功能性步态评价在帕金森病患者中的效度

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.11.014

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11): 1329-1332.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.11.014

功能性步态评价在帕金森病患者中的效度

杨雅琴, 周亚楠, 王拥军, 冯涛

首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经病学中心,国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心,北京市 100050

收稿日期:2018-07-21 修回日期:2018-10-10 出版日期:2018-11-20 发布日期:2018-12-26
通讯作者: 冯涛。E-mail: happyft@sina.com
作者简介:杨雅琴(1973-),女,汉族,山西太原市人,博士,副主任医师,主要研究方向：神经变性病的诊断、评定、治疗及康复。
基金资助:
首都卫生发展科研专项基金(No. 2011-2004-01)

Validity of Functional Gait Assessment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

YANG Ya-qin, ZHOU Ya-nan, WANG Yong-jun, FENG Tao

Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing 100050, China

Received:2018-07-21 Revised:2018-10-10 Published:2018-11-20 Online:2018-12-26
Contact: FENG Tao. E-mail: happyft@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的检验功能性步态评价(FGA)在帕金森病患者中的结构效度和同时效度。方法 2011年3月至12月,住院帕金森病患者121例(平均年龄61.9岁)行FGA评定,同时采用Berg平衡量表、功能性步态分级、计时起立-走测验、特异性活动平衡自信量表、运动障碍学会统一帕金森病评定量表第3部分、改良Barthel指数、最大步行速度和改良Hoehn and Yahr量表进行评定。采用主成分法正交旋转法分析其结构效度,计算FGA与其他评价方法之间的相关性分析同时效度。结果 FGA提取到1个公因子,解释总变异64.0%;FGA与其他评价之间的相关系数0.57~0.85。结论 FGA在帕金森病患者中效度较好。

关键词: 帕金森病, 功能性步态评价, 效度, 步态, 平衡, 评定

Abstract: Objective To investigate the construct and concurrent validity of the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) as the measure for balance and gait during walking in Parkinson's disease patients. Methods From March to December, 2011, 121 patients with Parkinson's disease (mean aged 61.9 years) were evaluated with FGA by one rater, as well as the other scales for balance and gait, such as Berg Balance Scale, Functional Ambulation Category, Timed Up and Go Test, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Movement Disorders Society revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part 3, modified Barthel Index, maximum walking speed and Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale. Principal Component Analysis was used to determine construct validity. Spearman correlation coefficients between the FGA and other measures were used to determine concurrent validity. Results One common factor was extracted, which cumulatively explained 64.0% of the total variance. The FGA correlated moderately with the other measures (r = 0.57-0.85). Conclusion FGA is good in validity for Parkinson's disease patients.

Key words: Parkinson's disease, Functional Gait Assessment, validity, gait, balance, assessment

中图分类号:

R742.5

杨雅琴, 周亚楠, 王拥军, 冯涛. 功能性步态评价在帕金森病患者中的效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(11): 1329-1332.

YANG Ya-qin, ZHOU Ya-nan, WANG Yong-jun, FENG Tao. Validity of Functional Gait Assessment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2018, 24(11): 1329-1332.

参考文献

[1] Souza CO, Voos MC, Barbosa AF, et al.Relationship between posturography, clinical balance and executive function in Parkinson's disease[J]. J Mot Behav, 2018, 23: 1-10.
[2] Paul SS, Dibble LE, Peterson DS.Motor learning in people with Parkinson's disease: implications for fall prevention across the disease spectrum[J]. Gait Posture, 2018, 61: 311-319.
[3] Opara J, Małecki A, Małecka E, et al.Motor assessment in Parkinson's disease[J]. Ann Agric Environ Med, 2017, 24(3): 411-415.
[4] Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, et al.Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment[J]. Phys Ther, 2004, 84: 906-918.
[5] Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH.Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications[M]. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1995.
[6] 杨雅琴,周亚楠,陈晨,等. 功能性步态评价应用于帕金森病患者的信度分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2013, 28(10): 918-922.
[7] Meara J, Bhownick BK, Hobson P.Accuracy of diagnosis in patients with presumed Parkinson disease[J]. Age Ageing, 1999, 28: 99-102.
[8] Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM.Functional Gait Assessment and Balance Evaluation System Test: reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying individuals with parkinson disease who fall[J]. Phys Ther, 2011, 91: 102-113.
[9] Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, et al.Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 88: 1314-1319.
[10] Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B.Balance in elderly patients: the "Get-up and Go" test[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1986, 67: 387-389.
[11] Brusse KJ, Zimdars S, Zalewski KR, et al.Testing functional performance in people with Parkinson disease[J]. Phys Ther, 2005, 85: 134-141.
[12] Powell LE, Myers AM.The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 1995, 50: M28-M34.
[13] Miller WC, Deathe AB, Speechley M.Psychometric properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputation[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84: 656-661.
[14] Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Hanley JA, et al.Psychometric evaluation of the Original and Canadian French Version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale among people with stroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87: 1597-1604.
[15] Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al.Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results[J]. Mov Disord, 2008, 23: 2129-2170.
[16] Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, et al.The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations[J]. Mov Disord, 2003, 18: 738-750.
[17] Goetz CG, Poewe W, Dubois B, et al.The MDS-UPDRS: how to apply the new UPDRS in practice and research settings [R]. Movement Disorder Society, 2006.
[18] Mahoney FI, Barthel DW.Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index[J]. Maryland State Med J, 1965, 14: 61-65.
[19] Wade DT, Collin C.The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability?[J]. Int Disabil Stud, 1988, 10: 64-67.
[20] Oveisgharan S, Shirani S, Ghorbani A, et al.Barthel index in a Middle-East country: translation, validity and reliability[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2006, 22(5-6): 350-354.
[21] Richards M, Marder K, Cote L, et al.Interrater reliability of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor examination[J]. Mov Disord, 1994, 9: 89-91.
[22] Hoehn MM, Yahr MD.Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality[J]. Neurology, 1967, 17: 427-442.
[23] Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, et al.Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations[J]. Mov Disord, 2004, 19: 1020-1028.
[24] Wrisley DM, Kumar NA.Functional Gait Assessment: concurrent, discriminative, and predictive validity in community-dwelling older adults[J]. Phys Ther, 2010, 90: 761-773.
[25] Thieme H, Ritschel C, Zange C.Reliability and validity of the Functional Gait assessment (German Version) in subacute stroke patients[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2009, 90: 1565-1570.

功能性步态评价在帕金森病患者中的效度

Validity of Functional Gait Assessment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王昊懿, 史亚伟, 鲁俊, 许光旭. 主观垂直感知障碍对脑卒中患者功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 68-73.
[2]	耿立蒙, 刘聪聪, 李玲, 吕攀攀, 王鑫, 刘芳. 运用心理教育量表(第3版)评估孤独症谱系障碍儿童心理行为特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1035-1039.
[3]	赵盼超, 纪仲秋, 姜桂萍, 文蕊香. 不同任务干扰对儿童早期步态特征和任务成本的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1072-1082.
[4]	胡晓诗, 张琦, 岳青, 梁艳华, 李晓松, 冯啊美, 张燕庆. 矫形弹力绷带对痉挛性偏瘫脑性瘫痪患儿步态对称性和步行能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1083-1089.
[5]	杨雅楠, 穆丽萍, 邢凤梅, 薛新宏, 王晓光, 陶徉聿, 孙竹梅, 张小丽. 基于计划行为理论的干预对肌少症老年人肌肉衰减状况及平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 869-874.
[6]	孙藤方, 任梦婷, 杨琳, 王耀霆, 王红雨, 闫兴洲. 高压氧治疗联合重复外周磁刺激干预脑卒中患者踝运动功能和平衡能力的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 875-881.
[7]	马圣楠, 柯竟悦, 董洪铭, 李建萍, 张洪浩, 刘超, 沈双, 李古强. 核心稳定性训练干预前交叉韧带重建术后动态平衡及表面肌电的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 882-889.
[8]	王亚楠, 刘西花. 脑卒中偏瘫患者主观和客观平衡功能测量的相关性及预测效能[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 890-895.
[9]	张意彬, 吕杰, 喻洪流. 基于模糊逻辑算法的智能膝关节假肢步态相位识别[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 896-902.
[10]	易琦峰, 黄卓尔, 杨国莉, 谢丽华, 谢胜锋, 吴小霞, 严谨. 在职医护人员呼吸康复培训知识需求问卷的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 985-992.
[11]	王靖萱, 吕迪阳, 方伯言. 帕金森病步态异常非药物康复循证研究：基于ClinicalTrials.gov数据库分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 816-821.
[12]	王一吉, 周红俊, 何泽佳, 刘根林, 郑樱, 郝春霞, 卫波, 康海琼, 张缨, 逯晓蕾, 袁媛, 蒙倩茹. 不完全性脊髓损伤患者运动功能对称性与步态对称性的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 639-645.
[13]	谭晓欢, 姜桂萍, 黄芯怡, 王丹丹, 张磊, 卜庆国, 吴雪萍. 社区高龄老年人下肢肌力与步速的关系：柔韧和动态平衡的链式中介作用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 646-653.
[14]	张倩, 孙新亭. 视频镜像训练对脑卒中恢复期患者下肢功能的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 703-707.
[15]	朱晓敏, 刘惠林, 刘元旻, 闫志宇, 杜雪晶, 王亚囡, 张通. 脑卒中患者步行中自发性转身方向与平衡和跌倒风险间的关系[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 510-515.