临床康复干预研究的常见问题及质量控制

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.02.022

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2019, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 244-248.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.02.022

• 论坛 • 上一篇

临床康复干预研究的常见问题及质量控制

章新琼, 王芹, 张小敏, 吴小婷, 洪静芳

安徽医科大学护理学院，安徽合肥市 230601

收稿日期:2018-08-26 修回日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2019-02-25 发布日期:2019-04-01
通讯作者: 洪静芳。E-mail: hjftong@gmail.com
作者简介:章新琼(1964-)，女，汉族，安徽合肥市人，硕士，副教授，硕士研究生导师，主要研究方向：肿瘤康复。
基金资助:
1.国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 81573017)；2.安徽省自然科学基金面上项目(No. 1608085MH183)

Common Problems and Quality Control in Clinical Rehabilitation Intervention Studies

ZHANG Xin-qiong, WANG Qin, ZHANG Xiao-min, WU Xiao-ting, HONG Jing-fang

School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China

Received:2018-08-26 Revised:2018-10-08 Published:2019-02-25 Online:2019-04-01
Contact: HONG Jing-fang. E-mail: hjftong@gmail.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81573017) and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui (No. 1608085MH183)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于本团队干预研究实践并结合文献，临床干预研究主要在临床试验注册、干预方案构建、研究对象招募和依从性、干预保真度、结局指标的选择与数据采集分析等方面存在问题。应充分认识临床试验注册必要性，并遵循注册程序，以理论框架为基础规范化构建干预方案，关注阻碍及促进干预对象招募的因素以保证样本量，制订提高干预对象依从性及干预保真度的策略，根据研究内容选择恰当的结局指标、适宜的数据收集和分析方法，以保证研究质量。

关键词: 干预性研究, 注册, 招募, 保真度, 依从性, 质量控制

Abstract: Based on the experience of our team combined with literature analysis, there were some problems in study of clinical intervention, mainly in the aspects of clinical trial registration, construction of intervention programs, recruitment and compliance of research objects, intervention fidelity, selection of outcome indicators and data collection and analysis. It is necessary to understand the importance of clinical trial registration and follow the registration procedure, establish an intervention program based on the theoretical framework, focus on the factors that impede or promote the recruitment of objects to ensure the sample size, formulate strategies to improve the compliance and intervention fidelity of the intervention objects and select the appropriate outcome indicators， apply appropriate data collection and analysis methods based on the content of the study, and thus improve the quality of intervention researches.

Key words: intervention studies, register, recruitment, fidelity, compliance, quality control

中图分类号:

R197.7

章新琼, 王芹, 张小敏, 吴小婷, 洪静芳. 临床康复干预研究的常见问题及质量控制[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(2): 244-248.

ZHANG Xin-qiong, WANG Qin, ZHANG Xiao-min, WU Xiao-ting, HONG Jing-fang. Common Problems and Quality Control in Clinical Rehabilitation Intervention Studies[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(2): 244-248.

参考文献

[1] 刘晓丹,严隽陶,胡军. 当代康复学科科研发展趋势分析[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(10): 969-971.
[2] 吴蓉,董冰媛,刘一洋. 医学论文文稿撰写中的质量问题及改进意见[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2017, 34(7): 664-666.
[3] Laba J M, Senan S, Schellenberg D, et al. Identifying barriers to accrual in radiation oncology randomized trials [J]. Curr Oncol, 2017, 24(6): e524-e530.
[4] 吴泰相,李幼平,李静,等. 中国临床试验注册和发表机制及实施说明[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2006, 12(9): 778-779.
[5] Gray R, Badnapurkar A, Hassanein E, et al. Registration of randomized controlled trials in nursing journals [J]. Res Integr Peer Rev, 2017, 2(1): 8.
[6] 杜亮,李幼平,张永刚. 强化两端,健全高质量证据生产的全程质控[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017, 17(11): 1241-1244.
[7] Viergever R F, Li K. Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013 [J]. BMJ Open, 2015, 5(9): e008932.
[8] 邬兰,田国祥,王行环,等. 临床试验的注册及注册平台比较分析[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2017, 9(2): 129-134.
[9] 耿朝辉,袁长蓉. 构建移动医疗领域健康行为干预模式的常用理论框架[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2016, 33(3): 43-48.
[10] Lewis F M,张娜芹,刘均娥,等. 设计以证据为基础的干预:从描述性研究到临床实验研究[J]. 中国护理管理, 2016, 16(8): 1013-1017.
[11] Yamato T, Maher C, Saragiotto B, et al. Improving completeness and transparency of reporting in clinical trials using the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist will benefit the physiotherapy profession [J]. J Man Manip Ther, 2016, 24(4): 183-184.
[12] Bacon S L, Lavoie K L, Ninot G, et al. An international perspective on improving the quality and potential of behavioral clinical trials [J]. Curr Cardiovascul Risk Rep, 2015, 9(1): 1-6.
[13] Chan A W, Tetzlaff J M, Altman D G, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2013, 158(3): 200-207.
[14] Schulz K F, Altman D G, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials [J]. Int J Surg, 2011, 9(8): 672-677.
[15] Daykin A, Clement C, Gamble C, et al. ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ - the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials [J]. Trials, 2018, 19(1): 76.
[16] Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, et al. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review [J]. BMJ Open, 2012, 2(1): e000496.
[17] Spaar A, Frey M, Turk A, et al. Recruitment barriers in a randomized controlled trial from the physicians' perspective－a postal survey [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2009, 9(1): 14.
[18] Mills E J, Seely D, Rachlis B, et al. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2006, 7(2): 141-148.
[19] Briel M, Olu K K,Von E E, et al. A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016, 80: 8-15.
[20] Alba R, Ann A, Peter W, et al. A new simple six-step model to promote recruitment to RCTs was developed and successfully implemented [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016, 76: 166-174.
[21] Mills N, Blazeby J M, Hamdy F C, et al. Training recruiters to randomized trials to facilitate recruitment and informed consent by exploring patients' treatment preferences [J]. Trials, 2014, 15(1): 323.
[22] Wilson C, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, et al. Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework [J]. Trials, 2018, 19(1): 50.
[23] Ailish H, Mary O, Byrne M C, et al. Identifying strategies to maximise recruitment and retention of practices and patients in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intervention to optimise secondary prevention for coronary heart disease in primary care [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2009, 9(1): 40.
[24] Mars T, Ellard D, Carnes D, et al. Fidelity in complex behavior change interventions: a standardised approach to evaluate intervention integrity [J]. BMJ Open, 2013, 3(11): e003555.
[25] Bellg A J, Borrelli B, Resnick B, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium [J]. Health Psychol, 2004, 23(5): 443-451.
[26] Spillane V, Byrne M C, Byrne M, et al. Monitoring treatment fidelity in a randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention [J]. J Adv Nurs, 2007, 60(3): 343-352.
[27] Morgan P P. Compliance in health care [J]. Can Med Assoc J, 1979, 121(11): 1495.
[28] El Feky A, Gillies K, Gardner H, et al. A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials [J]. Syst Rev, 2018, 7(1): 30.
[29] Brueton V C, Tierney J F, Stenning S, et al. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4(2): e003821.
[30] Booker C L, Harding S, Benzeval M. A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies [J]. BMC Public Health, 2011, 11(1): 1-12.
[31] Abshire M, Dinglas V D, Cajita M I A, et al. Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2017, 17(1): 30.
[32] Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? 1988 [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1997, 121(11): 1145-1150.
[33] 邱瑞瑾,孙杨,胡嘉元,等. 临床研究中选择结局指标测量工具的方法[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2018, 18(2): 238-243.
[34] 赵玉婷. 临床试验数据管理常见问题类型分析方法的建立[D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2012.
[35] Hussain J A, White I R, Langan D, et al. Missing data in randomised controlled trials testing palliative interventions pose a significant risk of bias and loss of power: a systematic review and meta-analyses [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2015, 74: 57-65.

临床康复干预研究的常见问题及质量控制

Common Problems and Quality Control in Clinical Rehabilitation Intervention Studies

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王靖萱, 吕迪阳, 方伯言. 帕金森病步态异常非药物康复循证研究：基于ClinicalTrials.gov数据库分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 816-821.
[2]	张元鸣飞,杨延砚,张娜,刘京宇,刘小燮,张之良,周谋望. 2021年度国家康复医学专业医疗服务与质量安全报告[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(12): 1365-1379.
[3]	王岑依,梁计陵,司誉豪,陈宁. 运动通过调控线粒体质量控制改善肌少症的研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(9): 1066-1070.
[4]	李新平, 白利明, 张鸣生, 马洪卓, 陈迪, 邱卓英, 李安巧. 基于ICF的互联网康复医疗质控信息平台需求分析和架构设计[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(9): 1016-1019.
[5]	张丽娟, 宋艳丽, 董博, 李魏, 何彦泽, 于睿. 正念认知疗法对脑卒中吞咽困难的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2018, 24(11): 1361-1364.
[6]	邓学, 邓欢, 虞乐华, 叶永玉. 美国注册作业治疗师考试的设计原理与样题解析及对中国作业治疗专业建设的启示[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(7): 859-864.
[7]	邓学，邓欢，虞乐华，叶永玉. 美国手部治疗师注册考试与认证制度详解及借鉴意义[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(4): 488-493.
[8]	谢红涛, 陶梅芳, 贾颖婕, 陈登良, 孙莉, 张春燕, 沈贞, 陆峥. 主动式社区家庭治疗对精神分裂症患者家庭环境及依从性的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2017, 23(1): 114-117.
[9]	王雪琼，朱世琼，艾艳，付靖，李亚梅. 延续护理对神经源性膀胱患者间歇导尿依从性的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2016, 22(12): 1480-1479.
[10]	胡鑫;李帼英;舒婧;赵智丽;薛桥;高磊. 随访系统在冠心病介入患者健康管理中的应用[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2013, 19(4): 398-400.
[11]	张雪艳;周裕婧;廖佩仪;. 中文版阿尔茨海默病联合注册表-神经心理学成套测试的测试者间信度与受试者工作特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2012, 18(9): 837-839.
[12]	吴新凤. 家庭随访对脑梗死患者治疗依从性的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2011, 17(3): 293-294.
[13]	任佩娟;张琳;王伊龙;陈璐;王志江. 疼痛学科科研设计质量管理[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2011, 17(11): 1023-1024.
[14]	陈建宁;王炎炎 . 健康教育对非风湿性心房纤颤老年患者抗凝治疗依从性的影响 [J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2008, 14(04): 334-335.
[15]	盖淑香;王晓青;陈红;尹丹卫;高丽美 . 高尿酸血症患者饮食治疗依从性影响因素的调查分析 [J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2008, 14(03): 278-280.