事件相关电位P300在意识障碍预后评估中的应用进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.07.009

《中国康复理论与实践》 ›› 2020, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 784-787.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.07.009

事件相关电位P300在意识障碍预后评估中的应用进展

孙晓琴^1,²,冯英^1,²,肖农^1,²()

1.重庆医科大学附属儿童医院康复科,重庆市 400014
2.儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实脸室,国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心,儿童发育重大疾病国家国际科技合作基地,重庆市 400014

收稿日期:2019-10-31 修回日期:2020-02-17 出版日期:2020-07-25 发布日期:2020-07-24
通讯作者: 肖农 E-mail:xiaonongwl@163.com
作者简介:孙晓琴(1993-),女,汉族,重庆市人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向：儿内科、儿童神经康复。
基金资助:
重庆市科卫联合项目(2018ZDXM029)

Advance in P300 Wave for Prognosis of Consciousness Disorders (review)

SUN Xiao-qin^1,²,FENG Ying^1,²,XIAO Nong^1,²()

1. Department of Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400014, China
2. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing 400014, China

Received:2019-10-31 Revised:2020-02-17 Published:2020-07-25 Online:2020-07-24
Contact: XIAO Nong E-mail:xiaonongwl@163.com
Supported by:
Chongqing Science and Technology Commission and Health Commission Joint Research Project(2018ZDXM029)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

越来越多的重度脑损伤患者伴有严重意识障碍,准确客观地评估他们的脑功能及预后亟待解决。在意识障碍患者中,事件相关电位P300潜伏期延长,振幅降低,可反映患者的残余认知功能;P300振幅和潜伏期的动态变化可用于判断认知功能的恢复程度;特殊的刺激形式产生的P300可能对于区分植物状态和最小意识状态有一定价值。

关键词: 事件相关电位, P300, 意识障碍, 综述

Abstract:

Severe brain-injured patients would suffer severe disorders of consciousness for a long time. It is needed to prognose their brain function and outcomes. P300 wave of event-related potentials may feature as long latency and short amplitude in disorders of consciousness, which respond to the residual cognitive function. The dynamic changes of P300 wave amplitude and latency can be used to determine the recovery of cognitive function. The P300 waves induced by special stimulus may help to differentiate the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state.

Key words: event-related potentials, P300, disorders of consciousness, review

中图分类号:

R651.1

孙晓琴,冯英,肖农. 事件相关电位P300在意识障碍预后评估中的应用进展[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2020, 26(7): 784-787.

SUN Xiao-qin,FENG Ying,XIAO Nong. Advance in P300 Wave for Prognosis of Consciousness Disorders (review)[J]. 《Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice》, 2020, 26(7): 784-787.

参考文献 41

[1]	Walshe T M, Leonard C. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state[J]. N Engl J Med, 1994, 330(21): 1499-1508. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199405263302107
[2]	Laureys S, Celesia G G, Cohadon F, et al. Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome[J]. BMC Med, 2010, 8(1): 68. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-68
[3]	Giacino J T, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria[J]. Neurology, 2002, 58(3): 349-353. pmid: 11839831
[4]	Heilinger A, Ortner R, la Bellar V, et al. Performance differences using a vibro-tactile P300 BCI in LIS-patients diagnosed with stroke and ALS[J]. Front Neurosci, 2018, 12:514. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00514
[5]	Giacino J T, Katz D I, Schiff N D, et al. Comprehensive systematic review update summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research[J]. Neurology, 2018, 91(10): 461-470. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005928 pmid: 30089617
[6]	Seel R T, Sherer M, Whyte J, et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2010, 91(12): 1795-1813. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.218
[7]	Childs N L. Misdiagnosing the persistent vegetative state misdiagnosis certainly occurs[J]. BMJ, 1996, 313(7062): 944-945. pmid: 8876118
[8]	Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment[J]. BMC Neurol, 2009, 9(1): 35-40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-35
[9]	Formisano R, D'Ippolito M, Risetti M, et al. Vegetative state, minimally conscious state, akinetic mutism and Parkinsonism as a continuum of recovery from disorders of consciousness: an exploratory and preliminary study[J]. Funct Neurol, 2011, 26(1): 15-24. pmid: 21693084
[10]	Giacino J T, Katz D I, Schiff N D, et al. Practice Guideline Update Recommendations Summary: Disorders of Consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 99(9): 1699-1709. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.001
[11]	Stender J, Gosseries O, Bruno M A, et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study[J]. Lancet (London, England), 2014, 384(9942): 514-522. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60042-8
[12]	Rollnik J D. Clinical neurophysiology of neurologic rehabilitation[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2019, 161(3): 187-194.
[13]	Dovgialo M, Chabuda A, Duszyk A, et al. Assessment of statistically significant command-following in pediatric patients with disorders of consciousness, based on visual, auditory and tactile event-related potentials[J]. Int J Neural Syst, 2019, 29(3): 1-15.
[14]	Sculthorpe-Petley L, Liu C, Hajra S G, et al. A rapid event-related potential (ERP) method for point-of-care evaluation of brain function: development of the Halifax Consciousness Scanner[J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2015, 245(1): 64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.008
[15]	Helfrich R F. Cognitive neurophysiology: event-related potentials[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2019, 160(3): 543-558.
[16]	Rohaut B. Disentangling conscious from unconscious cognitive processing with event-related EEG potentials[J]. Rev Neurol (Paris), 2017, 173(7-8): 521-528. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2017.08.001
[17]	Balconi M. The relationship between coma near coma, disability ratings, and event-related potentials in patients with disorders of consciousness: a semantic association task[J]. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback, 2015, 40(4): 327-337. doi: 10.1007/s10484-015-9304-y
[18]	Lugo Z R, Quitadamo L R, Bianchi L, et al. Cognitive processing in non-communicative patients: what can event-related potentials tell us?[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016, 10:569.
[19]	Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, et al. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty[J]. Science (New York), 1965, 150(3700): 1187-1188.
[20]	Xie Q, Pan J, Chen Y, et al. A gaze-independent audiovisual brain-computer interface for detecting awareness of patients with disorders of consciousness[J]. BMC Neurol, 2018, 18(1): 144. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1144-y
[21]	李晓裔, 李景恒. 脑损伤后综合征患者脑CT与事件相关电位的研究[J]. 贵州科学, 2001, 19(2): 71-73.
	Li X Y, Li J H. Study on event-related potential and brain CT in syndrome after brain trauma[J]. Guizhou Sci, 2001, 19(2): 71-73.
[22]	Alberti A, Sarchielli P, Mazzotta G, et al. Event-related potentials in posttraumatic headache[J]. Headache, 2010, 41(6): 579-585. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006579.x
[23]	Rivera-Lillo G, Rojas-Líbano D, Burgos P, et al. Reduced delta-band modulation underlies the loss of P300 responses in disorders of consciousness[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2018, 129(12): 2613-2622. doi: S1388-2457(18)31339-7 pmid: 30458356
[24]	Hauger S L, Olafsen K, Schnakers C, et al. Cognitive event-related potentials during the sub-acute phase of severe traumatic brain injury and their relationship to outcome[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2017, 34(22): 3124-3133. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5062
[25]	Li Y, Pan J, He Y, et al. Detecting number processing and mental calculation in patients with disorders of consciousness using a hybrid brain-computer interface system[J]. BMC Neurol, 2015, 15(1): 259. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0521-z
[26]	Heinrich S P, Aertsen A. Oblique effects beyond low-level visual processing[J]. Vision Res, 2008, 48(6): 809-818. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.012 pmid: 18249436
[27]	Rosenfeld J P, Biroschak J R, Kleschen M J, et al. Subjective and objective probability effects on P300 amplitude revisited[J]. Psychophysiology, 2005, 42(3): 356-359. pmid: 15943689
[28]	Schorr B, Schlee W, Arndt M, et al. Stability of auditory event-related potentials in coma research[J]. J Neurol, 2015, 262(2): 307-315. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7561-y
[29]	Soldatovicstajic B, Misicpavkov G, Bozic K, et al. Neuropsychological and neurophysiological evaluation of cognitive deficits related to the severity of traumatic brain injury[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2014, 18(11): 1632-1637.
[30]	van Dinteren R, Arns M, Jongsma M L. P300 development across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(2): e87347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087347
[31]	Davis T M, Hill B D, Evans K J, et al. P300 event-related potentials differentiate better performing individuals with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of semantic processing[J]. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2017, 32(4): E27-E36.
[32]	Ehlers M R, López Herrero C, Kastrup A. The P300 in middle cerebral artery strokes or hemorrhages: outcome predictions and source localization[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2015, 126(8): 1532-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.151 pmid: 25465358
[33]	Li R, Song W Q, Du J B, et al. Connecting the P300 to the diagnosis and prognosis of unconscious patients[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2015, 10(3): 473-480. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.153699
[34]	Zhang Y, Li R, Du J, et al. Coherence in P300 as a predictor for the recovery from disorders of consciousness[J]. Neurosci Let, 2017, 653:332-336. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.013
[35]	Cavinato M, Volpato C, Silvoni S, et al. Event-related brain potential modulation in patients with severe brain damage[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2011, 122(4): 719-724. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.024 pmid: 21051281
[36]	Dejanović M, Ivetić V, Nestorović V. The role of P300 event-related potentials in the cognitive recovery after the stroke[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2015, 115(4): 589-595. doi: 10.1007/s13760-015-0428-x pmid: 25578637
[37]	陈晓兰, 穆俊林, 陈兴时, 等. 轻型颅外伤患者的认知功能研究[J]. 中国民康医学, 2005, 17(3): 131-132.
	Chen X L, Mu J L, Chen X S. A study on cognition with minimal head injury patients[J]. Med J Chin People Health, 2005, 17(3): 131-132.
[38]	Rousseff R T, Tzvetanov P, Atanassova P A, et al. Correlation between cognitive P300 changes and the grade of closed head injury[J]. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 2006, 46(5): 275-277. pmid: 17059099
[39]	Candrian G, Müller A, Dall'Acqua P, et al. Longitudinal study of a NoGo-P3 event-related potential component following mild traumatic brain injury in adults[J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2018, 61(1): 18-26. doi: S1877-0657(17)30400-1 pmid: 28882543
[40]	Head O, Ben-Dror S, Stern M J, et al. Event-related potentials as an index of cognitive function during recovery from severe closed head injury[J]. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 1998, 13(3): 15-30. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199806000-00003
[41]	Duszyk A, Dovgialo M, Pietrzak M, et al. Event-related potentials in the odd-ball paradigm and behavioral scales for the assessment of children and adolescents with disorders of consciousness: a proof of concept study[J]. Clin Neuropsychol, 2019, 33(2): 419-437. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1555282 pmid: 30657026

事件相关电位P300在意识障碍预后评估中的应用进展

Advance in P300 Wave for Prognosis of Consciousness Disorders (review)

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邵伟婷, 雷江华. 反应中断再定向干预孤独症谱系障碍儿童刻板语言的效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 10-20.
[2]	王航宇, 葛可可, 范永红, 都丽露, 邹敏, 封磊. 基于ICD-11和ICF主动式音乐疗法改善认知障碍老年人认知功能的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 36-43.
[3]	闻嘉宁, 金秋艳, 张琦, 李杰, 司琦. 认知参与型身体活动对发展儿童青少年执行功能的效果：基于ICF的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 44-53.
[4]	葛可可, 范永红, 王航宇, 都丽露, 李长江, 邹敏. 失眠老年人正念干预健康效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2024, 30(1): 54-60.
[5]	张婧雅, 邹敏, 孙宏伟, 孙昌隆, 朱峻同. 听障儿童青少年焦虑或抑郁情绪心理干预效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1004-1011.
[6]	王俊宇, 杨永, 袁逊, 谢婷, 庄洁. 高强度间歇训练对健康儿童青少年执行功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1012-1020.
[7]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳. 特殊教育学校孤独症谱系障碍儿童参与适应性瑜伽活动的心理与行为效益的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1021-1028.
[8]	杨亚茹, 杨剑. 基于WHO-HPS架构学校身体活动相关健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1040-1047.
[9]	史佳伟, 李凌宇, 杨浩杰, 王琴潞, 邹海欧. 预康复对全膝关节置换术后患者的有效性：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1057-1064.
[10]	邹瑜聪, 周静, 林炜明, 李冬霞, 王娟, 王昱棋, 王玉龙. 近5年慢性意识障碍治疗的可视化分析[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(9): 1065-1071.
[11]	蒋长好, 黄辰, 高晓妍, 戴元富, 赵国明. 神经反馈训练对老年人认知功能效果的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 903-909.
[12]	魏晓微, 杨剑, 魏春艳, 贺启令. 学校环境下适应性体育课程促进智力与发展性残疾儿童心理运动发展的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 910-918.
[13]	蒙象强, 熊琪, 陈庚发, 白洋, 邹田子, 冯珍. 经颅磁刺激联合正中神经电刺激干预不同年龄段慢性意识障碍的效果[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(8): 940-947.
[14]	张园, 杨剑. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的学校健康服务及效果：Scoping综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 791-799.
[15]	王少璞, 陈钢. 基于世界卫生组织健康促进学校架构的心理行为健康服务及其健康效益：系统综述的系统综述[J]. 《中国康复理论与实践》, 2023, 29(7): 800-807.