《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 580-583.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.05.019

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文版运动觉-视觉想象问卷的结构效度

刘华1, 程钰琦1, 李洋1, 张通2,3, 荣湘江1   

  1. 1.首都体育学院运动康复学教研室,北京市 100191;
    2.首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市 100068;
    3.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院,北京市 100068。
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-03 修回日期:2017-02-21 出版日期:2017-05-25 发布日期:2017-05-24
  • 作者简介:刘华(1978-),女,汉族,湖北武穴市人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向:康复新方法及机制、运动损伤康复的机制。E-mail: liuhua@cupes.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    1.北京市科技创新服务能力建设科研计划课题(No.KM201610029001); 2.首都体育学院科研基地建设科技创新平台项目(No.15516017)

Construct Validity of Chinese Version of Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire

LIU Hua1, CHENG Yu-qi1, LI Yang1, ZHANG Tong2,3, RONG Xiang-jiang1   

  1. 1. Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, School of Kinesiology and Health, Beijing 100191, China;
    2. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China;
    3. Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2017-01-03 Revised:2017-02-21 Published:2017-05-25 Online:2017-05-24
  • Contact: LIU Hua. E-mail: liuhua@cupes.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 探讨中文版运动觉-视觉想象问卷(KVIQ)-20和KVIQ-10在脑卒中患者和正常人应用中的结构效度。方法 2012年10月至2014年3月,选取脑卒中患者和年龄、性别匹配的正常人各60例,应用中文版KVIQ-20和KVIQ-10进行评估,因子分析法分析结构效度。结果 KVIQ-20评估脑卒中患者,提取到2个因子,累计方差贡献率62.4%;KVIQ-10评估脑卒中患者,提取到2个因子,累计方差贡献率67.6%。KVIQ-20评估正常人,提取到2个因子,累计方差贡献率76.1%;KVIQ-10评估正常人,提取到2个因子,累计方差贡献率69.6%。2个因子可分别归纳为视觉想象和运动觉想象。结论 中文版KVIQ-20和KVIQ-10具有良好的结构效度,可从视觉想象和运动觉想象两个维度评估运动想象能力。

关键词: 运动觉-视觉想象问卷, 中文版, 运动想象, 视觉想象, 运动觉想象, 结构效度

Abstract: Objective To explore the construct validity of the Chinese version of Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ)-20 and KVIQ-10 in stroke patients and normal people. Methods From October, 2012, to March, 2014, 60 stroke patients and 60 normal people with matched gender and age participated in this study. They were assessed with the Chinese version of KVIQ-20 and KVIQ-10. The construct validity was investigated with factor analysis. Results Two factors were extracted from KVIQ-20 for stroke patients after varimax rotation, that accounted for 62.4% of the variance, as well as KVIQ-10 with 67.6% of the variance. Two factors were extracted from KVIQ-20 for normal people with 76.1% of the variance, as well as the KVIQ-10 with 69.6% of the variance. The factors could be named as visual imagery and kinesthetic imagery. Conclusion The Chinese version of KVIQ-20 and KVIQ-10 has good construct validity for assessing motor imagery from the dimensions of visual imagery and kinesthetic imagery, both in patients with stroke and normal people.

Key words: Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Chinese version, motor imagery, visual imagery, kinesthetic imagery, construct validity

中图分类号: