前交叉韧带损伤后膝关节功能评估量表的研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.12.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 前交叉韧带损伤是常见的运动损伤类型，膝关节功能评估量表在该疾病的评估治疗中具有重要意义。用于评估前交叉韧带损伤后及重建后膝关节功能的量表很多，仅有少数几种得到广泛验证。本文对国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节主观评价表、膝关节损伤与骨关节炎评分、辛辛那提膝关节量表、Lysholm膝关节评分、Tegner活动水平量表、Marx活动水平量表、健康调查简表(SF-36)、膝关节自我效能量表、前交叉韧带损伤生活质量量表和前交叉韧带损伤后重返运动量表的临床应用范围、优缺点和研究进展进行综述，并提出量表的应用原则。

关键词: 前交叉韧带, 量表, 综述

Abstract: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common sport injury, and knee functional scales play an important role in its evaluation and treatment. At present, there are varied scales focusing on this disease, in which only a few have been widely validated. This article introduced the clinical applied range, advantages and disadvantages, and advance of these scales including International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Cincinnati Knee Rating Scale, Lysholm Knee Scale, Tegner Activity Level Scale, Marx Activity Level Scale, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form, Knee Self Efficacy Scale, ACL Quality of Life Scale and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury Scale. Additionally, the application principles were pointed out.

Key words: anterior cruciate ligament, scales, review

中图分类号:

R684.7

刘凯, 宋伟, 阮槟, 高颀. 前交叉韧带损伤后膝关节功能评估量表的研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2019, 25(12): 1395-1399.

LIU Kai, SONG Wei, RUAN Bing, GAO Qi. Advance in Knee Functional Scales for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2019, 25(12): 1395-1399.

参考文献

1 PetushekE J, SugimotoD, StoolmillerM, et al. Evidence-based best-practice guidelines for preventing anterior cruciate ligament injuries in young female athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(7): 1-9
2 黄乐春,胡惠民,梁宇翔. 膝关节功能评分量表评述[J]. 中国医药科学, 2016, 6(13): 50-53.
3 GroupMARS. BigouetteJ P, OwenE C, LantzB B A， et al. Relationship between sports participation after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 2-year patient-reported outcome measures [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(9): 2056-2066.
4 GroupMARS. WrightR W, HustonL J, HaasA K， et al. Predictors of patient-reported outcomes at 2 years after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(10): 2394-2401
5 ?elikD, ??oban, ?K?l??o?lu. Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2019, 113: 1567-1573.
6 MilesM, NadarajahV, JaureguiJ J, et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in patients undergoing knee surgery [J]. J Knee Surg, 2019, 8: 1-8.
7 HantesM, FyllosA, PapageorgiouF, et al. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after multiligament knee injury using a delayed ligament reconstruction approach: a single-center experience [J]. Knee, 2019, 28(9): 788-798.
8 BillièresJ, LabruyèreC, SteltzlenC, et al. Multiligament knee injuries treated by one-stage reconstruction using allograft: Postoperative laxity assessment using stress radiography and clinical outcomes [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019, 4(9): 494-506.
9 MagnussenR, ReinkeE K, HustonL J, et al. Anterior and rotational knee laxity does not affect patient-reported knee function 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(9): 2077-2085.
10 HuangC C, ChenW S, TsaiM W, et al. Comparing the Chinese versions of two knee-specific questionnaires (IKDC and KOOS): reliability, validity, and responsiveness [J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2017, 15(1): 238.
11 OishiK, TsudaE, YamamotoY, et al. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score reflects the severity of knee osteoarthritis better than the revised Knee Society Score in a general Japanese population [J]. Knee, 2016, 23(1): 35-42.
12 WassersteinD, HustonL J, NwosuS, et al. KOOS pain as a marker for significant knee pain two and six years after primary ACL reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) prospective longitudinal cohort study [J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2015, 23(10): 1674-1684.
13 JacobsC A, PeabodyM R, LattermannC, et al. Development of the KOOS platform to measure patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(12): 1-7.
14 王影,王钢,许敬丽,等. 中文版膝关节损伤及骨性关节炎转归评分的信度和效度评价[J]. 广东医学, 2015, 36(16): 2572-2575.
15 Martin-AlguacilJ L, Arroyo-MoralesM, Martín-GomezJ L, et al. Strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts in soccer players: A randomized controlled trial [J]. Knee, 2018, 25(4): 704-714.
16 Ramos MarinhoA P, NunesG S, BenettiM, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2019, 13: 1-7.
17 ParchiP D, CiapiniG, PaglialungaC, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS artificial ligament-clinical results after a long-term follow-up [J]. Joints, 2018, 6(2): 75-79.
18 SaperM, PearceS, ShungJ, et al. Outcomes and return to sport after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescent athletes [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2018, 6(4): 1-7.
19 BriggsK K, LysholmJ, TegnerY, et al. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2009, 37(5): 890-897.
20 EshuisR, LentjesG W, TegnerY, et al. Dutch translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2016, 46(11): 976-983.
21 NwachukwuB U, PatelB H, LuY, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament repair outcomes: an updated systematic review of recent literature [J]. Arthroscopy, 2019, 35(7): 2233-2247.
22 WangW, LiuL, ChangX, et al. Cross-cultural translation of the Lysholm knee score in Chinese and its validation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury [J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2016, 17(1): 436.
23 MohtadiN G, ChanD S. A randomized clinical trial comparing patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and double-bundle ACL reconstructions: patient-reported and clinical outcomes at 5-year follow-up [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(11): 949-960.
24 RuzbarskyJ J, MaromN, MarxR G. Measuring quality and outcomes in sports medicine [J]. Clin Sports Med, 2018, 37(3): 463-482.
25 HuangH, ZhangD, JiangY, et al. Translation, validation and cross-cultural adaptation of a simplified-Chinese version of the Tegner Activity Score in Chinese patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(5): 1-6.
26 BaldassarriM, PerazzoL, GhinelliD, et al. Return to sport after ACL surgery: a comparison between two different reconstructive techniques [J]. J Knee Surg, 2019, 32(6): 717-726.
27 CameronK L, PeckK Y, ThompsonB S, et al. Reference values for the Marx Activity Rating Scale in a young athletic population: history of knee ligament injury is associated with higher scores [J]. Sports Health, 2015, 7(5): 403-408.
28 ShiraziC P, IsraelH A, KaarS G. Is the Marx Activity Scale reliable in patients younger than 18 years? [J]. Sports Health, 2016, 8(2): 145-148.
29 HancockK J, GlassN, AnthonyC A, et al. PROMIS: a valid and efficient outcomes instrument for patients with ACL tears [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(1): 1-6.
30 周慧玲,陈冰,曾嘉彦,等. 中文版SF-36量表在广东职业康复患者中信效度研究[J]. 康复学报, 2018, 28(3): 12-15.
31 KatzP, YazdanyJ, TrupinL, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in a multi-racial, multi-ethnic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort [J]. Arthritis Care Res, 2018, 24: 1-9.
32 WareJ K, OwensB D, AkelmanM R, et al. Preoperative KOOS and SF-36 Scores are associated with the development of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis at 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(4): 869-875.
33 BeischerS, Hamrin SenorskiE, ThomeéC, et al. How is psychological outcome related to knee function and return to sport among adolescent athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(7): 1-9.
34 PiussiR, BeischerS, ThomeéR, et al. Superior knee self-efficacy and quality of life throughout the first year in patients who recover symmetrical muscle function after ACL reconstruction [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 25(9): 689-696.
35 张爽,王秋勉,周春英,等. 膝关节前交叉韧带损伤患者自我效能水平对术后膝关节功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2012, 47(4): 332-333.
36 赵辉. 中文版膝关节自我效能量表的信效度研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2015, 30(22): 26-28.
37 MohtadiN G, ChanD S. A randomized clinical trial comparing patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and double-bundle ACL reconstructions: patient-reported and clinical outcomes at 5-year follow-up [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2019, 101(11): 949-960.
38 LafaveM R, HiemstraL, KerslakeS, et al. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the anterior cruciate ligament quality of life measure: a continuation of its overall validation [J]. Clin J Sport Med, 2017, 27(1): 57-63.
39 Costa-PazM, Garcia-MansillaI, MarcianoS, et al. Knee-related quality of life, functional results and osteoarthritis at a minimum of 20 years' follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Knee, 2019, 26(3): 357-368.
40 SilvaL O, MendesL M, LimaP O, et al. Translation, cross-adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the ACL-RSI Scale and ACL-QoL Questionnaire in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2017, 22(2): 127-134.
41 HadadiM, PirooziS, HaghighatF, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the ACL-QOL questionnaire in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2019, 24(3): 501-506.
42 FilbayS R, AckermanI N, DhupeliaS, et al. Quality of life in symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed individuals, with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritis [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2018, 48(5): 398-408.
43 Salatkait?S, ?iup?inskasL, GudasR. Translation and cultural adaptation of Lithuanian version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale [J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(7): 267-272.
44 LeeD W, YangS J, ChoS I, et al. Single-leg vertical jump test as a functional test after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J]. Knee, 2018, 25(6): 1016-1026.
45 SadeqiM, KloucheS, BohuY, et al. Progression of the psychological ACL-RSI Score and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective 2-year follow-up study from the French Prospective Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Cohort Study (FAST) [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2018, 6(12): 12-19.
46 McPhersonA L, FellerJ A, HewettT E, et al. Smaller change in psychological readiness to return to sport is associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury among younger patients [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 32(5): 1-6.
47 WebsterK E, NagelliC V, HewettT E, et al. Factors associated with psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery [J]. 2018, 46(7): 1545-1550.
48 HaJ K, KimJ G, YoonK H, et al. Korean Version of the anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Scale: translation and cross-cultural adaptation [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(2): 252-260.
49 WebsterK E, FellerJ A. Development and validation of a short version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2018, 6(4): 1-9.
50 ChenT, ZhangP, LiY, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(8): 1-7.
51 BaezS E, HochM C, HochJ M, et al. Psychological factors are associated with return to pre-injury levels of sport and physical activity after ACL reconstruction [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 5(9): 324-336.

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[3]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[4]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[5]	魏梦力, 钟亚平, 周易文, 桂辉贤, 关烨明, 于婷婷. 单侧前交叉韧带重建患者步行双侧下肢肌肉协同模式差异[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 95-104.
[6]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[7]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[8]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[9]	耿立蒙, 刘聪聪, 李玲, 吕攀攀, 王鑫, 刘芳. 运用心理教育量表(第3版)评估孤独症谱系障碍儿童心理行为特征[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1035-1039.
[10]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[11]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[12]	马圣楠, 柯竟悦, 董洪铭, 李建萍, 张洪浩, 刘超, 沈双, 李古强. 核心稳定性训练干预前交叉韧带重建术后动态平衡及表面肌电的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 882-889.
[13]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[14]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[15]	韩亚兵, 刘少青, 李新通, 梁馨文, 罗敬, 李婷, 潘玮敏. 髋部神经肌肉训练对女子足球运动员前交叉韧带损伤风险的影响[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 770-776.