离心运动神经控制的研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.00.022

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 97-101.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.00.022

离心运动神经控制的研究进展

黄信萍^1,2, 李鑫^1,2,3,4, 刘师宇^1,2, 李颖妍^1,2, 徐海兰^1,2, 庞伟^1,2,3

1.佳木斯大学康复医学院，黑龙江佳木斯市 154007
2.佳木斯大学儿童康复神经实验室，黑龙江佳木斯市 154007
3.佳木斯大学附属第三医院，黑龙江佳木斯市 154007
4.北京体育大学运动医学与康复学院，北京市 100084

收稿日期:2020-06-24 修回日期:2020-07-28 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-01-27
通讯作者: 庞伟， E-mail： pangwei76@aliyun.com
作者简介:黄信萍(1997-)，女，汉族，四川大英县人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向：小儿脑瘫的综合康复；庞伟，男，主任医师，教授，硕士生导师。
基金资助:
1.佳木斯大学校级科技创新团队项目(No. Cxtd-2013-02);2.佳木斯大学优秀学科团队项目(No. JDXKTD-2019006);3.佳木斯大学科研项目(No. S2009-042);4.佳木斯大学基础研究类面上项目(No. JMSUJCM2016-062);5.黑龙江省卫生健康委科研课题(No. 2019-350);6.黑龙江省教育厅基本科研业务费基础研究项目(No. 2019-KYYWF-1366)

Advance in Neural Control in Eccentric Exercise (review)

HUANG Xin-ping^1,2, LI Xin^1,2,3,4, LIU Shi-yu^1,2, LI Ying-yan^1,2, XU Hai-lan^1,2, PANG Wei^1,2,3

1. Rehabilitation Medical College, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang 154007, China
2. The Children's Rehabilitation Nerve Laboratory, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang 154007, China
3. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang 154007, China
4. School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2020-06-24 Revised:2020-07-28 Published:2021-01-25 Online:2021-01-27
Contact: PANG Wei, E-mail: pangwei76@aliyun.com
Supported by:
Jiamusi University Science and Technology Innovation Team Project (No. Cxtd-2013-02), Jiamusi University Excellent Discipline Team Project (No. JDXKTD-2019006), Jiamusi University Scientific Research Project (No. S2009-042), Jiamusi University General Basic Research (Natural) Project (No. JMSUJCM2016-062), Heilongjiang Health Commission Scientific Research Project (No. 2019-350) and Heilongjiang Education Department Basic Scientific Research Fees (Basic) (No. 2019-KYYWF-1366)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 神经系统对离心运动采取了独特的控制机制。离心运动过程中，皮质兴奋性增加，皮质内抑制减小，脊髓兴奋性下降。增加的皮质兴奋性对脊髓抑制存在下行补偿作用，最终皮质脊髓通路的兴奋性取决于脊髓水平兴奋与抑制的平衡，通常表现为降低。收缩强度等诸多因素能影响脊髓水平的兴奋-抑制平衡。离心运动具有显著的交叉作用，能更大程度调节未训练肢体的皮质脊髓兴奋性。肌肉长度、疲劳程度、训练持续时间等因素的影响和机制还不明确，目前研究均在健康人中开展，离心运动训练的治疗效果及其机制有待研究。

关键词: 离心运动, 皮质兴奋性, 脊髓兴奋性, 综述

Abstract: The nervous system controls eccentric exercise in a special way. During eccentric exercise, excitability increases in cortex, and inhibition decreases, causing excitability decrease in spinal cords. In another hand, increased cortical excitability results in extra excitatory compensation for spinal inhibition. The excitability of the corticospinal pathway depends on the balance between excitability and inhibition of the spinal cord level finally, which usually decreases. Many factors, such as the intensity of contraction, can affect the balance of corticospinal excitability. There is a cross-over effect in eccentric exercise, which promotes corticospinal excitability in untrained limbs. However, the effects and mechanisms of muscle length, fatigue and training duration are still unclear, and current researches have focused in the healthy populations. More researches are needed to explore the effects of eccentric exercise on ill populations.

Key words: eccentric exercise, cortical excitability, spinal excitability, review

中图分类号:

R493

黄信萍, 李鑫, 刘师宇, 李颖妍, 徐海兰, 庞伟. 离心运动神经控制的研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2021, 27(1): 97-101.

HUANG Xin-ping, LI Xin, LIU Shi-yu, LI Ying-yan, XU Hai-lan, PANG Wei. Advance in Neural Control in Eccentric Exercise (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2021, 27(1): 97-101.

参考文献

1 Hoppeler H. Moderate load eccentric exercise: a distinct novel training modality [J]. Front Physiol, 2016, 7: 483.
2 Douglas J, Pearson S, Ross A, et al. Eccentric exercise: physiological characteristics and acute responses [J]. Sports Med, 2017, 47(4): 663-675.
3 Clos P, Laroche D, Stapley P J, et al. Neuromuscular and perceptual responses to sub-maximal eccentric cycling [J]. Front Phys, 2019, 10: 354.
4 史姗姗,庞伟. 离心运动训练在康复治疗中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(2): 173-178. Shi S S, Pang W. Application progress of eccentric exercise training in rehabilitation [J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 2018, 24(2): 173-178.
5 Lepley L K, Lepley A S, Onate J A, et al. Eccentric exercise to enhance neuromuscular control [J]. Sports Health, 2017, 9(4): 333-340.
6 Shield A J, Bourne M N. Hamstring injury prevention practices in elite sport: evidence for eccentric strength vs. lumbo-pelvic training [J]. Sports Med, 2018, 48(3): 513-524.
7 Duchateau J, Enoka R M. Neural control of lengthening contractions [J]. J Exp Biol, 2016, 219(Pt 2): 197-204.
8 Taylor J L, Gandevia S C. Noninvasive stimulation of the human corticospinal tract [J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2004, 96(4): 1496-1503.
9 Gruber M, Linnamo V, Strojnik V, et al. Excitability at the motoneuron pool and motor cortex is specifically modulated in lengthening compared to isometric contractions [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2009, 101(4): 2030-2040.
10 Duclay J, Pasquet B, Martin A, et al. Specific modulation of spinal and cortical excitabilities during lengthening and shortening submaximal and maximal contractions in plantar flexor muscles [J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2014, 117(12): 1440-1450.
11 Hahn D, Hoffman B W, Carroll T J, et al. Cortical and spinal excitability during and after lengthening contractions of the human plantar flexor muscles performed with maximal voluntary effort [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e49907.
12 Löscher W N, Nordlund M M. Central fatigue and motor cortical excitability during repeated shortening and lengthening actions [J]. Muscle Nerve, 2002, 25(6): 864-872.
13 Hedayatpour N, Falla D. Physiological and neural adaptations to eccentric exercise: mechanisms and considerations for training [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015: 193741.
14 Forman D A, Monks M, Power K E. Corticospinal excitability, assessed through stimulus response curves, is phase-, task-, and muscle-dependent during arm cycling [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2019, 692: 100-106.
15 McDonnell M N, Buckley J D, Opie G M, et al. A single bout of aerobic exercise promotes motor cortical neuroplasticity [J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2013, 114(9): 1174-1182.
16 Cirillo J, Lavender A P, Ridding M C, et al. Motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation is enhanced in physically active individuals [J]. J Physiol, 2009, 587(Pt 24): 5831-5842.
17 Fang Y, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, et al. Greater movement-related cortical potential during human eccentric versus concentric muscle contractions [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2001, 86(4): 1764-1772.
18 Duchateau J, Baudry S. Insights into the neural control of eccentric contractions [J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2014, 116(11): 1418-1425.
19 Perrey S. Brain activation associated with eccentric movement: a narrative review of the literature [J]. Eur J Sport Sci, 2018, 18(1): 75-82.
20 Kwon Y H, Park J W. Different cortical activation patterns during voluntary eccentric and concentric muscle contractions: an fMRI study [J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2011, 29(3): 253-259.
21 Latella C, Goodwill A M, Muthalib M, et al. Effects of eccentric versus concentric contractions of the biceps brachii on intracortical inhibition and facilitation [J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2019, 29(3): 369-379.
22 Ziemann U, Siebner H R. Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity [J]. Brain Stimul, 2008, 1(1): 60-66.
23 Duclay J, Pasquet B, Martin A, et al. Specific modulation of corticospinal and spinal excitabilities during maximal voluntary isometric, shortening and lengthening contractions in synergist muscles [J]. J Physiol, 2011, 589(Pt 11): 2901-2916.
24 Garnier Y M, Paizis C, Lepers R. Corticospinal changes induced by fatiguing eccentric versus concentric exercise [J]. Eur J Sport Sci, 2019, 19(2): 166-176.
25 Opie G M, Semmler J G. Intracortical inhibition assessed with paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation is modulated during shortening and lengthening contractions in young and old adults [J]. Brain Stimul, 2016, 9(2): 258-267.
26 Garnier Y M, Paizis C, Martin A, et al. Corticospinal excitability changes following downhill and uphill walking [J]. Exp Brain Res, 2019, 237(8): 2023-2033.
27 Pitman B M, Semmler J G. Reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition after eccentric muscle damage in human elbow flexor muscles [J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2012, 113(6): 929-936.
28 Kolasinski J, Hinson E L, Divanbeighi Zand A P, et al. The dynamics of cortical GABA in human motor learning [J]. J Physiol, 2019, 597(1): 271-282.
29 Cash R F, Murakami T, Chen R, et al. Augmenting plasticity induction in human motor cortex by disinhibition stimulation [J]. Cereb Cortex, 2016, 26(1): 58-69.
30 孟海江.运动表象对运动皮层兴奋性持续增强的调节及其机制研究[D]. 上海:上海体育学院, 2019. Meng H J. The modulation of motor imagery on continuous enhancement of the motor cortex excitability and its mechanism [D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University of Sport, 2019.
31 Nielsen J, Petersen N. Is presynaptic inhibition distributed to corticospinal fibres in man? [J]. J Physiol, 1994, 477(Pt 1): 47-58.
32 Pierrot-Deseilligny E, Burke D. The Circuitry of the Human Spinal Cord. Spinal and Corticospinal Mechanisms of Movement [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 292-295.
33 Barrué-Belou S, Marque P, Duclay J. Recurrent inhibition is higher in eccentric compared to isometric and concentric maximal voluntary contractions [J]. Acta Physiol (Oxf), 2018, 223(4): e13064.
34 Aagaard P. Autogenic recurrent Renshaw inhibition is elevated in human spinal motor neurones during maximal eccentric muscle contraction in vivo [J]. Acta Physiol (Oxf), 2018, 223(4): e13107.
35 Bodkin S G, Norte G E, Hart J M. Corticospinal excitability can discriminate quadriceps strength indicative of knee function after ACL-reconstruction [J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2019, 29(5): 716-724.
36 Doguet V, Nosaka K, Guével A, et al. Muscle length effect on corticospinal excitability during maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors [J]. Exp Physiol, 2017, 102(11): 1513-1523.
37 Clos P, Garnier Y, Martin A, et al. Corticospinal excitability is altered similarly following concentric and eccentric maximal contractions [J]. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2020, 120(6): 1457-1469.
38 Škarabot J, Tallent J, Goodall S, et al. Corticospinal excitability during shortening and lengthening actions with incremental torque output [J]. Exp Physiol, 2018, 103(12): 1586-1592.
39 Sekiguchi H, Kimura T, Yamanaka K, et al. Lower excitability of the corticospinal tract to transcranial magnetic stimulation during lengthening contractions in human elbow flexors [J]. Neurosci Lett, 2001, 312(2): 83-86.
40 Walsh J A, Stapley P J, Shemmell J B H, et al. Global corticospinal excitability as assessed in a non-exercised upper limb muscle compared between concentric and eccentric modes of leg cycling [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 19212.
41 Garnier Y M, Lepers R, Stapley P J, et al. Changes in cortico-spinal excitability following uphill versus downhill treadmill exercise [J]. Behav Brain Res, 2017, 317: 242-250.
42 Aagaard P. Spinal and supraspinal control of motor function during maximal eccentric muscle contraction: effects of resistance training [J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2018, 7(3): 282-293.
43 Hortobágyi T, Lambert N J, Hill J P. Greater cross education following training with muscle lengthening than shortening [J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1997, 29(1): 107-112.
44 Kidgell D J, Frazer A K, Daly R M, et al. Increased cross-education of muscle strength and reduced corticospinal inhibition following eccentric strength training [J]. Neuroscience, 2015, 300: 566-575.
45 Lee M, Carroll T J. Cross education: possible mechanisms for the contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training [J]. Sports Med, 2007, 37(1): 1-14.
46 Clark D J, Patten C. Eccentric versus concentric resistance training to enhance neuromuscular activation and walking speed following stroke [J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2013, 27(4): 335-344.
47 Jubeau M, Doguet V. Muscle length: a new feature to investigate neural control of lengthening contractions [J]. Exp Physiol, 2020, 105(6): 930-931.
48 Hahn D. Comments on Doguetet al. (2017) 'Muscle length effect on corticospinal excitability during maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors' [J]. Exp Physiol, 2018, 103(10): 1435-1436.
49 Doguet V, Nosaka K, Guével A, et al. Reply to the letter to the editor: comments on Doguetet al. (2017) 'Muscle length effect on corticospinal excitability during maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors' [J]. Exp Physiol, 2018, 103(10): 1437-1438.
50 Oya T, Hoffman B W, Cresswell A G. Corticospinal-evoked responses in lower limb muscles during voluntary contractions at varying strengths [J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2008, 105(5): 1527-1532.
51 Martin P G, Gandevia S C, Taylor J L. Output of human motoneuron pools to corticospinal inputs during voluntary contractions [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2006, 95(6): 3512-3518.
52 Gelli F, Del Santo F, Popa T, et al. Factors influencing the relation between corticospinal output and muscle force during voluntary contractions [J]. Eur J Neurosci, 2007, 25(11): 3469-3475.
53 Lockyer E J, Benson R J, Hynes A P, et al. Intensity matters: effects of cadence and power output on corticospinal excitability during arm cycling are phase and muscle dependent [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2018, 120(6): 2908-2921.
54 McNeil C J, Giesebrecht S, Khan S I, et al. The reduction in human motoneurone responsiveness during muscle fatigue is not prevented by increased muscle spindle discharge [J]. J Physiol, 2011, 1589(Pt 15): 3731-3738.
55 Tallent J, Goodall S, Gibbon K C, et al. Enhanced corticospinal excitability and volitional drive in response to shortening and lengthening strength training and changes following detraining [J]. Front Physiol, 2017, 8: 57.
56 Vangsgaard S, Taylor J L, Hansen E A, et al. Changes in H reflex and neuromechanical properties of the trapezius muscle after 5 weeks of eccentric training: a randomized controlled trial [J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2014, 116(12): 1623-1631.
57 Hötting K, Röder B. Beneficial effects of physical exercise on neuroplasticity and cognition [J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013, 37(9 Pt B): 2243-2257.
58 Petzinger G M, Fisher B E, McEwen S, et al. Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12(7): 716-726.

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[3]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[4]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[5]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[6]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[7]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[8]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[9]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[10]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[11]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[12]	张园, 杨剑. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的学校健康服务及效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 791-799.
[13]	王少璞, 陈钢. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的心理行为健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 800-807.
[14]	蒋长好, 高晓妍. 短时身体活动对儿童认知功能影响的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 667-672.
[15]	袁媛, 杨剑. 社区老年人身体活动融合慢性病管理的健康效益：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 541-550.

离心运动神经控制的研究进展

Advance in Neural Control in Eccentric Exercise (review)

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0