运动性构音障碍的发声空气动力学检查及疗效

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.10.013

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (10): 1187-1194.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.10.013

运动性构音障碍的发声空气动力学检查及疗效

何怡¹, 庞子建², 李胜利¹

1.中国康复研究中心北京博爱医院听力语言科,北京市 100068;
2.北京语言大学语言康复学院,北京市 100083

收稿日期:2018-02-22 出版日期:2018-10-25 发布日期:2018-10-30
通讯作者: 李胜利。E-mail: 13693639311@163.com
作者简介:何怡(1977-),女,汉族,北京市人,主管治疗师,主要研究方向：言语听力康复。庞子建(1982-),女,汉族,河北保定市人,主治医师,主要研究方向：言语语言康复。
基金资助:
中国康复研究中心课题(No. 2013ZX-07)

Aerodynamic Evaluation and Intervention Effect on Dysarthria

HE Yi¹, PANG Zi-jian², LI Sheng-li¹

1. Speech & Language Department, Beijing Bo'ai Hospital, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China;;
2. Allied Health School of Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2018-02-22 Published:2018-10-25 Online:2018-10-30
Contact: LI Sheng-li. E-mail: 13693639311@163.com
Supported by:
China Rehabilitation Research Center Project (No. 2013ZX-07)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察汉语普通话应用者运动性构音障碍空气动力学检查的特点及康复疗效。方法 2013年7月至2016年12月选取45例运动性构音障碍患者,对所有患者均应用康复生理途径进行康复治疗,共4周。治疗前后采用言语空气动力学系统(PAS6600)测量患者肺活量、最长持续发声及发音效率,并进行比较。结果患者治疗后呼气峰值流量、发音时平均声压级、声门下压和声门阻力均优于治疗前(t>2.474, P<0.05),呼气气流持续时间、呼气量、音调、最长发声时间、平均气流率和发声效率有所改善,但均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。不同类型构音障碍间喉发声空气动力学参数无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论空气动力学检查可作为构音障碍疗效判定的有效工具,但不宜用于各种构音障碍的鉴别或分类诊断。

关键词: 运动性构音障碍, 空气动力学, 评定, 疗效

Abstract: Objective To explore the aerodynamic features and rehabilitation of patients with dysarthria who speak mandarin.Methods From July, 2013 to December, 2016, 45 patients with dysarthria were rehabilitated with physiologic approach (especially the pushing method) for four weeks. The vital capacity, maximum sustained phonation and voicing efficiency were tested before and after intervention.Results After intervention, the peak expiratory airflow, mean sound pressure level during voicing, subglottal pressure and glottal resistance improved (t>2.474, P<0.05), and no significant improvement was found in the expiratory airflow duration, expiratory volume, pitch, maximum phonation time, mean flow rate and vocal efficiency (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in all the indexes among different types of dysarthria (P>0.05).Conclusion The aerodynamic assessment could be a good tool to evaluate the effects on dysarthria, however, it cannot help to define the various type of dysarthria.

Key words: dysarthria, aerodynamic, assessment, effect

中图分类号:

R493

何怡, 庞子建, 李胜利. 运动性构音障碍的发声空气动力学检查及疗效[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(10): 1187-1194.

HE Yi, PANG Zi-jian, LI Sheng-li. Aerodynamic Evaluation and Intervention Effect on Dysarthria[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2018, 24(10): 1187-1194.

参考文献

[1] 李胜利. 言语治疗学[M]. 北京:华夏出版社, 2014: 77-97.
[2] Urban PP, Rolke R, Wicht S, et al.Left-hemispheric dominance for articulation:a prospective study on acute ischaemic dysarthria at different localization[J]. Brain, 2006, 129(Pt3): 767-777.
[3] 杨和钧,张道行. 我国嗓音医学研究现状[J]. 中国医学文摘耳鼻咽喉科学, 2006, 21(5): 280-281.
[4] Thoppil MG, Kumar CS, Kumar A, et al.Speech signal analysis and pattern recognition in diagnosis of dysarthria[J]. Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 2017, 20(4): 352-357.
[5] Gonzalez-Moreira E, Torres D, Ferrer CA, et al.Improving dysarthria classification by pattern recognition techniques based on a bionic model[M]// Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 246-253.
[6] Pawlukowska W, Szyli;#x00144;ska A, Kotl;#x00119;ga D, et al. Differences between subjective and objective assessment of speech deficiency in Parkinson disease [J]. J Voice, 2017, S0892-1997(17)30295-3.
[7] Moustapha SM, Alain G, Robert E, et al.Pneumophonic coordination impairments in parkinsonian dysarthria: importance of aerodynamic parameters measurements[J]. West Afr J Med, 2012, 31(2): 129-134.
[8] Alfwaress FS, Bibars AR, Hamasha A, et al.Outcomes of palatal lift prosthesis on dysarthric speech[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016, 28(1): 30-35.
[9] Roubeau B, Bruel M, de Crouy Chanel O, et al. Reduction of Parkinson's-related dysphonia by thyroplasty[J]. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2016, 133(6): 437439.
[10] Bressmann T.Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac, 2005, 42(4): 423-433.
[11] 李胜利,张庆苏. 运动性构音障碍言语、声学及疗效的研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2006, 12(7): 591-592.
[12] 徐文. 痉挛性发声障碍的治疗[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2012, 20(6): 518-520.
[13] Gartnerschmidt JL, Hirai R, Dastolfo C, et al.Phonatory aerodynamics in connected speec(8)[J]. Laryngoscope, 2016, 125(12): 2764-2771.
[14] Liu X, Zheng Y, Tian P, et al.The impact of tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy on voice: acoustic and aerodynamic assessments[J]. J Voice, 2015, 29(3): 346-348.
[15] Samad I, Akst L, Karatayli-Özgü rsoy S, et al. Evaluation of dyspnea outcomes after endoscopic airway surgery for laryngotracheal stenosis[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 142(11): 1075-1081.
[16] Schaeffer N.Pre- and poststimulation study on the phonatory aerodynamic system on participants with dysphoni[J]. J Voice, 2016, 31(2): 254-263.
[17] Joshi A, Watts CR.Phonation quotient in women: a measure of vocal efficiency using three aerodynamic instruments[J]. J Voice, 2017, 31(2): 161-167.
[18] Jiang JJ, Maytag AL.Aerodynamic measures of glottal function: what extra can they tell us and how do they guide management?[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014, 22(6): 450-454.
[19] Freed D.运动性言语障碍诊断与治疗[M]. 陈雅资,黄婷群,译. 台北:汤姆生, 2007: 99-243.
[20] Delebecque L, Pelorson X, Beautemps D.Modeling of aerodynamic interaction between vocal folds and vocal tract during production of a vowel-voiceless plosive-vowel sequence[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 2016, 139(1): 350-360.
[21] Zraick RI, Smith-Olinde L, Shotts LL.Adult normative data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600[J]. J Voice, 2012, 26(2): 164-176.
[22] Lewandowski A, Gillespie AI, Kridgen S, et al.Adult normative data for phonatory aerodynamics in connected speech[J]. Laryngoscope, 2018, 128(4): 909-914.
[23] 林生智. 无创性空气动力学检查在嗓音功能评估中的应用研究[D]. 福州:福建医科大学, 2012: 11-31.
[24] Thiel C, Jin Y, Crawley B, et al. Aerodynamic characteristics of syllable and sentence productions in normal speakers [J]. J Voice, 2018, pii: S0892-1997(17)30417-4.
[25] 郭永清,林生智,徐新林,等. 空气动力学参数在嗓音功能评估中的意义[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2012, 47(10): 858-861.
[26] 梁发雅,杨金珊,蔡谦,等. 嗓音训练前后对女性肌紧张性发声障碍患者发声空气动力学结果分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2014, 22(4): 371-374.
[27] Fu S, Theodoros DG, Ward E. Intensive versus traditional voice therapy for vocal nodules: perceptual, physiological, acoustic and aerodynamic changes [J]. J Voice, 2015, 29(2): 260.e31-44.
[28] Sarr MM, Pinto S, Jankowski L, et al.Measurement of intraoral pressure as a contributor for the understanding of pneumophonic coordination impairment in Parkinsonian dysarthria[J]. Rev Neurol, 2009, 165(12): 1055-1061.
[29] Awan SN, Novaleski CK, Yingling JR.Test-retest reliability for aerodynamic measures of voice[J]. J Voice, 2013, 27(6): 674-684.
[30] Rong P, Yunusova Y, Wang J, et al.Predicting early bulbar decline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a speech subsystem approach[J]. Behav Neurol, 2015, 2015(5): 1-11.
[31] Yunusova Y, Green JR, Wang J, et al.A protocol for comprehensive assessment of bulbar dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)[J]. J Vis Exp, 2011, 48(48): 2422-2427.
[32] Master S, Guzman M, Azcar MJ, et al.How do laryngeal and respiratory functions contribute to differentiate actors/actresses and untrained voices?[J]. J Voice, 2015, 29(3): 333-345.

运动性构音障碍的发声空气动力学检查及疗效

Aerodynamic Evaluation and Intervention Effect on Dysarthria

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	祝莉洁,贠国俊,张伟云,刘青,曹建国. 超声成像技术在痉挛型脑性瘫痪患儿腓肠肌定量评定中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(9): 1079-1083.
[2]	陈思齐,赵航,王洁,夏彬,刘巧云. 2~6岁儿童沟通功能量表的开发与标准化：基于ICF-CY[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(12): 1444-1451.
[3]	单洁玲,朱俞岚,阮婷婷,顾晟晨,黄凯文,李蕴,朱玉连. 剪切波弹性成像在辅助软组织松解术后跟腱功能评估中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(9): 1098-1103.
[4]	何蕾,柴双双,陈亚平. 平衡评估训练系统对脑卒中后平衡功能的康复效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(7): 760-764.
[5]	陈明珍,姜凡,单永,洪永锋,刘学,肖洪波,陈瑞全. 多模态超声成像在脑卒中患者腓肠肌痉挛评估中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(7): 791-796.
[6]	李建飞,李倩,李佳潞,王健,刘丽,李丽. 悬吊推拿运动治疗颈型颈椎病的持续疗效[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(7): 834-839.
[7]	朱晓敏,刘元旻,杜雪晶,王亚囡,王华伟,刘惠林,张通. 功能性伸展测试临床应用进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(5): 583-587.
[8]	王亚囡,张通,刘元旻,朱晓敏,杜雪晶. 星状伸展平衡测试评定脑卒中患者动态平衡的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(5): 604-608.
[9]	汪乐,徐林,胡传宇,张厚君,徐杰,赵毅,任敬佩,曾杰,于睿钦,穆晓红. 功能性电刺激改善脑性瘫痪儿童下肢及躯干功能的Meta分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(4): 420-428.
[10]	刘朗,刘勇国,李巧勤,杨尚明,金荣疆,何霞. 脑卒中患者运动功能自动化评定研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(9): 1028-1032.
[11]	韩春彦,赵存,王兴蕾,张亚斌,苟玲,裴菊红,田金徽,豆欣蔓. 脑卒中误吸筛查工具的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(9): 1052-1060.
[12]	郭忆,李雪梅,张皓,芦海涛,冯冰,王艺铮. 超声剪切波弹性成像在脑卒中患者小腿康复评定中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(7): 753-756.
[13]	崔威,李春光,徐嘉诚,何刘进,孙立宁. 功能性近红外光谱技术在神经疾病中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(7): 771-774.
[14]	熊健,郑国华. 脑卒中患者执行功能的研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(7): 797-801.
[15]	王鹤玮,王云龙,陆小锋,赵思淇,王传凯,丁力,陈树耿,王莹莹,王建晖,贾杰. 心理旋转试验在脑卒中患者运动表象能力评估中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(7): 813-819.