中文版疾病认知问卷在乳腺癌患者中的信度和效度检验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.02.016

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 203-207.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.02.016

中文版疾病认知问卷在乳腺癌患者中的信度和效度检验

韩静¹, 邱慧¹, 聂志红¹, 苏娅丽², 刘均娥¹

1.首都医科大学护理学院,北京市 100069;
2.首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院,北京市 100050

收稿日期:2017-11-16 修回日期:2018-01-12 出版日期:2018-02-25 发布日期:2018-03-02
通讯作者: 刘均娥。E-mail: liujune66@163.com
作者简介:韩静(1984-),女,汉族,江苏徐州市人,博士研究生,讲师,主要研究方向：乳腺癌患者心理社会康复。通讯作者：刘均娥(1966-),女,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向：癌症心理社会康复。
基金资助:
1.国家自然科学基金项目(No. 81573016); 2.北京市属高等学校高层次人才引进与培养计划项目(No. CIT&TCD20140328)

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Illness Cognition Questionnaire in Women with Breast Cancer

HAN Jing¹, QIU Hui¹, NIE Zhi-hong¹, SU Ya-li², LIU Jun-e¹

1. Capital Medical University School of Nursing, Beijing 100069, China;
2. Beijing Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China

Received:2017-11-16 Revised:2018-01-12 Published:2018-02-25 Online:2018-03-02
Contact: LIU Jun-e. E-mail:liujune66@163.com
Supported by:
; Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81573016) and Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (No. CIT&TCD20140328)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价疾病认知问卷(ICQ)在乳腺癌患者中应用的信度和效度,为评估乳腺癌患者心理康复水平提供有效工具。方法 2016年10月至2017年5月,采用ICQ、疾病感知问卷(简化版)(B-IPQ)对北京天坛医院乳腺科和北京抗癌乐园的297例乳腺癌患者进行问卷调查,分析问卷的信度和效度。结果 ICQ 3个维度(无助感、接纳、感知益处)的Cronbach α 信度系数分别为0.855、0.857、0.878;重测信度分别为0.946、0.963、0.901 (P<0.001);验证性因子分析显示模型拟合指数χ²/df=2.5000,SRMR=0.063,CFI=0.920,3个维度各条目的因子载荷为0.37~0.84,各维度之间的相关系数为-0.49~0.81 (P<0.001)。ICQ 3个维度中的无助感维度得分与B-IPQ总分的Pearson相关系数为0.727 (P<0.001)。结论 ICQ具有较好的信度和效度,适合在乳腺癌患者人群中应用。

关键词: 疾病认知问卷, 乳腺癌, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ) in women with breast cancer.Methods From October, 2016 to May, 2017, 297 women with breast cancer were investigated with the Chinese version of the ICQ and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ). The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of ICQ were tested.Results The Cronbach's α of three subscales of ICQ (helplessness, acceptance and perceive benefits) were 0.855, 0.857, 0.878, and the test-retest reliability of three subscales were 0.946, 0.963, 0.901 (P<0.001). A confirmatory factor analysis was tested, χ²/df=2.500,SRMR=0.063, CFI=0.920. The factor load capacity of each subscales was 0.37 to 0.84 and the correlation of helplessness, acceptance and perceive benefits was -0.49 to 0.81 (P<0.001). The correlation coefficient of criterion-related validity of the helplessness subscale of ICP with B-IPQ was 0.727 (P<0.001).Conclusion The Chinese version of ICQ has good reliability and validity, which is a valuable research tool in clinical studies of psychological cognition of patients with breast cancer.

Key words: Illness Cognition Questionnaire, breast cancer, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R737.9

韩静, 邱慧, 聂志红, 苏娅丽, 刘均娥. 中文版疾病认知问卷在乳腺癌患者中的信度和效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(2): 203-207.

HAN Jing, QIU Hui, NIE Zhi-hong, SU Ya-li, LIU Jun-e. Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Illness Cognition Questionnaire in Women with Breast Cancer[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2018, 24(2): 203-207.

参考文献

[1] 曹召伦. 慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染者疾病认知与神经心理学研究[D]. 合肥:安徽医科大学, 2007.
[2] Richters A, Derks J, Husson O, et al. Effect of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy on health-related quality of life and illness perception in patients with prostate cancer [J]. Urol Oncol, 2015, 33(1): 16.e9-16.e15.
[3] Hudson JL, Bundy C, Coventry PA, et al.Exploring the relationship between cognitive illness representations and poor emotional health and their combined association with diabetes selfcare. A systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2014, 76(4): 265-274.
[4] Postolica R, Iorga M, Petrariu FD, et al.Cognitive-behavioral coping, illness perception, and family adaptability in oncological patients with a family history of cancer[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017(1): 1-11.
[5] 李爽,叶旭春. 疾病认知的研究及其对护理的启示[J]. 护理研究, 2012, 26(10): 2789-2791.
[6] Chen WQ, Zheng RS, Baade PD, et al.Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2): 115-132.
[7] Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, et al.Breast cancer in China[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(7): e279-e289.
[8] Niclas CM.Breast cancer: the chronic disease[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2005, 42(5): 6-10.
[9] Millar K, Purushotham AS, McLatchie E, et al. A 1-year prospective study of individual variation in distress, and illness perceptions, after treatment for breast cancer[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2005, 58(4): 335-342.
[10] 江端英,高丽梅,侯香传,等. 中晚期乳腺癌病人就医延迟原因的质性研究[J]. 护理研究, 2013, 27(10): 3229-3230.
[11] Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Moss-Morris R, et al.The illness perception questionnaire: a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of illness[J]. Psychol Health, 1996, 11(3): 431-445.
[12] Leventhal H, Safer MA, Panagis DM.The impact of communications on the self-regulation of health beliefs, decisions, and behavior[J]. Health Educ Q, 1983, 10(1): 3-29.
[13] Leventhal H.I know distraction works even though it doesn't![J]. Health Psychol, 1992, 11(4): 208-209.
[14] 马纯华,张丽娟,颜君,等. 中文版改良疾病感知问卷的修订及其在乳腺癌患者中的信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2015, 18(27): 3328-3334.
[15] 梅雅琪,李惠萍,杨娅娟,等. 中文版疾病感知问卷简化版在女性乳腺癌患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2015, 22(24): 11-14.
[16] Evers AWM, Kraaimat F, van Lankveld W, et al. Beyond unfavorable thinking: the illness cognition questionnaire for chronic disease[J]. J Consult Clin Psychol, 2001, 69(6): 1026-1036.
[17] Lauwerier E, Crombez G, Van Damme S, et al.the construct validity of the Illness Cognition Questionaire: the robustness of the three-factor stucture across patients with chronic pain and chronic fatigue[J]. Int J Behav Med, 2010, 17(2): 90-96.
[18] Verhoof EJ, Mauricestam H, Heymans HS, et al.Psychosocial well-being in young adults with chronic illness since childhood: the role of illness cognitions[J]. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health, 2014, 8(12): 1-10.
[19] 李峥,刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2012.
[20] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2): 152-155.
[21] Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Maina J, et al.The brief Illness Perception Questionnaire[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2006, 60(6): 631-637.
[22] McLintire SA, Miller LA. 心理测量[M]. 骆方,孙晓敏,译. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2009.
[23] 方积乾. 生物医学研究的统计方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006.
[24] 王权. 国外实证性因素分析研究综述[J]. 心理科学, 2000, 23(3): 353-354.
[25] Hu LT, Bentler PM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J]. Struct Equ Modeling, 1999, 6(1): 1-55.
[26] 竺培梁. 心理测量-理论与应用[M]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社, 2008.

中文版疾病认知问卷在乳腺癌患者中的信度和效度检验

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Illness Cognition Questionnaire in Women with Breast Cancer

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	耿立蒙, 刘聪聪, 李玲, 吕攀攀, 王鑫, 刘芳. 运用心理教育量表(第3版)评估孤独症谱系障碍儿童心理行为特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1035-1039.
[2]	易琦峰, 黄卓尔, 杨国莉, 谢丽华, 谢胜锋, 吴小霞, 严谨. 在职医护人员呼吸康复培训知识需求问卷的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 985-992.
[3]	李俊毅, 陈泽华, 吴祖贵, 王毅, 李聪聪, 王帅, 陈伟健, 叶子璇, 沈星星, 向瑞安, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 超声回声强度评价膝骨关节炎患者股四头肌质量的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 738-744.
[4]	邱晓, 凌骏麒, 从洋洋, 白玉龙. 3D扫描容积法评定上肢远端体积的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 364-367.
[5]	沈星星, 熊玉玲, 陈伟健, 李聪聪, 李俊毅, 王帅, 章家皓, 向瑞安, 陈佳浩, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 慢性颈痛患者颈肩部肌肉性能差异及其与疼痛、体质量指数的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1420-1428.
[6]	杨佳曼,王毅,毛志涛,刘通,范德辉. 足姿指数评价青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者足部位置的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(8): 909-913.
[7]	谭茗丹,冯锭瑶,陈曦,刘汉军,李咏雪. 中文版构音障碍影响程度量表对帕金森病患者的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(6): 696-703.
[8]	周兆雯,王翠,黄真. 周历活动规划中文版在社区中老年人执行功能评测中的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(6): 737-744.
[9]	吴炜,倪波业,施加加. 扩展Barthel指数在脑卒中患者中的信度与效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(3): 261-268.
[10]	郭亚雯,林蓓蕾,张振香,王永利,符博,齐琲. 工作能力支持量表(中文版)在就业年龄脑卒中患者中的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(9): 1076-1082.
[11]	王玉仲,梁丹艳,郝江慧,温树正,王继宏. 跟腱完全断裂评分在急性跟腱断裂中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(6): 707-710.
[12]	景丽伟,刘辉,刘叶,曲文巧,胡元萍,金锋,王爱平. 康复期乳腺癌患者性功能障碍的现状与评估进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(4): 458-462.
[13]	怀宝玉,王翠,黄真,高雅. 周历活动规划中文版在大学生执行功能评测中的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(3): 363-367.
[14]	张振香,丁春戈,张春慧,梅永霞,林蓓蕾,王少阳,叶森. 居家脑卒中患者护理分级评估指标体系的构建和信效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(3): 368-372.
[15]	陈泽华,叶翔凌,陈伟健,许学猛. 足姿指数评价足部位置的信效度研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(10): 1193-1197.