残疾人居家环境测评工具研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.06.012

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 687-691.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.06.012

残疾人居家环境测评工具研究进展

王文娜,林蓓蕾,张振香(),郭亚雯,郭二锋

郑州大学护理与健康学院,河南郑州市 450001

收稿日期:2019-04-21 修回日期:2019-06-06 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-06-29
通讯作者: 张振香 E-mail:zhangzx6666@126.com
作者简介:王文娜(1994-),女,汉族,河南周口市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：社区与老年护理。
基金资助:
1.河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目(2018-ZZJH-547);2.河南省教育厅项目(19A320068)

Advance in Accessment Tools for Home Environment for People with Disabilities (review)

WANG Wen-na,LIN Bei-lei,ZHANG Zhen-xiang(),GUO Ya-wen,GUO Er-feng

School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China

Received:2019-04-21 Revised:2019-06-06 Published:2020-06-25 Online:2020-06-29
Contact: ZHANG Zhen-xiang E-mail:zhangzx6666@126.com
Supported by:
Education Department of Henan Humanities and Social Sciences Researches(General)(2018-ZZJH-547);Education Department of Henan Province(19A320068)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

残疾人居家环境相关测评工具可分为以经典测量理论为框架的测评工具和以现代项目反应理论为框架的测评工具两大类。本文综述这两类居家环境测评工具的内容、评估方法、适用人群、信度和效度,总结其优缺点。

关键词: 残疾人, 居家环境, 测评工具, 综述

Abstract:

Home environment assessment tools for people with disabilities can be classfied into those based on classical test theory and item response theory. This paper reviewed the content, methods, target population, reliability and validity of the two types of home environment assessment tools and summarized their advantages and disadvantages.

Key words: people with disabilities, home environment, measurement instruments, review

中图分类号:

王文娜,林蓓蕾,张振香,郭亚雯,郭二锋. 残疾人居家环境测评工具研究进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(6): 687-691.

WANG Wen-na,LIN Bei-lei,ZHANG Zhen-xiang,GUO Ya-wen,GUO Er-feng. Advance in Accessment Tools for Home Environment for People with Disabilities (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2020, 26(6): 687-691.

参考文献 39

[1]	世界银行, 世界卫生组织. 世界残疾报告(国际中文版)[R]. 邱卓英,译. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2011.
[2]	中共中央国务院. 中共中央国务院印发《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》[EB/OL]. ( 2016- 10- 25)[2018-04-15]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm.
[3]	Heinemann A W, Magasi S, Hammel J, et al. Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(4):589-595. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.024
[4]	World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)[S]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
[5]	Walsh M E, Galvin R, Loughnane C, et al. Factors associated with community reintegration in the first year after stroke: a qualitative meta-synjournal[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2015, 37(18):1599-1608. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.974834 pmid: 25382215
[6]	朱晓文. 基于传统和现代测量理论对学校归属感量表的评价分析[J]. 西安文理学院学报(社会科学版), 2019, 22(1):108-112.
[7]	McBride R E, Nasiruddin N, Xiang P, et al. Critical-thinking dispositions psychometric properties assessment: applying the Rasch model[J]. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2016, 87:16-17.
[8]	Babulal G M, Tabor C L. The measure of stroke environment (MOSE): development and validation of the MOSE in post-stroke populations with and without aphasia[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2016, 23(5):348-357. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1143697 pmid: 27077978
[9]	Foley E L, Nicholas M L, Baum C M, et al. Influence of environmental factors on social participation post-stroke[J]. Behav Neurol, 2019, 2019:2606039. doi: 10.1155/2019/2606039 pmid: 30800187
[10]	Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, St-Michel G. Measure of the Quality of the Environment-version 1.0[M]. Lac St Charles, Quebéc: CQCIDIH, 1997.
[11]	Boucher N, Dumas F B, Maltais D B, et al. The influence of selected personal and environmental factors on leisure activities in adults with cerebral palsy[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2010, 32(16):1328-1338. doi: 10.3109/09638280903514713
[12]	Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2001, 23(13):559-569. pmid: 11451190
[13]	Akyurek G, Gonca B. The Measure of Quality of the Environments’ Turkish validity and reliability[J]. OTJR (Thorofare N J), 39(1):1539449218812152018.
[14]	Gray D B, Hollingsworth H H, Stark S, et al. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2008, 30(6):434-457. doi: 10.1080/09638280701625377
[15]	Heinemann A W, Miskovic A, Semik P, et al. Measuring environmental factors: unique and overlapping ICF coverage of five instruments[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2016, 97(12):2113-2122. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.021
[16]	Julie K, Alan J, Stephen H. Development of the Home and Community Environment (HACE) instrument[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2005, 37(1):37-44. doi: 10.1080/16501970410014830
[17]	Stark S, Hollingsworth H H, Morgan K A, et al. Development of a measure of receptivity of the physical environment[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2007, 29(2):15.
[18]	Whiteneck G G, Harrison-Felix C L, Mellick D C, et al. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85(8):1324-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.027
[19]	Liao L, Lau R, Pang M. Measuring environmental barriers faced by individuals living with stroke: development and validation of the Chinese version of the Craig hospital inventory of environmental factors[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2012, 44(9):740. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1014
[20]	Ephraim P L, Mackenzie E J, Wegener S T, et al. Environmental barriers experienced by amputees: the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors-short form[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87(3):328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.010
[21]	Zhang L, Yan T, You L, et al. Barriers to activity and participation for stroke survivors in rural China[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(7):1222-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.024
[22]	Zhang L, Sui M, Yan T, et al. A study in persons later after stroke of the relationships between social participation, environmental factors and depression[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2016, 31(3):394-402. doi: 10.1177/0269215516641300
[23]	Saelens B E, Sallis J F, Black J B, et al. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation[J]. Am J Public Health, 2003, 93(9):1552-1558. pmid: 12948979
[24]	Becker H, Stuifbergen A K, Sands D. Development of a scale to measure barriers to health promotion activities among persons with disabilities[J]. Am J Health Promot, 1991, 5(6):449-454. pmid: 10171668
[25]	Clemson L, Fitzgerald M H, Heard R. Content validity of an assessment tool to identify home fall hazards: The Westmead Home Safety Assessment[J]. Br J Occup Ther, 1999, 62(4):171-179. doi: 10.1177/030802269906200407
[26]	陈冠宇, 陈平. 解释性项目反应理论模型:理论与应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(4):1-14.
[27]	胡晓亚. 基于项目反应理论的高中生物稳态与环境模块测评工具的编制及应用研究[D]. 沈阳:辽宁师范大学, 2016.
[28]	皋文君, 袁长蓉. 患者自我报告结局测量信息系统在国外的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(11):1401-1405.
[29]	Hahn E A, Devellis R F, Bode R K, et al. Measuring social health in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): item bank development and testing[J]. Qual Life Res, 2010, 19(7):1035-1044. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9654-0
[30]	Lai J S, Kupst M J, Beaumont J L, et al. Using the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to measure symptom burden reported by patients with brain tumors[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2019, 66:e27526. doi: 10.1002/pbc.v66.3
[31]	Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2010, 63(11):1179-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011
[32]	HealthMeasures. PROMIS® Reference Populations [Z/OL]. [2020- 01- 03]. http://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/reference-populations/279-reference-populations-promis.
[33]	HealthMeasures. Recommended HealthMeasures [Z/OL]. [2020- 01- 03]. http://www.healthmeasures.net/applications-of-healthmeasures/guidance/recommended-healthmeasures/233-recommended-healthmeasures.
[34]	Hahn E A, Garcia S F, Lai J S, et al. Measuring access to information and technology: environmental factors affecting persons with neurologic disorders[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2016, 97(8):1284-1294. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.027
[35]	Heinemann A W, Lai J S, Wong A, et al. Using the ICF’s environmental factors framework to develop an item bank measuring built and natural environmental features affecting persons with disabilities[J]. Qual Life Res, 2016, 25(11):2775-2786. pmid: 27207589
[36]	Lai J S, Hammel J, Jerousek S, et al. An item bank to measure systems, services, and policies: environmental factors affecting people with disabilities[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2016, 97(12):2102-2112. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.010
[37]	Garcia S F, Hahn E A, Magasi S, et al. Development of self-report measures of social attitudes that act as environmental barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(4):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.019
[38]	陈善佳. 基于整体观脑卒中患者社会参与能力及影响因素模型构建[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学, 2018.
[39]	Wong A W K, Ng S, Dashner J, et al. Relationships between environmental factors and participation in adults with traumatic brain injury, stroke, and spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional multi-center study[J]. Qual Life Res, 2017, 26(10):2633-2645. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1586-5

残疾人居家环境测评工具研究进展

Advance in Accessment Tools for Home Environment for People with Disabilities (review)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[3]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[4]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[5]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[6]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[7]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[8]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[9]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[10]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[11]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[12]	张园, 杨剑. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的学校健康服务及效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 791-799.
[13]	王少璞, 陈钢. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的心理行为健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 800-807.
[14]	蒋长好, 高晓妍. 短时身体活动对儿童认知功能影响的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(6): 667-672.
[15]	袁媛, 杨剑. 社区老年人身体活动融合慢性病管理的健康效益：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(5): 541-550.