临床研究

超声弹性成像在脑卒中后前臂屈肌痉挛定量评价中的应用

  • 芦海涛 ,
  • 郭忆 ,
  • 王艺铮 ,
  • 崔利华
展开
  • 1.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院,a. 神经康复中心;b. 超声科,北京市 100068
    2.首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市 100068
    3.北京市丰台右安门医院康复医学科,北京市 100054
芦海涛(1975-),女,汉族,北京市人,博士,副主任医师,主要研究方向:神经康复。

收稿日期: 2019-11-20

  修回日期: 2020-02-04

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-29

Application of Ultrasound Elastography in Quantitative Evaluation for Spasticity of Forearm Flexor Muscles after Stroke

  • Hai-tao LU ,
  • Yi GUO ,
  • Yi-zheng WANG ,
  • Li-hua CUI
Expand
  • 1.a. Neurorehabilitation Center; b. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
    2. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation, Beijing 100068, China
    3. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Development, Beijing Fengtai Youanmen Hospital, Beijing 100054, China

Received date: 2019-11-20

  Revised date: 2020-02-04

  Online published: 2020-05-29

摘要

目的 探讨应用超声弹性成像技术定量评价脑卒中后前臂屈肌痉挛的可行性及其特点。方法 2019年1月至10月,脑卒中后屈腕和屈指肌痉挛的住院患者30例,采用超声弹性成像测量前臂屈肌群桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)、尺侧腕屈肌(FCU)、指浅屈肌(FDS)和指深屈肌(FDP)剪切波速度(SWV),采用改良Ashworth量表(MAS)评定屈腕和屈指肌张力。结果 患侧和健侧各肌肉SWV在牵伸位时均显著高于放松位(|Z| > 3.844, P< 0.001);牵伸位时,患侧各肌肉SWV显著高于健侧(|Z| > 3.593, P< 0.001);牵伸位与放松位SWV差值比较,患侧各肌肉明显高于健侧(t> 3.199,P< 0.01);各肌肉牵伸位平均SWV与屈腕MAS评分显著相关(r= 0.605,P< 0.001);指浅屈肌和与指深屈肌牵伸位平均SWV与屈指MAS评分明显相关(r= 0.540,P< 0.01)。结论 超声弹性成像可以定量评价脑卒中后前臂屈肌群内不同肌肉的痉挛程度。

本文引用格式

芦海涛 , 郭忆 , 王艺铮 , 崔利华 . 超声弹性成像在脑卒中后前臂屈肌痉挛定量评价中的应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2020 , 26(5) : 579 -582 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.05.017

Abstract

Objective To apply the ultrasound elastography in quantitative evaluation for spasticity of forearm flexor muscles after stroke, and observe its characteristics. Methods From January to October, 2019, 30 inpatients with stroke were recruited, followning spasticity of wrist and finger flexor muscles. They were measured the shear wave velocity (SWV) of flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) with ultrasound elastography, and assessed the tension of wrist and finger flexors with modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).Results The SWV of all the muscles were more in stretching position than in relaxation position in both sides (|Z| > 3.844, P< 0.001). The SWV of all the muscles were more in the affected side than in the unaffected side in stretching position (|Z| > 3.593, P< 0.001). The differences of SWV between stretching and relaxation were more in all the muscles in the affected side than in the unaffected side (t> 3.199,P< 0.01). The mean SWV of all the muscles significantly correlated with the MAS score of wrist (r= 0.605,P< 0.001), while the mean SWV of FDS and FDP correlated with the MAS score of finger (r= 0.540,P< 0.01).Conclusion Ultrasound elastography is useful to quantitatively evaluate the spasticity of each muscle of forearm flexors after stroke.

参考文献

[1] Li S, Francisco G E. New insights into the pathophysiology of post-stroke spasticity[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2015, 9:192.
[2] Gao J, Chen J, O'Dell M, et al. Ultrasound strain imaging to assess the biceps brachii muscle in chronic poststroke spasticity[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(8):2043-2052.
[3] Opheim A, Danielsson A, Alt Murphy M, et al. Early prediction of long-term upper limb spasticity after stroke: part of the SALGOT study[J]. Neurology, 2015, 85(10):873-880.
[4] Gao J, Rubin J M, Chen J, et al. Ultrasound elastography to assess Botulinum toxin A treatment for post-stroke spasticity: a feasibility study[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2019, 45(5):1094-1102.
[5] Eby S, Zhao H, Song P, et al. Quantitative evaluation of passive muscle stiffness in chronic stroke[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2016, 95(12):899-910.
[6] 向云, 刘家庆. 表面肌电评定脑卒中后肢体痉挛状态的meta分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2019, 34(8):960-965.
[7] Lee S S, Gaebler-Spira D, Zhang L Q, et al. Use of shear wave ultrasound elastography to quantify muscle properties in cerebral palsy[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2016, 31:20-28.
[8] 王丽芸, 邱逦. 超声弹性成像在肌肉硬度评估中的应用进展[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2019, 42(1):90-93.
[9] 中华神经科学会, 中华神经外科学会. 各类脑血管病诊断要点[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 1996, 29(6):379-380.
[10] 芦海涛, 崔利华, 王艺铮. 不同方式引导肉毒毒素注射治疗脑卒中后屈腕屈指肌痉挛的比较[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(11):1352-1355.
[11] Kara M, Kaymak B, Ulasli A M, et al. Sonographic guide for Botulinum toxin injections of the upper limb: EUROMUSCULUS/USPRM spasticity approach[J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2018, 54(3):469-485.
[12] 樊留博, 刘宝华, 韩文胜. 超声弹性成像评价股四头肌神经入肌点针刺法治疗脑梗死肌痉挛的临床疗效[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2019, 21(4):263-266.
[13] 张志伟, 钱雪松. ACUSON S2000彩色多普勒超声诊断仪ARFI技术原理及临床应用[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2012, 33(8):125-126.
[14] 谭贤愧, 刘明辉, 刘秀梅, 等. 声触诊组织量化成像评价注射A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后前臂旋前肌痉挛肌肉硬度改变[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2019, 35(2):256-259.
[15] Shen Z L, Vince D G, Li Z M. In vivo study of transverse carpal ligament stiffness using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7):e68569.
[16] Friden J, Lieber R L. Spastic muscle cells are shorter and stiffer than normal cells[J]. Muscle Nerve, 2003, 27(2):157-164.
[17] 蒋明霞, 陈轩静, 胡锦荣, 等. 超声剪切波弹性成像对脑卒中患者腓肠肌硬度变化的定量评估[J]. 数理医药学杂志, 2019, 32(9):1283-1285.
[18] Kesikburun S, Yasar E, Adiguzel E, et al. Assessment of spasticity with sonoelastography following stroke: a feasibility study[J]. PM R, 2015, 7(12):1254-1260.
[19] Nordez A, Hug F. Muscle shear elastic modulus measured using supersonic shear imaging is highly related to muscle activity level[J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2010, 108(5):1389-1394.
[20] 廖麟荣, 廖曼霞. 脑卒中后肌肉特性变化研究进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(3):306-309.
[21] 陈欣欣. 剪切波弹性成像评价注射A型肉毒毒素治疗中枢神经损伤肌痉挛临床研究[D]. 广州:广州中医药大学, 2016.
[22] Lee S S, Spear S, Rymer W Z. Quantifying changes in material properties of stroke-impaired muscle[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2015, 30(3):269-275.
[23] 李良芳. 剪切波弹性成像超声评估肌肉硬度与肌张力分级的相关性研究[D]. 广州:广州中医药大学, 2016.
文章导航

/

〈 〉