超声成像测量不同姿势下腓肠肌形态的信度

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.11.014

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨肌肉骨骼超声测量站立位和俯卧位下人体腓肠肌内侧肌结构参数的信度，并比较不同姿势下腓肠肌内侧肌结构参数的差异。方法 2017年12月至2018年5月，由2名操作者使用肌肉骨骼超声分别获取健康青年人30例俯卧位和站立位右侧腓肠肌内侧肌超声图片，测量肌肉厚度、肌纤维长度和羽状角。3 d后由其中一名操作者使用同样的方法测量。计算组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化值(MDC)，比较两种姿势下参数的差异。结果俯卧位下测试者间ICC = 0.932~0.943，重测ICC = 0.880~0.915；站立位下测试者间ICC = 0.922~0.938，重测信度ICC = 0.839~0.925。俯卧位和站立位下，肌肉厚度、肌纤维长度和羽状角有非常显著性差异(P < 0.01)。站立位下测试者间SEM小于俯卧位，俯卧位下重测MDC小于站立位。结论超声测量站立位及俯卧位下腓肠肌内侧肌的结构参数具有良好的信度；腓肠肌形态学测量站立位更准确，俯卧位更敏感。

关键词: 肌肉骨骼超声, 肌肉厚度, 肌纤维长度, 羽状角, 信度

Abstract: Objective To investigate the reliability of the morphological measure of medial gastrocnemius by musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging on the standing and prone positions, and compare the differences in the structural parameters of the medial gastrocnemius in different positions. Methods From December, 2017 to May, 2018, 30 healthy young subjects were measured the muscle thickness, fascicle length and pennation angle of medial gastrocnemius on the prone and standing position respectively by two testers with musculoskeletal ultrasound. One of the testers re-tested three days later. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), measurement standard error (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) of all muscle morphological parameters in different positions were calculated respectively, and the differences of the morphological measurement of the medial gastrocnemius between these two positions were compared. Results In the prone position, the ICC of inter-rater was 0.932 to 0.943 and the ICC of intra-rater was 0.880 to 0.915. In the standing position, the ICC of inter-rater was 0.922 to 0.938, and the ICC of intra-rater was 0.839 to 0.925. There were significant differences in muscle thickness, fascicle length and pennation angle of medial gastrocnemius in standing position and prone position (P < 0.01). Inter-rater SEM of muscle thickness and fascicle length was less in standing position than in prone position, while intra-rater MDC of pennation angle was less in prone position. Conclusion It is reliable to measure medial gastrocnemius in standing and prone positions with ultrasonography. Morphological measurement of gastrocnemius is more accurate in standing position, while the measurement in prone position is more sensitive.

Key words: musculoskeletal ultrasound, muscle thickness, fascicle length, pennation angle, reliability

中图分类号:

R445.1

职文倩, 刘超然, 王宁华. 超声成像测量不同姿势下腓肠肌形态的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(11): 1336-1341.

ZHI Wen-qian, LIU Chao-ran, WANG Ning-hua. Reliability of Morphological Measurement of Gastrocnemius Using Ultrasonography in Different Positions[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(11): 1336-1341.

参考文献

1 AggeloussisN, GiannakouE, AlbrachtK, et al. Reproducibility of fascicle length and pennation angle of gastrocnemius medialis in human gait in vivo [J]. Gait Posture, 2010, 31(1): 73-77.
2 WhittakerJ L, StokesM. Ultrasound imaging and muscle function [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2011, 41(8): 572-580.
3 NeunanD A. 骨骼肌肉功能解剖学[M]. 刘颖,师玉涛,闫琪,译. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2014.
4 BallN, ScurrJ C. Task and intensity alters the RMS proportionality ratio in the triceps surae [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2015, 51(6): 890-898.
5 KannasT, KellisE, ArampatziF, et al. Medial gastrocnemius architectural properties during isometric contractions in boys and men [J]. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2010, 22(1): 152-164.
6 YangY B, ZhangJ, LengZ P, et al. Evaluation of spasticity after stroke by using ultrasound to measure the muscle architecture parameters: a clinical study [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014, 7(9): 2712-2717.
7 FleccaD, TomeiA, RavazzoloN, et al. US evaluation and diagnosis of rupture of the medial head of the gastrocnemius (tennis leg) [J]. J Ultrasound, 2007, 10(4): 194-198.
8 宋春红,扈慧静,张玉霞. 康复机器人训练对脑卒中下肢肌肉结构形态影响的超声研究[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2016, 23(2): 117-120.
9 KayA D, Husbands-BeasleyJ, BlazevichA J. Effects of contract-relax, static stretching, and isometric contractions on muscle-tendon mechanics [J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2015. 47(10): 2181-2190.
10 刘超然,李威,王宁华. 肌骨超声评估腓肠肌在康复领域中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2019, 34(1): 90-95.
11 MaganarisC N, BaltzopoulosV, SargeantA J. In vivo measurements of the triceps surae complex architecture in man: implications for muscle function [J]. J Physiol, 1998, 12(2): 603-614.
12 K?nigN, CasselM, IntziegianniK, et al. Inter-rater reliability and measurement error of sonographic muscle architecture assessments [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(5): 769-777.
13 冯亚男,张志杰,豆勇刚,等. 肌肉骨骼超声成像测量健康青年股骨外侧髁髂胫束的信度[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(12): 1156-1157.
14 丛卉,周谋望,杨延砚,等. 不同体位肩关节旋转肌群等速肌力评定的重测信度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(1): 36-42.
15 KwahL K, PintoR Z, DiongJ, et al. Reliability and validity of ultrasound measurements of muscle fascicle length and pennation in humans: a systematic review [J]. J Appl Physiol, 2013, 114(6): 761-769.
16 RajI S, BirdS R, ShieldA J. Reliability of ultrasonographic measurement of the architecture of the vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius medialis muscles in older adults [J]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2012, 32(1): 65-70.
17 LegerlotzK, SmithH K, HingW A. Variation and reliability of ultrasonographic quantification of the architecture of the medial gastrocnemius muscle in young children [J]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2010, 30(3): 198-205.
18 GiannakouE, AggeloussisN, ArampatzisA. Reproducibility of gastrocnemius medialis muscle architecture during treadmill running [J]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2011, 21(6): 1081-1086.
19 KellisE, EllinoudisA, IntziegianniK. Reliability of sonographic assessment of biceps femoris distal tendon strain during passive stretching [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2017, 43(9): 1769-1779.
20 SakanakaT E, GillJ, LakieM D, et al. Intrinsic ankle stiffness during standing increases with ankle torque and passive stretch of the Achilles tendon [J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0193850.
21 FukunagaT, IchinoseY, ItoM, et al. Determination of fascicle length and pennation in a contracting human muscle in vivo [J]. J Appl Physiol, 1997, 82(1): 354-358.
22 NariciM V, BinzoniT, HiltbrandE, et al. In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction [J]. J Physiol, 1996, 496(1): 287-297.
23 McMahonJ J, TurnerA, ComfortP. Within- and between-session reliability of medial gastrocnemius architectural properties [J]. Biol Sport, 2016, 33(2): 185-188.
24 LieberR L, WardS R. Skeletal muscle design to meet functional demands [J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2011, 366(1570): 1466-1476.
25 RileyD A, van DykeJ M. The effects of active and passive stretching on muscle length [J]. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2012, 23(1): 51-57.
26 SuettaC, AndersenJ L, DalgasU, et al. Resistance training induces qualitative changes in muscle morphology, muscle architecture, and muscle function in elderly postoperative patients [J]. J Appl Physiol, 2008, 105(1): 180-186.
27 de BoerM D, MaganarisC N, SeynnesO R, et al. Time course of muscular, neural and tendinous adaptations to 23 day unilateral lower-limb suspension in young men [J]. J Physiol, 2007, 583(3): 1079-1091.
28 ItoM, KawakamiY, IchinoseY, et al. Nonisometric behavior of fascicles during isometric contractions of a human muscle [J]. J Appl Physiol, 1998, 85(4): 1230-1235.
29 KawakamiY, IchinoseY, FukunagaT. Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction [J]. J Appl Physiol, 1998, 85(2): 398-404.
30 FukunagaT, KawakamiY, KuboK, et al. Muscle and tendon interaction during human movements [J]. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2002, 30(3): 106-110.
31 IvanenkoY, GurfinkelV S. Human postural control [J]. Front Neurosci, 2018, 3(12): 1-9.
32 LichtwarkG A, BougouliasK, WilsonA M. Muscle fascicle and series elastic element length changes along the length of the human gastrocnemius [J]. J Biomech, 2007, 40(1): 157-164.
33 MagnussonS P, HansenP, AagaardP, et al. Differential strain patterns of the human gastrocnemius aponeurosis and free tendon, in vivo [J]. Acta Physiol Scand, 2003, 177(2): 185-195.
34 KaramanidisK, StafilidisS, DeMonteG, et al. Inevitable joint angular rotation affects muscle architecture during isometric contraction [J]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2005, 15(6): 608-616.
35 KlimstraM, DowlingJ, DurkinJ L, et al. The effect of ultrasound probe orientation on muscle architecture measurement [J]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2007, 17(4): 504-514.

[1]	易琦峰, 黄卓尔, 杨国莉, 谢丽华, 谢胜锋, 吴小霞, 严谨. 在职医护人员呼吸康复培训知识需求问卷的编制及信度、效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 985-992.
[2]	李俊毅, 陈泽华, 吴祖贵, 王毅, 李聪聪, 王帅, 陈伟健, 叶子璇, 沈星星, 向瑞安, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 超声回声强度评价膝骨关节炎患者股四头肌质量的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 738-744.
[3]	邱晓, 凌骏麒, 从洋洋, 白玉龙. 3D扫描容积法评定上肢远端体积的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(3): 364-367.
[4]	沈星星, 熊玉玲, 陈伟健, 李聪聪, 李俊毅, 王帅, 章家皓, 向瑞安, 陈佳浩, 刘文刚, 许学猛. 慢性颈痛患者颈肩部肌肉性能差异及其与疼痛、体质量指数的相关性[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(12): 1420-1428.
[5]	杨佳曼,王毅,毛志涛,刘通,范德辉. 足姿指数评价青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者足部位置的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(8): 909-913.
[6]	谭茗丹,冯锭瑶,陈曦,刘汉军,李咏雪. 中文版构音障碍影响程度量表对帕金森病患者的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2022, 28(6): 696-703.
[7]	周兆雯,王翠,黄真. 周历活动规划中文版在社区中老年人执行功能评测中的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(6): 737-744.
[8]	吴炜,倪波业,施加加. 扩展Barthel指数在脑卒中患者中的信度与效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(3): 261-268.
[9]	郭亚雯,林蓓蕾,张振香,王永利,符博,齐琲. 工作能力支持量表(中文版)在就业年龄脑卒中患者中的信度和效度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(9): 1076-1082.
[10]	怀宝玉,王翠,黄真,高雅. 周历活动规划中文版在大学生执行功能评测中的信度[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(3): 363-367.
[11]	张振香,丁春戈,张春慧,梅永霞,林蓓蕾,王少阳,叶森. 居家脑卒中患者护理分级评估指标体系的构建和信效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(3): 368-372.
[12]	陈泽华,叶翔凌,陈伟健,许学猛. 足姿指数评价足部位置的信效度研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(10): 1193-1197.
[13]	徐悦莹, 郑洁皎, 夏汶, 李勇, 徐国会, 段林茹, 曲冰, 邱卓英. 基于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0慢性病患者整体功能的评估研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(9): 993-999.
[14]	龚迪, 王惠芳, 刘晓晨, 胡浩宇, 郑依莉, 王雪强. 老年人腰椎位置觉重测信度研究[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(4): 377-380.
[15]	李学会, 傅志军, 刘江, 董咚. 残疾认同量表的信度与效度检验[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(4): 455-459.