《中国康复理论与实践》

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 470-474.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.04.023

• 心理与行为康复 • 上一篇    下一篇

持续注意任务活动中心智游移表现与干预方法研究

李洁玲1，姚家新2，李欣3   

  1. 1.北京体育大学研究生院，北京市100084；
    2.天津体育学院健康与运动科学系，天津市300381；
    3.中国智力和发展性残疾分级、评估和康复(运动)重点实验室，郑州大学，河南郑州市450001。
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-11 出版日期:2017-04-05 发布日期:2017-05-17
  • 通讯作者: 姚家新(1956-)，男，汉族，湖北当阳市人，教授，博士，主要研究方向：运动员心理训练与调控、运动行为与社会心理。E-mail：yaojiaxin@tjus.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:李洁玲(1984-)，女，汉族，河北唐山市人，博士研究生，主要研究方向：运动心理学。

Performance and Interventions of Mind Wandering in Sustained Attention Response Task

LI Jie-ling1, YAO Jia-xin2, LI Xin3   

  1. 1. School of Graduate of Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China;
    2. School of Health and Sport Science of Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin 300381, China;
    3. China Key Laboratory of Classification, Evaluation and Rehabilitation (Sport) of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • Received:2016-08-11 Published:2017-04-05 Online:2017-05-17
  • Contact: YAO Jia-xin. E-mail: yaojiaxin@tjus.edu.cn

PDF (PC)

被引次数

3

摘要： 目的　 分析持续注意任务中发生心智游移对操作表现的影响，并研究应对干预措施。方法　 2016年12月，采用持续注意反应任务范式对37名运动员进行检验，测量技术指数、反应时变异和反应正确率。结果　 有效参与者25名。复杂任务中的技术指数显著低于简单任务(t(35)=-8.019, P<0.001)。复杂任务中心智游移的go平均反应时变异与简单任务中心智游移的平均反应时变异无显著性差异(t(23)=-1.575, P=0.129)；心智游移类型主效应不显著(F(1,23)=0.488, P=0.492)；心智游移类型与任务难度交互作用不显著(F(1,23)=0.054, P=0.262)。复杂任务中心智游移的平均反应正确率与简单任务中心智游移的平均反应正确率无显著性差异(t(23)=-1.046, P=0.307)；心智游移类型主效应不显著(F(1,23)=0.119, P=0.733)；心智游移类型与任务难度交互作用边缘显著(F(1,23)=3.608, P=0.070)。结论　 在复杂持续注意任务中个体的元意识心智游移会带来消极影响；应用正念训练和任务参与训练可以有效应对心智游移。

关键词: 心智游移, 活动表现, 干预

Abstract: Objective To investigate the impact of mind wandering in sustained attention response task, and offer interventions to cope with mind wandering. Methods In December, 2016, a total of 37 athletes were tested with sustained attention response task. Their technical index, reaction time variation and accurate rate were calculated. Results The statistics of 25 athletes showed that, the technical index was lower in complex task than in simple task (t(35)=-8.019, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in the reaction time variation between two tasks (t(23)=-1.575, P=0.129), the main effect of mind wandering was not significant (F(1,23)=0.488, P=0.492), as well as the interaction of mind wandering and task difficulty (F(1,23)=0.054, P=0.262). No significant difference was found in the accurate rate between two tasks (t(23)=-1.046, P=0.307), the main effect of mind wandering was not significant (F(1,23)=0.119, P=0.733), and the interaction of mind wandering and task difficulty was marginal significance (F(1,23)=3.608, P=0.070). Conclusion Athlete's mind wandering with awareness would influence the performance in complex sustained attention response task. Mindfulness training and tasks engagement could effectively cope with mind wandering.

Key words: mind wandering, performance, intervention

中图分类号: