国外常用辅助技术服务模式的比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.02.20

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 224-228.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.02.20

国外常用辅助技术服务模式的比较

郎倩倩, 郑俭

1.重庆师范大学教育科学学院,重庆市 401331;
2.重庆市特殊儿童心理诊断与教育技术重点实验室,重庆市 401331

收稿日期:2017-10-30 修回日期:2017-12-11 出版日期:2018-02-25 发布日期:2018-03-02
通讯作者: 郑俭。E-mail: zhengjjjj@263.net
作者简介:郎倩倩(1992-),女,汉族,河北保定市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：特殊教育辅助技术。通讯作者：郑俭(1953-),女,教授,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向：特殊教育辅助技术。E-mail: zhengjjjj@263.net。

Assistive Technology Models Commonly Used Abroad

LANG Qian-qian, ZHENG Jian

1. College of Education and Science, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Mental Diagnosis and Educational Technology for Special Children in Chongqing, Chongqing 401331, China

Received:2017-10-30 Revised:2017-12-11 Published:2018-02-25 Online:2018-03-02
Contact: ZHENG Jian. E-mail:zhengjjjj@263.net

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 辅助技术服务模式是辅助技术选择和适配的指导方针和理论依据,深入了解辅助技术服务模式可以帮助残疾人选择合适的辅助技术。本文详细介绍了国外常用的四种辅助技术服务模式,并从适用对象、适用环境、目标、评估项目、有无评估流程、有无具体评估工具等几个方面对四个模式进行对比和分析。

关键词: 辅助技术, 残疾人, 适配, 模式

Abstract: Assistive technology model is the guideline and theoretical basis of assistive technology selection and adaptation, and in-depth understanding of assistive technology model can help disabled people choose the appropriate assistive technology. This paper introduced four assistive technology models which were commonly used abroad, and they were compared and analyzed from the applicable objects, suitable environment, target, evaluation project, with or without any assessment steps and tools, and several other aspects.

Key words: assistive technology, people with disabilities, adaptation, models

中图分类号:

R496

郎倩倩, 郑俭. 国外常用辅助技术服务模式的比较[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(2): 224-228.

LANG Qian-qian, ZHENG Jian. Assistive Technology Models Commonly Used Abroad[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2018, 24(2): 224-228.

参考文献

[1] U.S.Department of Education. Individual with Disabilities Education Act [A/OL].[2017-05-12]. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/?src=policy-page.
[2] Lee H, Templeton R.Ensuring isabilities[J]. Theory Into Practice, 2008, 47(3): 212-219.
[3] Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System. ATOMS Project: Models and Taxonomies Relating to Assistive Technology Resource [EB/OL]. [2017-05-15]. http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/fs7/tr-fs-taxonomiesmodels-resource.html.
[4] U.S.Government Printing Office. Assistive Technology Act of 1998 [A/OL]. [2017-05-12]. https://www.section508.gov/assistive-technology-act-1998.
[5] Lenker JA, Paquet VL.A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice[J]. Assist Technol, 2003, 15(1): 1-15.
[6] Cook AM, Polgar JM, Hussey SM.Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice[M]. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier, 2014.
[7] Zabala JS. Sharing the SETT framework [EB/OL]. [2017-05-25]. http://www.joyzabala.com/Home.php.
[8] Zabala JS. SETT Framework Documents [EB/OL]. [2017-05-25]. http://www.joyzabala.com/Documents.html.
[9] Zabala JS. SETT Scaffold for Consideration of ST Needs [EB/OL]. [2017-05-20]. http://www.joyzabala.com/uploads/Zabala_SETT_Scaffold_Consideration.pdf.
[10] Zabala JS. Using the SETT Framework to Level the Learning Field for Students with Disabilities [EB/OL]. [2017-06-15]. http://www.joyzabala.com/uploads/Zabala_SETT_Leveling_the_Learning_Field.pdf.
[11] Zabala JS. SETT Scaffold for Tool Selection [EB/OL]. [2017-06-15]. http://www.joyzabala.com.
[12] Scherer MJ. The Institute for Matching Person and Technology [EB/OL]. [2017-06-18]. http://www.matchingpersonandtechnology.com/purpose.html.
[13] Scherer MJ. Matching Person and Technology (MPT) Assessment Process. The Institute for Matching Person and Technology [EB/OL]. [2017-06-18]. http://www.matchingpersonandtechnology.com/mptdesc.html.
[14] Scherer MJ, Craddock G.Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process [EB/OL]. [2017-06-18].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279688474.
[15] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Mission Statement [EB/OL]. [2017-12-05]. http://www.wati.org/about/.
[16] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Assessing Students, Needs for Assistive Technology [EB/OL]. [2017-06-20]. http://www.wati.org/free-publications/assessing-students-needs-for-assistive-technology/.
[17] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Student Information Guide Process Forms [EB/OL]. [2017-12-05]. http://www.wati.org/free-publications/wati-student-information-guide-process-forms/.
[18] Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. Assistive Technology Consideration to Assessment [EB/OL]. [2017-12-05]. http://www.wati.org/free-publications/assistive-technology-consideration-to-assessment/.
[19] Bromley BE. Assistive Technology Assessment: A Comparative Analysis of Five Models [EB/OL]. [2017-06-30]. http://homemods.org/resources/pages/ATAssess.shtml.
[20] Watts EH, O'Brian M, Wojcik BW. Four Models of Assistive Technology Consideration: How Do They Compare to Recommended Educational Assessment Practices?[J]. J Spec Educ Technol, 2003, 19(1): 43-56.

国外常用辅助技术服务模式的比较

Assistive Technology Models Commonly Used Abroad

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郝传萍. 教育情境下辅助技术应用：政策架构与核心领域[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 119-124.
[2]	闫媚, 江华, 董理权, 柳博飞, 贺炜洁, 吴小高, 郭智洋. 中国辅助技术的需求、供给和满意度研究：基于快速辅助技术评估数据[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(4): 373-380.
[3]	郭帅, 赵艺皓, 刘尚君, 郑晓瑛. 基于VOSviewer中国残疾研究的循证证据[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 302-311.
[4]	王梓彤, 马松翠, 徐丽丽, 马瑞, 孙旭, 程梅. 肢体残疾人自我效能感、照顾质量与生活质量的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 340-348.
[5]	邱服冰, 杨亚茹. 深圳市公共体育场馆无障碍设施建设与辅助技术应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1465-1472.
[6]	杨秀莲, 秦毽, 先元涛, 刘宏亮, 杨亚茹, 向友余, 罗捷, 钟时勋, 钟宇, 周素君, 苏红, 肖红梅, 周新建. 基于世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构构建残疾人家庭医生团队康复基础培训课程[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(11): 1249-1260.
[7]	肖晓飞, 刘妤姝, 杨亚茹, 邱卓英. 世界卫生组织康复胜任力架构在康复科学教育体系和课程开发中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(11): 1261-1267.
[8]	张叶凡, 张晗, 张艳秋, 石志学, 邢洋, 嵇丽红, 蔡伟芹, 高倩倩, 高润国, 陈晓云, 井淇. 基于地理重心模型2011年至2021年残联系统康复人员分布研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(1): 64-70.
[9]	董红,崔慧霞,徐笑笑,王维维. 康复科护理人员对残疾人态度、工作成就感与人性化护理能力的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(6): 739-744.
[10]	范韫仪,郑晓瑛. 我国残疾人精准康复服务行动实施效果评估[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(10): 1117-1125.
[11]	杨锦茹,常浩然,王冠军,武春燕,胡善菊,井淇. 我国东部地区残疾人基本康复服务效率研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(10): 1143-1149.
[12]	刘冯铂,张忠秋,李安巧,周晟,张萌. 正念训练改善残疾人情绪和心理接受效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(1): 105-110.
[13]	吴弦光,陈迪,荀芳,付雨萌,张萌,汤修齐. 发展康复事业促进实现“健康中国2030”目标[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(1): 6-14.
[14]	杨思创,汤修齐,邱服冰,李安巧,陈琳,王舒云. 国际辅助技术服务的政策架构、核心内容和发展研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(9): 1006-1016.
[15]	朱图陵. 关于辅助技术的几个理论问题[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(9): 1017-1023.