《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2018, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12): 1417-1421.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2018.12.012

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

重返工作测评工具研究进展

郭亚雯, 符博, 梅永霞, 林蓓蕾, 张振香   

  1. 郑州大学护理学院,河南郑州市 450001
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-13 修回日期:2018-09-11 出版日期:2018-12-25 发布日期:2019-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 张振香(1961-),女,河南郑州市人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向:社区与老年学。张振香。E-mail: zhangzx6666@126.com
  • 作者简介:郭亚雯(1995-),女,汉族,河南汝州市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向:社区康复护理。
  • 基金资助:
    2018年度河南省科技攻关项目(No. 182102310198)

Advance in Measurement Instruments of Return-to-work (review)

GUO Ya-wen, FU Bo, MEI Yong-xia, LIN Bei-lei, ZHANG Zhen-xiang   

  1. The Nursing College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • Received:2018-07-13 Revised:2018-09-11 Published:2018-12-25 Online:2019-01-04
  • Contact: ZHANG Zhen-xiang. E-mail: zhangzx6666@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Henan Science and Technology Research Project (No. 182102310198)

摘要: 重返工作测评工具涉及重返工作能力、重返工作自我效能感、重返工作准备度及重返工作障碍等方面的测评。本文对重返工作测评工具进行综述,比较相关研究中各测评工具的内容、评估方法、适用人群、信度和效度,总结其优缺点,为构建职业康复干预方案和效果评价提供参考。

关键词: 重返工作, 测评工具, 综述

Abstract: There are many return-to-work measurement instruments, including return-to-work ability, return-to-work self-efficacy, readiness for return-to-work and obstacles to return-to-work. This paper reviewed the return-to-work measurement instruments, content, evaluation method, targeting group, reliability and validity of measurements, and summarized its advantages and disadvantages. It could provide reference for construction of vocational rehabilitation programs and improvement of evaluation of the effect.

Key words: return to work, measurement instruments, review

中图分类号: