高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者手功能康复的疗效

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.02.012

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 179-183.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.02.012

高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者手功能康复的疗效

肖长林, 潘翠环, 陈艳, 叶正茂, 付桢, 姜荣荣, 林文倩, 罗丽娟

广州医科大学附属第二医院康复医学科,广东广州市 510260

收稿日期:2017-10-24 修回日期:2017-12-07 出版日期:2018-02-25 发布日期:2018-03-02
通讯作者: 潘翠环。E-mail: pancuihuan@126.com
作者简介:肖长林(1991-),男,汉族,广东韶关市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：神经康复。通讯作者：潘翠环,女,教授、主任医师,硕士研究生导师。
基金资助:
广州市教育局广医大创新强校质量工程项目(No. B16021008)

Effect of High-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Hand Function in Patients after Stroke

XIAO Chang-lin, PAN Cui-huan, CHEN Yan, YE Zheng-mao, FU Zhen, JIANG Rong-rong, LIN Wen-qian, LUO Li-juan

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510260, China

Received:2017-10-24 Revised:2017-12-07 Published:2018-02-25 Online:2018-03-02
Contact: PAN Cui-huan. E-mail:pancuihuan@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者手功能康复的疗效。方法 2016年6月至2017年9月将本科30例脑卒中患者根据随机数字表法分为对照组(n=15)和实验组(n=15)。实验组给予3 Hz的rTMS治疗及常规康复训练,对照组给予伪rTMS治疗及常规康复训练,每天1次,每周5 d,共10次。治疗前后采用Fugl-Meyer评定法(手指部分,FMA)、改良Ashworth评分(MAS)评估手功能恢复情况,改良Barthel指数(MBI)评估患者日常生活活动能力。结果共27例患者完成实验。治疗后,两组FMA评分均有提高(Z>2.070, P<0.05),实验组提高差值高于对照组(Z=-2.296, P<0.05);对照组MAS评分无变化(Z=-0.816, P>0.05),实验组MAS评分改善(Z=-2.456, P<0.05),实验组差值明显高于对照组(Z=-2.792, P<0.01);两组MBI评分均明显提高(t>3.085, P<0.01),两组间MBI评分及差值无显著性差异(t<0.246, P>0.05)。结论高频重复经颅磁刺激可以促进脑卒中患者手功能的康复。

关键词: 脑卒中, 手功能, 重复经颅磁刺激, 高频

Abstract: Objective To observe the effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on hand function in patients after stroke.Methods From June, 2016 to September, 2017, 30 stroke patients were randomly divided into control group (n=30) and experimental group (n=30). Both groups received routine training after sham rTMS or 3 Hz rTMS. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) were used to evaluate the hand function and the activities of daily living before and after treatment.Results Finally 27 patients completed the experiment. After treatment, the FMA score increased in both groups (Z>2.070, P<0.05), and the difference value was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (Z=-2.296, P<0.05); the MAS score improved in the experimental group (Z=-2.456, P<0.05), no difference was found in the control group (Z=-0.816, P>0.05), and the difference value was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (Z=-2.792, P<0.01); the MBI score improved in both groups (t>3.085, P<0.01), however, no difference was found in the MBI score and the difference value between two groups (t<0.246, P>0.05).Conclusion High-frequency rTMS could promote the hand function in patients after stroke.

Key words: stroke, hand function, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, high-frequency

中图分类号:

R743.3

肖长林, 潘翠环, 陈艳, 叶正茂, 付桢, 姜荣荣, 林文倩, 罗丽娟. 高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者手功能康复的疗效[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(2): 179-183.

XIAO Chang-lin, PAN Cui-huan, CHEN Yan, YE Zheng-mao, FU Zhen, JIANG Rong-rong, LIN Wen-qian, LUO Li-juan. Effect of High-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Hand Function in Patients after Stroke[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2018, 24(2): 179-183.

参考文献

[1] Hsu WY, Cheng CH, Liao KK, et al.Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor functions in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis[J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(7): 1849-1857.
[2] 姜荣荣,陈艳,潘翠环. 脑卒中后上肢和手运动功能康复评定的研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(10): 1173-1177.
[3] Wang C, Tsai P, Yang TF, et al.Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2014, 20(4): 355-363.
[4] Ho NS, Tong KY, Hu XL, et al.An EMG-driven exoskeleton hand robotic training device on chronic stroke subjects: task training system for stroke rehabilitation[J]. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot, 2011, 2011(5): 5975340.
[5] Orihuela-Espina F, Roldán GF, Sánchez-Villavicencio I, et al.Robot training for hand motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Hand Ther, 2016, 29(1): 51-57.
[6] Hu XL, Tong KY, Wei XJ, et al.The effects of post-stroke upper-limb training with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot[J]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2013, 23(5): 1065-1074.
[7] Brodie SM, Meehan S, Borich MR, et al.5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilesional sensory cortex enhances motor learning after stroke[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2014, 8(5): 143.
[8] Kondo T, Kakuda W, Yamada N, et al.Effect of low-frequency rTMS on motor neuron excitability after stroke[J]. Acta Neurol Scand, 2013, 127(1): 26-30.
[9] 乐趣,屈云,朱守娟,等. 低频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后手部运动功能康复疗效的荟萃分析[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2013, 30(6): 1229-1234.
[10] Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, et al.Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2009, 120(12): 2008-2039.
[11] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2014[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(4): 246-257.
[12] Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A.Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(8): 741-754.
[13] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经康复学组,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组,卫生部脑卒中筛查与防治工程委员会办公室,等. 中国脑卒中康复治疗指南(2011完全版)[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(4): 301-318.
[14] 朱琳,贾晓红,刘霖,等. 运动想象对卒中后偏瘫患者手功能康复的疗效观察[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2009, 6(9): 451-455.
[15] 付桢,胡楠,潘翠环,等. 脑卒中患者手运动功能康复的功能磁共振成像研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2015, 21(11): 1277-1281.
[16] 张丹,李佳蔚. 探索思维的力量:脑机接口研究现状与展望[J]. 科技导报, 2017, 35(9): 62-67.
[17] Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J.Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2012, 49(4): 479-496.
[18] Auriat AM, Neva JL, Peters S, et al.A review of transcranial magnetic stimulation and multimodal neuroimaging to characterize post-stroke neuroplasticity[J]. Front Neurol, 2015, 6: 226.
[19] Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, et al.Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014, 10(10): 597-608.
[20] Yin Z, Shen Y, Reinhardt JD, et al.5 Hz Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with maximum voluntary muscle contraction facilitates cerebral cortex excitability of normal subjects[J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2015, 14(10): 1298-1303.
[21] Khedr EM, Etraby AE, Hemeda M, et al.Long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke[J]. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 2010, 121(1): 30-37.
[22] 孙玮,赵晨光,牟翔,等. 低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中患者上肢痉挛的临床研究[J]. 中国康复, 2017, 32(2): 102-105.
[23] Hosomi K, Morris S, Sakamoto T, et al.Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke upper limb paresis in the subacute period[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2016, 25(7): 1655-1664.
[24] Kim YH, Chang WH, Bang OY, et al.Long-term effects of rTMS on motor recovery in patients after subacute stroke[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2010, 42(8): 758-764.
[25] 付桢,姜荣荣,潘翠环,等. 康复机器手辅助下任务导向训练对脑卒中手功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(3): 338-344.
[26] Barros GS, Borba CDSR, Borba DSP, et al.Efficacy of coupling repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper-limb spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(2): 222-229.
[27] Khedr EM, Abdel-Fadeil MR, Farghali A, et al.Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischaemic stroke[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2009, 16(12): 1323-1330.
[28] Sasaki N, Kakuda W, Abo M.Bilateral high- and low-frequency rTMS in acute stroke patients with hemiparesis: a comparative study with unilateral high-frequency rTMS[J]. Brain Inj, 2014, 28(13-14): 1682-1686.
[29] Gillick BT, Krach LE, Feyma T, et al.Safety of primed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and modified constraint-induced movement therapy in a randomized controlled trial in pediatric hemiparesis[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(4 Suppl): S104-S113.
[30] Dobek CE, Blumberger DM, Downar J, et al.Risk of seizures in transcranial magnetic stimulation: a clinical review to inform consent process focused on bupropion[J]. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2015, 11: 2975-2987.

高频重复经颅磁刺激对脑卒中患者手功能康复的疗效

Effect of High-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Hand Function in Patients after Stroke

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	林娜, 高菡璐, 卢惠苹, 陈燕清, 郑军凡, 陈述荣. 虚拟现实技术对脑卒中上肢功能影响的弥散张量成像研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 61-67.
[2]	王昊懿, 史亚伟, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 主观垂直感知障碍对脑卒中患者功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 68-73.
[3]	陈珺雯, 陈谦, 陈程, 李淑月, 刘玲玲, 吴存书, 龚翔, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 改良八段锦身体活动对脑卒中患者心肺功能、运动功能和日常生活活动能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 74-80.
[4]	胡永林, 马颖, 窦超, 陆安民, 江小鸽, 宋新建, 肖玉华. 肩部控制训练联合神经松动术对脑卒中偏瘫患者肩痛及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 81-86.
[5]	刘冬, 徐子涵, 李江, 鞠萍. M1区联合背外侧前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛患者脑电图θ振幅的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 87-94.
[6]	王贺, 韩靓, 阚梦凡, 于少泓. 电刺激治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征有效性的系统评价与Meta分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1048-1056.
[7]	孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 王耀霆, 王红雨, 闫兴洲. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 875-881.
[8]	王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895.
[9]	王海云, 王寅, 周信杰, 何爱群. 基于“中枢-外周-中枢”理论的经颅直流电刺激结合针刺干预脑卒中患者中枢及上肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 919-925.
[10]	陈怡婷, 王倩, 崔慎红, 李映彩, 张思鈺, 魏衍旭, 任慧, 冷军, 陈斌. 双侧序贯重复经颅磁刺激干预脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 926-932.
[11]	李振亚, 孙洁, 郭鹏飞, 王光明. 脑卒中患者口期和咽期吞咽功能改变与误吸的相关性：基于电视透视吞咽检查[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 933-939.
[12]	蒙象强, 熊琪, 陈庚发, 白洋, 邹田子, 冯珍. 经颅磁刺激联合正中神经电刺激干预不同年龄段慢性意识障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 940-947.
[13]	华玲, 张一楠, 郑玉, 孙俏仪, 房辉, 宋达. 手控节律音乐治疗对脑卒中后单侧空间忽略的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 833-838.
[14]	蒋孝翠, 刘臻, 苏清伦, 赵秦, 夏晓昧, 陆飞. 间歇性Theta节律经颅磁刺激对脑卒中后非流利性失语的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 839-843.
[15]	许苗苗, 李楠, 应颖, 杨凯翔, 杨婧瑞, 李杰, 邱彦群. 重复外周磁刺激对左右颈7神经交叉移位术后脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 686-690.