 , Vol. 26 >Issue 1: 89 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.01.016

临床研究

动态和静态手动作观察疗法对脑卒中慢性非流畅性失语的效果比较

  • 吴春薇 ,
  • 桂沛君 ,
  • 陈宸 ,
  • 吴辉 ,
  • 王索刚 ,
  • 谢瑛
展开
  • 1.首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院康复科,北京市 100050
    2.天津医科大学生物医学工程与技术学院,天津市 300070
吴春薇(1977-),女,汉族,广东广州市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：神经康复。|谢瑛(1971-),女,汉族,湖南长沙市人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向：神经康复。

收稿日期: 2019-02-19

  修回日期: 2019-05-23

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-07

基金资助

北京市自然科学基金项目(7162049)

收起

Effect of Dynamic or Static Hand Action Observation on Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia after Stroke

  • Chun-wei WU ,
  • Pei-jun GUI ,
  • Chen CHEN ,
  • Hui WU ,
  • Suo-gang WANG ,
  • Ying XIE
Expand
  • 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
    2. College of Medical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China

Received date: 2019-02-19

  Revised date: 2019-05-23

  Online published: 2020-02-07

Supported by

Beijing Natural Science Foundation(7162049)

Fold

摘要

目的 比较基于非目标导向的动态视频和静态动作图片观察对慢性非流畅性失语症脑卒中患者言语功能的影响。
方法 2016年1月至2018年12月,脑卒中非流畅性失语患者30例随机分为两组,对照组(n = 15)予以非目标导向手动作图片和动词复述,试验组(n = 15)予非目标导向手动作视频和动词复述,共4周。治疗前及治疗后每周末,采用西方失语症成套测验(WAB)进行测试。
结果 两组失语商均随时间而改善(F > 32.922, P < 0.001),各时间点两组间均无显著性差异( t < 0.699, P > 0.05),时间和分组交互效应显著( F = 6.398, P < 0.001),试验组失语商增加更多。
结论 动态手动作观察可能较静态观察更有利于脑卒中慢性非流畅性失语患者言语功能的恢复。

关键词： 脑卒中; 慢性非流畅性失语; 手动作观察; 康复; 镜像神经元

本文引用格式

吴春薇 , 桂沛君 , 陈宸 , 吴辉 , 王索刚 , 谢瑛 . 动态和静态手动作观察疗法对脑卒中慢性非流畅性失语的效果比较[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2020 , 26(1) : 89 -92 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.01.016

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of observation to non-goal-oriented hand actions with video or pictures on speech recovery in stroke patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia.
Methods From January, 2016 to December, 2018, 30 patients with non-fluent aphasia after stroke were randomly divided into two groups. The control group (n = 15) repeated the verbs after watching picture, and the experimental group (n = 15) repeated the verbs after watching videos, for four weeks. They were assessed with Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) before treatment and every week after treatment.
Results Aphasia quotient (AQ) increased with time (F > 32.922, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between two groups at any time points ( t < 0.699, P > 0.05). The interactive effect between time and group was significant ( F = 6.398, P < 0.001), which suggested that AQ increased more in the experimental group than in the control group.
Conclusion For non-goal-oriented hand action observation, video observation maybe promote speech recovery in stroke patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia.

Key words： stroke; chronic non-fluent aphasia; hand action observation; rehabilitation; mirror neuron

参考文献

[1] Shih T Y, Wu C Y, Lin K C, et al. Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2017, 18(1):459-476.
[2] Furlanis G, Ridolfi M, Polverino P, et al. Early recovery of aphasia through thrombolysis: the significance of spontaneous speech[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2018, 27(7):1937-1948.
[3] Tarrant M, Carter M, Dean S G, et al. Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention to improve well-being[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(9):e025167-e025179.
[4] de Ridder I R, Dijkland S A, Scheele M, et al. Development and validation of the Dutch Stroke Score for predicting disability and functional outcome after ischemic stroke: a tool to support efficient discharge planning[J]. Eur Stroke J, 2018, 3(2):165-173.
[5] Palmateer J, Pan J, Pandya A, et al. Ultrasonic vocalization in murine experimental stroke: a mechanistic model of aphasia[J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2016, 34(2):287-295.
[6] Chen W, Ye Q, Ji X, et al. Mirror neuron system based therapy for aphasia rehabilitation[J]. Front Psychol, 2015, 6:1665-1676.
[7] Looeiyan N, Kianfar F, Ghasisin L. The introduction of IMITATE-R and its comparison with the IMITATE treatment method in the naming ability of two Persian speaking aphasic patients[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2018. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1496940.[Epub ahead of print].
[8] Gili T, Fiori V, de Pasquale G, et al. Right sensory-motor functional networks subserve action observation therapy in aphasia[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2017, 11(5):1397-1411.
[9] Ertelt D, Binkofski F. Action observation as a tool for neurorehabilitation to moderate motor deficits and aphasia following stroke[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2012, 7(26):2063-2074.
[10] Cacioppo S, Juan E, Monteleone G. Predicting intentions of a familiar significant other beyond the mirror neuron system[J]. Front Behav Neurosci, 2017, 11:155-167.
[11] Nilipour R, Pourshahbaz A, Ghoreyshi Z S. Reliability and validity of bedside version of Persian WAB (P-WAB-1)[J]. Basic Clin Neurosci, 2014, 5(4):253-258.
[12] Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions[J]. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 1996, 3(2):131-141.
[13] Maranesi M, Livi A, Bonini L. Spatial and viewpoint selectivity for others' observed actions in monkey ventral premotor mirror neurons[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):8231-8238.
[14] Hobson H M, Bishop D V. The interpretation of mu suppression as an index of mirror neuron activity: past, present and future[J]. R Soc Open Sci, 2017, 4(3):160662-160684.
[15] Marangolo P, Caltagirone C. Options to enhance recovery from aphasia by means of non-invasive brain stimulation and action observation therapy[J]. Expert Rev Neurother, 2014, 14(1):75-91.
[16] Arya K N, Pandian S. Inadvertent recovery in communication deficits following the upper limb mirror therapy in stroke: a case report[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2014, 18(4):566-568.
[17] Biagi L, Cioni G, Fogassi L, et al. Action observation network in childhood: a comparative fMRI study with adults[J]. Dev Sci, 2016, 19(6):1075-1086.
[18] 陈文莉, 夏扬, 杨玺, 等. 手动作观察训练对脑卒中失语症患者语言功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(2):141-144.
[19] Chen W L, Ye Q, Zhang S C, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation based on mirror neuron theory: a randomized-block-design study of neuropsychology and functional magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2019, 14(6):1004-1012.
[20] Isoda K, Sueyoshi K, Ikeda Y, et al. Effect of the hand-omitted tool motion on mu rhythm suppression[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016, 10:266-273.
[21] Riello M, Faria A V, Ficek B, et al. The role of language severity and education in explaining performance on object and action naming in primary progressive aphasia[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2018, 10:346-356.
[22] Wilson S M, Lam D, Babiak M C, et al. Transient aphasias after left hemisphere resective surgery[J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 123(3):581-593.
[23] Sinanovic O, Mrkonjic Z, Zukic S, et al. Post-stroke language disorders[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2011, 50(1):79-94.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉