Alyn水中适应性测试量表2的汉化及在脊髓损伤患者中的信度与效度

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.00.009

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11): 1302-1308.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.00.009

Alyn水中适应性测试量表2的汉化及在脊髓损伤患者中的信度与效度

崔尧^{1, 2}, 丛芳^{1, 2}, 李建军^{1, 2, 3}, 朱爱玲^{1, 2}, 曾明⁴, 金龙^{1, 2}, 司凤山^{1, 2}, 姚斌^{1, 2}, 贾威^{1, 2}, 萧敦武^{1, 2}, 李东洋⁵, 张凯^{1, 2}

1.首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市 100068;
2.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院,北京市 100068;
3.中国康复科学所,北京市 100068;
4.嘉兴市第二医院,浙江嘉兴市 314000;
5.淄博万杰康复医院,山东淄博市 255200

收稿日期:2018-09-13 修回日期:2018-09-28 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-12-26
通讯作者: 李建军。E-mail: crrc100@163.com
作者简介:崔尧(1988-),男,汉族,陕西西安市人,硕士研究生,主管治疗师,主要研究方向：康复治疗。
基金资助:
1.首都医科大学校长基金(No. 2018JYJX083); 2.中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No. 2013CZ-50)

Water Orientation Test of Alyn 2 (Chinese) and Its Reliability and Validity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

CUI Yao^{1, 2}, CONG Fang^{1, 2}, LI Jian-jun^{1, 2, 3}, ZHU Ai-ling^{1, 2}, ZENG Ming⁴, JIN Long^{1, 2}, SI Feng-shan^{1, 2}, YAO Bin^{1, 2}, JIA Wei^{1, 2}, XIAO Dun-wu^{1, 2}, LI Dong-yang⁵, ZHANG Kai^{1, 2}

1. Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China;
2. Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;
3. Chinese Institute of Rehabilitation Science, Beijing 100068, China;
4. The Second Hospital of Jiaxing City, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314000, China;
5. Zibo Wanjie Rehabilitation Hospital, Zibo, Shandong 255200, China

Received:2018-09-13 Revised:2018-09-28 Published:2018-11-20 Online:2018-12-26
Contact: LI Jian-jun. E-mail: crrc100@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的翻译Alyn水中适应性测试量表2 (WOTA2),并检验其用于脊髓损伤患者的信度和效度。方法获得授权后,将英文版WOTA2及其培训手册翻译成中文。2018年1月至9月,采用汉化后的WOTA2对137例脊髓损伤患者进行评定。先由两名评定者独立进行WOTA2测试;3 d后,其中一名评定者再次进行测试。计算Cronbach α系数、Spearman-Brown系数、组内相关系数(ICC)和Kappa系数评估信度。利用单项内容效度指数(I-CVI)和量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)评价内容效度,利用因子分析评价结构效度。结果中文版WOTA2全部条目Cronbach α系数为0.947,心理适应条目为0.890,水中技能条目为0.954。奇偶折半法两部分评分之间Pearson相关系数为0.948,折半信度为0.973。重测ICC总分为0.965,百分制总分为0.965,心理适应部分为0.847,水中技能部分为0.970;评定者间ICC总分为0.964,百分制总分为0.965,心理适应部分为0.847,水中技能部分为0.970。27个条目重测Kappa系数为0.528~0.927,评定者间为0.478~0.936。I-CVI为0.8~1.0,S-CVI为0.63。因子分析提取4个公共因子,符合理论预设,累积方差贡献率67%。结论中文版WOTA2应用于脊髓损伤患者有良好的信度和效度,可在国内水中运动疗法临床实践中推广应用。

关键词: Alyn水中适应性测试量表, 水中运动疗法, 脊髓损伤, 水中功能评定, 康复, Halliwick理念

Abstract: Objective To translate the Water Orientation Test of Alyn 2 (WOTA2) into Chinese, and to study its reliability and validity for patients with spinal cord injury. Methods After authorizing, the English version WOTA2 scale and its training package were translated into Chinese. From January to September, 2018, 137 patients with spinal cord injury were evaluated with the Chinese version WOTA2 by two evaluators independently, and evaluated again three days later by one of the evaluators. The Cronbach's α, Spearman-Brown coefficient, intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa coefficient were calculated to evaluate the reliability. Content Validity Index (CVI) of items (I-CVI) and scale (S-CVI) were used to evaluate the content validity, and factors analysis was used to evaluate the structure validity. Results The Cronbach's α was 0.947 in all items of the scale, 0.890 in mental adjustment items and 0.954 in aquatic skills items. Pearson correlation coefficient of the half scales separated by odd and even items was 0.948, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.973. The ICC of test-retest was 0.965 in total score, 0.965 in centesimal system total score, 0.847 in mental adjustment score and 0.970 in aquatic skills score. The ICC of inter-testers was 0.964 in total score, 0.965 in centesimal system total score, 0.847 in mental adjustment score and 0.970 in aquatic skills score. The Kappa coefficient was 0.528 to 0.927 in test-retest and 0.528 to 0.927 in inter-testers. The I-CVI was 0.8 to 1.0 and S-CVI was 0.63. Factors analysis extracted four factors, which met the theory, and contributed 67% of cumulative variance. Conclusion The Chinese version WOTA2 is good in reliability and validity for patients with spinal cord injury, and can be used in the clinical practice of aquatic therapeutic exercise in China.

Key words: Water Orientation Test of Alyn, aquatic exercise, spinal cord injury, hydrotherapy assessment, rehabilitation, Halliwick concept

中图分类号:

R651.2

崔尧, 丛芳, 李建军, 朱爱玲, 曾明, 金龙, 司凤山, 姚斌, 贾威, 萧敦武, 李东洋, 张凯. Alyn水中适应性测试量表2的汉化及在脊髓损伤患者中的信度与效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(11): 1302-1308.

CUI Yao, CONG Fang, LI Jian-jun, ZHU Ai-ling, ZENG Ming, JIN Long, SI Feng-shan, YAO Bin, JIA Wei, XIAO Dun-wu, LI Dong-yang, ZHANG Kai. Water Orientation Test of Alyn 2 (Chinese) and Its Reliability and Validity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2018, 24(11): 1302-1308.

参考文献

[1] Ellapen TJ, Hammill HV, Swanepoel M, et al.The benefits of hydrotherapy to patients with spinal cord injuries[J]. Afr J Disabil, 2018, 7(9): 450.
[2] Li C, Khoo S, Adnan A.Effects of aquatic exercise on physical function and fitness among people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(11): e6328.
[3] Frontera WR, Jette AM, Carter GT, et al.Delisa康复医学理论与实践(第五版) [M]. 励建安,毕胜,黄晓琳,译. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2013: 1283-1295.
[4] Campion MR.Hydrotherapy: Principles and Practice[M]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.
[5] 崔尧,丛芳,金龙. Halliwick理念及其在水疗康复中的应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2013, 19(3): 239-245.
[6] 崔尧,丛芳,金龙. Halliwick理念[M]//黄东峰,李建新,王宁华. 综合水疗学. 北京:金盾出版社, 2015: 62-88.
[7] Becker BE, Cole AJ.Comprehensive Aquatic Therapy [M]. 3rd ed. Pullman WA: Washington State University Publishing, 2011.
[8] Garcia M, Cordeiro Joares E, Alves Silva M, et al.The Halliwick Concept, inclusion and participation through aquatic functional activities[J]. Acta Fisiatr, 2012, 19(3): 142-150.
[9] Tirosh R, Katz-Leurer M, Getz MD.Halliwick-based aquatic assessments: reliability and validity[J]. Int J Aquatic Res Educ, 2008, 2(3): 224-236.
[10] 王玉龙. 康复功能评定学[M]. 2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2017.
[11] 恽晓平. 康复疗法评定学[M]. 2版. 北京:华夏出版社, 2014.
[12] 金龙,丛芳,崔尧,等. Alyn水中适应性测试量表1的汉化及信度与效度研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(5): 539-543.
[13] 丛芳,崔尧,金龙,等. 国内水疗康复概况与发展趋势[J]. 世界康复工程与器械, 2014, 4(2): 9-11.
[14] 崔尧,李建军,丛芳,等. 一种基于浏览器/服务器结构的综合康复信息系统的设计与初步实现[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(1): 114-116.
[15] 李建军. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准参考手册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008.
[16] 美国脊髓损伤协会. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(2011年修订)[J]. 李建军,王方永,译. 中国康复理论与实践, 2011, 17(10): 963-972.
[17] 马斌荣. 医学科研中的统计方法[M]. 4版. 北京:科学出版社, 2012.
[18] 王于领,梁崎,黄东锋,等. 脊髓独立测量量表Ⅱ中文版的开发及信度和效度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2007, 22(8): 714-717.
[19] 孙知寒,马洪路,王莲屏. 世界卫生组织生活质量-100量表在脊髓损伤人群生活质量评价中的信度和效度[J]. 中国临床康复, 2005, 9(5): 33-35.
[20] Kabacoff RI.R语言实战(第2版) [M]. 王小宁,刘撷芯,黄俊文,等,译. 北京:人民邮电出版社, 2016.
[21] 张铁军,陈兴林,刘振球. R语言与医学统计图形[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018.
[22] R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [DB/OL]. (2014-06-16). https://www.R-project.org/.
[23] Gandhi P, Chan K, Verrier MC, et al.Training to improve walking after pediatric spinal cord injury: a systematic review of parameters and walking outcomes[J]. J Neurotraum, 2017, 34(9): 1713-1725.
[24] Paddison S, Hexter B.Spinal Cord Injury[M]. Phys Manag Neurol Cond E-Book, 2018: 171.
[25] Lima LV, Abner TS, Sluka KA.Does exercise increase or decrease pain? Central mechanisms underlying these two phenomena[J]. J Phys, 2017, 595(13): 4141-4150.
[26] Parfitt R, Hensman MY, Lucas SJ.Cerebral blood flow responses to aquatic treadmill exercise[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2017, 49(7): 1305-1312.
[27] Rodríguez LS, Gonzalez J, Barrios M, et al.Physiotherapeutic intervention in a patient with spinal cord injury[J]. Indian J Sci Tech, 2017, 10(32): 1-7.
[28] Recio A, Kubrova E.Effectiveness of aquatic therapy among spinal cord injury patients with complex medical conditions[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2017, 98(10): e60.
[29] Recio AC, Stiens SA, Kubrova E.Aquatic-based therapy in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: effective yet underutilized[J]. Cur Phys Med Rehabil Rep, 2017, 5(3): 108-112.
[30] Rimmer J, Lai B.Framing new pathways in transformative exercise for individuals with existing and newly acquired disability[J]. Disabil rehabil, 2017, 39(2): 173-180.

Alyn水中适应性测试量表2的汉化及在脊髓损伤患者中的信度与效度

Water Orientation Test of Alyn 2 (Chinese) and Its Reliability and Validity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	罗丽华, 王雨生, 李剑锋, 董继革. 术后早期综合康复对儿童青少年肱骨髁上骨折伴尺神经损伤的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 105-110.
[2]	王子豪, 李昕华, 蒋慧萍, 郭赛男, 梁秋曼, 史婷奇. 全膝关节置换术后短期膝关节功能及其影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 111-118.
[3]	陈珺雯, 陈谦, 陈程, 李淑月, 刘玲玲, 吴存书, 龚翔, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 改良八段锦身体活动对脑卒中患者心肺功能、运动功能和日常生活活动能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 74-80.
[4]	刘冬, 徐子涵, 李江, 鞠萍. M1区联合背外侧前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛患者脑电图θ振幅的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 87-94.
[5]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[6]	蔡华年, 费思先, 张忆晨, 孙青, 郭帅, 宋韬. 基于导纳控制的双边康复机器人运动辅助分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1104-1109.
[7]	刘洋, 张鹏, 黄英, 陈翰, 许辰, 李敏. 知觉压力影响创伤康复期患者事件影响程度的中介效应路径分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 954-960.
[8]	易琦峰, 黄卓尔, 杨国莉, 谢丽华, 谢胜锋, 吴小霞, 严谨. 在职医护人员呼吸康复培训知识需求问卷的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 985-992.
[9]	李子怡, 宋为群, 杜巨豹, 曹光磊, 张艳明, 李冉. 运动表象训练对膝关节单髁置换术后膝关节功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 745-749.
[10]	任艺, 王蕊, 章耀华. 本体感觉神经肌肉促进技术联合神经肌肉电刺激对慢性踝关节不稳的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 750-755.
[11]	李芳, 霍速, 杜巨豹, 刘秀贞, 李小爽, 宋为群. 经颅直流电刺激联合任务导向性康复训练对脊髓损伤大鼠前肢运动障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 777-781.
[12]	刘宁, 刘雨泉, 祝斌, 于凌佳, 谭海宁, 杨雍, 李想. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准国内应用情况的文献计量学研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 808-815.
[13]	王靖萱, 吕迪阳, 方伯言. 帕金森病步态异常非药物康复循证研究：基于ClinicalTrials.gov数据库分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 816-821.
[14]	马甜甜, 于子夫, 秦芳, 冷晓轩, 刘西花. 强制性运动疗法在康复领域应用的可视化分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 822-832.
[15]	唐强, 郑爽, 王蕾, 王艳, 李保龙, 刘贵军, 朱路文. 基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构的中医康复学专业课程开发研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 862-868.