脊髓损伤神经功能变化随访与预测模型

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.10.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 脊髓损伤的治疗与功能康复已成为全球关注的重要课题。研究不同脊髓损伤平面以及损伤程度的患者功能是否能改善、改善的时间，以及根据急性损伤时的相关因素预测脊髓损伤患者的预后，对于判断患者预后、合理制定康复计划具有重要意义。本文系统分析脊髓损伤康复评价量表和预后随访时间的选择、预后研究情况、预后预测因素和预测模型。

关键词: 脊髓损伤, 预后, 影响因素, 预测模型, 评估量表, 综述

Abstract: The treatment and functional rehabilitation of spinal cord injury is globally concerned. It is of significance to study the follow-up since people with different levels and completeness of traumatic spinal cord injury experience different patterns or profiles of both neurological and functional recovery. This review systematically analyzed the assessment scales of spinal cord injury and the selection of follow-up period, the prognostic studies, the prognostic factors and prediction models.

Key words: spinal cord injury, prognosis, influence factors, prediction model, assessment scale, review

中图分类号:

R651.2

蔡亚飞, 洪毅, 王方永. 脊髓损伤神经功能变化随访与预测模型[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(10): 1120-1124.

CAI Ya-fei, HONG Yi, WANG Fang-yong. Follow-up for Change of Neurological Function and Predict Model of Spinal Cord Injury (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(10): 1120-1124.

参考文献

1 LudovicK, VirginieC, EduardC, et al. Functional outcome prediction after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical factors [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2017, 34(12): 2027-2033.
2 KirshblumS C, BurnsS P, Biering-SorensenF, et al. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (Revised 2011) [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2011, 34(6): 535-546.
3 GlassC A, TesioL, ItzkovichM, et al. Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: applicability to the UK spinal cord injured population [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2009, 41(9): 723-728.
4 DitunnoJ F Jr, StoverS L, FreedM M, et al. Motor recovery of the upper extremities in traumatic quadriplegia: a multicenter study [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1992, 73(5): 431-436.
5 KirshblumS, MillisS, McKinleyW, et al. Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85(11): 1811-1817.
6 PiepmeierJ M, JenkinsN R. Late neurological changes following traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurosurg, 1988, 69(3): 399-402.
7 SpiessM R, MüllerR M, RuppR, et al. Conversion in ASIA Impairment Scale during the first year after traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2009, 26(11): 2027-2036.
8 KhorasanizadehM, YousefifardM, EskianM, et al. Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. 2019, 15(1): 1-17.
9 WatersR L, YakuraJ S, AdkinsR H, et al. Recovery following complete paraplegia [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1992, 73(9): 784-789.
10 WatersR L, AdkinsR H, YakuraJ S, et al. Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1993, 74(3): 242-247.
11 WatersR L, AdkinsR H, YakuraJ S, et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 75(1): 67-72.
12 WatersR L, AdkinsR H, YakuraJ S, et al. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 75(3): 306-311.
13 DitunnoJ F Jr, AppleD F, BurnsA S, et al. A view of the future Model Spinal Cord Injury System through the prism of past achievements and current challenges [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2003, 26(2): 110-115.
14 CurtA, KeckM E, DietzV. Functional outcome following spinal injury: significance of motor-evoked potentials and ASIA scores [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1998, 79(1): 81-86.
15 MaynardF M Jr, BrackenM B, CreaseyG, et al. International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association [J]. Spinal Cord, 1997, 35(5): 266-274.
16 PostM W, DallmeijerA J, AngenotE L, et al. Duration and functional outcome of spinal cord [J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2005, 42(3 Suppl 1): 75-85.
17 Bourassa-MoreauE, Mac-ThiongJ M, LiA, et al. Do patients with complete spinal cord injury benefit from early surgical decompression? Analysis of neurological improvement in a prospective cohort study [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2016, 33(3): 301-306.
18 FurlanJ C, FehlingsM G. The impact of age on mortality, impairment, and disability among adults with acute traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2009, 26(10): 1707-1717.
19 WilsonJ R, Grossman R G FrankowskiR F, et al. A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(13): 2263-2271.
20 SearsJ M, BlanarL, BowmanS M. Predicting work-related disability and medical cost outcomes: a comparison of injury severity scoring methods [J]. Injury, 2014, 45(1): 16-22.
21 StephanK, HuberS, HaberleS, et al. Spinal cord injury incidence, prognosis, and outcome: an analysis of the Trauma Register DGU [J]. Spine J, 2015 S, 15(9): 1994-2001.
22 NottM T, BaguleyI J, HeriseanuR, et al. Effects of concomitant spinal cord injury and brain injury on medical and functional outcomes and community participation [J]. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 2014, 20(3): 225-235.
23 SharmaB, BradburyC, MikulisD, et al. Missed diagnosis of traumatic brain injury in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. J Rehabil Med, 2014, 46(4): 370-373.
24 JugM, KejzarN, VeselM, et al. Neurological recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury is superior if surgical decompression and instrumented fusion are performed within 8 hours versus 8 to 24 hours after injury: a single center experience [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2015, 32(18): 1385-1392.
25 GrassnerL, WutteC, KleinB, et al. Early decompression (< 8 h) after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury improves functional outcome as assessed by spinal cord independence measure after one year [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2016, 33(18): 1658-1666.
26 PiattJ H Jr. Pediatric spinal injury in the US: epidemiology and disparities [J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2015, 16(4): 463-471.
27 HallE D, WolfD L. Post-traumatic spinal cord ischemia: relationship to injury severity and physiological parameters [J]. Cent Nerv Syst Trauma, 1987, 4(1): 15-25.
28 HornE M, TheodoreN, AssinaR, et al. The effects of intrathecal hypotension on tissue perfusion and pathophysiological outcome after acute spinal cord injury [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2008, 25(5): E12.
29 HuangL, ChenK, ChenF C, et al. Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for microcirculatory evaluation in rhesus monkey withspinal cord injury [J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(25): 40756-40764.
30 WilsonJ R, CadotteD W, FehlingsM G. Clinical predictors J of neurological outcome, functional status, and survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review [J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2012, 17 (1Suppl): 11-26.
31 Al-HabibA F, AttabibN, BallJ, et al. Clinical predictors of recovery after blunt spinal cord trauma: systematic review [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2011, 28(8): 1431-1443.
32 BurnsA S, MarinoR J, FlandersA E, et al. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury [J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2012, 109(1): 47-62.
33 BurnsA S, LeeB S, DitunnoJ F, et al. Patient selection for clinical trials: the reliability of the early spinal cord injury examination [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2003, 20(5): 477-482.
34 MaynardF M, ReynoldsG G, FountainS, et al. Neurological prognosis after traumatic quadriplegia. Three-year experience of California Regional Spinal Cord Injury Care System [J]. J Neurosurg, 1979, 50(5): 611-616.
35 DonovanW H, CifuD X, SchotteD E. Neurological and skeletal outcomes in 113 patients with closed injuries to the cervical spinal cord [J]. Paraplegia, 1992, 30(8): 533-542.
36 ValeF L, BurnsJ, JacksonA B, et al. Combined medical and surgical treatment after acute spinal cord injury: results of a prospective pilot study to assess the merits of aggressive medical resuscitation and blood pressure management [J]. J Neurosurg, 1997, 87(2): 239-246.
37 MarinoR J, HerbisonG J, DitunnoJ F Jr. Peripheral sprouting as a mechanism for recovery in the zone of injury in acute quadriplegia: a single-fiber EMG study [J]. Muscle Nerve, 1994, 17(12): 1466-1468
38 KomarowskaM, DebekW. Brown-Sequard syndrome in a 11-year-old girl due to penetrating glass injury to the thoracic spine [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2013, 23(Suppl 2): S141-S143.
39 McKinleyW, SantosK, MeadeM, et al. Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2007, 30(3): 215-224.
40 Bourassa-MoreauE, Mac-ThiongJ M, FeldmanEhrmann , et al. Complications in acute phase hospitalization of traumatic spinal cord injury: does surgical timing matter [J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013, 74(3): 849-854.
41 MarinoR J, DitunnoJ F, DonovanW F, et al. Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the model spinal cord injury systems [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 80(11): 1391-1396.
42 MaD N, ZhangX Q, YingJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of 9 nonoperative regimens for the treatment of spinal cord injury: A network meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(47): e8679.
43 EnickerB, GonyaS, HardcastleT. Spinal stab injury with retained knife blades: 51 consecutive patients managed at a regional referral unit [J]. Injury, 2015, 46(9): 1726-1733.
44 LiangY, JiJ, LinY, et al. The ganglioside GM-1 inhibits bupivacaine-induced neurotoxicity in mouse neuroblastoma Neuro2a cells [J]. Cell Biochem Funct, 2016, 34(6): 455-462.
45 BarrosT E Jr, AraujoF F, Higino LdaP, et al. The effect of monosialoganglioside (GM-1) administration in spinal cord cord injury [J]. Acta Ortop Bras, 2016, 24(3): 123-126.
46 LiuD, JiangT, CaiW, et al. An in situ gelling drug delivery system for improved recovery after spinal cord injury [J]. Adv Health Mater, 2016, 5(12): 1513-1521.
47 CrozierK S, GrazianiV, DitunnoJ F, et al. Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1991, 72(2): 119-121.
48 VasquezN, GallA, EllawayP H, et al. Light touch and pin prick disparity in the International Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) [J]. Spinal Cord, 2013, 51(5): 375-378.

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王子豪, 李昕华, 蒋慧萍, 郭赛男, 梁秋曼, 史婷奇. 全膝关节置换术后短期膝关节功能及其影响因素[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 111-118.
[3]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[4]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[5]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[6]	刘冬, 徐子涵, 李江, 鞠萍. M1区联合背外侧前额叶高频重复经颅磁刺激对脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛患者脑电图θ振幅的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 87-94.
[7]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[8]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[9]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[10]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[11]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[12]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[13]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[14]	李芳, 霍速, 杜巨豹, 刘秀贞, 李小爽, 宋为群. 经颅直流电刺激联合任务导向性康复训练对脊髓损伤大鼠前肢运动障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 777-781.
[15]	张园, 杨剑. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的学校健康服务及效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 791-799.