大鼠脊髓损伤后神经连接蛋白1的表达

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.01.011

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 60-65.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.01.011

大鼠脊髓损伤后神经连接蛋白1的表达

郭永强^1,2, 赵鑫^1,2, 陈铁戈^1,2, 张东亮^1,2, 王明^1,2, 汪静², 李森³, 王海燕³, 伍亚民³, 张海鸿¹

1.兰州大学第二医院骨科,甘肃兰州市 730030
2.甘肃省骨关节疾病研究重点实验室,甘肃兰州市 730030
3.陆军军医大学大坪医院野战外科研究所三室,创伤、烧伤与复合伤国家重点实验室,重庆市 400042

收稿日期:2017-10-13 修回日期:2017-12-04 出版日期:2018-01-25 发布日期:2018-01-31
通讯作者: 张海鸿,男,博士,主任医师,副教授,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向：脊柱脊髓损伤;E-mail:zhanghaihong1968@sina.com。
作者简介:郭永强(1990-),男,汉族,甘肃定西市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：脊柱脊髓损伤。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.30772299)

Expression of Neuroligin1 after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

GUO Yong-qiang^1,2, ZHAO Xin^1,2, CHEN Tie-ge^1,2, ZHANG Dong-liang^1,2, WANG Ming^1,2, WANG Jing², LI Sen³, WANG Hai-yan³, WU Ya-min³, ZHANG Hai-hong¹

1. Department of Orthopedics, the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
2. Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, the Third Department of Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China

Received:2017-10-13 Revised:2017-12-04 Published:2018-01-25 Online:2018-01-31
Contact: ZHANG Hai-hong.E-mail:zhanghaihong1968@sina.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30772299)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探究神经连接蛋白1 (NL1)在大鼠脊髓损伤后不同时间表达的变化。方法成年雌性Sprague-Dawley大鼠60只随机分为假手术组(n=30)和实验组(n=30),每组再等分为3 d、7 d、14 d、21 d和28 d亚组。假手术组行T_9-11椎板切除术,实验组用Allen打击仪 (10 g×25 mm)制造T₁₀脊髓损伤模型。术后相应时间点行BBB评分,Golgi-Cox染色观察损伤中心上端脊髓白质树突及树突棘变化,免疫荧光染色检测NL1在损伤中心上端脊髓白质中的表达。结果与假手术组相比,实验组各时间点BBB评分均显著降低(P<0.001);脊髓白质树突逐渐减少,树突棘密度逐渐降低(P<0.001);NL1于损伤后3 d开始升高,至14 d时达到峰值(P<0.05)。结论 NL1在脊髓损伤后自发性升高,但不足以诱导突触再生。

关键词: 脊髓损伤, 神经连接蛋白1, 突触再生, 大鼠

Abstract: Objective To observe the change of expression of neuroligin1 (NL1) in injured spinal cord in rats.Methods A total of 60 adult female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into control group (n=30) and experiment group (n=30), and both groups were further arranged into three days, seven days, 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days subgroups. The control group accepted T_9-11 laminectomy, while the experiment group was injured at T₁₀ spinal cord hit by Allen's technique (10 g×25 mm). They were assessed with Basso, Beattie & Bresnahan locomotor rating scale (BBB scale), in their time-points, while Golgi-Cox staining was used to observe the variation of dendrites and density of dendritic spine in the white matter located at upper end of spinal cord injured center, and immunofluorescence staining was used to detect the expression of NL1.Results The score of BBB scale reduced in the experiment group compared with that in the control group in every subgroup (P<0.001). Compared to the control group, both dendrites and density of dendritic spine in the white matter decreased with time after injury (P<0.001), while the level of NL1 increased three days after injury, peaked on the 14th day after injury (P<0.05).Conclusion NL1 increases spontaneously after spinal cord injury, but it is not enough to promote synaptic regeneration.

Key words: spinal cord injury, neuroligin1, synaptogenesis, rats

中图分类号:

R651.2

郭永强, 赵鑫, 陈铁戈, 张东亮, 王明, 汪静, 李森, 王海燕, 伍亚民, 张海鸿. 大鼠脊髓损伤后神经连接蛋白1的表达[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(1): 60-65.

GUO Yong-qiang, ZHAO Xin, CHEN Tie-ge, ZHANG Dong-liang, WANG Ming, WANG Jing, LI Sen, WANG Hai-yan, WU Ya-min, ZHANG Hai-hong. Expression of Neuroligin1 after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2018, 24(1): 60-65.

参考文献

[1] Shah RR, Tisherman SA. Spinal Cord Injury [M]// Falter F, Screaton NJ. Imaging the ICU Patient. London: Springer, 2014: 377-380.
[2] Freria CM, Hall JCE, Wei P, et al. Deletion of the fractalkine receptor, CX3CR1, improves endogenous repair, axon sprouting, and synaptogenesis after spinal cord injury in mice [J]. J Neurosci, 2017, 37(13): 3568-3587.
[3] Deng LX, Deng P, Ruan Y, et al. A novel growth-promoting pathway formed by GDNF-overexpressing Schwann cells promotes propriospinal axonal regeneration, synapse formation, and partial recovery of function after spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurosci, 2013, 33(13): 5655-5667.
[4] Bottos A, Rissone A, Bussolino F, et al. Neurexins and neuroligins: synapses look out of the nervous system [J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2011, 68(16): 2655-2666.
[5] Maćkowiak M, Mordalska P, Wędzony K. Neuroligins, synapse balance and neuropsychiatric disorders [J]. Pharmacol Rep, 2014, 66(5): 830-835.
[6] Krueger DD, Tuffy LP, Papadopoulos T, et al. The role of neurexins and neuroligins in the formation, maturation, and function of vertebrate synapses [J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2012, 22(3): 412-422.
[7] Schapitz IU, Behrend B, Pechmann Y, et al. Neuroligin 1 is dynamically exchanged at postsynaptic sites [J]. J Neurosci, 2010, 30(38): 12733-12744.
[8] Kwon HB, Kozorovitskiy Y, Oh WJ, et al. Cortical synaptogenesis and excitatory synapse number are determined via a neuroligin-1-dependent intercellular competition [J]. Nat Neurosci, 2012, 15(12): 1667.
[9] Soler-Llavina GJ, Fuccillo MV, Ko J, et al. The neurexin ligands, neuroligins and leucine-rich repeat transmembrane proteins, perform convergent and divergent synaptic functions in vivo [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108(40): 16502-16509.
[10] Feng P, Akladious AA, Hu Y. Hippocampal and motor fronto-cortical neuroligin1 is increased in an animal model of depression [J]. Psychiatry Res, 2016, 243: 210-218.
[11] Suzuki K, Hayashi Y, Nakahara S, et al. Activity-dependent proteolytic cleavage of neuroligin-1 [J]. Neuron, 2012, 76(2): 410-422.
[12] Budreck EC, Kwon OB, Jung JH, et al. Neuroligin-1 controls synaptic abundance of NMDA-type glutamate receptors through extracellular coupling [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013, 110(2): 725-730.
[13] Heikkinen A, Pihlajaniemi T, Faissner A, et al. Neural ECM and synaptogenesis [J]. Prog Brain Res, 2014, 214: 29-51.
[14] Giannone G, Mondin M, Grillo-Bosch D, et al. Neurexin-1β binding to neuroligin-1 triggers the preferential recruitment of PSD-95 versus gephyrin through tyrosine phosphorylation of neuroligin-1 [J]. Cell Rep, 2013, 3(6): 1996-2007.
[15] Smith GM, Strunz C. Growth factor and cytokine regulation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans by astrocytes [J]. Glia, 2005, 52(3): 209-218.
[16] Garland P, Broom LJ, Quraishe S, et al. Soluble axoplasm enriched from injured CNS axons reveals the early modulation of the actin cytoskeleton [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(10): e47552.
[17] David S, Kroner A. Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2011, 12(7): 388.
[18] Matsushita T, Lankford KL, Arroyo EJ, et al. Diffuse and persistent blood-spinal cord barrier disruption after contusive spinal cord injury rapidly recovers following intravenous infusion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells [J]. Exp Neurol, 2015, 267: 152-164.
[19] Südhof TC. Synaptic neurexin complexes: a molecular code for the logic of neural circuits [J]. Cell, 2017, 171(4): 745-769.
[20] Poulopoulos A, Aramuni G, Meyer G, et al. Neuroligin 2 drives postsynaptic assembly at perisomatic inhibitory synapses through gephyrin and collybistin [J]. Neuron, 2009, 63(5): 628-642.
[21] Südhof TC. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease [J]. Nature, 2008, 455(7215): 903.
[22] Craig AM, Kang Y. Neurexin-neuroligin signaling in synapse development [J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2007, 17(1): 43-52.
[23] Darian-Smith C. Synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and functional recovery after spinal cord injury [J]. Neuroscientist, 2009, 15(2): 149-165.
[24] Xu J, Xiao N, Xia J. Thrombospondin 1 accelerates synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons through neuroligin 1 [J]. Nat Neurosci, 2010, 13(1): 22-24.
[25] Liauw J, Hoang S, Choi M, et al. Thrombospondins 1 and 2 are necessary for synaptic plasticity and functional recovery after stroke [J]. J Cerebr Blood F Met, 2008, 28(10): 1722-1732.

大鼠脊髓损伤后神经连接蛋白1的表达

Expression of Neuroligin1 after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘冬, 徐子涵, 李江, 鞠萍. M1区联合背外侧前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛患者脑电图θ振幅的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 87-94.
[2]	李芳, 霍速, 杜巨豹, 刘秀贞, 李小爽, 宋为群. 经颅直流电刺激联合任务导向性康复训练对脊髓损伤大鼠前肢运动障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 777-781.
[3]	刘宁, 刘雨泉, 祝斌, 于凌佳, 谭海宁, 杨雍, 李想. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准国内应用情况的文献计量学研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 808-815.
[4]	王一吉, 周红俊, 何泽佳, 刘根林, 郑樱, 郝春霞, 卫波, 康海琼, 张缨, 逯晓蕾, 袁媛, 蒙倩茹. 不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动功能对称性与步态对称性的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 639-645.
[5]	袁媛, 周红俊, 丛欣莹, 刘根林, 卫波, 郑樱, 郝春霞, 张缨, 王一吉, 康海琼, 逯晓蕾, 蒙倩茹. 创伤性颈脊髓损伤程度与磁共振成像的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 725-730.
[6]	蒋乐, 杜良杰, 黄富表. 完全性脊髓损伤患者的情绪及认知行为分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 576-581.
[7]	郭霜, 谢咏祺, 张良, 张春佳, 彭润, 杨德刚, 杨明亮. 舞蹈致儿童无骨折脱位型脊髓损伤神经学预后的影响因素及预测模型[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 582-589.
[8]	罗兰, 李璐, 金沐. 氙气后处理对脊髓缺血再灌注损伤的效果：Akt信号通路和自噬机制[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(2): 174-181.
[9]	张园, 杨剑. 基于ICD-11和ICF脊髓损伤患者运动康复干预方案及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1377-1385.
[10]	石孝宇, 杨剑. 脊髓损伤患者适应性身体活动及其健康效益：基于ICF的Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1395-1404.
[11]	黄志霖, 徐发邵, 施静, 黄淦, 刘梅芳, 张霞辉. 线栓法建立卒中后吞咽障碍的大鼠模型[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(10): 1147-1153.
[12]	秦彦强, 董浩, 孙迎春, 程先宽, 姚海江. 不同针刺方案对卒中后抑郁大鼠神经递质及相关炎性因子的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(1): 30-37.
[13]	刘根林,周红俊,李建军,卫波,郑樱,郝春霞,张缨,王一吉,康海琼,逯晓蕾,袁媛,蒙倩茹. 伴并发症脊髓损伤的神经学分类研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(8): 934-938.
[14]	缪培,张通,米海霞,张伟东. 不同线栓法复制局灶性脑缺血模型大鼠恢复期学习记忆能力的差异及其机制[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(7): 789-796.
[15]	康海琼,周红俊,刘根林,卫波,郑樱,张缨,郝春霞,王一吉,逯晓蕾,袁媛,蒙倩茹. 脊髓损伤患者股骨远端和胫骨近端骨密度的变化[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(7): 855-858.