《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2017, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (12): 1450-1458.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2017.12.016

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

保护性镇痛对截肢后幻肢痛发生率影响的Meta分析

熊巍2, 张军卫2, 王增春2, 任自刚2, 王强2   

  1. 1.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院,a.麻醉科;b.脊柱脊髓外科,北京市100068;
    2.首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市 100068。
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-14 修回日期:2017-08-23 出版日期:2017-12-25 发布日期:2017-12-28
  • 通讯作者: 张军卫(1966-),男,汉族,辽宁铁岭市人,博士,主任医师,副教授,主要研究方向:脊柱脊髓外科疾病诊治。王强(1968-),男,汉族,浙江杭州市人,博士,主任医师,主要研究方向:临床麻醉与疼痛治疗。E-mail: 13910158172@163.com (张军卫);13801032889@163.com (王强)。
  • 作者简介:熊巍(1974-),女,汉族,北京市人,主治医师,主要研究方向:临床麻醉与疼痛治疗。

Effect of Protective Analgesia on Incidence of Phantom Limb Pain after Amputation: A Meta-analysis

XIONG Wei2, ZHANG Jun-wei2, WANG Zeng-chun2, REN Zi-gang2, WANG Qiang2   

  1. 1.a. Department of Anesthesiology; b. Department of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;
    2.Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China
  • Received:2017-07-14 Revised:2017-08-23 Published:2017-12-25 Online:2017-12-28
  • Contact: ZHANG Jun-wei, WANG Qiang. E-mail: 13910158172@163.com (ZHANG Jun-wei);13801032889@163.com (WANG Qiang)

摘要: 目的 系统评价保护性镇痛对截肢后幻肢痛发生率的影响。方法 检索建库至2017年6月Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、OVID、Science Direct数据库,收集围术期保护性镇痛防治截肢后幻肢痛的临床研究进行评价。由两位独立研究人员根据纳入与排除标准筛选文献并进行质量评价后,提取文献中的相关资料,包括一般资料和幻肢痛发生率,利用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果 最终筛选出6篇符合条件的文献。术后随访1个月期共纳入256例患者,其中对照组129例,实验组127例。术后随访6个月期共纳入232例患者,其中对照组118例,实验组114例。术后随访12个月期共纳入118例患者,其中对照组60例,实验组58例。采用围术期保护性镇痛方式进行干预后术后1个月[RD=-0.21, 95%CI (-0.38, -0.04), Z=2.47, P=0.01]和术后6个月[RD=-0.28, 95%CI (-0.52, -0.05), Z=2.37, P=0.02]的幻肢痛发生率低于对照组,而术后12个月的幻肢痛发病率两组之间无显著性差异[RD=-0.20, 95%CI (-0.48, 0.09), Z=1.35, P=0.18]。结论 围术期保护性镇痛能够预防截肢后近期和中期幻肢痛的发生率,但远期效果需要做进一步观察。

关键词: 围术期, 保护性镇痛, 截肢, 幻肢痛, 前瞻性研究, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective To systemically evaluate the effect of protective analgesia on preventing phantom limb pain (PLP) after amputation. Methods Published articles from the earliest date available to June, 2017 were recalled from Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, OVID, and Science Direct to collect prospective studies using protective analgesia in perioperative period to prevent PLP after amputation. Two reviewers screened literatures referring to studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of them. Data of general information and incidence of PLP in the follow-up period were extracted and analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. Results Six studies were included with a total of 256 patients in the one-month follow-up period including 127 cases in the protective analgesia group (group P) and 129 cases in the control group (group C), a total of 232 patients in the six-month follow-up period including 114 cases in group P and 118 cases in group C, and a total of 118 patients in the twelve-month follow-up period including 58 cases in group P and 60 cases in group C. The incidence of PLP were lower in group P than those in group C in the one-month follow-up period (RD=-0.21, 95%CI [-0.38, -0.04], Z=2.47, P=0.01) and in the six-month follow-up period (RD=-0.28, 95%CI [-0.52, -0.05], Z=2.37, P=0.02), and it was not significant in the twelve-month follow-up period (RD=-0.20, 95%CI [-0.48, 0.09], Z=1.35, P=0.18). Conclusion Protective analgesia in perioperative period can prevent against PLP after amputation in the recent time, however, it needs further observation in long-term.

Key words: perioperative period, protective analgesia, amputation, phantom limb pain, prospective study, meta-analysis

中图分类号: